Republicans to raise ruckus re: Democrat obstruction of Bush judicial nominees

leahy.jpgJust received a welcome press release from the Committee for Justice.

Senate Democrats, led by Judiciary Committee chairman Pat Leahy, pictured left, have hamstrung the nation's federal courts by obstucting the confirmation of Bush nominees. The critical shortage of judges only grows more critical.

Confirmations are headed for a "historic low for a two-term President in modern times," stated GOP Senator Arlen Specter, pictured below right, the ranking Republican on that committee.

Specter has been holding Increasingly frustrated Republicans at bay, trying to appeal to Leahy.

Time is apparently up....

On February 29 Specter, pictured left, wrote Leahy a letter calling for a bipartisan protocol and timetable to confirm judges. Democrats scoffed at President Bush's likewise proposal in 2002.

If this fails, there will be a "showdown," according to the press release.

The last showdown was averted by the Gang of 14, a group of 7 Dems and 7 GOPers who created a bloc to force compromise. John McCain headed the Gang, you'll recall, a point of contention among conservatives ever since, although this did pave the way for Alito and Roberts' confirmations.

specter.jpgThe press release speaks of "hardball tactics" and "Specter... ready to lead his colleagues into battle." I called the release writer, Curt Levey, to explain what sort of ruckus the Republicans might make. Curt said:

Republicans can threaten to deny a quorum to Leahy in committee; they can slow things down on the Senate floor; they can block specific pieces of legislation they know Leahy really wants. Anything they do to raise the visibility of the issue is helpful.

This is an issue that cuts the Republican way. The more visibility, the more Democrats want to make it go away. The biggest trouble they can cause is to have a confrontation, get a lot of media publicaity. The last thing in the world [Senate Majority Leader Harry] Reid or Obama wants is for judges to be a big issue this fall.

Yes, according to the release, one tactic will be to put Obama on the hotseat. The man calling for bipartisanship and an end to acrimony should not oppose bipartisan rules for judicial confirmations, right?

The Swamp added this:

Leahy won't say it, but if he and the Democrats are indeed running a kind of four-corners offense to delay consideration of nominees, it may be in their best interest to do so. If either... Clinton or... Obama is elected president in November, pending judicial nominations will likely lapse or be pulled and replaced by nominees more palatable to Democrats. That was undoubtedly was very much in the mind of Specter and McConnell as they made their remarks Monday.

[Leahy photo courtesy of CBC News; Specter photo courtesy of Sports Illustrated;


Comments:

"Senate Democrats, led by Judiciary Committee chairman Pat Leahy, pictured left, have hamstrung the nation's federal courts by obstucting the confirmation of Bush nominees"

Maybe Bush should nominate better Judges.

Posted by: Hal at March 4, 2008 6:52 PM


Hello,

Cool Article, I linked to your site for this article in The www.raptureready.com Message Board.

God's Blessings,

Vic

Posted by: Vic at March 4, 2008 7:42 PM


Cool Article on Worldnetdaily, that's where I got your web-site address from!

God Bless,

Vic
www.endoftheworld.net

Posted by: Vic at March 4, 2008 7:45 PM


Leahy is a good friend to Amnesty, resisting protocols that allow torture.

Posted by: prettyinpink at March 4, 2008 7:55 PM


Leahy is the biggest blowhard in the Senate. A real scumbag who is most concerned with terrorists getting a little water poured over their faces (which they havent done since 2003 and it was done on the mastermind of the WTC bombing -> Kalid shiek Moohamad).

Latest stats:

abortions in US: 49,120,987
terrorists waterboarded: 3
terrorists roughed up: 9

Posted by: jasper at March 4, 2008 8:02 PM


Hal, the problem is that Bush's judges are too good, not that they aren't good enough. Leahy doesn't like good judges. He likes activist judges who agree with him politically. That's pretty much all the courts are to the Democrats - a way of forcing unpopular leftist policy on the nation.

Posted by: John Lewandowski at March 4, 2008 8:12 PM


But jasper, obviously three terrorists being waterboarded since the war on terror began is worse than six million abortions over the same time period. Right? After all, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed only attacked us because BUSH tried to steal his oil, or whatever crazy conspiracy theory is popular now.

Posted by: John Lewandowski at March 4, 2008 8:16 PM


True John...and I'm not even in favor with the CIA residing to torture, but this guy Leahy has spent the last 6 years holding hearings on waterboading which the CIA hasnt done since 03 (3 terrorist have been waterboaded). what a waste of time.

Posted by: jasper at March 4, 2008 8:30 PM


All the people that complain about the Democrats don't allow any up or down votes on Judicial nominations seem to forget about the Republicans not allowing Clinton's Judicial nominees have any hearings needed before they could get to a vote.

Posted by: jaybones at March 4, 2008 8:30 PM


"All the people that complain about the Democrats don't allow any up or down votes on Judicial nominations seem to forget about the Republicans not allowing Clinton's Judicial nominees have any hearings needed before they could get to a vote."

Maybe Clinton should've nominated better Judges.

