Share an E-Card about Obama from Wisconsin Right to Life.


search the site



rss feeds

[rss feed]
[rss feed]

« previous entry | return home | next entry »

March 27, 2008
Planned Parenthood to spend $10 mil on election? Puleeze

Much has been made of Planned Parenthood's Big Annoucement that it plans to spend $10 million on the 2008 elections. ABC News has a story on it today:

The Planned Parenthood Action Fund is promising to spend $10 million this election cycle - three times more than the organization has spent in any previous election.

Look, making these Big Announcements to attract friends and scare enemies is PP's modus operandi. Words, words. It's all a scam. PP is just going for the media splash. That's its endgame here.

PP doesn't expect anyone to check back after its media splashes. Well here's 1 person who does.

Does the following sound familiar? In 2002, our old friend Steve Trombley and Planned Parenthood of Chicago promised to spend $1 million in the IL governor's race, as quoted by Crain's Chicago Business, June 24, 2002 (click to enlarge):

PP spend 4.jpg

And this is what PP actually spent, according to the IL State Board of Elections website...

PP spend 6.jpg

$42,500, less than 5% of what PP boasted it would. In total, PP spent $67,500 on the 2002 governor's race, less than 10% of its claim. PP didn't even spend all Trombley said donors had earmarked for it.

PP lies. The 1st thing anyone should think when PP says anything is, "This is a lie."

Still, it's nice PP senses such a threat. Love it. I was surprised by this in the ABC story, although "defending itself" portrays PP as the victim:

Planned Parenthood is defending itself against a range of civil and criminal complaints in several states, and critics charge that the organization is trying to buy influence in Congress.

[HT: reader Kristina]

[pulse]
posted on March 27, 2008 1:48 PM
[pulse2]



Trackback Pings:

TrackBack URL for this entry:





Comments:

Personally, I'm glad they didn't waste all that money on that idiot.

Posted by: Edyt at March 27, 2008 2:13 PM



The record shows that Jim Ryan was easily defeated in that race, so I would not expect anyone to waste a lot of money campaigning against him.

But don't let facts stand in the way of yet another paranoid rant against PP.

Posted by: anonymous at March 27, 2008 2:20 PM



yawn and double yawn. Is this news?

Posted by: Hal at March 27, 2008 2:28 PM



Lie? Oh gosh. They didn't lie. They just... uh... re-evaluated the situation... and, like... changed their minds 'n stuff. Yeah. I bet you that's what Planned Parenthood did.

Posted by: Cranky Catholic at March 27, 2008 2:36 PM



They are non- profit, why can PP spend my tax dollars on political campaigns?

Posted by: Anonymous at March 27, 2008 2:48 PM



I love how PP gets our tax dollars, but then some "PP Action Fund" which is run by the same people can fund pro-abortion political candidates... who in turn reward PP with more tax dollars. If elected president, would Barack Obama put an end to that practice? After all, he doesn't take money from "special interests"! Ha, ha, ha!

Can you imagine if the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops started a "Pro-Life Action Fund", to fund pro-life candidates? The pro-aborts in Congress would howl with anger, and demand that the Catholic Church be punished.

Posted by: John Lewandowski at March 27, 2008 3:51 PM



They are non- profit, why can PP spend my tax dollars on political campaigns?

Posted by: Anonymous at March 27, 2008 2:48 PM

They're not. Their PAC is a separate entity.

Posted by: Hieronymous at March 27, 2008 4:39 PM



Thanks for the update on the real PP actions. Typical. It would actually be news if they ever were honest. ABC is bit late to the news on the $10 million. The Wall Street Journal and others carried the piece a couple of months back.

PP is funded by over $300 million/annually by taxpayers. It would seem a good investment if they could turn 10 mil into 1.2 billion by helping to elect supporters for a four year term (the aim here is self survival) so it wouldn't surprise me if they did go ahead and spend the money after all.

Posted by: Jerry at March 27, 2008 5:36 PM



Thank God for Planned Parenthood, despite any and all nay-saying.

Posted by: Pap Taylor Gang at March 31, 2008 5:27 PM










Visit www.BornAliveTruth.org
barack obama’s radical positions on abortion
  • Barack Obama opposed legislation as IL state senator to protect abortion survivors from being shelved to die:

    » Links to Obama's votes on IL’s Born Alive Infant Protection Act

    » Obama’s 10 reasons for supporting infanticide

    » Why Jesus would not vote for Obama

    » Audio of Obama arguing against giving medical care to abortion survivors

  • Barack Obama thinks partial birth abortion is a “legitimate medical procedure”:

    » Michelle Obama's partial birth abortion fundraising letter

  • Barack Obama opposes parental notification of minor girls before they abort:

    » Media Matters corroboration

  • Barack Obama has stated “the first thing I’d do as president“ would be to sign the Freedom of Choice Act, which would overturn every local, state, and federal abortion law passed in the past 35 years:

    » Video of Obama promising FOCA to Planned Parenthood

  • jasper's quote of the day
    ”I think it's going to actually help our movement right now. I think it's going to help unite everybody and bring people back to the fold, get people reinvigorated. I feel like the past eight years, everybody thought, since we have a pro-life president, we don't have to do that much. He's looking out for us; don't worry about it. I think it's going to get people back into the fold, being vigilant, watching what's happening in Washington".

    ~ Kristan Hawkins, Students for Life of America spokeswoman and executive director. Referring to the soon to come Obama administration

    As quoted by: catholicfire.blogspot.com Nov 18. HT: prolifeblogs.com
    who do they think i am?

    Jill Stanek, a prominent anti-abortion columnist and blogger… said…”

    ~ Los Angeles Times

    Jill Stanek, an anti-abortion blogger with a nationwide following… says…”

    ~ Chicago Tribune

    “… said Jill Stanek, a nurse in the Chicago area who… writes an anti-abortion blog.”

    ~ New York Times

    “… Jill Stanek, an Illinois nurse and anti-abortion activist, wrote on her Web site…”                      ~ Associated Press

    “… said Jill Stanek, a conservative blogger popular with the pro-life community.”                         ~ Wall Street Journal

    “Pro-life blogger Jill Stanek... pointed out....”

    ~ Washington Times

    “Here’s [a blog] worth clicking on… jillstanek.com.

    ~ Washington Post


    …and then Jill rendered O’Reilly speechless…


    (click to view)
    site proofreaders
    (notify for corrections)
    daily record
    November 2008
    Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
                1
    2 3 4 5 6 7 8
    9 10 11 12 13 14 15
    16 17 18 19 20 21 22
    23 24 25 26 27 28 29
    30            


    have news?
    BornAliveTruth.orgBornAliveTruth.org

    [World Net Daily]

    [Heritage House76]
    Click the photo above to order Jill's DVD from Heritage House



    Operation Rescue




    [CWA]


    [ProLifeBlogs.com]
    ProLifeBlogs - An independent news site created to capitalize on weblog technology as an uncompromising defender of the sanctity of human life.

    Contact Jill Stanek for more info on placing an advertisement with jillstanek.com.