Hollywood A-listers and families attending the March 8 premiere of the animated Horton Hears a Who in Los Angeles got a bonus feature: pro-life protesters who after the film ended began chanting the story's famous line, "A person is a person, no matter how small."
Celebrities included 2 of the film's stars, Jim Carrey and Steve Carell, along with Jenny McCarthy, Brooke Shields, and Victoria Beckham, all with kids in tow. All 12 American Idol contestants also saw the pro-life performance.
After chanting the pro-lifers placed red duct tapes over their mouths with "LIFE" printed on them and marched around the theater....
I'm a "no justice, no peace" kind of girl, so I endorse this sort of protest, sorry as I am that kids who beforehand were unaware of the epic moral battle of our time learned a sad thing or 2 Saturday afternoon.
Media and blog coverage, although disparaging, drew attention to Seuss's beautiful pro-life statement, intended or not. Otherwise anti-lifers would have ignored the dots and the mushy middle remained oblivious. Now to a even a small extent, they cannot.
Which brings me to the pro-life dilemma with Horton Hears a Who.
Seuss's widow, Audrey Geisel, is a pro-abort who supports Planned Parenthood, which I've previously documented. It is purported Seuss was a pro-abort as well.
So do pro-lifers give business to a pro-life themed movie, the proceeds of which will go in part to support pro-abort causes?
March 4, 2008
Here's a wild story, from the Associated Press, February 28:
A newborn girl fell through the toilet in a moving train and onto the tracks moments after her mother gave birth prematurely, surviving nearly two hours before being found....The infant's mother, who uses the single name Bhuri, was traveling with relatives... when she went to the bathroom... and unexpectedly gave birth, said Arjun Kumar, her brother-in-law.
"Later, she fell unconscious and the baby fell through the toilet," he said. "Two stations later, we knocked at the door."
Bhuri opened the door, soaked in blood....
"When we asked her about what happened, she said the baby had fallen through onto the tracks," Kumar said.Toilets on Indian trains usually have holes that open directly onto the tracks....
[R]elatives pulled the train's emergency brake and notified railway officials. A search was quickly organized, and guards at one of the stations the train had passed soon found the baby.
"She was on the rail track for almost 1-1/2 to two hours," said Dr. Gautam Jain, a pediatrician at Rajasthan Hospital... where the baby and mother were taken.
The infant, who has not yet been named, was eight to 10 weeks premature and weighed only about 3# 4oz, Jain said. She had a low heart rate and body temperature.
"We do not expect such children to survive," Jain said, adding that her survival was "God's mercy."
I can't believe the baby lived either. So many reasons she should not have. Yes, God's mercy.
[HT: reader JM; photo of Bhuri and baby courtesy of the AP]
March 3, 2008
From the Associated Press, March 2:
Activist-actor Martin Sheen will be honored by the University of Notre Dame with its Laetare Medal for his humanitarian work, the school announced Sunday.Sheen, who played a U.S. president who was a Notre Dame graduate in the TV series "West Wing," is to receive the medal at the school's May 18 commencement.
Since 1883, the Laetare Medal has been awarded annually to a Catholic "whose genius has ennobled the arts and sciences, illustrated the ideals of the church and enriched the heritage of humanity."...
"He has used that celebrity to draw the attention of his fellow citizens to issues that cry out for redress, such as the plight of immigrant workers and homeless people, the waging of unjust war, the killing of the unborn and capital punishment," [university president Rev. John] Jenkins said....
Sheen, 67, describes himself as a Catholic peace activist. He has been arrested for taking part in nonviolent demonstrations against various U.S. military policies, and has donated money and time to such causes as the alleviation of poverty and homelessness, human rights for migrant workers and environmental protection.
In 2001, Feminists for Life named Sheen as 1 of its Remarkable Pro-Life Men that year.
LifeNews.com previously reported Sheen is a "longtime supporter of the Seamless Garment Network, a pro-life group that also opposes war, poverty, abortion, racism, and capital punishment."
Sheen filed a brief supporting Joe Scheidler's right to free speech in the infamous Now vs. Scheidler case, heard before the U.S. Supreme Court twice.
[HT: son Tim; photo courtesy of Anything & Everything]
February 26, 2008
About this year's Academy Awards Moviefone reported, "Baby-on-board is the new black in Hollywood," a pretty funny line.
Enjoying Tinsel Town's swell of pregnancy pride while it lasts, here were the baby bumps spotted at the Oscars:
Jessica Alba (left) and Cate Blanchett (right)...
![]()
Nicole Kidman...
For bauble fans, Kidman's necklace contained 7645 diamonds including rough, faceted, and polished diamonds, totalling ~1400 carats, according to Fox Business, adding:
Each diamond was individually selected... to fit together into an overall design. The intricate design required in excess of 6200 man hours to handcraft.
[Alba photo courtesy of the Associated Press; Blanchett photo also courtesy of the AP; Kidman photo courtesy of the Academy Awards]
February 22, 2008
TMZ wondered February 20 whether Tori Spelling's 2nd pregnancy was a "ploy" to get a repeat contract from NutriSystem:
Tori Spelling probably made a ton of money from NutriSystem. After all, what a great ad - someone famous losing her baby weight.So what does Tori do? She gets knocked up again and gains it all back. We're thinkin' it's one of the great ploys of 2008.
Here's the scenario. Tori has the kid and then resigns with NutriSystem, which pays her even more money to advertise how women with two kids can dump the weight.
We're guessing Tori could end up in a mansion again, with her own money and more kids than Mia Farrow....
The 34-year-old, married to actor Dean McDermott, delivered Liam Aaron on March 13, 2007.
She then lost 35-40# (reports differ) of baby fat on NutriSystem, going on to become a company spokesperson. According to People magazine, Spelling shot a new ad campaign in November that began appearing in women's magazines in December.
During this time Spelling got pregnant again, with not quite an Irish twin. She just announced her 2nd is due in July, 16 months after her 1st, according to People, where Spelling graces this week's cover.
Back to TMZ. Spelling announced in the October 1 edition of Ok! magazine she wanted to have kids close together. According to my pregnancy wheel, October was the month she conceived. Unless she deliberately withheld info from NutriSystem, the company knew in November she was pregnant again, or Spelling herself did not yet know.
TMZ may be just a gossip rag, but it examples how the calloused pop culture views children. It thinks having children close together or having a big family is abnormal, and no one would do it on purpose without an external, self-serving reason, in this case a get-richer-quicker scheme.
[Top photo credit: TMZ]
February 19, 2008
I had to ponder the double negative in the first sentence of this blog post on Juno by pro-abort Revolution Newspaper. "[N]ot anti-choice"? What, they don't even want to be called pro-choice anymore?
How is it that audiences who are not anti-choice are walking out of a movie like Juno without even realizing what hit them?For many years now, Christian fascists have been hammering a message that what America needs is a return to the oppressive values of the 1950s (and in many ways, the 1850s), including a return to traditional woman's role as mother. They have been setting terms very broadly, to the point that any Democrat who wants to run for president has to declare that abortion is morally wrong and tragic, while the movement to ban all abortion grows and shuts down clinics....
And through all this, a morality has spread that accepts that we "all" supposedly abhor abortion as a tragedy. The fact that so many people have been taken in by Juno should serve as a wake-up call on how ominously far things have gone in that direction.
I do wonder what alternative Rev thinks we have to a "woman's role as mother." I know they're working on uterine facsimiles, but until then, I must enlighten Rev that there is only one conduit to propagate the species. What, didn't you have comprehensive sex ed, my friend?
I also must note the "morality [that] has spread that accepts that we 'all' supposedly abhor abortion as a tragedy" was started by Rev's very own Bill Clinton, now perpetuated by Hillary. "Safe, legal, and rare," Rev? Never heard that phrase?
I agree this presents a problem. As recently as two days ago, Bill called abortion a "tragedy." The next question is, why?
I agree with Rev that their situation is ominous.
On a related note, a young reporter named Brianna, writing for a school newspaper in CA, emailed me last week with questions about my thoughts on Juno. One was, "What message or impact do you feel this movie sends to teens?" I responded I would be interested in her answering that for my blog, which she did:
Well... most of my friends and I thought that it wasn't realistic. Although none of us have even come close to getting pregnant, we still felt that the decision would be much harder to make and that our parents would have been much more upset than Juno's were.It was extremely unrealistic that she would find adoptive parents that quickly, and I thought the movie stereotyped your typical planned parenthood.
I personally thought that the movie glorified teen pregnancy and that people who saw this movie would think of pregnancy in a greater light. I think that the movies and media have an easier way to get into teens heads and they sometimes give unspoken lessons that teens listen to instead of their parents. Therefore, some of my friends and I think that this movie is a propaganda for the teen.
Despite some of my friends and I's opinion, many people believe that it was good for teens to see the consequences of their actions. I think for many people the movie was a reality check and it really made people think of what could happen.
January 28, 2008
While pro-life themed Juno soared past the $100 million earnings mark this weekend, the critically acclaimed anti-life film 4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days opened in just 2 theatres nationwide.
And while the The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences nominated Juno for Best Picture, it snubbed Sure Thing 4 Months (see below) for Best Foreign Film.
More evidence Hollywood has begun to bank on life? I think so.
You can't tell by the trailer what 4 Months is about, unless you have abortion on the brain, as I do. Wonder why they hid the sole topic of the movie, a mother's length of gestation before aborting:
MSM critics everywhere have been trying to pump life into 4 Months for several months. A New York Times critic named it the #1 movie of 2007. This week's People magazine gave 4 Months 4 stars and stamped it as its "Critic's Choice".
Awards for 4 Months are impressive: Cannes Film Festival Golden Palm, Golden Globe Awards 2007 Best Foreign Language Film, European Film Awards Best European Film, Hollywood Film Festival's Best Film, San Sebastian International Film Festival Film of the Year, Stockholm Film Festival Best Film, National Board of Review Top Five Foreign Films, Los Angeles Film Critics Association Best Foreign Film, Sight & Sound Films of 2007 Best Film, Chicago Film Critics Association Best Foreign Language Film, Toronto Film Critics Association Best Foreign Language Film, National Society of Film Critics Best Foreign Language Film, Australian Film Critics Association 2007 Best Overseas Film, yadda yadda yadda.
And yet the Academy snubbed it.
MSM critics are hot. Rolling Stone's Peter Travers said the snub was "one of the stupidest things that I've ever seen happen."
And Kenneth Turan of the LA Times, showing the height of snob snubbery himself, wrote, "if the foreign-language Oscar is going to be saved from becoming a laughing-stock, measures need to be taken to ensure that its choices are at least within hailing distance of what the rest of the informed film world thinks."
That's the problem. The "informed film world" has lost touch with what is a good movie, preferring the cinematic equivalent of crucifixes in urine, to true art.
January 18, 2008
Sorry, off topic but can't help but post this... :)
[HT: moderator MK]
January 16, 2008
Rikki Lake has just released a documentary, The Business of Being Born. From the film's website:
Birth: it's a miracle. A rite of passage. A natural part of life. But more than anything, birth is a business. Compelled to find answers after a disappointing birth experience with her first child, actress Ricki Lake recruits filmmaker Abby Epstein to examine and question the way American women have babies.The film interlaces intimate birth stories with surprising historical, political and scientific insights and shocking statistics about the current maternity care system....
Should most births be viewed as a natural life process, or should every delivery be treated as a potentially catastrophic medical emergency?
I'll answer that. Pro-lifers say the former; pro-aborts the latter, and not just about delivery but about the entire pregnancy.
Here's the trailer:
I'm thrilled with any promotion of pregnancy. Halle Berry was a great pregnancy advocate in this month's In Style magazine:
"My skin is aglow from all the hormones. I actually wear less makeup, which is really good. I want to stay pregnant forever," she says....

