Pro-life photos of the week: Pro-choice expressions at a pro-life rally
This week Lila Rose and Live Action sponsored a rally in front of the Planned Parenthood located two blocks from the White House.
At one point an unidentified pro-abortion man heckled Rose by standing at the podium alongside her yelling, “Stop interfering with women’s healthcare decisions!” Click all photos to enlarge…
A female deathscort gave Rose the stink eye…
The Daily Caller snapped the above pictures. I attended the rally as well, and I got a different look from the female deathscort…
Oct.18, 2014 1:00 pm |
Photo of the week |
Jill Stanek is a nurse turned speaker, columnist and blogger, a national figure in the effort to protect both preborn and postborn innocent human life.
Lila’s reaction was pretty classy.
I can always tell when I am presenting and a man in the audience is pro abortion. they show anger.
I find this to be the hardest part about pro-life activism: Facing the unmasked anger and hatred that pro-aborts unleash. They are like attack dogs, on the verge of violence. Wild animals.
Pro-lifers suffer physical symptoms in the presence of pro-aborts. A queasy sickness in our stomachs. Do the pro-aborts know that they make people sick?
“Pro-lifers suffer physical symptoms in the presence of pro-aborts.”
And little children are prolife. Think how much damage one probort teacher does.
“Lila’s reaction was pretty classy.”
Lila is classy
I’m glad pro choicers are angry. We should get angry. Stop interfering with the law of the land and we won’t be so angry
I would LOVE to see more violence at these protests. The pro lifers certainly show intimidation…it’s about time we respond in kind
Little children are neither pro life or pro choice…they become what they are taught. If sane rational people teach them to fight for women’s rights (yes fight), then they will be set upon the right path.
Standing near clinics and telling people abortion is wrong and/or encouraging alternatives is not intimidation or interfering with any legitimate law. Thus, pro-aborts have no right at all to be angry.
If women feel intimidated by that, that is because of their internal conscience bothering them and it is supposed to.
Little children innately know there is no difference between killing them and killing the unborn.
Mike. You really believe the vile lies you just vomited from your mouth? You don’t intimidate?? You are full of it my friend. We will fight fire with fire. Believe that
You see how silly this all is? No one wants violence really. No one advocates violence. Yet you do intimidate. Yet this blog post says we are violent because we stand up and voice an opinion. Commenters say we are on the verge of voilence…why? Because we do what you do. Stand up for our beliefs. Who killed tiller?? It wasn’t pro aborts. We don’t advocate violence. So please stop saying in the comments we are on the verge of violence. It is a stupid argument and does no one any good. Peace out
Ugh! I accidentally liked one of Bob Smith’s posts, and there is no way to rectify the error! Bob Smith, I witnessed an abortion worker almost hitting two people with a car because of anger that these two people were praying outside a clinic. The person backed the car up, revving the engine and tore out of the clinic, coming within about 6 inches of hitting a man and a young child. It was terrifying to witness that kind of anger. Anyone who kills someone is not pro-life. The person who killed Tiller was not pro-life, but was pro-death, and most likely deranged – mentally unstable. People like to claim that pro-life people are violent, but in truth it is the pro-death people who believe in violence. Anyone who uses the label pro-life while espousing violent tendencies is merely a wolf in sheep’s clothing – another one of the pro-death crowd. While abortion is wrong and a great evil, we still love the sinner, and we pray for that person’s repentance and for that person to come to know God. You speak of intimidation. Do you call standing peacefully on the sidewalk “intimidation”? I suppose you say it is intimidating because you feel the strength of the spiritual warfare. The rosary is more powerful of a weapon than the sword, and I am sure you feel its strength and feel intimidated by that.
“Ugh! I accidentally liked one of Bob Smith’s posts, and there is no way to rectify the error!”
Yeah, I’ve done things like that as well. I always hate when that happens.
bring it on Bob pro life is winning this Fight. Because murder is murder not health care.
“You see how silly this all is? No one wants violence really. No one advocates violence.”
Bob, I like to see how the progressive mind works so maybe you could answer this question for me. Is it violent to tear unborn humans from the womb?
And a second question for you also Bob just to help clarify the mindset of progressives for me. Is it violent to tear unborn puppies from the womb?
“Ugh! I accidentally liked one of Bob Smith’s posts, and there is no way to rectify the error”
No Julie, at this point the best you can do is fess up to your mistake and use an alcohol swab to try and clean the stain from your mouse button.
