Pro-aborts blink? May not challenge NE's fetal pain law?

The Associated Press posted an article on June 27 speculating that pro-aborts may not challenge NE's fetal pain law. (Read background here.) This would be interesting, a sign of weakness, although if I were a betting woman I'd say the other side will decide it must sue. But here is the other side of the argument, per the AP:

fetal pain 6-30-10.jpg

... [E]xperts say attempts by abortion-rights groups to block [the fetal pain law]... from going on the books could backfire.

A ban on abortions starting at 20 weeks - set to go into effect this fall - is based on assertions from some doctors that fetuses feel pain by that stage of development. But it might be allowed to stand over fears that a losing challenge to the law would change the legal landscape for abortion, say lawyers on both sides of the debate....

Continue reading "Pro-aborts blink? May not challenge NE's fetal pain law?"

No brain, no pain?

by Mary Kay Hastings

From the New York Times, February 10:

... [W]hen Kanwaljeet Anand was a medical resident in a neonatal intensive care unit, his tiny patients, many of them preterm infants, were often wheeled out of the ward and into an operating room. He soon learned what to expect on their return. The babies came back in terrible shape: their skin was gray, their breathing shallow, their pulses weak.
preemie%20cbc.jpg
That is when I discovered that the babies were not getting anesthesia, he recalled recently.

Doctors were convinced that newborns nervous systems were too immature to sense pain, and that the dangers of anesthesia exceeded any potential benefits.

In a series of clinical trials, Anand demonstrated that operations performed under minimal or no anesthesia produced a massive stress response in newborn babies, releasing a flood of fight-or-flight hormones like adrenaline and cortisol....

Continue reading "No brain, no pain?"

Fetal pain: Brits discuss what we won't

16%20year%20old.jpgLondon's The Daily Mail, followed a 16-year-old (photo right) aborting her 16-week baby and told their story in, "What REALLY happens during an abortion: One surgeon finally tells the truth," October 12.

What a refreshingly honest article, which we are certainly unused to in the U.S. Part of it discussed fetal pain....

Continue reading "Fetal pain: Brits discuss what we won't"

Fetal pain and logic

Yesterday, Tim posted thoughts by Justin Taylor on the JAMA fetal pain controversy.

As you know, I also wrote of the fetal pain controversy in my WorldNetDaily.com column today.

I have additional thoughts on John's commentary, specifically on his following points:

I have a hard time getting emotionally invested in the issue of fetal pain.... It seems clear to me that the goal behind the proposed legislation is not really about alleviating pain from fetuses. (After all, the fetuses get killed anyway!) The hope is that once a mother is informed about the reality of fetal pain by her physician, she will change her mind and pursue other options besides abortion.

I have mixed feelings about this approach. On the one hand, I embrace forms of pragmatism and incrementalism in the fight for life. If it's true that unborn babies feel pain at 20 weeks, and if informing a mother of this fact causes her not to murder her baby, then I support such legislation.

All the while, I believe we should be making passionate, persuasive arguments against a functional view of personhood (roughly, that a "person" is defined by his functions)....

Nonetheless, I wonder if some of our language as Christians can unwittingly reflect or reinforce a functional view of personhood....

Dear blogger host Tim further added:

I note that the use of pain or the developmental status of an unborn baby as the basis for an ethical argument opposing abortion is prone to difficulty because, as Justin articulates, it can be used to demean the personhood of the child....

I’m not writing in opposition to the incremental approaches mentioned by Justin, nor backing down from criticism of the JAMA article. I simply agree with Justin that the argument must ultimately be brought back to its metaphysical basis.

I do not want to discount anything John and Tim say. I understand their logic.

I will simply add this point.

Sometimes discussion of logic, functions, and metaphysics does take us away from the actual.

The actuality is that second trimester fetuses beyond 20 weeks assuredly feel intense, prolonged pain while being drawn and quartered via abortion.

If we cannot stop abortion yet, we can at least try to ensure these babies are humanely murdered. I can barely sit here imagining the torture these babies endure while being killed. I can't stop the killing, but perhaps I can alleviate their suffering.

Even the Roman soldiers offered Jesus vinegar water while killing Him.

And if, along the way, this discussion helps people understand these are humans being killed, all the better.