Ask her how she's feeling these days and Berry answers without missing a beat. "Fantastic! The second trimester, everybody told me, 'You'll see, you're going to be a whole new woman.' And it's true.... [R]ight now I just have so much joy and energy that I feel like I've already done 12 things today. I can just go and go and go."
Something weird is happening here. Not only is Hollywood suddenly high on procreation, but so is the rest of America. CNN reported yesterday the U.S. is experiencing a "baby boomlet."
Interesting that a "boomlet" these days means America has reattained a population replacement level of 2.1 children per woman. Well, there's good news. We're no longer dying off. Can't say that about much of the rest of the world. According to CNN:
[T]he United States has a higher fertility rate than every country in continental Europe, as well as Australia, Canada and Japan....Countries with much lower rates - such as Japan and Italy, both with a rate of 1.3 - face future labor shortages and eroding tax bases as they fail to reproduce enough to take care of their aging elders.
But there's still hope. I appreciated this line from the CNN piece, even if I'm unsure it's true:
"Americans like children. We are the only people who respond to prosperity by saying, `Let's have another kid,"' said Nan Marie Astone, associate professor of population, family and reproductive health at Johns Hopkins University.
January 14, 2008
Congratulations to my friend, Wendy Wright. Liberal Keith Olbermann of liberal MSNBC recently proclaimed Wendy, president of Concerned Women for America, the Worst Person in the World!
See Keith Olbermann's diss of Wendy beginning at 1:23:
Explained the CWA website....
In a recent appearance on Fox News, Wendy pointed out that the loudest proponents of that abysmal failure labeled "comprehensive sex education" are the most likely to benefit financially when children and teens become pregnant or contract sexually transmitted diseases.For example, Planned Parenthood, which receives its lion's share of profit from abortion, has a vested interest in ensuring that young girls become pregnant and have abortions. It's a classic case of "the fox watching the hen house."
For that pro-abort bloggers went balistic and Olbermann ballyhooed.
I take pleasure in pointing out that the impetus for this story was that the Democrat-controlled Congress, for all its blather, kept abstinence funding intact for FY'08.
In fact, they left every single pro-life rider on appropriations bills intact, including the Mexico City Policy, which disallows U.S. international $$ from going to promote or commit abortions.
They did increase Title X, the Planned Parenthood subsidy program, by $17 million to almost $300 million.
But the situation looked far bleaker earlier this year. Democrats simply blinked at President Bush's veto threat.
[HT: LifeNews.com]
I got quoted in a The New Republic column January 11 on the topic of Juno:
The politics of films like Juno, Waitress, and Knocked Up have become new turnbuckles in the wrestling ring of the culture wars.

Befitting the binary nature of the abortion debate, they also serve as something of a civic Rorschach test: For every conservative celebrating Juno as what Pro Life Pulse blogger Jill Stanek calls "the movie pro-aborts will hate," there's a pro-choicer declaring that the real power of the movie lies in their autonomous lead characters' ability to make their own decisions. "The flick is pro-choice in the most literal sense of the term," The American Prospect's Ezra Klein wrote of Knocked Up. "She has a choice; nothing is forced on her." But critics on both sides of the debate imply something new and dramatic is afoot, even if no one quite agrees on what it means.
Nice spin! The pro-abort columnist, Michael Schaffer, of course ignores the truly contempt-ridden reviews his side has given Juno, like this one from RH Realtity Check, which is the actual truth....
Indirect in its underlying condemnation of abortion on request, the film is a far more costly blow against abortion rights than anything the anti-abortion crowd could possibly hope for or ever produce - and they are big gainers (at no cost to them) from its sappy popularity.
With all the attention we're all giving to the pro-life phenomenon in movies of late, I expect Hollywood to reassuredly respond with one promoting abortion.
Which will fall flat.
Meanwhile, Juno is on pace to become Fox's biggest hit. Made for $7.5 million, it is looking to "vault past $100 million and beyond," according to Marketwatch.
January 8, 2008
Every now and then we veer off topic for a change of pace. So here we go.
Yesterday Hillary Clinton became verklempt during an interview, provoking lots of questions. Was it real or fake? Is it acceptable for presidents/presidential candidates to cry? Is it sexist for us to focus on Hillary's tearful moment? Do you think she was really crying for her country or because she was admittedly tired? In other words, were she well rested and not under such pressure following her loss in Iowa, would she have become so emotional?
January 3, 2008
The January 2008 issue of Marie Claire magazine sports pregnant and mostly naked Christina Aguilera on the cover.
I spotted it on the newstand and was mostly thrilled, despite misgivings of the pose. I love when the pop culture promotes pregnancy, particularly of the rare married celebrity, although this promotion was indeed a bit disconcerting. The accompanying story included more risqué shots. See one on page 2.
I also love to read the altered language when the pop culture promotes pregnancy. Were Aguilera discussing her abortion, names would have been changed to deflect from the innocent. Words like "child," "baby," and "roommate" would have been nixed for "fetus" and the generic "pregnancy."...
When reading these quotes, bear in mind Aguilera's last known position was pro-abortion, and the writer is MC's executive editor, Lucy Kaylin, and MC is decidedly pro-abortion, with easy evidence on its last page, when it wishes "Happy 35th, Roe v. Wade" (click graphic to enlarge)....
"May I?" I say, reaching out - actually copping a feel of icon tummy. Under normal circumstances, breaching the electric fence that surrounds stars of her magnitude would be unthinkable. But this glowing - dare I say earthy? - version of Aguilera is hard to resist...."We were planning on starting to try after the tour," she says.... "And so I had gone off the Pill to prepare my body, because I didn't know how much time it would take....
"By the time I was supposed to get my period, I was like, It's not coming - and I'm never late. And there were emotions coming up that I'd never felt before - I was already starting to get emotional. So I did a test. And when the double lines came, my jaw dropped; I started shaking. I couldn't help but smile, and I started to tear up."...
Well and good. Only problem was she still had a month left on an 8-month world tour.... "There are so many things that could go wrong - somebody could slip, somebody could fall, I could fall.... There was no way in hell I was going to jeopardize my baby for my show."...
"Because I hadn't said anything, people thought I was trying to keep it this big, bad secret, and that's not the case at all. I just wasn't commenting.... I'm not going to announce my child. Why do I have to announce something that's personal?...
Now the woman who made a public fetish of control and self-determination is happily giving herself over to the unplumable mysteries of procreation. She seems humbled by the knowledge that this whole thing is bigger than she is - that she's just not alone in the universe anymore. "Some days when you're pregnant, you just don't feel like doing a show, but I'd be like, 'Come on, little one,'" she says, gazing down at her belly and giving it a stroke. "I really did feel like I had a teammate. It felt like my little roommate in there. Like, little one was egging me on and encouraging me to do it...."
With the dazed smile of a lottery winner, [husband Jordan Bratman] says how excited he is about the baby - that they've actually started to feel him kick...."