Bob should have a starring role in ATTACK OF THE PRO-ABORTION BETA MALES!
Oh, Bob.
You don’t want violence???
Bob, that’s PRECISELY what abortion is. PRECISELY. It is violence paid by the stronger to destroy the weaker through VIOLENCE.
Hence, all the blood.
Lila is way classy!
To answer your questions.. 1) no on pulling fetuses from the womb, 2) yes on puppies.
“They are like attack dogs, on the verge of violence. Wild animals” – remind me, which side has killed more members of the other?
“And little children are prolife” – are they? How do you know that? Before you indoctrinate them I mean.
“Because murder is murder not health care” – who said murder is health care? Abortion is healthcare.
“To answer your questions.. 1) no on pulling fetuses from the womb, 2) yes on puppies.”
You seem to be confused on the facts there, Bob. “Fetus” does not denote species. “Fetus” is a stage of development of an animal. So you just think it’s worse to kill canines than it is to kill other humans. You, for some reason, believe it is violent to kill dogs in their fetal stage of development, but that it is not violent to kill other human beings in their fetal stage of development.
Why is that, exactly?
http://www.prochoiceviolence.com/
…and you also don’t seem to know what sarcasm means, either.
Oh x how I’ve missed you. You disappeared for a while. Still see you are a stupid C
[This forum is under new moderation. You get one warning: This sort of personal attack and crude insult will not be tolerated. – Mod]
[And note: The topic of this article was the inability of abortion supporters to behave with civil manners.]
Bob, what would you do if you saw me taking a puppy that was just born and kicking it and twisting it’s head? Most pro abortionist are against any type of brutality concerning animals. Most pro lifers are against that too. But I do not understand the logic of it being ok to kill a baby because if the mother doesn’t want the baby it’s going to grow up starving in a horrible home. But yet killing a puppy you should go to jail. Please tell me your logic in it?
Bob, are you aware that abortion used to be illegal. There’s a reason why it was illegal. Because it WRONG.
Bob,
You know the violence in tearing unborn humans from the womb. There is no plausible deniabililty so you resort to sarcasm and insults. Seeing those pro-life witnesses and their graphic posters of aborted babies forces you to face the constant violence pro-abort people wrought on society on a daily basis.
“There’s a reason why it was illegal. Because it WRONG” – what, like inter-racial marriage, women voting and having bank accounts?
I just like to come around every now and again to remind myself how much you pro-aborts respect us women. You didn’t dissapoint. Thanks!
Hi xalisae, always good to hear from you. Hope all is well.
In your sentence alluding sarcastically to respect, the correct key term is ‘anti-choicers’ not ‘women’.
Hahaha. Oh my goodness. Geralyn is taking this puppy analogy seriously. Geralyn has surpassed X as the most clueless pro lifer on this board. And btw X….so glad I didn’t disappoint. You have personally made my night…so glad I made yours.
Bob,
Sometimes good people believe what other people say. But I know you can rarely expect to get the truth (or even rational thought) out of the mouth of a pro-abort.
Bob smith makes Reality look delightful and clever.
Reality copies comments from our posts, and makes counter-assertions. Reality says things like, “It is not a child until it is born” and “Abortion is healthcare.” One gets the impression that Reality could back himself up with some facts and analysis, if only we shared his core assertion that some lives have no value.
Bob hurls words like “stupid” and “stupid” again and “clueless,” and then acts like his has made some sort of point.
“Bob smith makes Reality look delightful and clever.”
I’m not fan of Bob Smith, but I must say that was kind of mean.
Re the claim that “Little children are neither pro life or pro choice…they become what they are taught.”
This is how I explain abortion to my children:
Do you know what the word “pregnant” means?
(yes. It means a mommy is going to have a baby)
Well, sometimes the woman does not wish to be pregnant because of reasons that are important to her, so she goes to a doctor who will make her not pregnant any more.
(oh) and there is always a pause. then (what happens to the baby?)
the doctor takes the baby out
(oh)
It gets different here, depending on the child. Some have gone to the final question, but another has asked (I thought the baby had to stay in the mommy’s tummy for a while) to which I answer, yes. The baby does need to stay in the mommy’s tummy.
Then the final question
(Does the baby live?)
No. The baby dies.
And guess what Bob Smith. Every single child has stated, loudly and with tears:
BUT THAT’S NOT FAIR TO THE BABY!
Bob, Every. Single. Child.
and ALWAYS, after…..
