<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>jillstanek.com</title>
<link>http://www.jillstanek.com/</link>
<description></description>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 09:27:30 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=4.1</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 


<item>
<title>Sunday funnies</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This week political cartoonists were too busy with other topics to wax on ours.  So here are a couple off-topic funnies that cracked me up...</p>

<p>by <a href="http://hubert.mycomicspage.com/signewilkinson/2008/05/09" target=_blank"><strong>Signe Wilkinson</strong></a>...<br />
<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="cartoon 5-10.gif" src="http://www.jillstanek.com/cartoon%205-10.gif" width="500" height="307" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></span></p>

<p>by <a href="http://hubert.mycomicspage.com/glennmccoy/2008/05/13" target=_blank"><strong>Glenn McCoy</strong></a>...<br />
<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="cartoon mccoy 5-18 color.gif" src="http://www.jillstanek.com/cartoon%20mccoy%205-18%20color.gif" width="500" height="425" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></span></p>]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/05/sunday_funny_8.html</link>
<guid>http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/05/sunday_funny_8.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 09:27:30 -0600</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>New poll/Old poll</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="poll%20graphic%20correct%20size.bmp" src="http://www.jillstanek.com/poll%20graphic%20correct%20size-thumb.bmp" border="0" align="right" width="213" height="160" />The new poll question is up:</p>

<blockquote>Which <strong>Democrat</strong> candidate would do more to further abortion ideology and the industry as president?</blockquote>

<p>The most popular response to last week's poll question surprised me.  Almost 85% of you think a pastor should steer clear of political talk?  Not good....</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p>In reality, <strong>American</strong> churches were free and did speak passionately on grave moral issues like slavery, women's suffrage, and child labor for nearly the 1st 200 years of our history, weaving politics and candidates' positions into their teachings.  </p>

<p>In 1954 all that changed with the (<strong>Lyndon</strong>) <strong>Johnson</strong> amendment to the tax code, chilling the constitutional right to free speech from the pulpit, including abortion.  Pro-lifers should support restoring <strong>First Amendment</strong> rights to churches.  Of course liberals don't want churches speaking out on the issues.  Why would we concur?</p>

<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.jillstanek.com/slide%201%205-17.jpg"><img alt="slide 1 5-17.jpg" src="http://www.jillstanek.com/slide 1 5-17-thumb-500x466.jpg" width="500" height="466" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></a></span></p>

<p>If you voted, find your personal brightly colored flag on the maps below, the top of the <strong>USA</strong> and the bottom <strong>International</strong>.  This week all seemed to agree on the poll answer.  Click to enlarge:</p>

<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.jillstanek.com/slide%202%205-17.jpg"><img alt="slide 2 5-17.jpg" src="http://www.jillstanek.com/slide 2 5-17-thumb-500x270.jpg" width="500" height="270" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></a></span></p>

<p>The International map fascinates me.  I'm learning geography.  For instance, the green flag below right of <strong>Australia</strong> is in <strong>New Zealand</strong>.  The blue flag above left Australia is in <strong>Singapore</strong>.  And the blue flag off the coast of Africa?  That one appears to have come from a ship.  There is no land mass in the vicinity. </p>

<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.jillstanek.com/slide%203%205-17.jpg"><img alt="slide 3 5-17.jpg" src="http://www.jillstanek.com/slide 3 5-17-thumb-500x271.jpg" width="500" height="271" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></a></span></p>

<p>If you want to view these maps in more detail, click on "Comment" on the <em><strong>Vizu</strong></em> poll, You'll see this week's map, which can be manipulated and enlarged.  If you want to check a previous week's poll map, after clicking "Comment," highlight "My <em><strong>Vizu</strong></em>," click on "My Polls," and then click on the poll question that interests you.  You'll see the map.</p>

<p>As always, please make comments to either the old or new poll here, not at the <em><strong>Vizu</strong></em> website.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/05/new_pollold_pol_28.html</link>
<guid>http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/05/new_pollold_pol_28.html</guid>
<category>Polls</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 09:18:04 -0600</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Weekend question</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="weekend question.jpg" src="http://www.jillstanek.com/weekend%20question.jpg" width="129" height="94" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;" /></span>Here is an off-topic but related question this weekend.</p>