December 28, 2007
Priests for Life was kind to send me a copy of Anthony DeStefano's book, A Travel Guide to Heaven, for Christmas. Anthony is the executive director of PFL as well as a prolific author.
But Anthony previously gave me a copy of his book.
I'm sure Anthony and PFL would want this book read rather than shelved.
So, I'll send this copy to the first person who emails me with his or her mailing address (who hasn't recently won something here... :).
December 20, 2007
Last week on The View, Barbara Walters was surprised to receive a Christmas card from President Bush with a Bible verse inside. "Does this also go to agnostics and atheists and Muslims?" Walters wondered. Here's Walters:
What Walters received was a birthday card. Christmas is a celebration of Jesus' birthday. I don't recall the last time I celebrated someone's birthday but was disallowed to mention the one being celebrated for fear of offending someone else who either wasn't sure the person existed, didn't believe the person existed, or didn't like the person.
In fact, although the card shows a Christmas tree in the window, it never says, "Merry Christmas." The theme of the verse and the particular watercolor chosen carry out the White House's National Parks theme for the season, which gives glory to God for creation.
The White House mixed all that into one card, for which I give it lots of credit for savvy.
We also received that Christmas card. Note the RNC paid for the card, and it was postmarked from Crawford, TX. I am so fed up with stupid people who think they're so smart, with intolerant people who consider themselves so tolerant, with mean-spirited people who think they are just the opposite. Here is that card close up (view on page 2)....
UPDATE, 1:10p: Read "release [of] some atheist angst" over my post at The Huntress' Domain.

December 19, 2007
Britney Spears' 16-year-old sister Jamie Lynn announced today she is just over 12 weeks pregnant by 19-year-old boyfriend (and statutory rapist - see page 57), Casey Aldridge, 19.
What we have here is a young girl who made a mistake and is responding admirably thus far. From OK! magazine:
"I can't say it was something I was planning to do right now," the 16-year-old confesses to OK!. "But now that it's in my lap and that it's something I have to deal with, I'm looking forward to being the best mom I can be."...
And Jamie Lynn, who intends on raising the child in her home state of Louisiana, also tells OK! that she intends to face up to the life-changing choice she's made. "I'm the one who has to live with it for the rest of my life," she says. "I put myself in this position, an adult position, so I have to act like an adult and take responsibility for what I did."...As for any message Jamie Lynn's fans might take away from this news, the young actress is realistic. "I definitely don't think it's something you should do; it's better to wait. But I can't be judgmental because it's a position I put myself in."
Added People:
Spears told [Ok!] magazine that after confirming the pregnancy with a home test and a subsequent doctor's visit, she told only one friend - then waited two weeks before telling anybody else, including her parents."I needed to work out what I would do for myself before I let anyone's opinion affect my decision," she told the magazine. "Then I told my parents and my friends. I was scared, but I had to do what was right for me."
The pressures on this girl to abort must have been enormous. Imagine. Her decision likely cost her the starring role on Nickelodeon's highly rated Zoey 101, a show about a wholesome teen that was nominated for an "Outstanding Childrens Program" Emmy in 2005.
And it also likely cost her mother her book deal on parenting, due out in 2008. According to the Washington Post, "Yesterday the publishing house announced that the book's printing would be delayed... indefinitely."
And certainly Jamie understood the brutal response her news would bring. And sure enough, liberal blogs are treating the news viciously, hypocritical pigs. They promote premarital sex and call those advocating abstinence Neanderthals, but then have this to say about Jamie, quoting Perez Hilton:
Dang. We thought Jamie Lynn was the nice and normal one.Now we know she's just trailer trash like her sister!!!
Other blog comments:
"another spears retard...""abortion. abortion. abortion."
"i used to love and respect jamie but now i don't she is having a baby! that is so yuk, discusting and wrong at sixteen..."
Some are asking what sort of role model Jamie Lynn is. I say, an admirably brave, mature one. She is admitting her mistake and trying to do the right thing on the other side. Abortion is the cowardly way out.
[HT: new Stanek proofreader Angela and reader AB Laura; photo credit: People]
December 18, 2007
A reporter from Focus on the Family's Family News in Focus called yesterday about a story she's preparing on the Abercrombie & Fitch t-shirts I reported on here and here December 14.
She said someone wondered in a production meeting yesterday morning how does Stanek find all her stuff? Her first question to me was exactly that, and I responded, "Tips, I get great tips. I hardly have time to do my own scouting anymore because I get so many good tips." The A&F tip came from John Jansen of Pro-Life Action League.
So this morning moderator Jacqueline sent me a great tip based on the A&F-tipped post! Jacque gave me the link to this t-shirt on BustedTees.com:

At first glance, this t-shirt could be one promoting procreation. In fact, it does. But it doesn't mean to. Here is the vile description of the shirt:

I still don't get how the words on the t-shirt translate into that obviously low caliber, young male-written message. (Young males most support abortion, btw. No wonder.) Perhaps someone can explain.
I prefer my own translation, which makes the shirt clever and humorous.
December 13, 2007
The pro-life themed movie Juno, which opens Christmas Day and which I've favorably reviewed, was nominated this morning for a Golden Globe. According to the Associated Press:
Nominated for best comedy or musical along with Charlie Wilson's War were the Beatles musical Across the Universe, the Broadway adaptation Hairspray, the teen-pregnancy comedy Juno and the bloody musical Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street.
Star Ellen Page was also nominated for Best Actress, Musical or Comedy, and stripper turned blogger turned writer Diablo Cody for Best Screenwriter.
December 6, 2007
Here's another diversion from our topic to lighten things up a little.
All the talk at the White House last night was of Jenna Bush's phone call to her dad while taping the Ellen DeGeneres show yesterday.
But I see it's all over the news as well - 257 news articles, according to Google!
So here 'tis, very cute....
December 4, 2007
I recently reported that pregnant parents Nicole Richie and John Madden had created the Richie Madden Children's Foundation to provide items for moms and families in need, particularly at the LA Free Clinic. In fact, Richie designated all gifts given at her November 18 baby shower to her new charity.
Well, People reported yesterday:
Not many kids have a foundation launched in their honor before they're born. But that will be one of the many privileges bestowed upon Nicole Richie and Joel Madden's baby, due in January.The couple hosted a surprise baby shower Monday for 100 expectant and new moms at the Los Angeles Free Clinic in Hollywood, where they handed out more than $200,000 worth of gifts. "The looks on their faces were priceless," Richie told reporters after the shower. "Some of them didn't even believe us [when they saw the gifts]. They thought we were joking."...
The Richie Madden Children's Foundation, Madden said, was an idea the couple had when they found out they were expecting. "We grew up in Los Angeles," he said, "and we want our child to be a part of the community, and to know that there's a responsibility to help the community."

And it's a family affair. "We named it the Richie Madden Children's Foundation because we each have families and our families are close, and our family is involved," Richie said. By her side with his arm stroking her back during moments in the conference, Madden quipped, "We're lucky that we have families that get along and love each other," adding, "I think it's great that our child will grow up as a part of that family."Amongst the goodies given to families in need were Baby Bjorn products, cribs, mattresses and toys from Fisher-Price. "Everything they got, we got," Richie says, "so everything that will be in their nursery, will be in our nursery."
Madden felt good about the event. "Sometimes people don't want to believe that me and Nicole are just a young couple having a baby and we're really excited. We don't really get to share our lives with people. It's nice to connect with people on a real level."
Again, good for them. Well done.
[HT: reader AB Laura]
November 30, 2007
Great story in the entertainment section of the Philadelphia Inquirer yesterday:
In America, about one in five pregnancies ends in abortion, according to the latest figures from the Guttmacher Institute. In recent American movies, however, every unplanned pregnancy is carried to term.

From Knocked Up to Waitress to Juno [scene pictured left], opening Dec. 14, abortion is The Great Unmentionable, euphemized as "we don't perform, uh, -- " (Waitress), and "nipped it in the bud" (Juno) in comedies in which pregnancy is the situation. Abortion is likewise obliquely referenced, if actually considered, in the drama Bella, now in theaters."It's as if there's an 'every conception deserves delivery' policy being observed," says Virginia Rutter, senior scholar at the Council on Contemporary Families....
To the extent that mainstream movies are a barometer of public opinion, the evidence of America's continued ambivalence about abortion can be found at the multiplex."The ground has shifted," says Robert George, professor of the philosophy of law at Princeton. "We don't see characters wrestling with the question of abortion as we saw it during the '70s when (television's) Maude weighed the decision whether to keep or terminate her pregnancy."...
[A]cross the ideological spectrum, scholars and advocates ponder why the procedure that so divides Americans - according to a May Gallup Poll, 49% of Americans identify as pro-choice and 45% as pro-life - effectively has vanished from the screen....

