« Botched abortion at Planned Parenthood, Naples, FL  |  Home  |  Dispute over ownership of "Rock for Life" brand »
May 25, 2010

(Prolifer)ations 5-25-10

Thumbnail image for blog buzz.jpg

by Susie Allen, host of the blog, Pro-Life in TN

  • Barbara of Mommy Life showcases an article by Lloyd Marcus, who challenges the black community on their support of Obama and boldly asks whether their desire to see a black man in the White House trumps their commitment to Christ....

  • Rai's Mundo draws attention to FL Gov. Charlie Crist 's statement that he and his new wife were both troubled by the pending ultrasound bill's "notion that women would be lectured to... during this deeply personal decision." Rai points out the oddity of the Governor's argument, remarking, "I get lectured by my dentist twice a year for not flossing more."

  • Pro-Life Action League gives an update on the successful protest of PP CEO Cecile Richards' appearance in Cedar Rapids, IA including slide show and links to all news stories.

  • Dr. Gerard Nadal continues to explore the controversy of the excommunicated nun in Phoenix who authorized the abortion of an 11-week-old preborn baby. He includes an interesting email exchange with a pediatric cardiologist, Judith Becker, M.D. who takes exception with his writings on this issue. Under the HIPAA law, no information should be given out on this issue to protect the privacy of the woman, yet the hospital is leaking information favorable to its decision.

  • Christina at RealChoice pulls together a requested retrospect of her posts concerning late term abortions including her posts about the late Dr. Tiller. They are conveniently grouped by topic.

  • Carol of Parenting Freedom highlights articles and studies showing the risk of repeated ultrasounds during pregnancy.

    • Posted 05/25/10 at 3:30 PM


    Comments:

    Here's something I don't understand.....

    If pro-aborts believe abortion is "health care," then why are they so against giving women actual information? Pro-aborts insist on keeping women in the dark. Abortion is cloaked in secrecy and obfuscation. How can a woman make an informed "choice" if you don't even give her information? How is that a choice at all?

     Posted by: MaryLee at May 25, 2010 3:38 PM


    It is all about the money trail Mary Lee.

     Posted by: Susie at May 25, 2010 4:05 PM


    The concerns over the use of ultrasound as an educational tool for pregnant women can be overcome by using files (with patient information deleted to avoid HIPAA violations) of fetuses of the same age or using plastic or computer models of children of the same age. Concerns over ultrasound should NOT be the wedge the pro-abortionists use to keep mothers and fathers ignorant about their children's development. When I had my wisdome tooth pulled, the dentist did indeed show me exactly what was going to happen. He didn't tell me my tooth was just a lump of tissue, pat me on the head, and proceed.

     Posted by: ninek at May 25, 2010 6:37 PM


    So who does Lloyd Marcus think people should have voted for - he didn't mention anyone else. Maybe just not vote?

     Posted by: Ex-GOP Voter at May 25, 2010 10:08 PM



    « Botched abortion at Planned Parenthood, Naples, FL  |  Home  |  Dispute over ownership of "Rock for Life" brand »