Entries for June, 2010

Scandal: ACOG’s collusion with the White House to rewrite objective medical opinion to fit subjective political script

UDPATE, 1:09p:

Pro-aborts blink? May not challenge NE’s fetal pain law?

The here.) This would be interesting, a sign of weakness, although if I were a betting woman I’d say the other side will decide it must sue. But here is the other side of the argument, per the AP: … [E]xperts say attempts by abortion-rights groups to block [the fetal pain law]… from going on […]

Lunch Break: Obama, are you listening?

To give us a break from the daily grind… A video from Email LauraLoo with your Lunch Break suggestions. [HT: carder]

Quote of the Day 6-30-10

Monday was Justice John Paul Stevens’ final day on the Supreme Court – and it attracted a small group of protesters who showed up at the court to decry Stevens for his decisions on abortion. One protester, dressed as the grim reaper, wielded a megaphone into which he suggested Stevens will go to hell. Another, […]

New Stanek WND.com column, “Exposed! Kagan’s partial-birth abortion scheme”

UPDATE, 9:25a: A high up source tells me GOP senators plan to bring up today Kagan’s collusion with ACOG to rewrite its medical opinion of partial-birth abortion. The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology is well-known in pro-life circles to be radically pro-abortion. For instance, ACOG supports the most heinous of all abortion practices, partial-birth […]

(Prolifer)ations 6-19-10

by Susie Allen, host of the blog, ProWomanProLife discusses the

Woman uses emergency contraceptive to kill wrongly implanted babies

Jivin J’s Life Links 6-29-10

by JivinJ, host of the blog, New York Times Magazine: At week 24, the fetus is a fully formed baby, weighing over a pound and measuring nearly a foot long. The mother has felt it kicking and seen it in lifelike detail on a screen; were she to go into labor, it would perhaps survive. […]

Pro-life group challenges US Senate candidate’s rape/incest exception

Well, hooyah. It’s about time we stopped letting pro-life political candidates get away with saying they have a “rape/incest exception.” That’s simply code for saying they support killing an innocent child whose father is a sexual criminal. In the State of WA, all 3 Republicans facing off in the August 17 primary – businessman Paul […]

Lunch Break: Tim Hawkins, “Side Effects”

To give us a break from the daily grind…

facebooktwittergoogle_plusrssyoutubeinstagrammail
Help us meet our financial goal!

Who Is Jill Stanek?

Jill Stanek is a nurse turned speaker, columnist and blogger, a national figure in the effort to protect both preborn and postborn innocent human life.

Read Jill's full bio »
What the Media says »

mcallisterby Kelli

Rampell argues that if only poor people in America could get free birth control and more comprehensive sex education, have “easy access” to abortions in unregulated clinics, and receive more government-sponsored childcare by expanding the welfare state, then unwanted pregnancies would be a thing of the past and Americans would live happily ever after.

Oh, the joy of a liberal utopia.

Rampell doesn’t pause to consider other factors that have seriously contributed to the disparity between the rich and poor on out-of-wedlock births. Instead of looking at the issue in terms of personal choice regarding marriage and childbirth, as well as personal responsibility, and respecting all people as rational human beings capable of self-government, she concludes that a “trap” is being laid; someone must be doing something to these women or not enough for them. Neither is truly the case….

When it comes to finding solutions that will help low-income single mothers, we need to do more than just dish out contraceptives (which will be ineffective for those who are actually choosing to have babies out of wedlock), herd them into unregulated abortion clinics, give them “comprehensive” sex education that fails to factor in the spiritual and moral dimension of human beings, and then continue their dependence on government and the cycle of poverty by increasing welfare programs….

I can just hear the mockery now and the hysterical screams of “Don’t stigmatize my choice to have sex!” But no one is stigmatizing sex, let alone your choice to have it. What’s being stigmatized in our culture is marriage and the choice not to have sex….

[S]ome of us have a higher view of women — that they don’t have to be controlled by their base desires, by poverty, by fear, by dependency — all of which drive us to more constricted and unhappy lives.

We can do better. We have done better. And we can be better again.

~ D.C. McAllister (pictured), responding to Catherine Rampell’s assertion that “sex is for rich people” and that “a trap” is laid for poor people who want to have sex, The Federalist, October 21

Comments (2)
Stanek Top 20