Since the '80s, when characters in Fast Times at Ridgemont High and Dirty Dancing sought abortions, abortion has virtually disappeared from Hollywood features. The Cider House Rules, released in 1999 and focusing on an obstetrician-abortionist and his anti-abortion protege during the 1940s, may well have been the last mainstream American movie to utter the A-word.In Europe, it is different: The 2004 indie British drama Vera Drake and the 2007 Romanian film 4 Months, 3 Weeks, 2 Days, which took top honors at Cannes in May, dramatize the peril to women in situations where abortion is not safe and legal.
Also add the currently released August Rush and soon to be released Noelle to the list of decidedly pro-life films:
Why do you think abortion is vanishing from American cinephotography?
[HT: mods Jasper and MK]
November 29, 2007
The jury's out whether I'm suffering from carbohydrate withdrawal or a touch of the flu, but I think it's the former.
I started on The Maker's Diet yesterday, and the author warned I might feel a little nauseous or headachy for a few days. So, sorry, I've been out of it today.
The premise of the book is to get back to eating foods God instructed the Israelites to eat in the form they ate them, organically.
Something the author wrote made me think of the young posters on this site, so many of whom have health problems....
Then there is my generation, affectionately termed "Generation X" - the first generation of young people to suffer in alarming numbers from chronic degenerative and autoimmune diseases such as multiple sclerosis, lupus, chronic fatigue syndrome, Crohn's disease, Type I diabetes, and even Parkinson's disease. The rates of infertility are staggering....
I have been very concerned about the startling number of young people here who are on antidepressants, and have all sorts of maladies, including allergies and ADD. Is diet a key? The more I read, the more I think so.
But I'll not leave we baby boomers out. Here's what he said about us:
The baby boomers of the 1940s and 1950s are clearly the generation of widespread obesity, a health condition leading to diabetes, cancer, and heart disease. It seems that the main reason some baby boomers do not get cancer is because their lives have already been claimed by sudden heart attack.
I'm seeing food in a whole new light. God warned against eating pork, fish without scales like catfish, lobster, crab, etc., because these are all scavenger animals. They eat crap, pardon me. God just didn't make up food rules to be mean. Up until recently when many abandoned orthodoxy, Jews enjoyed superior health to others. Because so many of them survived the Black Plague during the Dark Ages, for instance, they were even accused of causing it by poisoning wells from which they would not drink. Wiki confirms this point from the book.
There's much more, and I'm sure my queasiness may not be the best advertisement for The Maker's Diet (it's pathetic, really), but it makes total sense. And it's not just about food. It discusses Biblical hygiene - which God prescribed thousands of years before doctors learned to wash hands and instruments to maintain germ control - as a way to alleviate colds and flus from ourselves and our children.
I picked up the book at my local Bible book store, but there's also a website.
Ok, back to work.
November 27, 2007
Two points:
From the Associated Press, November 25....
Six-year-old Oscar Jimenez Jr. [pictured below with mom Kathryn] was beaten to death in California, then buried under fertilizer and cement. Two-year-old Devon Shackleford was drowned in an Arizona swimming pool. Jayden Cangro [mom Carly Moore pictured right at grave], also 2, died after being thrown across a room in Utah.
In each case, as in many others every year, the alleged or convicted perpetrator had been the boyfriend of the child's mother - men thrust into father-like roles, which they tragically failed to embrace.Every family is different. Some single mothers bring men into their lives who lovingly help raise children when the biological father is gone for good.

Nonetheless, many scholars and social workers who monitor America's families see the abusive-boyfriend syndrome as part of a broader, deeply worrisome trend. They note an ever-increasing share of America's children grow up in homes without both biological parents, and say the risk of child abuse is markedly higher in the nontraditional family structures."This is the dark underbelly of cohabitation," said Brad Wilcox, a University of Virginia sociologist. "Cohabitation has become quite common, and most people think, 'What's the harm?' The harm is we're increasing a pattern of relationships that's not good for children."...
[Oscar's photo credit: Kansas City Star; Jayden's photo credit: ABC News]
November 21, 2007
Friend Paris Hilton threw a Beverly Hills, Wizard of Oz-themed (Nicole's fav) baby shower this past Sunday for expectant parents Nicole Richie and boyfriend Joel Madden. Nicole is due in January.
But guests were told beforehand their gifts would be donated via the newly created Richie Madden Children's foundation to help moms in need.
Very cool.
There is no website yet, but a press release announcing the formation of the charitable organization states....
Nicole would like to invite friends, family and fans across America to participate in the moms-in-need program and highly publicized baby shower. The Richie Madden Children's Foundation will create and promote an online registry to inspire the purchases of items for moms and their families in need. Anyone in the country will be able buy from the registry on her behalf for the clinic. The registry link will live on the Richie Madden Children's Foundation website for at least six months and will be updated regularly based on the needs of the LA Free Clinic and other participating clinics.
Hollyscoop adds, "Next month, their charity will also donate 100 Mom-to-Be kits to the Los Angeles Free Clinic."
Richie acknowledged having a "bad 'pattern' in her life that was only saved by her child not yet born, who some would consider a nonentity, a blob. She told Diane Sawyer in an August 2 interview:
I owe the baby my life. I owe this baby everything and I have a responsibility now. Besides being responsible for myself, I'm now responsible for someone else. And I have to set the right examples. I have to really be someone that I would want my child to look up to.
She is.
According to ABC, Madden, who is lead singer for the band Good Charlotte, reads his Bible and sports multiple tattoos of Jesus. He told Seventeen magazine in 2005:

Each day, I'd read and think a lot. I also started thinking about God again for the first time in years. My mom is a devout Christian, but I used to be like, Forget about what God wants, I'll do what I want. Yet once I thought about what I really wanted, I realized it was to get close to God. And I knew that I had to stop the things I was doing because God wanted me to respect myself.
November 19, 2007
[HT: friend Karen]
November 14, 2007
I had an opportunity to screen the movie Juno last Thursday, due out December 14.
Turns out we shared the theater with 50 friends and family of Juno's stripper-turned-blogger-turned-debut-movie-writer Diablo Cody, who is from Chicago, which made the experience that much more entertaining.
Juno is the third in an unplanned movie trilogy, the others being Waitress and Knocked Up, where a girl accidentally gets pregnant and grows into a heroine by rejecting abortion as a quick solution.
Social conservatives attempting to break through in movies have not yet mastered the art of getting our point across without coming off preachy.
But it's fascinating to watch the Hollywood and Indie crowd handle one of our premises pretty much the way we'd like it handled....
And here's Juno's premise, by movie reviewer Matthew Turner:
Engaging, frequently hilarious teen comedy with a terrific script, a wonderful cast and a delightful central performance from rising star Ellen Page.Ellen Page stars as brainy 16-year-old Juno MacGuff, who gets pregnant the first time she has sex with fellow virgin Paulie Bleeker (Michael Cera). Unable to go through with an abortion, Juno decides to give the baby up for adoption, so she finds childless couple Mark and Vanessa (Jason Bateman and Jennifer Garner) through the want ads.

However, as Juno spends more time with Mark and Vanessa, she realises that their marriage isn't quite as picture-perfect as it first appeared. Meanwhile, Juno's father (J.K. Simmons), stepmother (Allison Janney) and best friend Leah (Olivia Thirlby) offer as much help as they can.
Here are lessons/positives from Juno I with my pro-life antennae picked up :

And the mill itself? Stereotypically bad! I laughed and laughed and would have clapped if in a room of pro-lifers. The noncaring receptionist's face was piercings-laden. She uncouthly told Juno to list "every score and every sore" after offering her a fruit-flavored condom. Not a pleasant place.

The movie's ending is somewhat a cliff-hanger, unexpected, yet emotionally satisfying. It goes almost as social conservatives would want it but not completely. I have a feeling there will be a few complaints. I got over it.
Juno and its cast are being mentioned as Ocar contenders, which would be very good. Here are other reviews. Here is the trailer:
November 8, 2007
When junior Stephanie Hoffmeier's request to launch The Pro-Life Club at Colonial Forge High School in Stafford, VA, was rejected in August, she sued.
School officials initially said no to the club because "it was not tied to the school curriculum," according to the Washington Post, although the Fellowship of Christian Athletes, Young Republicans, and Young Democrats had been previously accepted.
On October 24, the school backed down. End of story. Yeah.
Kudos to the aforementioned Washington Post for writing a fair story, even though editors apparently couldn't bear to see the word "pro-life" in the headline, even though that was the name of the club, and so entitled the piece, "Teen Wins Fight for Antiabortion Club at School."
[HT: John Jansen at Generations for Life; photo credit of Stephanie and mother Bernadette: Washington Post]
November 3, 2007
My husband and I watched Mr. Brooks on dvd last night, starring Kevin Costner, William Hurt, and Demi Moore, and co-starring Marg Helgenberger.
I didn't realize what I was getting into or I likely wouldn't have rented Mr. Brooks, because it is one of those serial killer movies, and they freak me out.
But I really liked this movie. In fact, I give it 3-1/2 stars, a rarity for me. I love Hurt in any movie, and Costner, who I've never considered a great actor, was great.
So was the plot, for the most part. But there was one plot line that nabbed me. I only review movies with a pro-life theme or thread, and we had one here....
It was similar to the Godfather II thread, which portrayed ruthless mobster Michael Corleone as a fiercely devoted family man who became so enraged when finding out wife Kay had had a secret abortion he slapped her and banned her not just from his life but also from their children's lives.
Here's the trailer for Mr. Brooks:
In Mr. Brooks, the teenage daughter of serial killer Earl Brooks (Costner) turns up pregnant midway through her first semester of college. When Jane tells her parents, Earl emphatically states abortion is out of the question and offers to raise the baby. Jane is equally emphatically abortion minded until that moment, when she says she will reconsider. Typical. If a mother in a crisis pregnancy is offered love and support, she will most often choose life.
I won't give away the end of Mr. Brooks except to say the prospect of his seeing future grandchild became Earl's motivation for a life or death decision.
All of this is way twisted, I know. But similar to Godfather II, even a schizophrenic serial killer knows abortion is wrong, and similar to Godfather II, this became a redeeming quality of one who had no others.
Mr. Brooks' pro-life stance was an obviously planned juxtaposition.
On one hand he was a serial killer no better than Dahmer and Gacy.
On the other, he was pro-life. Of of all possible character attributes, the writer and director chose this as Mr. Brooks' one featured nobility, something they decided demonstrated the exact opposite of the schizophrenic killer mentality.
Why is that?
November 2, 2007
New theatres have been added this weekend.

