Pro-life blog buzz 9-30-14
by Susie Allen, host of the blog, Pro-Life in TN, and Kelli
- At Live Action News, Lauren Enriquez gives an update on the courageous teacher who took a stand against Planned Parenthood’s indoctrination of his students and was fired for it. He has filed a wrongful termination suit:
Planned Parenthood persisted in bribing his students with cash and gifts to sign up for the government-funded “Teen Outreach Program” even after [Bill] Diss asked them to leave. And the clearly-biased school administration sided with Planned Parenthood, subjecting Diss to scrutiny and discrimination for his belief that Planned Parenthood’s involvement in his math class was not in the best interest of his students’ well-being. - After Abortion quotes an article in which a UK psychotherapist says she has witnessed ill effects in post-abortive women, despite studies concluding that abortion does not generally affect them:
Over the years, I’ve noticed that a large proportion of women who come for therapy have terminated a pregnancy. As they begin to talk about the abortion, they become very emotional and express feelings of great sorrow and confusion.Some of these women are astonished that having a termination has affected them so badly, despite believing they were right to halt the pregnancy.
- Stand True is promoting a contest for creative pro-lifers to design a meme for the upcoming Pro-Life Silent Day of Solidarity on October 22nd. See one example, pictured left.
- Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life discusses the strong pro-abortion record of state Gov. Mark Dayton, who is running for re-election. He has vetoed several pro-life bills passed by the Legislature and thinks taxpayers need to pay for abortions:
The Legislature passed a bill to stop the use of taxpayer funds to pay for abortions. Dayton vetoed the bill.Taxpayers will pay about $3.5 million for 14,000 abortions during Dayton’s four years as governor. If a 2009 estimate from the Guttmacher Institute (a staunch advocate of unlimited abortion) is applied to the public funding numbers in Minnesota, about 3,500 fewer Minnesota women would have had abortions over Dayton’s tenure if the state did not pay for abortions.
The Legislature passed bans on human cloning and the taxpayer funding of human cloning, but Dayton vetoed both.
- Clinic Quotes highlights a statement made by a pro-choice nun who supports the idea that the Virgin Mary was also pro-choice:
I was reminded of being with men and women from the Unitarian faith tradition last year as they celebrated Mary who by her assent, they believed, was one of the first women in the New Testament to express Choice. - American Life League’s Judie Brown encourages us to be persistent and not grow weary in fighting for the rights of the unborn:
Human existence and its indisputable integrity are not negotiable, though in our day and age many would disagree. We hear words like “freedom of choice” and “constitutional right” being applied to life and death questions. Many of us often shrink from debating the falsehoods integral to these phrases for fear that we might offend someone or seem intolerant. And sadly, this hesitancy is exactly what the enemy expects. - Down on the Pharm posts a video of an interview with longtime Rush Limbaugh call screener James “Mr. Snerdley” Golden. At 1:36 and 3:36, he discusses Kermit Gosnell. Click below to watch:
[Graphic via Stand True]
Sep.30, 2014 3:30 pm |
Blogs |
Jill Stanek is a nurse turned speaker, columnist and blogger, a national figure in the effort to protect both preborn and postborn innocent human life.
If the Blessed Virgin had not chosen Life for our Savior, then no one would have ever had a chance to accept Jesus as a Savior.
And Sister Donna Quinn would not have had a job working for His Church.
Sister Quinn was really that insane, favorably comparing Mary’s choice of accepting the Savior for the world with a modern mother’s choice to kill her child by abortion.
Sister Quinn: Accepting Jesus as Savior is always a good choice. This means rejecting sin as an alternative.
Choosing to kill a child is always a bad choice. It means rejecting Jesus and His salvation.
Mary did not wait until she found out she was pregnant and THEN decide whether or not she was going to carry the Christ child to term or abort Him.
So… there’s that, Sister Quinn.
Um, are Unitarians even considered Christian? They reject the Trinity, the Virgin Birth, the Nicene Creed, and most other tenents of the faith, so I am not really sure if they are.
Just so everyone is clear: The Donna Quinn fiasco all happened back in 2009. The old bat was photographed wearing a deathscort vest at an abortion clinic.
http://www.fathermazzuchellisociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/DonnaQuinn340_AbortionNun01largeimage.jpg
She is unrepentant.
http://wizbangblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/nuns-for-choice.jpg
But the bishops of three dioceses and her own Order of Dominican religious sisters basically quieted her down. We haven’t heard much from her in 5 years.
I am so sick of these radical heretic nuns. The wimpy bishops don’t do anything about them and everyone just walks on eggs around them including their superiors.
Then there’s that loony group called “Nuns on the Bus”…so lovingly supported by none other than Joe Biden…another heretic.
The Unitarian “church” where I live cannot be classified as Christian. They host talks on things like the local aquifer and other topics that just seem really odd and random, to say the least, for a church. I grew up with some women who attend there, and I know at least one told me when we were 8 years old that she didn’t believe in God and neither did her parents. To this day, they are still in active membership at the Unitarian church.
If you believe in anything there you don’t belong. Strange
Folks, there is no discussion. The Unitarian church is not Trinitarian. If they are not Trinitarian, they cannot be a “Christian” church.
No Unitarians attempt to thinly veil the fact that they are not Christian.
You may hear things about believing Jesus was a wise man, etc., but the entire theology has NOTHING to do with faith in the Old Testament, including the belief in the eventual appearance of the Messiah, AND has no tenet regarding Jesus as divine, or as son of God, or God.
Nothing. Nowhere. Nohow.
They are people who might loosely believe in some abstract concept you might call “God,” or “the divine,” and anyone can go explore those ideas as much as they want.
But they are not Christian and do not claim to be. And do not want to be. This is from them. Not my opinion.