Posted by: John Lewandowski at March 4, 2008 8:37 PM


jasper, I don't know how many times we've been through this.

Torture occurs, and it is not limited by waterboarding. Other things are allowed that aren't waterboarding. Plenty of people have had to report to the government because torture of all kinds was covered up, carried out, and unknown to most of mainstream America.

I would think as a fellow pro-lifer, you would be concerned with torture happening. It seems as long as they are middle eastern, then torture is okay.

I think we have discussed this numerous times, and you have never changed your fact sheet.

Besides the fact that illegal torture is being underreported in the US government, and you are only counting one form of legal torture, people have gone out to say that unnecessary torture was carried out with the White House sanction:

http://thinkprogress.org/2007/12/11/kiriakou-white-house/


Anyway, back on topic, I don't know too much about him except for his good work to try to end sanctioned torture in the US.

Posted by: prettyinpink at March 4, 2008 9:00 PM


Gee, PIP, I would think jasper would be against torture, too.

jasper: "I'm not even in favor with the CIA residing to torture"

Huh.

Posted by: John Lewandowski at March 4, 2008 9:05 PM


PIP, I'm against the CIA using torture, I just don't think it deserves the coverage/weight that it gets in the media....

btw, intersting 1st paragraph in the link you posted (below).... and he goes on to say that other techniques could be used to get the same information and I'm fine with that.

"In an interview last night with ABC News, John Kiriakou — the CIA official who headed the team that interrogated al Qaeda leader Abu Zubaydah — said that Zubaydah was waterboarded, but defended those actions as having prevented “maybe dozens” of planned attacks and “probably saved lives.”"

Posted by: jasper at March 4, 2008 9:09 PM


"PIP, I'm against the CIA using torture, I just don't think it deserves the coverage/weight that it gets in the media...."
This must be a new development...last time we discussed this waterboarding wasn't even torture. It was just the same as kids playing in a pool.

jasper, did you care to read beyond the paragraph?

"But despite his vigorous defense of his past conduct, Kiriakou says he now views what he did as torture and says that he would not recommend those tactics going forward. “We don’t need enhanced techniques to get that nugget of information,” he said in an interview with Matt Lauer this morning on The Today Show."

Even someone who defends that knows its torture and knows it is not necessary to get that kind of information.

Then why make it policy?

Posted by: prettyinpink at March 4, 2008 9:26 PM


If you are fine with using non-torture techniques, why are you fine with techniques that involve torture? You seem to brush it off as unimportant, while I consider torture both here and abroad to be an offense to human character and conduct.

Posted by: prettyinpink at March 4, 2008 9:27 PM


What about judges?

Oh yeah good judges.

Rather than blame Bush, or Clinton or republicans or democrats, how about rational criteria.

One way one could say a judge is "good" is whether the Supreme court often overturns their rulings.

There are some judges whose rulings are often overturned and then there are judges who have never had a decision overturned. Unfortunately some fear congress sometimes likes the former sort more than the latter.

It seems it would be easy to confirm a judge whose decisions are never overruled and more difficult to confirm a judge whose decisions have be often overruled.

I don't know which sort been nominated. Does anyone else?

I am just trying to interject a reasonable basis here.

Does anyone else have any ideas?

Posted by: hippie at March 4, 2008 11:56 PM


Hippie that makes a lot of sense. I didn't mean to derail this thread, just to essentially say "hey! I know that guy from somewhere!"

I don't know much about the judges in question, either, so I'm not sure what to take from this story.

Posted by: prettyinpink at March 5, 2008 12:07 AM


Good judges don't legislate from the bench.

Posted by: truthseeker at March 5, 2008 12:09 AM


Is MK around? I have solidified my plans for the Chicago trip and want to know when we are all getting breakfast together...

Posted by: prettyinpink at March 5, 2008 12:14 AM


pip - Pizzera Uno or Pizzeria Due downtown. Hands down the best pizza anywhere. Make sure and try it while your in town. I think it must be the ovens they use that make it sooo good.

Posted by: truthseeker at March 5, 2008 1:23 AM


Hillary won Ohio and Texas and Obama is on the ropes.

Posted by: truthseeker at March 5, 2008 2:22 AM


The Dems will now have a bruising battle that continues all the way to the convention. Whoever the Dem nominee is, s/he will be damaged going into the general election. Thanks Texas and Ohio(smiles). Go McCain!!!!

Posted by: Carrie at March 5, 2008 6:22 AM


"This must be a new development...last time we discussed this waterboarding wasn't even torture. It was just the same as kids playing in a pool."

I changed my stance on this PIP.

Posted by: jasper at March 5, 2008 6:46 AM


I never thought I would be rooting for Hillary, but I am when shes running against Obama.

Posted by: jasper at March 5, 2008 6:48 AM


jasper, me to. I live in Ohio.

Posted by: heather at March 5, 2008 7:26 AM


I don't know though. I still can't see her in office.

Posted by: heather at March 5, 2008 7:40 AM


What about Harriet Myers? Is she back up again, that was awesome. Maybe Alberto Gonzales? Get his lying two faces up there for some fun.....