Last weekend was great!

Tony Bennett loved Bella!
"This film is a work of art.... This is one of the masterpieces.... This is a film that, with our social problem right now between Mexico and the United States, this is the most important film that every citizen in America should go see."
The October 26 "Friday Five" Citizen interview with Eduardo Verastegui included his brush with abortion and his save:
Q: You visited an abortion clinic as part of your research for your part in Bella. Tell me about that.A: This is the biggest, hardest role I’ve done in my life, and on top of that I was producing as well.
I ended up going to an abortion clinic because I wanted to do research - to understand my character and understand the pain she was going through so I could help her. I thought it would be very simple and easy - just get in there, stop the first young lady and ask her a few questions. Of course, I was very naive and I didn't know what was going to happen.

When I got there, I was in shock because I saw all young ladies - 16, 17 years old - going in, and I forgot about the film and I didn't know what to say.I see a group of people outside trying to convince a lady not to do it. A lady in that group pointed me to a couple who didn’t speak English, only Spanish. The couple recognizes me from the soap operas, and we start talking for like 45 minutes and became friends. We talked about life and faith and Mexico and her dreams. And she missed her appointment.
I called her the next day and said, "Listen, I don't believe in coincidences; I was there for a reason." So we built a friendship through the phone.
Months later I receive a call from a man who was there that day and he tells me he has great news: his baby was born yesterday, and he wanted to ask me permission to name him Eduardo.
I couldn’t even talk. I just started crying.
I didn’t plan to do that, but I was used by the grace of God as an instrument to save this beautiful baby. Even if Bella doesn’t sell one ticket, I rejoice in the Lord for little Eduardo.
[HT: Citizen article: reader Sheri K.]
October 29, 2007
First, in an October 27 column, "'Bella' and the pro-life film trend," Brent Bozell of Media Research Center wrote:
The bohemian worldview of Woodstock Nation is in some ways dominant, and in some ways passe in our popular culture.... [T]he "free love" spirit of "if it feels good, do it" still runs strong, especially in our entertainment world. And yet, burbling beneath a noisy culture of sexual excess and self-love, there's a quiet undercurrent in our movies carrying subtle, and even obvious, pro-life themes.
Bozell gives examples of recent film releases: Children of Men, Waitress, Knocked Up, and Bella (pictured above right).
I would add another, due out this holiday season, Juno, starring Jennifer Garner, Jason Bateman, Ellen Page, and Rainn Wilson (Dwight Schrute for Office fans) [HT: moderator MK]:
Back to Bella, you done good....
Bella finished #3 among movies opening this week, #17 overall, while in only 5-8% of theatres showing the #1 and #2 movies. Just imagine had Bella been allowed the same wide distribution....
In head to head competition, Bella came in #2 for receipts ($) garnered per theatre.
BoxOfficeGuru reported, "Also showing strength in its debut was the inspirational tale Bella...."
Here are the weekend estimates, from Box Office Mojo. Click to enlarge. See complete chart here.
October 27, 2007
Let's talk about the documentary we're watching on Fox News, Facing Reality: Choice....
My notes from the show are on page 2.
Now that the documentary is over, what did you think? Did it help, hurt, or not make a difference in the debate?
UPDATE, 10/28, 7a: We are gratetful to have heard from Bobbie in the comments section last night, the sister of Brooke, the third mother in the Fox News documentary....
Brooke and husband Tom learned when their preborn baby Marlee was 20 weeks old that she was stricken with a fatal chromosomal disorder, Trisomy 18, and would likely not live beyond hours or days after delivery.
Brooke was given the option of aborting, a terribly misguided attempt to assuage a mother's grief, which it does not. Aborting a handicapped baby has the opposite of the intended affect. Then a mother has live her entire life knowing she killed her particularly helpless baby rather than protect him or her according to the maternal mother bear instincts God has placed within women. I have spoken to these mothers, who live tortured lives of guilt and regret.
I have also spoken and read stories of mothers who allowed God to determine life and death, and I have never ever heard of a mother - or family - who regretted taking this path.
Bobbie wished Fox News had shown a picture of Marlee. I'm honored to:

Bobbie also recommended visiting a website dedicated to Marlee, here.
Bobbie has also composed a touching video, which I cried through, about Marlee. Brooke, Tom, and Bobbie, thank you for letting us share in the love and grief of your short time with Marlee:
JLS notes from documentary
First pregnant mother, Kayla....
A product herself of a crisis pregnancy....
Her commitment to abstinence kept Kayla chaste throughout high school....
Got on the pill; got sloppy with taking it. Typical of youth. Did whatever "comprehensive sex ed" she got with the pill work? No. Anytime a woman goes on the pill, the doctor, nurse, or health clinic assume responsibility.
Fayetteville abortion mill: William Harrison. Sinister man. I've had conversations with him.
Second pregnant mother, Jeanne, 29 years old, pregnant with 6th baby. Does not have custody of first 4. Placed 5th drug addicted baby for adoption less than a year ago.
Adopted, yet "would never give my kid up for adoption." Don't get that.
Another product of "comprehensive sex ed" failure....
Third pregnant mother, Brooke....
This is typical. Most handicapped babies are conceived into wanted homes.
Ultrasound at 20 weeks: abnormal. Amniocentesis: Trisomy 18 (extra 18th chromosome). 70% of these babies don't survive to delivery. (So why abort?) Others will generally die within hours to days after birth.
Abortionist William Harrison. Heinous man. Has aborted between 10-20k babies. "I'm not in the business of murdering children. I'm in the business of saving the lives of my patients." Those sentences make absolutely no sense.
Kayla is aborting. The drug is what makes her weepy says the nurse. Bull.
"Last time"? Second time aborter, less than a year ago. Her Mom is helping her. Grandmother watching her grandchild being killed. Can't comprehend.
Jeanne again. Called her boyfriend, who did not want her to abort. So she planned not to. She miscarried.
Pregnant again?! Says adoption is her only option. That's good. Placing the baby with parents of her previous adoptive baby. Whoops, rethinking. Baby due after show airs - February 2008.
Brooke again.
Brooke describes being in shock when told the diagnosis, of course. Yet her doctor asked if she wanted to terminate at that time. Feeling the pressure... the clock ticking... in a surreal situation... very unfair to ask of these vulnerable mothers.
Baby died 20 minutes before birth. Family surrounding her. I've never known a mom who regretted leaving her baby's life and death in God's hands. But I've met several moms who regretted terminating. Of course.
I will live blog thoughts about Fox Cable New's documentary, Facing Reality: Choice, tonight beginning when its starts at 9p EST (8p CST, etc.) and welcome you to live blog alongside me with your analyses.
I spotlighted this documentary and my concerns on October 24. Every clip of the show's promos now includes that kindly looking abortionist creep William Harrison, which makes my skin crawl.
Fox commentator Fr. Jonathan Morris wrote reassuring words about the documentary....
On Saturday evening at 9 p.m. ET, the FOX News Channel will air a provocative documentary also about abortion and "choice." Executive producer, Brian Gaffney, described to me his team's work in this way: "This show has no political handicapping, no medical experts, and no Constitutional analysis. We simply follow three women as they decide what to do about their problem or unwanted pregnancies."This includes toting FOX cameras into an operating room with a 20-year-old student as she undergoes an abortion. Facing Reality, Choice, hosted by E.D. Hill and produced by Rachel Feldman, also documents the story of Brooke and Tom who bring to full-term a child with a fatal disease, knowing it will only survive a few hours after birth. I have not seen the documentary, but if it lives up to the advertisement, it will be groundbreaking in its ability to make us consider, once again, what "choice" is all about....

