Entries for the ‘Suicide’ Category

Watch[ed] me die [and liked it]

UPDATE, 12/15, 7a: From judge forcing assisted suicide on her state… and on the heels of a picking pro-euthanasia attorney Thomas Perrilli (who represented Michael Schiavo) for his transition team… comes this from

Martin Sheen ad says no to physician-assisted suicide in WA

The State of Washington has an initiative on the ballot to legalize physician-assisted suicide, I-1000. According to

JivinJ’s Life Links 7-30-08

by trying to deal with numerous illegal abortionists: Dr. Kato, who at first said he did not do abortions and referred The Herald to other “doctors,” later admitted to offering the service, saying it would cost R600 for someone who was 5 months pregnant. He promised the procedure was safe and quick. “They call it […]

Sunday funny

by Larry Wright…

French woman fooled the world on assisted suicide request

by Steven Ertelt So the latest news out of France is that Chantal Sebire allowed herself to get in the condition she was in so she could press for assisted suicide. Sebire, as Jill’s readers will recall, is the woman with a terrible facial tumor who received international attention for her condition and French courts […]

Strange love: The Osbournes’ suicide pact

From the

Well, yes, there’s also this “choice”…

GujaretGlobal.com of India girl.

  
facebooktwittergoogle_plusrssyoutubeinstagrammail
Help us meet our financial goal!

Who Is Jill Stanek?

Jill Stanek is a nurse turned speaker, columnist and blogger, a national figure in the effort to protect both preborn and postborn innocent human life.

Read Jill's full bio »
What the Media says »

mcallisterby Kelli

Rampell argues that if only poor people in America could get free birth control and more comprehensive sex education, have “easy access” to abortions in unregulated clinics, and receive more government-sponsored childcare by expanding the welfare state, then unwanted pregnancies would be a thing of the past and Americans would live happily ever after.

Oh, the joy of a liberal utopia.

Rampell doesn’t pause to consider other factors that have seriously contributed to the disparity between the rich and poor on out-of-wedlock births. Instead of looking at the issue in terms of personal choice regarding marriage and childbirth, as well as personal responsibility, and respecting all people as rational human beings capable of self-government, she concludes that a “trap” is being laid; someone must be doing something to these women or not enough for them. Neither is truly the case….

When it comes to finding solutions that will help low-income single mothers, we need to do more than just dish out contraceptives (which will be ineffective for those who are actually choosing to have babies out of wedlock), herd them into unregulated abortion clinics, give them “comprehensive” sex education that fails to factor in the spiritual and moral dimension of human beings, and then continue their dependence on government and the cycle of poverty by increasing welfare programs….

I can just hear the mockery now and the hysterical screams of “Don’t stigmatize my choice to have sex!” But no one is stigmatizing sex, let alone your choice to have it. What’s being stigmatized in our culture is marriage and the choice not to have sex….

[S]ome of us have a higher view of women — that they don’t have to be controlled by their base desires, by poverty, by fear, by dependency — all of which drive us to more constricted and unhappy lives.

We can do better. We have done better. And we can be better again.

~ D.C. McAllister (pictured), responding to Catherine Rampell’s assertion that “sex is for rich people” and that “a trap” is laid for poor people who want to have sex, The Federalist, October 21

Comments (12)
Stanek Top 20