I received the letter below a week ago from head of the American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists with the following preface:

PLEASE READ THIS LETTER CAREFULLY. It concerns the world-level meeting in London to discuss improving women’s healthcare on a worldwide basis, and especially in the undeveloped countries….
The agenda for this meeting was not set up by flesh and blood, but by the rulers, the authorities, the powers of this dark world and by spiritual forces of evil in high places, to quote a well known writer. This is what we face on a world scale.

Well, I did read the letter carefully. Our side wrote it in response to the recently held Women Deliver Global Conference, held under the guise of reducing infant and maternal mortality, as you would think by this graphic from its site as all others on this post:
WD%202-2.jpg


I didn’t post the letter because frankly I thought your eyes might glaze over. But it shocked me, helping me see the pervasiveness of the abortion industry in the world, and that abortion in America is but one part, indeed a small part.
The letter’s gravity has stuck with me. The health and safety of women, pregnant mothers, and children worldwide, particularly in poor countries, is being ignored to promote abortion.
Furthermore, the funding to abort poor women has obviously to come from elsewhere – us. This is the reason pro-aborts have targeted the overturn of the U.S.’s Mexico City Policy (in upcoming post) as its number one priority.
So I am posting the letter now and hope you will read it:
LETTER TO THE ORGANISING COMMITTEE OF THE CONFERENCE “WOMAN DELIVER”
London, 20 October 2007

WE, THE UNDERSIGNED ORGANISATIONS, wish to express our profound disappointment and dismay that the Women Deliver conference has failed to meet its stated objective of addressing Millennium Development Goal 5, which is to reduce maternal mortality and morbidity.
Delegates were invited to attend a global conference on the causes, prevention and treatment of the complications of pregnancy and childbirth which lead to the deaths of so many mothers, particularly in developing countries, and to consider effective solutions.
Regrettably, the conference agenda was so preoccupied with promoting the ideology and practice of abortion that the genuine healthcare needs of women and children were virtually ignored in the plenary sessions and overwhelmed in the panel discussions.
Numerous UN reports, such as The World’s Women 2005: Progress in Statistics, have concluded that accurate data about maternal mortality, including abortion, are not available, especially for the developing world. Therefore, the presentation of unsubstantiated and unreliable data on illegal abortion as fact can only be seen as a deliberate attempt to mislead the conferees and the international community.
To assert that “unsafe abortions” are only those that are illegal, and to subsequently imply that legal abortion is therefore safe, is both disingenuous and scientifically flawed. The fact that the WHO [World Health Organization] will not be collecting information on the morbidity and mortality related to legal abortion is unconscionable if there is truly a commitment to accurate and meaningful data collection on morbidity and mortality statistics.
The consistent assertions that improvements in the maternal mortality rate are dependent on the promotion of legal abortion not only diverts attention from the urgent need for basic heath care, skilled birth attendants and emergency obstetrics, it threatens to undermine the field of obstetrics and gynaecology if implemented on a wide scale.

WD%203-3.jpg

Furthermore, we oppose the fact that:
~ Members of the organising committee, including the International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF) and Marie Stopes International, who have financial interests in the provision of abortion, have used the conference to promote a private agenda to spread abortion throughout the developing world;
~ The organising committee has attempted to manufacture a false consensus by ensuring that only the views which reinforced its pre-conceived ideas were represented during the conference;
~ The conference has sidelined the main issues related to maternal mortality (basic health conditions based on vaccine availability, clean water, sanitation, basic nutritional supplementation, primary medical post-natal and peri-natal care, fistula, female genital mutilation, haemorrhage, sepsis, obstructed labour, eclampsia). Such sidelining is a serious act of negligence which leads not only to continuing, but increasing, the risks associated with maternal health.
We call upon the conference partners to focus on basic health care, skilled attendants and emergency obstetrics, which have been the key to decreasing maternal mortality in the developed world, instead of exploiting the tragedy of maternal mortality to promote abortion rights.

  • Instituto De Politica Familiar, ECOSOC consultative status with the UN
  • Concerned Women for America, ECOSOC consultative status with the UN
  • MaterCare International, ECOSOC consultative status with the UN
  • World Federation Of Catholic Medical Associations, ECOSOC consultative status with the UN
  • United Families International, ECOSOC consultative status with the UN
  • Society For the Protection of Unborn Children, ECOSOC consultative status with the UN
  • World Union of Catholic Women’s Organisations, ECOSOC consultative status with the UN
  • Federacion Espanola de Asociaciones Provida, ECOSOC consultative status with the UN
  • Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute
  • American Association of Prolife Obstetricians and Gynecologists
  • Instituto Mujer y Vida, Spain
  • Comite Nacional Provida de Mexico, A.C.
  • Salud Sexual y Reproductiva De Mexico, A.C.
  • Asociacion Mexicana Cultura de la Vida
    wd%2012.jpg