“I’m glad you didn’t abort me!”
What of the above presentation is indoctrination? Did or did not the child come up with it’s own conclusions?
These are 5 and 6 yr olds we’re talking about here.
Every child knows that their beginnings where not at birth, but while they were in their mommy’s “tummy”. Every child knows that abortion kills another little human being, and that it could’ve been “me”. Not “before I was me”, but “me”.
Children are naturally pro-life, because all humans have a survival instinct.
Unless of course, children are taught that what is growing inside a woman’s womb is not a human being in it’s earliest form. But that would be lying to the child then.
“Unless of course, children are taught that what is growing inside a woman’s womb is not a human being in it’s earliest form. But that would be lying to the child then.”
Or unless children are taught that it’s okay to kill humans. But that would be evil.
“In your sentence alluding sarcastically to respect, the correct key term is ‘anti-choicers’ not ‘women’.”
Am I not a woman, Reality?
“Bob smith makes Reality look delightful and clever” – come now Del, don’t get too carried away :-)
“Children are naturally pro-life, because all humans have a survival instinct” – children are naturally susceptible to adopting their parents way of thinking about life in general even before and particular topic is discussed.
“Am I not a woman, Reality?” – as far as I can ascertain xalisae, yes you are. In the context of most discussions here though, it’s not your gender that is relevant. It is your stance on what is being debated.
“In the context of most discussions here though, it’s not your gender that is relevant. It is your stance on what is being debated.”
Excuse me, sir, but I’m afraid that my gender has the most to do with my stance on what is being debated in the context of abortion than any other possible factor. I’m against abortion BECAUSE I am a woman who was exploited by a man, and my daughter (another woman, by the way!) would have paid the price for his exploitation with her own life. So please, do tell me why exactly you can seemingly attempt to strip me of my womanhood because you disagree with me on the topic of abortion. I’m just dying to know how you justify this in your own mind.
Tut tut xalisae, such overblown rhetoric. No one is stripping you of your womanhood. There are a myriad of reasons why anti-choicers become anti-choicers, some more valid than others. I don’t care if you’re a woman, a man or a swan, nothing justifies your attempts to force your views onto other peoples choices and behavior, especially women.
and don’t call me ‘sir’, it’s patronizing ;-)
“nothing justifies your attempts to force your views onto other peoples choices and behavior”
Reality, in your progressive mind does that include restricting people’s choices to kill humans?
Why not ask Rick Perry truthseeker, maybe our answers might have some similarities ;-)
Paula,
I explain it this way. Gather around little children…once upon a time a woman was raped and became pregnant. She had free will and the ability to decide that she didn’t want a baby nor did she want her body to go through nine months of body changing pregnancy for a baby she didn’t want nor try to obtain. Then prolifers came and told her she couldn’t be in charge of her body or her choices. Children at this point say why do violent prolifers intimidate women like this? I just shake my head and say they are delusional and anti women. They don’t understand the prolife position and grow up to fight for the right to choose. Funny how we have different results huh? Of course one of us (you Pamela) don’t tell the whole story.
Sorry I meant Paula not Pamela at the end of my post
Geralyn
Are you aware interracial marriage used to be illegal??? Was that WRONG as well???
Bob I pray one day God will touch your heart, and you will come to him with your pain and suffering. I always believed abortion was o.k. My mother tried to have me aborted but God in his Grace saved me. How could I not believe it was o.k. When you were told all your life that abortion is a good thing and yes, be reminded that if your parents had the money I would have been aborted. I believed the lie it was a women’s right. I even took a friend one time to get her abortion. But something changed when I came to know God in such a personal way. I realized I could not change what you feel. That is something that only comes from God. I really wish you well. I do not plan on trying to make you see it differently, and I know if I kept coming back here I would get caught up in the rights and wrongs of abortion. May your life be blessed.
“No one is stripping you of your womanhood.”
You’re attempting to do so when you try your hardest to ignore the fact that I am a woman, and pretend that this whole “anti-abortion” thing is just because we mean ol’ “anti-choicers” hate women, and hate it when women make choices, and hate choices. Which is ridiculous. Do you think I hate my right to make choices? Really? Why must you avoid the *actual* topic at hand here, which has been pointed out to you and hashed out over, and over, and over, and over, AND OVER AGAIN:
We women can and should be free to make any choices we like-AS LONG AS THE CHOICE IS NOT TO HARM OUR OFFSPRING. That should go for our offspring in-utero as well as outside.