We hear a lot of chatter about the politics of abortion, but rarely do we hear anyone talk about my abortion, or my wife's abortion, or the child we almost aborted. Similarly, we rarely hear discussion about how to support women in the midst of their agonizing decisions, often forced upon them by irresponsible men.Until we see up-close what "choice" really is and what its consequences are, we will, I'm afraid, forever be a country held bondage by sterilized debates that have nothing to do with women, children, or the good of society.
Storytelling may be the best way to break the impasse, and it all starts this weekend. Tune in....
October 26, 2007
The movie Bella opens tonight, and if possible, please see it this weekend. The first weekend of a film's opening is its most important.
Bella is an indy movie with a strong pro-life theme, which I think explains why it has juxtaposedly received wide audience acclaim at film festivals (see awards above) but halfhearted if not panned critical acclaim and difficulty nabbing a distributor.
Here's the trailer....
Bella is playing in limited theatres. Find the one closest to you here.
Today's Philadelphia Daily News provides background info:
In the world of independent movies, the road from script to screen is paved with land mines. There are budget issues, talent issues, production problems, and if the film ever gets completed, there's the biggest roadblock of all: How do you get people to see it?Every low-budget film has a crazy story behind it and "Bella," (opening today... ) is no exception.... (Continue reading story on page 2.)
Last week at the FRC Washington Briefing I posted Eduardo Verastegui's story. He is described as the Brad Pitt of Latin America. Eduardo has the male lead in Bella. Here it is again:
I saw Bella in the worst possible conditions, on a portable screen in an uncomfortable chair with cheap speaker sound in an acoustically abysmal room anyway, and I still thought it was good. Can't wait to see it in the right environment. Hope you will, too.Philadelphia Daily News
'Bella' took an interesting path to the screen
By HOWARD GENSLER
gensleh@phillynews.com 215-854-5678
In the world of independent movies, the road from script to screen is paved with land mines. There are budget issues, talent issues, production problems, and if the film ever gets completed, there's the biggest roadblock of all: How do you get people to see it?
Every low-budget film has a crazy story behind it and "Bella," (opening today, review on Page 61) is no exception.
Eustace Wolfington looks more like a CEO than a Hollywood slickster. A stately senior, he wears conservative suits, and made his money in the car business - first as a Chevy dealer in Roxborough and later as the pioneer of auto leasing.
A couple of years ago, his nephew Sean, who was interested in the movie business, came to him with some Mexican filmmakers - including director Alejandro Gomez Monteverde and actor Eduardo Verástegui - an idea and a dream.
"They hadn't even finished the script yet," Eustace Wolfington said in the Daily News office Wednesday. "But they put a screen up, I looked at their short films and they blew my mind.
"Before they left that night, we had a deal for $3 million on a handshake. We never had a contract."
"Bella" was shot on location in New York City in 35 mm, a speedy 24-day shoot. When filming finished, there was only $250,000 left in the budget for color correcting, sound and music, but industry veterans fell in love with the film and waived their usual fees.
"One of the guys cried his eyes out and said 'I'll do it,' " Wolfington said.
"We had to get rid of a lot of the songs," because of budget constraints, Wolfington said, but then Spanish singer Alejandro Sanz saw the movie and donated two his songs.
Tammy Blanchard, "Bella's" female star, had a scheduling conflict with a role in Robert De Niro's "The Good Shepherd," and according to Wolfington, De Niro, and Blanchard's own agent, tried to get her to pull out of the indie film.
"Tammy said, 'If I can't do "Bella," I won't do "Good Shepherd," ' " Wolfington said.
"Bella" got accepted to the 2006 Toronto International Film Festival when festival staffers ganged up on the fest director, who wanted to pass on the film.
"No one was paying any attention to us," Wolfington said, "and we win the whole thing." "Bella" left Toronto with the People's Choice Award, previously won by films such as "American Beauty" and "Hotel Rwanda."
Distribution seemed a sure thing.
"We were right at the top," Wolfington said. "Everyone wanted the film. Then they all backed out because no one knew how to market it."
Roadside Attractions and Lionsgate came on board with distribution support only a month ago, and "Bella" recently won the $100,000 first prize at the Heartland Film Festival held in Indianapolis.
"It's the first money the movie's made," Wolfington joked.
The first-time film financier said "Anyone who's sensitive will love this movie."
It's a good thing filmgoers tend to be more sensitive than film critics because "Bella" has been taking some knocks. The movie, however, got a spiritual thumbs-up Tuesday when it was endorsed by Cardinal Justin Rigali, archbishop of Philadelphia.
"["Bella"] has a message that is so connected to life, to the problems of life, the challenges of life, the value of life," Rigali said. "This film, I believe, is destined to have an extraordinary impact on people's lives." *
"Bella" is playing in selected area theaters. It premiered locally last night at the UA King of Prussia.
October 24, 2007
Just in time for Halloween, reader Jess has sent me an intriguing video produced by the Festival Travel Channel wherein "Melody visits a Haunted House in Brooklyn based on the fundamentalist Christian's Hell House."
What sets this Hell House apart is it was produced and staged by Les Freres Corbusier, an off-Broadway professional acting troupe, which earned it rave reviews. For the most part, the troupe tried to stick true to the original intent with no sarcasm, so the whole thing is a mix of the bizarre, shocking, scary, camp, and sometimes embarrassing, all the while very well done.
What is a hell house? Les Freres Corbusier explained....
... a nearly exact recreation of the thousands of hell houses staged by Christian Evangelicals in communities across America during the Halloween season. First staged by Jerry Falwell in the 1970s, hell houses take a traditional haunted house's ghosts and ghouls and substitute teenage cheerleaders getting abortions, gay men dying of AIDS, and secular humanists sipping lattes.
Here is the NY Times review of the production. And a couple others:
"Stange and sinfully entertaining." ~ New York Sun"The edgiest entertainment in the city!" ~ New York Observer
"Pretty much the entire journey has immediate shock/laugh value, but over the next few days I find myself disturbed. I didn't get The Passion of the Christ, the movie, but I'm closer to an understanding of His passion thanks to the Les Freres production of this Hell House" ~ Curtain Up
I didn't think I could sit through Melody's half hour tour of Hell House, but I did. In case you're not sure you want to invest the time, here's a 2:30 preview:
And here's the entire show, complete with an abortion depiction, also from the baby's perspective. There's a bit of a surprise ending, and Melody's interview with the Columbinesque actor after that is interesting.
[Photo credit: NYT]
October 22, 2007
Yesterday afternoon, my daughter Daena and I went to the Corcoran Gallery of Art in DC to view the just opened exhibit, Annie Leibovitz: A Photographer's Life, 1990-2005.
I have always loved Leibovitz's work, from the Lennon/Ono shot taken just hours before he was literally shot in 1981, to Queen Elizabeth's portrait taken by Leibovitz just this year, and everything in between.
But I should have known I could not escape the liberal agenda even there.
Naive me, I didn't know until yesterday Leibovitz is a lesbian....
But she infused her entire exhibit with photos of the life and slow demise of her lover, Susan Sontag, who not incidentally died of breast cancer in 2004, prevalent among lesbians because they forego the protection of child-bearing.
It was certainly Leibovitz's right to push her sexual preference on us as well as her pro-abortion position in another photo of a man with a "I am pro-choice" button as his most prominent feature.
It was Leibovitz's right to exhibit several warm photos of the Clintons alongside several harsh, cold photos of the Bush cabinet.
But the exhibit only served to drain me.
Still, there's always hope. Here's a photo from the exhibit Leibovitz took in 1993 of AIDS activist and beseiged Rebecca Denison. I couldn't find a large clear view of the color portrait we saw, so I am including a large b&w so you can read the words on Denison's body with a thumbnail of the color, so you can see the art intended (click to enlarge):
Note one word missing from what comprises a woman: MOTHER.
But in 2001 Leibovitz gave birth to a daughter at the age of 52 with the help of donated sperm and had twins by surrogate in 2004. So she's evolving as a woman in her own lesbian way.
To be fair, Leibovitz celebrated motherhood in 1991 with a nude photo of very pregnant Demi Moore for the cover of Vanity Fair, and there were other photos of pregnant women in the exhibit, including one of Leibovitz nude - who is no Demi Moore, but at least she's honest.
But Leibovitz's polarized polaroid political statements overshadowed all else.
October 16, 2007
A company called Party City must be run by pedophiles. Here are some of its costume options for girls:
"French Maid":

Is there any earthly reason to promote costumes like this other than to sexualize little girls? See more on page 2.
"Devil Grrrl":

"Major Flirt":

"Little Red Riding Hood":

"Runway Diva":

"Devil Bride":

"Alley Cat":

"Aqua Fairy":

"Bad Spirit":

[HT: moderator MK]
October 11, 2007
Over the course of 18 years, director Tony Kaye filmed a 2-1/2 hour documentary about abortion called Lake of Fire, released on a limited scale 1 week ago. By limited I mean one theater in NY. It will open in LA this Friday, likely on just as small a scale.
I first read about Lake of Fire when it debuted at the Toronto Film Festival last September. I had hoped to personally review it, but this now appears unlikely until it is released on dvd. Instead, I will piece together a review based on reviews, all by pro-abort movie critics as far as I can tell. All who identified their positions were such. Before I go on, here's the trailer:
Despite anticipating skewed reviews, I was interested to read their take since I knew the movie was bookended by footage of two abortions - the first late-term and the last early-term. Most pro-aborts avoid the truth of abortion like the plague that it is. But because Kaye, one of their own, made the documentary, reviewers let down their guard and agreed with the need to sit through them for balance and objectivity's sake.
Sniffed TV Guide's Ken Fox:
Showing the torn arms and legs and crushed skulls of aborted fetuses as they're washed and reassembled on a steel tray (the only way to ensure a late-term abortion is complete) simultaneously reveals a plain, painful truth about abortion while defusing one of the radical pro-life movement's favorite tactics of displaying graphic photos of aborted babies by finally putting them into their proper context
I can't imagine how showing an abortion "defus[es]" our "tactics" by putting abortion in its "proper context." But whatever.
LOF's title comes from Scripture quoted by a pro-lifer in the movie, Rev. 20:12-15. Kaye shot the film mostly throughout the 90s, using footage of the 2006 SD abortion ban battle to reflect back.
Almost every reviewer thought LOF was important. How important? Tom Hall:
I believe that in 20 years time, as our nation's political landscape changes in whatever ways it will, we will return to Lake of Fire... as an essential documentary; A piece of the cinematic puzzle of our nation. I knew Lake Of Fire would be difficult (any responsible film about the issue of abortion must be), but I was not prepared for the film's epic complexity; I have used the word masterpiece on this site before, but Lake of Fire is one of the most important documentary films ever made. Shot entirely on gorgeous black and white film and utilizing extreme close-ups of many of his interview subjects to tremendous effect, Kaye... has crafted what is, both aesthetically, politically, and cinematically, what I can only imagine will be remembered as the film of record about our battle over a woman's right to choose an abortion....[T]he film is much more than a simple roll-call of the names and faces that have lead the fight over abortion rights in the last two decades; it is, quite simply, a devastating chronicle of America's slow and steady slide into political intolerance. With unimaginable access to people on both sides of the issue, Kaye refuses to flinch from the comprehensive presentation that the subject requires.... Most difficult of all, two abortion procedures are shown in detail.
Against that backdrop, reviewers had a hard time stomaching the film. Kenneth Morefield:
Watching it... comprised two of the most grueling hours of my life.
... sprawling, scary, nearly unbearable film....
It's certainly not the heated debate they had a hard time with. Still, reviewers agreed Kaye was evenhanded. By that they meant he devoted much footage to pro-life extremists. According to John Horn of the LA Times:
[H]e clearly is drawn to people on the fringes of the debate, chiefly religious activists who feel they are called by God to demonize and even kill abortion providers.
I couldn't help but think that nearly all the pro-lifers interviewed came across as deeply disturbed, with a couple of exceptions.