How can we trust ANYONE bush puts forth at this point? Scalia, Roberts, Bush, Cheney, Gonzales and Alito need to find a new country to ruin.

Posted by: PeachPit at March 5, 2008 7:56 AM


pip - Pizzera Uno or Pizzeria Due downtown. Hands down the best pizza anywhere. Make sure and try it while your in town. I think it must be the ovens they use that make it sooo good.

Posted by: truthseeker at March 5, 2008 1:23 AM

Oooo, crazy. I agree with truthseeker about something!

PiP, try to hit Millenium Park on the lakefront if you can. It's really pretty, and you can warm up at the Art Institute if it's cold outside.

Posted by: Hieronymous at March 5, 2008 8:04 AM


jasper,

That makes me so happy! Thank you!

truthseeker and Hieronymous,

Thanks for the tips, I will definitely check them out!

Posted by: prettyinpink at March 5, 2008 8:09 AM


I love Chicago!

Posted by: heather at March 5, 2008 8:27 AM


I also got tickets to Jerry Springer :)

Posted by: prettyinpink at March 5, 2008 8:37 AM


You'll get no tears from me. Compared to Republican obstruction of Clinton judicial nominees, often by a single senator, Bush's are sailing through scott free.

Posted by: Ray at March 5, 2008 9:17 AM


Bush needs to sit quietly in a corner somewhere for the next 10 months and do no more harm.

Posted by: Hal at March 5, 2008 11:38 AM


pip - Pizzera Uno or Pizzeria Due downtown. Hands down the best pizza anywhere. Make sure and try it while your in town. I think it must be the ovens they use that make it sooo good.

Posted by: truthseeker at March 5, 2008 1:23 AM
...................................

I think it's the crust.

Posted by: Sally at March 5, 2008 1:47 PM


PiP, try to hit Millenium Park on the lakefront if you can. It's really pretty, and you can warm up at the Art Institute if it's cold outside.

Posted by: Hieronymous at March 5, 2008 8:04 AM
..................

Very very cool sculpture in Millennium Park. The Museum of Science and Industry is my favorite. If you like Ikea, there is one in Schaumburg. Tony 'n Tina's Wedding at the Chicago theater is a lot of fun too.

Posted by: Sally at March 5, 2008 1:57 PM


Don't forget to visit Intelligentsia Coffee on Randolph, half a block west of the northwest corner of Millennium park. Ask 'em for a Clover brew. :-)

Posted by: rasqual at March 5, 2008 9:55 PM


Anybody know how Erin is doing? Haven't seen her on the blog since her car wreck?

Posted by: truthseeker at March 6, 2008 1:49 AM


pip, is Bridgette still improving? I pray for her every now and again.

Posted by: truthseeker at March 6, 2008 1:52 AM


Maybe thats why diplomats usually schedule a meal prior to the meeting. They can all start by agreeing that the food was good.

Posted by: truthseeker at March 6, 2008 1:58 AM


Maybe thats why diplomats usually schedule a meal prior to the meeting. They can all start by agreeing that the food was good.

Posted by: truthseeker at March 6, 2008 1:58 AM

I think you may be on to something :-)

Posted by: Hieronymous at March 6, 2008 8:20 AM


truthseeker,

Yes, she is! She was moved to a rehab center were they were able to take out her trach and she can talk. Now she can move her arms, write, and eat solid food. She is having bouts of confusion but the doctors say that it is part of the recovery process--that her brain is trying to "wake up." And she is experiencing some neuropathy, but pain medications are helping.

Thanks for asking :) Our prayers are definitely working.

Posted by: prettyinpink at March 6, 2008 8:43 AM


Maybe thats why diplomats usually schedule a meal prior to the meeting. They can all start by agreeing that the food was good.

Posted by: truthseeker at March 6, 2008 1:58 AM
..............................

Imagine being the chief and trying to please everyone's palate. The pressure!

Posted by: Sally at March 6, 2008 12:37 PM


Bush needs to sit quietly in a corner somewhere for the next 10 months and do no more harm.

Posted by: Hal at March 5, 2008 11:38 AM


Hal,

Bush has already nominated the judges.

Now it is up to congress to hold hearings to confirm or reject them.

Are you saying the congress should not hold hearings to confirm or reject the nominees for the next 10 months?

Posted by: hippie at March 6, 2008 2:11 PM


pip, that's great that she is still improving. I'll keep praying for her too.

Posted by: truthseeker at March 7, 2008 3:56 AM


Looks perfectly straight to me. Of course, I'm also the type of person who allegedly [ahem! allegedly] agree with everything.

Posted by: Laydee D at April 6, 2008 2:01 PM


It's a pain in everyone else's butt. Let’s just stop discussing this crap, the topic is too questionable.

Posted by: MoGuns at April 9, 2008 5:46 AM


block kids on the mp3 New http://new-kids-on-the-block.barerube.cn >block on New kids the girl

Posted by: the block on kids loving New at May 18, 2008 6:45 AM