Regarding the situation between Bishop Patrick Zurek and Father Frank Pavone, which also involves Priests for Life, complete the following sentence: “The evidence I have seen leads me to think…”
There are 10 options listed, three for Catholics, three for Protestants, three for secularists, and one for all.
Vote on the lower right side of the home page.
CatholicCulture.org conducted a poll along the same lines, but I didn’t think the options it gave logically flowed, or were even accurate, specifically questions 1 and 2:
- “Father Pavone is an effective pro-life leader; his bishop should not curtail his activities.”
- “Bishop Zurek has legitimate reason to exert control over Priests for Life; Father Pavone should not resist his authority.”
Both of those questions combine two issues that do not follow one another. Both try to make it seem there is a logical jump between the bishop having certain authority and the reasonableness of a particular decision. Furthermore, I don’t think it is accurate to state the bishop is trying to “exert control over Priests for Life.”
Interesting results on the previous poll, a bit unexpected. It appears Romney supporters piled on. With almost 5,400 votes, this poll probably got my highest response ever…
Click on the map to enlarge to find your own brightly colored flag…
As always, make comments to either the previous or current poll here, not on the Vizu website.