<p>This week <strong>Democrat</strong> presidential candidate <strong>Barack Obama </strong>was touring a <strong>Detroit </strong>auto plant when a female reporter tried to ask him a question... </p>

<div style="text-align: center;"><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Juy9NwI8_i0&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Juy9NwI8_i0&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></div>

<p>Obama later apologized to the reporter for calling her "sweetie."  Do you think he was displaying sexism in an un guarded moment, or are we all just hypersensitive to any "-isms" in these politically correct days?</p>]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/05/weekend_questio_45.html</link>
<guid>http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/05/weekend_questio_45.html</guid>
<category>Weekend question</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 06:32:20 -0600</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>(Prolifer)ations 5/15/08</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="Thumbnail image for blog buzz.jpg" src="http://www.jillstanek.com/assets_c/2008/04/blog buzz-thumb-250x94.jpg" width="250" height="94" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" /></span><strong>by</strong> <a href="http://jivinjehoshaphat.blogspot.com/" target="_blank"><strong><em>JivinJ</em></strong></a></p>

<p><li> Looks like <strong>Geron</strong> will have to put off its human embryonic stem cell clinical trial on spinal cord injuries <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/15/business/15stem.html?ref=business" target="_blank">at least another year. </a> At least the company apparently applied for a clinical trial this year as opposed to all the previous years where it promised to apply but never did.  </p>

<p><li> <strong>AZ's Board of Nursing </strong><a href="http://www.azstarnet.com/allheadlines/239101" target="_blank">has decided</a> that nurse practitioners with special training can commit first-trimester abortions.  The AZ legislature is currently considering a bill to only allow physicians to perform abortions but I doubt Gov. <strong>Janet Napolitano</strong> would sign it....</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.jillstanek.com/claw%20out%202.jpg"><img alt="claw out 2.jpg" src="http://www.jillstanek.com/claw out 2-thumb-200x335.jpg" width="200" height="335" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;" /></a></span><li> The pro-choice claws are coming out after <a href="http://www.naral.org/elections/election-pr/pr_05042008_obamaendorsement.html" target="_blank"> <strong>NARAL</strong> issued its endorsement of <strong>Obama</strong></a>.  <strong>NOW-NY State </strong>president <a href="http://www.nownys.org/pr_2008/pr_051408.html" target="_blank"><strong>Marcia Pappas</strong></a> (of <strong>Ted</strong>-<strong>Kennedy</strong>-committed-<a href="http://www.nownys.org/pr_2008/pr_012808.html" target="_blank">"ultimate betrayal"</a> by-endorsing-Obama fame), <strong>EMILY's List</strong>president <a href="http://origin.observer.com/2008/emilys-list-trashes-naral-obama-endorsement" target="_blank"><strong>Ellen Malcolm</strong></a>, and <a href="http://www.prochoiceny.org/news/press/200805141.shtml" target="_blank"> NARAL's NY State affiliate</a> aren't on board.  </p>

<p>On one hand, it's "Is it really that big of a deal to endorse the presumptive nominee now that he has basically wrapped the nomination up?" and on the other hand it's "Why not just wait until it's completely over?"  The only reason to give the endorsement now seems to be to convince <strong>Clinton</strong> to drop out sooner rather than later.   </p>

<p><li> <a href="http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/opinion/story.html?id=f58747bf-2888-4b8f-ba14-2f8c0e7be1c6" target="_blank"><strong>Canadian Ken Epps </strong>on his bill</a> to punish individuals who commit acts of violence against pregnant women and their unborn children:</p>

<blockquote>There is something seriously wrong with our system when the so-called "right" to end a pregnancy takes away another pregnant woman's right to have her wanted baby protected in law.....