So please, SIR, quit pretending that *you* are the white knight around here, saving women from the mean ol’….umm…women. Derp.
“There are a myriad of reasons why anti-choicers become anti-choicers, some more valid than others.”
I think wanting to protect my daughter-another woman, by the way-from abortion when my life was hitting the skids and everyone around me thought she would be better off dead…I think that’s a pretty valid reason to oppose abortion (not “choice”, Mr. Euphemism. Abortion is but one choice, all choices are not abortion. I support plenty of choices, thankyouverymuch), and has *everything* to do with my gender. That the child I could have had killed to help improve my own circumstances happened to be a woman herself only adds delicious irony to the entire situation and your ridiculousness as you tilt at the windmills of female oppression (because HOW DARE WE say, “Excuse me, ma’am, but could you please not kill your child? Thanks.” OPPRESSION!!! OMGZZ!). Never mind that if men were doing the same to their offspring en masse, we’d oppose it just as vehemently. But don’t let facts get in the way of a perfectly good make-believe crusade, Don Quixote.
“I don’t care if you’re a woman, a man or a swan, nothing justifies your attempts to force your views onto other peoples choices and behavior, especially women.”
I don’t care if you’re a woman, a man, or a swan (well, actually, swans can go ahead and do what they like all day long, they’re just stupid swans who don’t know any better.), nothing justifies your attempts to help enforce your view that offspring (otherwise known as “children”) in utero are human beings who are unworthy of basic human rights and therefore deserving of death at the whim of a parent, especially that child’s mother.
“Gather around little children…once upon a time a woman was raped and became pregnant.”
Wow! I didn’t realize that every. single. abortion. is because of rape! No wonder you can talk people who don’t know much about the issue, like children and low information voters, into supporting abortion! That’s a really hard case right there!
…or wait…This just in, everyone…but…it turns out that actually only around 1% of abortions are possibly performed due to rape, and Bob is just full of b.s.
Hey Bob: when you have to premise your entire position on the lie that hard cases (which still aren’t really legitimized, honestly) are the norm, you might want to re-think your position.
P.S.
When do you tell your kids that they could have ended up being that “baby she didn’t want or try to obtain” and wind up down the garbage disposal with yesterday’s lunch leftovers, or shoved into the incinerator with the rest of the biohazard waste? Or do you not get into what happens to the unwanted baby?
Ah, big smiles.
There’s the Xalisae I know and love (and miss)!
Pweach it, sister.
That was one story. Here is another. Gather around children, here is a story about a woman who is poor, uneducated, living in the projects. Her man knocks her up and leaves her after learning she is pregnant. No one is willing to support her and she can’t afford to feed another child (she has five already and is barely getting by). She wishes to focus on her 5 children and can’t afford to leave work for maternity issues. Rather than give birth to this child, she would like to choose to end the pregnancy to keep feeding her family and keep a roof over everyone’s head. Now children, would you prefer she keeps the pregnancy or support her family?
Here’s another story, a married couple sees that fetus has many birth defects and will not survive once born. Now children, do you want mommy to go through with this pregnancy just so she can bury a dead kid?
There X…is that better for you? Can you follow that logic? My kids certainly can.
“and leaves her after learning she is pregnant”
Why aren’t guys like you tracking these deadbeats down and holding them accountable?
Oh and killing children will never unrape anyone. Can you follow that logic?
“just so she can bury a dead kid?”
In your sick world, parents should have the right to off their born children who suffer from fatal illnesses too, eh? After all, who wants to suffer through all those hospital visits, medical treatments and up-all-nights with their child, right?
Hi X, nice to see you back – I’ve missed you!
Why do I have to track down deadbeat dads? Why don’t you? Oh right, you can’t. So now that we have established that neither one of us will track down every deadbeat dad in America, let’s now go to the next logical step and let the woman choose an abortion.
Be gone with you hater of women and children!
I love women and children. You hate women by taking away their choices. You and X should re-evaluate your thought process.
We can’t track down the kids’ deadbeat dad, and we’re struggling to keep a roof over our head and food on the table. So, which one of my kids should I kill, Bob?
I’m sorry your kids were raised by a psycho who taught them their lives were disposable garbage, Bob. You’re the one who needs evaluation here.
X, Bob is never going to get it.
I don’t know what you can do to teach someone that every human life has intrinsic worth, but you can feel his darkness and misery, can’t you?
