NAACP convention attendees in NYC see black genocide

naacp convention 2009.jpg

The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People held its national convention in New York City last week.

The Center for Bio-Ethical Reform and Pastor Clenard Childress of also came to educate convention attendees (and NYC) on how abortion targets blacks for genocide, since the NAACP leadership is unwilling.

naacp convention 2009 1.jpg

(More photos on page 2.)

naacp convention 2009 4.jpg

naacp convention 2009 2.jpg

According to CBR's press statement:

With 33% of all abortions performed on black women - that is black genocide. With over half of all pregnancies to black women ending in abortion - that is black genocide. When African-Americans make up 13% of the population but continue to kill babies at such an astounding rate, it is past time to confront the leadership of the NAACP in their complicity in black genocide.

naacp 2009 6.jpg

naacp convention 2009 5.jpg

naacp convention 7.jpg

naacp convention 8.jpg

naacp convention 2009 10.jpg

The groups also showed Barack and Michelle Obama "Choice" signs, "exposed the NAACP delegates to the reality of... the radical positions of America's pro-infanticide President Barack Obama," according to the release.

naacp convention 2009 11.jpg


There's no holding back the TRUTH about so-called "CHOICE".

Posted by: RSD at July 21, 2009 12:03 PM

Great job Rev. Childress, our prayers are with you.

Just received my copy of Maafa21 yesterday. Order yours for $20 here:
If you have Maafa 21 and 22 Weeks, you have an arsenal that is UNDENIABLE against all the rhetoric the "choicers" can throw at you. Images and experiences trump words every time.

According to His own Word, whatever we have done to the "least of these" we have done to Jesus Himself. I fear for the destiny of our Nation.

Posted by: Amy at July 21, 2009 12:30 PM

I applaude these efforts. I am running into problems as Vice President of Florida Democrats for Life- in trying to get approval of pastors of predominantly African-American churches, to speak about the need for those who are registered or who vote for Democratic candidates, to take responsibility for transforming the Democratic Party back into a truly Pro-Life political force.

I am not trying to convert Republicans into Democrats, I am just trying to empower and organize those in the religious African-American communitites to become organizers and candidates of Pro-Life within their chosen political party. Why are the pastors not cooperating or even calling me back? I am not asking for their endorsement, only to be part of a dialogue for social justice. I would appreciate the help of any African-American pastors who may have contacts in the Melbourne, Florida area, to help me have the chance for this dialogue. God bless.

Posted by: Tim Shipe at July 21, 2009 12:36 PM

Woo Hoo!!

The truth will set us free!

Posted by: Leslie Hanks at July 21, 2009 12:37 PM

It is Margaret Sanger's dream come true.
And of the babies that are born, 70% are into single mother households. That helps to increase the chances that the children that are not aborted end up in prison or otherwise disengaged from the rest of society.
Single mother household accounts for the entire difference between black and white incarceration rates.
But these two issues are of no interest to the so-called black leadership.
By dealing with these two issues alone, the quality of life in the black community will rise out of government dependence to personal responsibility and fulfillment. But that is not what the NAACP wants. They need these problems to keep the money coming in. Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson need these problems because without them they would have to get real jobs.
The truth of this is seen in how they respond to successful black conservatives.

Genecide will be codified into BO health care reform.

Posted by: Mark at July 21, 2009 12:46 PM


Thanks for your coverage of CBR's events. America will not end abortion until America sees abortion and it's imperative that pro-lifers understand the vital role these pictures will play in changing public opinion. Thank you for helping to build that support.

Posted by: Tom at July 21, 2009 1:24 PM

Genecide will be codified into BO health care reform.
Posted by: Mark at July 21, 2009 12:46 PM

it's hardly genocide. Don't worry about it.

Posted by: Hal at July 21, 2009 1:29 PM

Thanks for clearing that up, Hal. I can sleep easy knowing that this genocide doesn't exist because some dude on the internet said so!

Posted by: Lauren at July 21, 2009 1:55 PM

Just doing my part, Lauren.

Posted by: Hal at July 21, 2009 2:10 PM

"33% of all abortions performed on black women - - that is black genocide"

Ok, Hal...what percentage do you need for this to be effectively called 'genocide'?

To visualize that...imagine yourself with 33% of your front teeth missing. Or even imagine the bathroom door 33% open when you're using it...

