This is a follow-up to last weekend’s question, which was, “Is abortion the problem?”

This weekend’s question is: What is the goal of the anti-abortion movement? What should be our goal?

(I singled out “anti-abortion” from “pro-life,” since the problems and goals of the movement at large are broader.)

Our Quote of the Day today adds real insight:

In every society, there are two critical lists: acceptable conditions for having a baby, and acceptable conditions for having sex. From time immemorial, the one thing that almost every society had in common was that their two lists matched up.

It was only with the widespread acceptance of contraception in the middle of the 20th century, creating an upheaval in the public psyche in which sex and babies no longer went hand-in-hand, that the two lists began to diverge. And now, in 21st-century America, they look something like this:

Conditions under which it is acceptable to have sex:

  • -If you’re in a stable relationship
  • -If you feel emotionally ready
  • -If you’re free of sexually transmitted diseases
  • -If you have access to contraception
  • Conditions under which it is acceptable to have a baby:

  • -If you can afford it
  • -If you’ve finished your education
  • -If you feel emotionally ready to parent a child
  • -If your partner would make a good parent
  • -If you’re ready for all the lifestyle changes that would be involved with parenthood
  • As long as those two lists do not match, we will live in a culture where abortion is common and where women are at war with their own bodies.

    Thoughts?