Because the wholesale rejection of abortion would take a level of decency and self-sacrifice, neither of which Bob has, as he has demonstrated.
Let it Go. Cue the song.
X…you should start with yourself and see what happens after that. Courtnay, hate to break it you babe, but darkness and misery doesn’t define me. You can think it does all you want, but reality does not equate to darkness and misery.
What a big, tough man coming to a prolife blog spouting about how he is supports women “choosing” to kill children. Go Bobby! Go Bobby! Beat the ladies down! Feel all mighty and powerful now!
Darkness and misery may not define you but they sure do confine you.
I’ve been chewed up and spit out by bigger pigs. I vomit in your direction, little man.
“When you were told all your life that abortion is a good thing and yes, be reminded that if your parents had the money I would have been aborted.”
Akkkk!!!! I am so sorry you were told this, geralyn and I am so thankful that you stand up for Life in spite of angry, messed-up adults trying to get you to share in their misery.
Maybe Bob’s parent(s) said the same kind of stuff to him. Abortion has caused so much pain. I hope he finds help and healing somewhere.
I’m so sorry for whatever it was that has blackened your heart, Bob, and that you have not been able to find any love in our world.
I hope you find help and healing. And I hope others stay away from you until you do. Peace.
I feel so left out when the new trolls don’t respond to my posts to them….lol
Bob,
Here is a song to change your heart:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UwE43PZh9MI
Bob, 4, 5, 6 yr olds wouldn’t understand you as you are speaking the language of adults. It strikes me that you haven’t spoken to children at all about this. Only you know for sure, but anyone working with young children will question your claim.
If one has to lie in order to support their position, one is very weak about their position. Again, only you know for sure. Are you honest with yourself?
Bob, you claim you bring up women impregnated by rape when you speak to children. Only 2% of abortions are done on women impregnated by rape Unless you support legal abortion *only* in the case of rape, using the ‘rape argument’ to support your position, again, shows a very weak position.
{Bob} “Now children, would you prefer she keeps the pregnancy or support her family?”
This is no different then saying to your son. “Bob Jr. I just lost my job, and we no longer can afford to have 6 children anymore. Now would you prefer we allow you to stay alive, or support our family”
Nonsense!
{Bob} “a married couple sees that fetus has many birth defects and will not survive once born. Now children, do you want mommy to go through with this pregnancy just so she can bury a dead kid?”
This is nothing more then teaching your children how to discriminate against the disabled. No, make that the *potential* disabled, as there are experiences of women who, against the strong recommendations of their doctors, brought forth their child, only for that child to be not as disabled as technology predicted, some not disabled at all. But even if this were not the case, aborting a child because of their health condition keeps us from creating medical advancements which correct such conditions. Thus making aborting the disabled, not only the worst kind of discrimination, but also keeping us medically ignorant.
Well, hey there, “Bob.” Or is it Jake? Or is it James? Or is it “Geno”?
Don’t come here and break commenting rules by changing monikers, spewing comments which are clearly sexual harassment and anti-religious bigotry and expect not to have your comments removed.
Ok? Thanks. You’ve proven by your behavior that you are definitely a troll, not a serious commenter who wants to engage in discussion.
We’re done here. Any of your comments that are found, or even suspected as being written by you will be removed. You’re banned.
Thanks, Kel.
“You’re banned.”
Finally! :)
Awww. Mods always take away my toys when I’m having fun. *poutyface*
P.S.
Bob, I can see your comments even though you’ve been banned because I subscribed to comments and I get them delivered to my email address. If you’d like to continue, be my guest, Jake. You vile thing, you.
Along that vein, let me address your final comment to me:
“X…you should start with yourself and see what happens after that.”
Nothing happens, Jake. At least not for me, at least not after I killed myself in a similar fashion as children are killed in utero by abortion. That’s the problem with abortion: reasonable people know that killing yourself or others is not a sane solution to one’s problems.
But furthermore, you dodged my question, and really didn’t address what I said at all, since aborting *myself* is not an option when one is speaking about abortion as a panacea for problems like poverty and rape. You brought up poverty and rape, and I asked, which one of my children should I have killed _x_ amount of years prior to now so that all these problems would be relieved?
Only one like on Jimi Hendrix Belly Button Window??? Possibly the greatest pro-life song ever written.
Hey ts, I had never heard that Hendrix song — that I remember anyway!
X, Thanks for being you — scrappy as ever. I hope all is well with you and your family.
FINALLY Jake is banned, I’ve been waiting for that forever.