Even so, there was still truth in the cliched debate for those with eyes. The New York Post's Kyle Smith:
While Kaye portrays nearly all abortion defenders as eloquent and reasonable, he doesn't seem to notice how often these activists change the subject to things no reasonable person supports, such as racism and gay bashing.
Because he offput pro-lifers while devoting so much time to offputting pro-aborts by the graphic display of abortion, reviewers wondered who would want to watch the film, and which side was more convincing?
We don't know who will watch the film, but I do know which side had the greatest impact, and it was the pro-life side, because, thank God, Kaye showed the reality of abortion. That's all it takes. Pro-lifers are used to being called nutcases and most let it roll off. But pictures are worth a thousand words and make stereotyping of pro-lifers worth it.
The New York Times' Manohla Dargis:
Not everyone will agree about the abortion visuals, including, perhaps, those who worry that such explicit imagery can speak louder than any pro-abortion-rights argument. It's an understandable concern.

Because they are filmed (the dead woman is immortalized in a still photograph), the abortions are unnerving, which is why I suggest that the faint of heart skip the rest of this paragraph. After the first operation, a second-trimester abortion, the doctor sorts through a tray of fetal parts, including a perfect-looking tiny hand and a foot, to make sure that nothing has been left inside the patient, which might lead to poisoning or even death. The doctor then holds up the severed fetal head. One eerily bulging eye looks as if it's staring into the camera and somehow at us....It's possible that Mr. Kaye opted to show several abortions because he wanted viewers, particularly those sympathetic to a woman's right to abortion, to understand what stirs some people not just to action, but also to kill doctors. If nothing else, the first abortion in the film (of a 20-week-old fetus, though that information is not in the film) reinforces what an abstraction the term pro-choice really is. Abortion does end the life of something.
It's disconcerting, after all, to see what abortion actually looks like; if your beliefs around abortion are based on holding it firmly in your mind that a fetus is just tissue and an abortion a medical procedure no more morally meaningful than an appendectomy, you may be a little turned off by seeing a doctor measuring a tiny severed foot. The more graphic dead-baby abortion footage in the film is mostly from later-term abortions, but we also see abortion from the doctor's perspective, planted firmly between the stirrup-splayed legs of naked women....
No matter where people stand on the issue, the abortion Kaye presents just 20 minutes into the film will certainly become indelible to many: Concerned that he leave no fragments of an aborted fetus in his patient's uterus, a doctor reassembles the body parts -- tiny feet, arms, a head with a clearly discernible face -- into a nearly intact whole. And the camera never blinks.
NPR's Bob Mondello:

Still, when the focus narrows to the personal - to the story of a woman undergoing first counseling and then the actual procedure of terminating her pregnancy, for instance, or to the transformation of Roe v. Wade's original "Jane Roe" into a fervent right-to-lifer - the film becomes undeniably powerful in its specifics.
And the two most memorable portions of the film are powerful propaganda for pro-lifers. The scenes of shredded bloody fetuses at a clinic contain some of the most shocking, revolting footage I've ever seen.
Chris Cabin of FilmCritics.com:
None of the footage outweighs the sight of the actual procedure, which is shown twice as a set of bookends for the film. At first rather faceless, easy-going and clinical, the first procedure only becomes shocking when the doctor explains how he must put together the aftermath to make sure they got it all, holding the gelatinous beginnings of a head between his thumb and forefinger. By actualizing the event early, Kaye guides us into the argument with fresh eyes.
Fresh eyes. Sick pun.
Read more reviews here.
September 28, 2007
I have actually said every one of these except, "No texting at the table." That nuisance came after my kids were grown... lol....
[HT: reader rosie]
From the Daily Mail, September 27:
Kimberly [Mueller] is the smallest baby ever born in Germany and the youngest to survive.She was just 10.2 inches long and weighed little more than a packet of butter [10-1/2 ounces] when she arrived in the 25th week of her mother's pregnancy....
Kimberly's progress was underlined when she arrived home this week weighing five and a half pounds and measuring 17 inches....


And from the Daily Mail, September 26...
A Siberian woman who gave birth to her 12th child - doing more than her fair share to stem Russia's population decline - was stunned to find that little Nadia weighed in at a massive 17.1 lb.Nadia was delivered by caesarean section in the local maternity hospital in the Altai region on September 17, joining eight sisters and three brothers, a local reporter said....