33% (1/3) IS a considerable percentage no matter who views it.

Posted by: RSD at July 21, 2009 2:46 PM


Pol Pot decimated only a third of the Cambodian population was decimated through starvation, deprivation, torture, brutality, and murder. Genocide? Nahhhhh.

Posted by: Mary at July 21, 2009 6:58 PM

Oh my I'm tripping over my keys. It should say,

Pol Pot decimated only a third of the Cambodian population through starvation, deprivation torture and murder.

Posted by: Mary at July 21, 2009 7:03 PM

Wow...can't believe anybody would actually type that out! So, essentially, what you've just said HAL is "Ahhh...they're only killing a FEW black people...don't worry about it". Wow...

Posted by: Pamela at July 21, 2009 7:23 PM

I was listening to a rotund conservative radio talk show person today and he was discussing 'obamacare'.

He said that under 'obamacare' elderly people who had been ill would have to be interviewed by 'counselors' as part of the process of receiving medical treatment.

It reminded me of something I read in the 80's.
It was an article by a Boston Psychiatrist Leo Alexander who served as a consultant to the Secretary of War with the office of the chief counsel for the war crimes in Nuremburg.

The article first appeared in the July 4, 1949 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine, entitled, 'Medicine Under Dictatorship'.

Here is the link. Remove the quotation marks and and copy and paste to go to the 11 page article.

First a disclaimer. Do not read this article before meal time, you may lose your apetite.

Do not read this ariticle before bedtime, you may find it difficult to go to sleep and when you do you may experiene unpleasant dreams.


Here is a little excerpt to whet your apetite.

"The first direct order for euthanasia was issued by Hitler on September 1, 1939, and an organization was set up to execute the program. Dr. Karl Brandt headed the medical section, and Phillip Bouhler the administrative section. All state institutions were required to report on patients who had been ill five years or more and who were unable to work, by filling out questionnaires giving name, race, marital status, nationality, next of kin, whether regularly visited and by whom, who bore financial responsibility and so forth. The decision regarding which patients should be killed was made entirely on the basis of this brief information by expert consultants, most of whom were professors of psychiatry in the key universities. These consultants never saw the patients themselves. The thoroughness of their scrutiny can be appraised by the work of on expert, who between November 14 and December 1, 1940, evaluated 2109 questionnaires.

These questionnaires were collected by a "Realm's Work Committee of Institutions for Cure and Care."[4] A parallel organization devoted exclusively to the killing of children was known by the similarly euphemistic name of "Realm's Committee for Scientific Approach to Severe Illness Due to Heredity and Constitution." The "Charitable Transport Company for the Sick" transported patients to the killing centers, and the "Charitable Foundation for Institutional Care" was in charge of collecting the cost of the killings from the relatives, without, however, informing them what the charges were for; in the death certificates the cause of death was falsified."

yor bro ken

Posted by: kbhvac at July 21, 2009 8:59 PM

Where's soonerman? I wonder what he has to say about 1/3 of the African American population being wiped out by abortion? Is it ok when it's done by "choice", and liberals encourage it?

Posted by: xalisae at July 21, 2009 9:12 PM

Posted by: xalisae at July 21, 2009 9:12 PM

"Where's soonerman?"

sooooooooooner what than what?

Is the soooooooooooner man a member of the african-american community?

If so does the sooooooooooner man recognize J. C. Watts as being an 'authentic' black man?

Or does sooooooonerman believe you have be and/or vote liberal, humanist democrat to be an 'authentic' black man?

yor bro ken

Posted by: kbhvac at July 21, 2009 9:27 PM

Yes, ken, and he's said some pretty deplorable things about conservatives belonging to minority groups (Dr. Alan Keyes and even myself) because we don't fall in line when the democrats say we must. We don't jump when Nancy Pelosi cracks the whip, so we are "bad minorities", and one day our white conservative friends are going to turn on us and somehow do us harm (he didn't specify what "it" was when he said "when 'it' happens"...). But I'm more frightened of a "wise Latina woman" and her ilk than I am of any white man. White men don't want to take my right to bare arms away, and don't have the power to do it anyway.

Posted by: xalisae at July 22, 2009 1:35 AM

Good Morning X,

Liberals don't like minorities to wander off the liberal plantation. We all know minorities not only look exactly alike, but they think exactly the same as well. Liberals certainly know what's best for minorities, even if minorities do not.