<p>The irony is that for years pro-lifers have been accused of trying to impose their views on others. The opponents of <strong>C-484</strong> are now attempting to impose on women who want to be pregnant and want to love and protect their babies the view that the child in her womb is unworthy of protection in criminal law, unworthy of any amount of respect at all to the extent that a criminal can brutally attack that mother's child with a fist or a boot or a gun or a knife or a sword and face no consequences for killing what is so dear to her.</blockquote></p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/05/proliferations_26.html</link>
<guid>http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/05/proliferations_26.html</guid>
<category>Blogs</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 17:07:19 -0600</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Did candidate Mike Erickson pay for girlfriend&apos;s abortion? &quot;Absolutely not.&quot;</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="mike erickson.jpg" src="http://www.jillstanek.com/mike%20erickson.jpg" width="292" height="290" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;" /></span>On May 13 <em><strong>JivinJ</strong></em> <a href="http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/blogs/" target=_blank">posted a story</a> in <em><strong>(Prolifer)ations</strong></em> on accusations against pro-life <strong>OR</strong> congressional candidate <strong>Mike Erickson </strong>by his opponent <strong>Kevin Mannix</strong> of paying for a girlfriend's abortion in 2000.  </p>

<p>A couple items in follow-up.  </p>

<p>First, Mannix's mailer implicated OR Right to Life as having endorsed Erickson.  I received an email  of clarification from <strong>Lois Anderson</strong>, political director of the ORRTL PAC:</p>

<blockquote> Hi Jill,

<p>Just to make sure you know. We have solely endorsed Kevin Mannix for CD 5 in 2008.  Erickson was endorsed in 2006 before she came forward with her story.</blockquote></p>

<p>Second, Erickson is now saying he didn't do it.  From the <a href="http://www.oregonlive.com/metrosouth/oregonian/index.ssf?/base/metro_south_news/1210902919170560.xml&coll=7" target=_blank"><em><strong>Oregonian</strong></em></a>, today...</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<blockquote>Speaking publicly for the first time... Republican congressional candidate Mike Erickson denied that he knowingly paid for an ex-girlfriend's abortion. 

<p>He acknowledged dating a woman named Tawnya for "a couple of months" in 2000 and helping her with financial problems but said he was unaware she became pregnant or had the procedure. </blockquote></p>

<blockquote>"I never asked anybody in my life to have an abortion," Erickson said. "Did I pay for an abortion? Absolutely not." 

<p>Erickson... said... it was a casual relationship and that he could not remember her last name or where she lived. </p>

<p>One day she asked him for a ride to a doctor's appointment, he said. She also asked for financial help, and he gave her $300, he said, adding that their relationship soon ended. </p>

<p>The abortion charge surfaced in 2006.... Kristi Oetken, a friend of Tawnya, sent an e-mail to... media outlets claiming Erickson knew he had impregnated the woman and knowingly gave her money for an abortion. The allegations remain unsubstantiated.... </p>

<p>On Monday, Mannix sent a letter disclosing the 2006 allegations to 60,000 Republican voters. He continued to press the allegations Thursday, this time with a letter sent to 36,000 Republican women who haven't voted. </p>

<p>The letter, from <strong>Gayle Atteberry</strong>, executive director of Oregon Right to Life, called on Erickson to withdraw from the race, accusing him of dishonesty both in seeking the organization's 2006 endorsement and in denying he had any role in Tawnya's alleged abortion....</p>

<p>"When we approached Mike about these allegations, he admitted giving her money and dropping her at a 'doctor's office.' He said he did not know she was getting an abortion," Atteberry wrote. "No matter where you stand on abortion, Mike's actions are troubling."</blockquote></p>

<p>Oh, come on.  He gave her $300 but didn't know why?  He drove her to a doctor's office but didn't know what for?</p>

<p>And he doesn't even remember her name?  Low blow, Mike.  You just lost the women's vote.</p>

<p>[Photo credit: <a href="http://www.ericksonforcongress.org/" target=_blank"><em><strong>Mike Erickson for Congress</strong></em>]</a></p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/05/did_candidate_m.html</link>
<guid>http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/05/did_candidate_m.html</guid>
<category>Political anti-life bias</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 11:25:12 -0600</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>NARAL&apos;s endorsement of Obama causes &quot;uproar&quot;</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.jillstanek.com/nyt%20uproar.jpg"><img alt="nyt uproar.jpg" src="http://www.jillstanek.com/nyt uproar-thumb-500x206.jpg" width="500" height="206" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></a></span></p>