One of the commenters to this story wrote, "Even the little one on the right looks shocked."
I'm betting Mom had undiagnosed gestational diabetes.
[HT: friend Michelle]
September 24, 2007
The last time we discussed The View conservative co-host Elisabeth Hasselbeck, she had just announced she was pregnant, which caused liberal co-host Rosie O'Donnell to blog she was hence too delicate to debate any longer about 9/11 conspiracies or the Iraq War. But when Rosie couldn't help herself and broke her promise, she stepped in it and then tried to blame Elisabeth two days later. But when Elizabeth more than held her own, Rosie got her feelings hurt (interesting to rewatch) and quit the show early. Score one for the power of pregnant mothers.
That was May. My, how Elisabeth has blossomed throughout the summer, to the point she is gracing the cover of the November issue of Pregnancy magazine. So cute, and one tiny sign we are breaking the stronghold of liberal political correctness
Elisabeth answered questions of interest in an interview inside....
PM: Pregnancy hormones and all, how on earth did you keep it together so well during your big argument with Rosie on The View?
EH: I think when you're pregnant, it kind of goes one way or the other. I almost had the same feeling in me as when I had a championship [softball] game and I was up to bat and the pressure was on. I'm very lucky that tears didn't come out. But unfortunately when a woman cries, it's never seen as a sign of strength and never seen in a positive light. A man cries and he's sensitive, and a woman cries and she's weak. So, even when you're debating another woman, the first person to cry pretty much loses.
PM: What are the challenges of being a conservative mother in 2007?
EH: Being a conservative mother isn't the challenge. Being a conservative in New York City on television is the challenge. Once I had [2-year-old] Grace, I had more reassurance and affirmation as to why I have felt the things that I've felt for a long time. And as a mom, now I want to make sure that the decisions I'm making and the votes that I'm casting are going to create long-term benefits for Grace and my next child and hopefully more to come after that.
September 21, 2007
That's us. We're the new media. We find, report, and discuss what the old media, known in the blog world as MSM - the mainstream media - can't or won't.
A citizen journalist using the pseudonym Laura Mansfield incredibly found the most recent al-Quaida/bin Laden video before they were ready to go public with it:
I know many here can identify with Mansfield's blogging habits, outlined in an accompanying September 20 AP story. And if a pro-lifer substitutes the words "abortion industry" or "Planned Parenthood" for "jihadists," one can personally relate what she does with what we do....
Once her son is off to school, Laura Mansfield settles in at her dining room table with her laptop and begins trolling Arabic-language message boards and chat rooms popular with jihadists....She sometimes spends 100 hours a week online....
"It's really important to understand what the jihadists think and how they're planning on doing things," she said....
Actress Ellen Burstyn was in town attending the Toronto Film Festival the week September 6-14 in part to attend a screening of the classic movie in which she starred, Alice Doesn't Live Here Anymore.
While being interviewed on CFRB radio, the 74-year-old actress was asked what was the lowest moment of her life.
And for the first time, she publicly disclosed it:
Burstyn: You know, I guess, I hate to talk about this on the air, but having an abortion. You know that was really an extremely painful experience.Interviewer: Did you feel you didn't have a choice?
Burstyn: At the time I was just young and dumb, I didn't really want to have a baby then. It was the wrong thing to do and I really didn't understand that till later. That was very very painful, that was probably the worst. I try not to allow regret to settle over me like a shroud, because I think its an unhealthy way to live.
[HT: LifeSiteNews.com via moderator MK; photo courtesy of Evan Agostini/Getty Images]
September 19, 2007
Don't know who cancelled who. Barry Manilow says he "bowed out" and The View says it cancelled him before he could.
Bottom line is Manilow didn't want to sit at the same roundtable as token conservative View co-host Elizabeth Hasselbeck. Manilow told TMZ: "I strongly disagree with her views. I think she's dangerous and offensive. I will not be on the same stage as her."
Here's his version of the story (click to enlarge):
And here's The View's version....
Either way, alienating one's fan base is never a good idea. Ask the Dixie Chicks. And it appears the cowardly crooner is already sorry. According to today's Starpulse News Blog:
Barry Manilow is already regretting sparking a feud with the co-hosts of the TV show The View - because that's all people want to talk to him about....However now the Mandy singer is beginning to regret the whole fuss - because it's all people want to talk about when he appears on other shows. Angry Manilow got so tired of one Fox TV interviewers' questions, he snapped, "Alright, stop! I'm sorry this thing had to happen. Let's just talk about the album, OK?"
No, Barry, it didn't have to happen. You wrote this song, pardon the pun. As an all too typical liberal who is intolerant of opposing views, you made your bed, so you're going to have to sleep in it. (Speaking of, neither do liberals like the consequences of who they sleep with in that bed.)
But still, this is all really sad for me. I used to love Copacobana back in the disco days.
[HT: moderator MK]
September 13, 2007
As an off-topic pop culture feature, on September 10 I posted Britney Spears' poor performance at the MTV Awards the night before.
On the O'Reilly Factor last night, comedian and Hollywood insider Dennis Miller made sobering points:
I don't want to be the last person to tell a joke about Britney Spears before she kills herself. I'll be honest with you. That girl looks like she's right at the brink. I guess it's the only punctuation mark that a Marilyn Monroe act-alike can put on themselves, or a Chris Farley with John Belushi. I don't know what's going on there, but it looks so dangerous to me right now that I just hope somebody steps in.... This girl looks right on the brink of ending it to me....
I know the human condition is not as noble as we imagine it to be sometimes. But we should all at least concede that if we are going to ogle this thing from here on in it has become a bit of a grotesquery, and we're active participants in her demise if we don't just step in right now and say we're not interested 'til you pull it back together, and the people around you.... Save your life, then we'll talk....
Carl's Jr., a company that can be called nothing less than creative for connecting a sexy Paris washing cars to hamburgers, is at it again.
And here's one for their Hardee's brand....
Appropriate? I'll bet none of the conservative pro-lifers on this site think so. How about you liberals? Do you have no problem with these?
[HT: Dr. Frank]
One of our young pro-life feminist commenters, prettyinpink, advocates accomodating pregnant mothers to lower the abortion rate.
One of our moderators, Lauren, has told her horror story of being discriminated against in college when she became pregnant.
Is this an example of discrimination? From the Associated Press, September 12:
A breast-feeding mother who wants extra breaks so she can pump milk during the licensing exam that she needs to secure a prestigious medical residency has asked a Massachusetts judge to settle her dispute with the board that administers it....
Sophie Currier has completed a joint M.D./Ph.D. program at Harvard University while having two babies in the last two years. Her goal is a residency at Massachusetts General Hospital and a career in medical research."The one requirement is to pass this exam," she said Tuesday.
Currier, 33, requested extra break time during the nine-hour test, saying that if she does not nurse her 4-month-old daughter, Lea, or pump breast milk every two to three hours she risks medical complications.
The National Board of Medical Examiners, which administers the test, said it understands the needs of breast-feeding mothers but cannot grant extra time for pumping....
"If we are variable in the time that's allotted to trainees, we alter the performance of the examination," board spokeswoman Dr. Ruth Hoppe said.
Currier filed a petition in state Superior Court in Massachusetts asking the court to intervene and grant her the extra time during the test later this month....
Currier... has already received special accommodations under the Americans with Disabilities Act for dyslexia and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; she can take the nine-hour test, which is offered throughout the nation several times a year, over two days instead of one. She is seeking an extra 60-minute break each day to pump breast milk....
Hoppe said other nursing mothers who have taken the exam have found the 45 minutes of permitted break time sufficient.
"We've had women who either fed their infant or pumped during their break time," she said.
But Dr. Ruth Lawrence, who chairs the American Academy of Pediatrics' breast-feeding section, called the medical examining board's position too rigid.
"It's a classic institutional response," said Lawrence.... "You would hope that everyone in the medical profession had an appreciation for the tremendous importance of breast-feeding one's infant."
Medical authorities have long touted the benefits of breast-feeding for mother and baby. Lawrence said the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that babies be fed breast milk exclusively for the first six months of life and that they continue to nurse for at least six more months while other foods are added to their diets.
Some employers have made accommodations for breast-feeding mothers such as providing lactation rooms for pumping in private, but federal anti-discrimination laws do not protect nursing mothers.
The Breastfeeding Promotion Act, pending in Congress, would protect women from being fired or punished for pumping or nursing during breaks.
It appears the medical board is being unreasonable. Here are details on the time being requested. Per the Boston Globe, September 10:
Currier... [said] the 45 minutes of free time allowed over the course of the nine-hour exam was not enough for her to expel milk in addition to eating and using the restroom.
Per Currier's blog:
[W]hen I called NBME in to ask if they would give me 20 minutes of extended break time during the 9 to 10 hour period in which I would be taking USMLE step 2, I was shocked when they replied "no, nursing is not a permanent condition".
Per WCVBTV, September 12:
"Because it's physically impossible for a nursing mom to go nine hours or nine-and-a-half hours without expressing milk, I told them that they were putting me in a position of choosing between nursing my child and taking this exam and advancing my career," Currier said...."I think that it's actually discriminating against women because men don't have to do this job. No male will ever have to face this problem of deciding between feeding (his) child and taking an exam," Currier said.
The Boston Globe reports that the NBME's request for this case to be held in federal rather than state court will be decided in court today. Currie's side says this is a ploy by the NBME to delay the case until after the exam when the point is mute.
September 6, 2007
Here's what we did on Labor Day. We watched the first two Bourne movies on dvd at home and then drove to the theatre and watched the third. Ooh la la, they were great.
And never mind that Matt Damon is a flaming liberal who tosses around the word misogynist. He was born to play Bourne. Wish there were more to come, but alas, he says no. Bad abortion joke: My husband quipped #4 could be Bourne Alive.
At any rate, I guess we were not alone in our analysis. Moviefone took a poll on Summer movies 2007, and out of 14 categories (click to enlarge):
And the theatric bane of pro-abort existence, Knocked Up, was popular, too....
Click to enlarge:
Why are both these cartoons true?

Townhall.com, September 4

Tribune Media Services, September 6
August 31, 2007
Ten years ago today, Princess Diana was killed in a car accident in Paris. She is another of those pop icons I studied and admired. She was a wonderful mother and humanitarian. She used her spotlight for good. She was a gorgeous fashionista. She was flawed, but we all are.
At least for me, Princess Diana's death created another of those freeze frames in life, like when President Kennedy died, or 9/11, or the Challenger accident. I was in church when I heard, between Sunday School and the worship service. I was so shocked I couldn't concentrate after that, truly saddened.
When I spent one day in Paris a couple years ago, the tunnel where she died was a must see. Such a tragic, surreal place.
Where were you? What are your thoughts, good, bad, or indifferent?
August 30, 2007
Evan Marc Katz, author of two books, I Can't Believe I'm Buying This Book - A Commonsense Guide to Successful Internet Dating, and Why You're Still Single: Things Your Friends Would Tell You If You Promised Not to Get Mad, wrote a Yahoo article, "10 Classic Online Dating Mistakes That Women Make." He listed this as #10:
Mistake #10: Thinking That Your Great Date Actually Meant Something

Have you ever had a man say how much he likes you, how sexy you are, and how he's serious about finding a long-term relationship? Ever have an amazing date where the chemistry was great, the conversation flowed, and you hooked up with him afterwards.Have you ever had a man do all of these things and then NOT call?
No, you're not crazy or delusional....
Your mistake is thinking that what a man says on a date actually means something. It doesn't. It means he's being in the moment. So don't put too much weight on a great date. The only way you can tell how a man REALLY feels about you is by how quickly he follows up for another date.
Feminists to the Rescue took issue with that:
In short, ladies, your mistake is in expecting men to follow up on their word. Your mistake is to expect more out of men than what they normally give you as a second-class citizen. That's your mistake, not theirs....Oi. Hate catchy little lists about what's so wrong with women that they can't get a wonderful man to date them. Really hate them.
I can't believe but can that Katz declared men innocent of exploiting women for sex as simply "being in the moment," when thousands of years of the same sad story prove there's usually premeditation involved. He even quoted the classic come-on lines.
And while Feminists caught Katz's sexism (dare I say, misogyny?), she missed the real mistake women make here that keeps them from getting a "wonderful man." Did you catch it?
I said the other day I wasn't vouching, just reporting, on an August 26 Times Online article that reported Amnesty International may have "duped" some stars who sang on a recent fundraising album after which AI added abortion as a "human right." Specifically, the article tagged two potentially "duped" singers:
[Christina] Aguilera, 26, is a devout American Catholic. She is reportedly expecting her first child and has taken part in a television show in which she interviewed a teenager who had kept her baby rather than have an abortion.[Avril] Lavigne, 22, is a French-Canadian from a tight-knit Christian family. Her song Keep Holding On is the backing track to a pro-life video on YouTube that declares "abortion is murder."...
Pro-life bloggers have been running with this while pro-aborts desperate for it not to be so have found Aguilera to have a pro-abort history. Whew, although they'd better stand guard. Who knows if she'll rethink things if indeed pregnant?
And if that's all there is, it is weak to conclude Lavigne is pro-life because one of her songs was used in a YouTube video. But here 'tis, at any rate.
[Photo of Aguilera, supposed evidence she is sporting a "baby bump," is courtesy of Waleg.com, August 24]
![[Jill Stanek]](/images/jill_try2.gif)