Why, on MSNBC they pointed out the "tea parties" should have positioned the "few" black people that were present in front of the cameras. I could actually find it in my heart to be embarassed for them.

Thus, minorities who don't fall in line when the liberal massas crack the whip and think, you know the way all minorities are supposed to think, aren't "real".

Racist and patronizing? My dear no. This is enlightenment and tolerance and you obviously don't know enough to recognize it X.

Posted by: Mary at July 22, 2009 6:26 AM

I wonder how many hearts and minds were changed? I love looking at the faces of passers by in the pictures. Some looking at every photo, some with their heads down. Some being informed for the first time that abortion targets the African-American community.

What's that Hal? No, it doesn't? Oh, ok. Pack up the trucks and go home, people. Nothin to see here.

Posted by: carla Author Profile Page at July 22, 2009 6:39 AM

Hi Ken,

I would also like Soonerman's thoughts on the funding of abortions for Washington DC's black majority while at the same time discontinuing the charter school program that has been highly successful academically (all students have graduated and been accepted to colleges) and very popular with Washington DC parents and students.
What happened to "choice"? Washington DC parents can kill their unborn children but can't choose what schools to send them to? I notice the Obamas certainly have a choice where to send their daughters, and its not to Washington DC public schools!

I strongly suspect the Democrat Party's loyalty to the teacher's union, as well as the abortion industry, comes before valuing and bettering the lives of Washington DC's black majority.

Posted by: Mary at July 22, 2009 8:00 AM

Soonerman, if you are in fact a member of the African-American community, as Ken implies, and a Democrat supporter, I would appreciate your perspective on my 8am post.

Posted by: Mary at July 22, 2009 8:03 AM

"33% of all abortions performed on black women - - that is black genocide"

African Americans are having all the children they want. That's why it's not genocide. No one is attempting to wipe out black Americans, and the African American birth rates are higher than average. In 2005, for example, African American women had 67.2 live births for every 1000, while the figure for white women was 58.4 per 1000.

The higher termination rate is due to a higher number of unwanted pregnancies. Not an attempt to wipe out black people.

You guys seriously need to chill.

Posted by: Hal at July 22, 2009 10:25 AM

African Americans are having all the children they want.

No, they aren't, Hal. 64 percent of abortions are coerced, either by a boyfriend, husband, mother, father, or friend - or job or college.

Posted by: bethany Author Profile Page at July 22, 2009 12:10 PM

Oh yeah, or "doctor"

Posted by: bethany Author Profile Page at July 22, 2009 12:11 PM

If I recall correctly Pol Pot was considered guilty of genocide even though the Cambodian people were not totally wiped out and Cambodian women could still have babies.

Posted by: Mary at July 22, 2009 1:49 PM

64 percent of abortions are coerced, either by a boyfriend, husband, mother, father, or friend - or job or college.
Posted by: bethany Author Profile Page at July 22, 2009 12:10 PM

What is the percentage of African American women who abort who claim to be "coerced?" Maybe it's much lower. Maybe it's not. Unless African American women are more "coerced" than other women, I don't see how you can claim this is "genocide." That's a pretty strong allegation.

Posted by: Hal at July 22, 2009 2:08 PM

"Liberals don't like minorities to wander off the liberal plantation."

True that, Mary!

There is only one race, the human race. When will the liberal grassroots wake up and stop supporting racist leaders who locate their Planned Barren-Hood centers in poor minority hoods, and who are so out-of-touch they haven't dropped the white man's burden Sangerism of the 1920s?

It's nice that the Democrat pro-lifers are becoming more vocal. Perhaps more rank-and-file liberals are waking up since US Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's gaffe about getting rid of "populations that we don't want to have to many of."

More power to my minority brothers and sisters!

Posted by: Catherine at July 22, 2009 2:27 PM

"No one is attempting to wipe out black Americans.."

See post above from Leslie Hanks to see who wanted the fact that she approves of Hitler's Holocaust is more than disturbing.

Posted by: RSD at July 22, 2009 3:14 PM

Okay, RSD, change my post to read "No one ALIVE is attempting to wipe out black Americans."

Posted by: Hal at July 22, 2009 3:42 PM

Check out this excellent website: Black Americans For Real Change and have a lovely day in Jesus!

