Entries for January, 2009

Congratulations Life Prizes Award Winner Jill Stanek!

For your dedication and efforts in the defense of life. From the moderators, proofreaders and regulars at JillStanek.com.

Stanek: 1 month vacation announcement

UPDATE, 1/17, 8:30a: I’ve posted my

BornAliveTruth.org hosts world premiere of “22Weeks”!

New poll/Old poll

Bill O’Reilly asked a great poll question this week, and I thought I’d ask it here: Are you rooting for Barack Obama to succeed? Congratulations to Sarah Palin for polling as the 2008 Pro-lifer of the Year in last week’s poll, and congrats as well to 2nd place winner, David Bereit! Here was the vote […]

New poll/Old poll

The new poll question is up: Who do you think should be named the 2008 Pro-Lifer of the Year? Thanks for reader suggestions for nominees. Here were responses to the previous poll question…

Sunday funnies

No political cartoons on our issue this week. This one by Chuck Asay…

Long weekend question

Two questions: What stands out in your mind as the biggest pro-life story of 2008? Who would you nominate as Pro-Lifer of the Year for 2008? I’ll run a poll after getting suggestions. [Graphic courtesy of

  
facebooktwittergoogle_plusrssyoutubeinstagrammail
Help us meet our financial goal!

Who Is Jill Stanek?

Jill Stanek is a nurse turned speaker, columnist and blogger, a national figure in the effort to protect both preborn and postborn innocent human life.

Read Jill's full bio »
What the Media says »

createdequaljumbotronby Kelli

Before the release of footage of one football player slugging his wife, he received a two game suspension. Later, when the footage revealing the actual strike was released to the public… people became disgusted. The slugger was punished twice for the same offense… [and is] no longer allowed to be a part of the NFL.

Imagine if the footage in those cases was not revealed. It would not have the same impact….

Animal rights and groups which feel compassion for abused, starved, tortured animals are allowed to show imagery on television and elsewhere. Where is the outrage over that?

Slaughtering a tiny new human being who is defenseless, innocent, and depends on mother for her life, is the worse of all the aforementioned, combined, yet, for some reason, people become all sensitive, outraged, and offended when defenders of innocent babies reveal the truth of abortion…. People become more upset if an animal in utero is abused or killed than a human baby suffering a worse fate….

Millions of people watch movies which depict women being assaulted, stripped naked, tortured, raped, dismembered, burned alive, screaming in agony and terror, pleading for mercy, pleading to be released, pleading for their lives….

Why is it so many have the stomach for such vile imagery… but demand that imagery of the real effects of elective, induced abortion are adamantly blocked, fought, and touted as unfit for public scrutiny?

It makes no sense.

Let people see what abortion really is and then let them defend the disgusting, truly offensive, violent, blood slaughter of innocent babies pushed by a society which raises abortion up to some sacred, wonderful experience and a badge of honor making a woman a conqueror, a victor over some weird concept of “power,” and “autonomy.”

Yes, high schoolers SHOULD see abortion victims. They might already be rather jaded from ingesting the imagery from all the abusive athletes, suffering animals, torture and abuse in movies, and so forth, but they should see and become educated in the truth and counter the whitewashed imagery of abortion as some wonderful, sacred, women liberating rite of passage.

~ Commenter William, remarking on why images of abortion victims should be seen by the public, in response to “Pro-life vid of day: Should high schoolers see abortion victims?” at JillStanek.com, September 17

[Photo via usforacle.com]

Leave a Comment
Stanek Top 20

Latest Comments