by JivinJ
Cal State Long Beach, focusing on his dislike of a display with images of aborted children.
He claims the Center for Bio-Ethical Reform shouldn't be allowed to display these pictures because of "Supreme Court cases on freedom of speech rights" and then fails to cite a single case.
He claims the pictures are from illegal abortions without evidence, and then shows he doesn't seem to know the meaning of the words "hypocritical" or "statistic."...
If we're lucky, we might get to see more poorly researched and argued articles by Oyama in the future. He's a senior journalism major.
... he told her the baby had not really formed, that she would be fat and ugly like the women in the supermarket.
Here Kmiec applauds Obama for taking "off the table" the option of "reproductive cloning." But that only means cloned human embryos will be created solely for stem cells and other research uses, and not be allowed to survive and be born. That cannot be called a sensitive or pro-life policy.With all due respect to Kmiec, then, on this and other issues relating to the destruction of unborn human life, the federal government is not moving "in a noticeably more Catholic-friendly direction." Nor is it moving in a human-friendly direction.
Comments:
"stem cell research using aborted human eggs."
This belongs on Ripley's Believe it NOT!
Posted by: angel at April 30, 2009 2:50 PMI remain astounded at the stubbornness displayed by "catholic scholar" Douglas Kmiec. In spite of his knowledge of all these catholic, he exhibits a profound sense of truth-twisting.
Posted by: carder at April 30, 2009 3:05 PMI remain astounded at the stubbornness displayed by "catholic scholar" Douglas Kmiec. In spite of his knowledge of all these catholic, he exhibits a profound sense of truth-twisting.
Posted by: carder at April 30, 2009 3:05 PM
carder, Kmiec is neither catholic nor scholarly. He's clearly delusional.
Posted by: angel at April 30, 2009 4:09 PMI remember Bill Clinton referring to unfertilized embryos.
Posted by: xppc at April 30, 2009 4:37 PMAborted human eggs?
Aren't they discarded when women have their periods?
Aborted human eggs?
Aren't they discarded when women have their periods?
Posted by: Chris Arsenault at April 30, 2009 6:25 PM
Chris you oughta know better by now. When has basic biology ever gotten in the way of a proaborts reasoning? They make up their own science as they go. ;)
"When has basic biology ever gotten in the way of a proaborts reasoning? They make up their own science as they go. ;)"
=============================================
yeah, Angel..why let a little thing called, truth, logic and science get in the way?
When you're hot, you're hot!
I think that they are talking about getting eggs from aborted baby girl at 20 weeks and on to get the eggs from. There bodies are good for 48 hour on ice.
Posted by: alice at May 1, 2009 4:20 PM
Jill Stanek is a nurse turned speaker, columnist and blogger, a national figure in the effort to protect both preborn and postborn innocent human life.
