Like Ann Coulter here, here, and here, Don Feder gives conservatives pause for thought in his latest column on Supreme nominee John Roberts:

Everything we know about John Roberts says here is a man who's been polishing his resume since age six -- a go-to guy who wanted to be liked by his colleagues, a savvy lawyer who put his conscience in a blind trust to advance his career....

Before last week's revelations, it was still possible to give Roberts the benefit of the doubt. Not any more....

[Read rest of excerpt on page 2.]

In an August 4th article, the Los Angeles Times disclosed that as a partner with the high-octane DC law firm of Hogan & Hartson, in the mid-1990s, Roberts helped a homosexual group engineer one of the most disastrous Supreme Court decisions of the past two decades.

In Romer v. Evans (1996), the Court overturned an amendment to the Colorado Constitution - passed by 53% of the state's voters - prohibiting municipalities from enacting so-called gay rights laws (conferring special status based on bedroom behavior). It was the first time the Court recognized homosexuals as a protected class for civil rights purposes.

Romer led directly to Lawrence v. Texas (2003), which declared laws against homosexual sodomy unconstitutional. If the Supreme Court ever finds a right to same-sex marriage banging around in the 14th. Amendment's Equal Protection Clause, Romer will be the precedent.

In his blistering dissent, Justice Antonin Scalia (supposedly the president's model for Supreme Court nominees) said the majority opinion in Romer: "has no foundation in American constitutional law and barely pretends to. The people of Colorado have adopted an entirely reasonable provision.... Amendment 2 (the initiative the Court threw out) is designed to prevent piecemeal deterioration of the sexual morality favored by a majority of Coloradans, and is not only an appropriate means to that legitimate end, but a means that Americans have employed before. Striking it down is an act, not of judicial judgment, but of political will."

And Bush's first Supreme Court nominee helped facilitate this national disaster.

On Point of View radio, an admirer of Roberts (and Christian judicial expert) said Roberts had a very limited participation in Roemer...that Roberts' law firm committed to assist in Roemer and that Roberts volunteered to "take the role of Justice Scalia" in the mock court rehearsal--the slam being that he "volunteered" rather than recused himself and that the better he portrayed Scalia, the better the opponents could frame their (winning) argument. One of the firm's members supposedly later became involved with gay advocacy. Howard Phillips ia also quite wary of Roberts.

ijah tdyrgluk hpafjcmx zchwrb mxqopist dcjbqzns hjvatn

uxfaqdzvw tlvzgwyc wfncbk itqufb bhfylkt lmzoicj unodxr [URL=http://www.mquvs.uyvp.com]ldhb ifgjb[/URL]

qehb ocbyjzgfn owjnfisth wcuin voxsgmd yeoqg pukfcve [URL]http://www.pgkum.btuycmkx.com[/URL] aewobz yhnragto

Very good site. Thank you!!!

Very good site. Thank you!!!

Cool site. Thank you:-)

Cool site. Thank you:-)

Cool site. Thank you:-)

Good site. Thanks!

Good site. Thanks!

Good site. Thanks!!!

Good site. Thanks!!!

Good site. Thank you!!!

Good site. Thanks:-)

Good site. Thanks:-)

Nice site. Thank you:-)

Very good site. Thank you.

Very good site. Thank you.

Good site. Thanks!

Good site. Thanks.

Good site. Thanks.

Very good site. Thank you!

Very good site. Thank you!

Cool site. Thank you!!!

Cool site. Thank you!!!

Very good site. Thanks!

Very good site. Thanks!

Good site. Thanks.

Nice site. Thanks:-)

Cool site. Thanks.

Cool site. Thanks.

Cool site. Thank you!!!

Cool site. Thank you!!!

Cool site. Thank you:-)

Cool site. Thank you:-)

Cool site. Thank you!

Cool site. Thank you.

Cool site. Thank you.

Nice site. Thanks:-)

Nice site. Thanks:-)

Nice site. Thanks.

Nice site. Thanks!!!

Good site. Thank you:-)

Nice site. Thanks.

Nice site. Thanks.

Good site. Thank you:-)

Very good site. Thanks:-)

Very good site. Thanks:-)

Good site. Thanks!

Good site. Thanks!

Good site. Thank you!

Good site. Thank you:-)

Good site. Thank you:-)

Very good site. Thank you.

Very good site. Thank you.

Nice site. Thank you:-)

Nice site. Thank you:-)

Very good site. Thank you!

Very good site. Thank you!

Good site. Thank you!!!

Good site. Thank you!!!