Posted by: Ginny Bain Allen at July 22, 2009 4:07 PM

I think I must somewhat agree with Hal, but Mary too has an interesting perspective re. Paul Pot in Cambodia,

It does not matter the %, as long as those terminated are 'unwanted'. This label is mute upon birth, except for bo. Blacks (and anyone else - a family; a society) MAY (have the 'right' to) commit suicide this way. Even if somewhat alarming 1/3 annihilation is not enough for Hal. So the problem is: that white folks are not in sync and must INCREASE their abortion rates to mime those of blacks ... 'equality' of rights. enter: the health plan!

1) get Medicaid to fund abortion
2) get rid of all nuisance opposition and legally not permit protest via conscience legislation. this strategy will be used to terminate 'all' unwanted (unpleasant) human life in the near future .... exit the disabled, poor, elderly, and those with psychiatric problems. Seems the 'welcoming' of the 'Statue of Liberty' and of JUSTICE (American-style) is not so 'blind', eh? Only when that 'hit list' includes political dissenters will Hal object - it seems.

Posted by: John McDonell at July 22, 2009 5:40 PM

"Even if somewhat alarming 1/3 annihilation is not enough for Hal."

what is that supposed to mean? The statistic quoted in an earlier post was that black women account for 33% of abortions, not that 33% of black pregnancies are terminated. (maybe that number is 33% too, I really don't have any idea--and it doesn't matter.)

I get the argument that abortion is wrong, and that it's immoral, and that it should be illegal. It is not, by any stretch, genocide.

Posted by: Hal at July 22, 2009 7:17 PM

It's kind of funny because I am white and do not consider myself a racist. I am totally against abortion, no matter the race. I read most of these posts and there are some great points made here by various people. While I applaud the effort and demonstration that was put on in NY, I also question why this would be considered genocide? Are abortions being performed on the unwilling? Believe me, I am totally against abortion, as I stated, but genocide seems like it's an attack against whitey. It almost limits the scope and effect by making it a race issue. Showing pictures of blacks being hung is not the same as a black woman walking into an abortion clinic. One is a horrible crime committed against someone because of their race. I would agree more with the genocide arguement there, but a willful act by a woman who decides to walk in and have an abortion isn't something that she couldn't control. It is a choice she made. If they wanted to make a point about killing innocent children, do you do that by making it about race? It seems to cheapen the arguement is all I am saying. Not trying to stir up trouble, just an observation. please correct me if I am wrong as I am open to debate...not insults. Thanks.

Posted by: DJ in Arizona at July 22, 2009 7:37 PM


Perhaps the question here is would this black woman be having an abortion if it was not legal and 78% of "family planning" clinics were not located in black neighborhoods.

Posted by: Mary at July 22, 2009 8:14 PM

Abortion covers all races, creeds and colors. It's genocide of the unborn. Why not call it feticide?

Posted by: Janet at July 22, 2009 9:14 PM

"I get the argument that abortion is wrong, and that it's immoral, and that it should be illegal. It is not, by any stretch, genocide.

Posted by: Hal at July 22, 2009 7:17 PM"

Try adding the concept of "Time" to this equation.
Either forward or backwards in time.

All of us came from a particular ancestor. I seem to remember reading about a common gene/ trait that everybody has that has been traced to one woman/"Eve".

Now, imagine that woman being killed when she was young (either born or pre-born)...what happens to us (her descendants thru countless ages/ generations)? We cease to exist.

Fast forward to NOW. There is a woman with an unborn child that got the pregnancy "terminated".
What happens to this child's descendants? They are now cut off like a branch in the Human race's Family tree.

Generations upon generations henceforth will be missing the presence of these brothers and sisters... all due to the selfishness of one act.

As the Talmud states: "Whoever saves one life saves the whole world entire"

IMO, it only takes ONE abortion for it to be called "Genocide".

Posted by: RSD at July 23, 2009 2:11 PM

RSD @ 2:11,
Excellent point. Most liberals aren't thinking along those lines. To them births cause a population "problem", a CRISIS!

Posted by: Janet at July 23, 2009 2:54 PM


Most liberals aren't THINKING (period).

They only focus on themselves and what they want and need.

Posted by: RSD at July 24, 2009 3:41 PM