<p>I <a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=56827" target=_blank">wrote in February</a> that pro-aborts were raucously split in support of <strong>Clinton</strong> vs. <strong>Obama</strong> for president.  </p>

<p>Ideologues like <strong>NOW</strong> (feminists 1st, abortion zealots 2nd) <a href="http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/01/now_new_york_ra.html" target=_blank">support Clinton</a>.  <strong>Hillary</strong> is a woman, and the presidency is their grail.</p>

<p>Pragmatics (abortion zeal and greed tied for 1st) support Obama.  They expect him to do more to help the industry through government handouts, laws, and presidentially-overseen agencies. </p>

<p>So the <strong>NARAL </strong>board's May 14 announcement to endorse Obama is no surprise.  The abortion industry funds NARAL.  It's no dummy.</p>

<p>And the protest by feminist groups like <strong>EMILY's List</strong> is no surprise, nor defections of pocket NARAL affiliates, particularly <strong>NY</strong>, likely headed by rabid feminists.  </p>

<p>Reported the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/16/us/politics/16campaign.html?ref=us" target=_blank"><em><strong>New York Times</strong></em></a>, today...</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p></p>

<blockquote>The decision by a major abortion-rights group to endorse Senator Barack Obama has created an uproar among some of its affiliates and other abortion-rights advocates. Many said that Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton had as good a record on reproductive rights as Mr. Obama and that there was no need to take sides in the <strong>Democratic </strong>primary....

<p>Clinton supporters in the blogosphere said they perceived it as a badly timed gratuitous slap at Mrs. Clinton as she grapples with the likely end of her quest for the presidency....</blockquote></p>

<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.jillstanek.com/naral%20endorse%20obama.jpg"><img alt="naral endorse obama.jpg" src="http://www.jillstanek.com/naral endorse obama-thumb-300x172.jpg" width="300" height="172" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;" /></a></span><blockquote>In making the Naral announcement, <strong>Nancy Keenan</strong>, the president, said Mr. Obama, who leads in the delegate count and could claim the nomination as early as Tuesday, was the more viable candidate. Ms. Keenan said it was important to make the announcement now because Senator John McCain, the presumptive <strong>Republican</strong> nominee, who opposes abortion rights, was getting a "free ride."...</p>

<p><strong>Elizabeth Shipp</strong>, political director of Naral... said there was a feeling that endorsing Mr. Obama at a high-profile juncture might help Naral <u>shed its image as an organization for white women only</u>....</blockquote></p>

<p>Very interesting last line, a distancing from <strong>NOW</strong>.</p>

<p>NARAL has been trying to generate a swarm against McCain for some time in its email alerts, apparently to no avail.  See a couple examples below.  NARAL must finally have become exasperated that the clock is ticking and pro-aborts have yet to really begin hammering him.</p>

<p>This from the <em><strong>NYT's </strong></em>article is another indicator the abortion industry thinks Obama will be its sugar daddy:</p>

<blockquote>... Obama... collected four more superdelegates on Thursday, including Representative <strong>Henry Waxman</strong> of <strong>California</strong>....</blockquote>

<p>Waxman is the industry's go-to guy to push increased government funding of comprehensive sex ed and to terrorize pregnancy care centers.</p>

<p>[HT: <em><strong><a href="http://www.lifenews.com/state3231.html" target=_blank">LifeNews.com</a></strong></em>]</p>

<p>NARAL email alert March 31...</p>

<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.jillstanek.com/keenan%20on%20mccain%201.jpg"><img alt="keenan on mccain 1.jpg" src="http://www.jillstanek.com/keenan on mccain 1-thumb-500x1054.jpg" width="500" height="1054" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></a></span></p>

<p>NARAL email alert April 18...</p>

<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.jillstanek.com/keenan on mccain 2-thumb-500x1061.jpg"><img alt="Thumbnail image for keenan on mccain 2.jpg" src="http://www.jillstanek.com/assets_c/2008/05/keenan on mccain 2-thumb-500x1061-thumb-500x1061.jpg" width="500" height="1061" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></a></span></p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/05/narals_endorsem.html</link>
<guid>http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/05/narals_endorsem.html</guid>
<category>Industry watch</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 09:26:55 -0600</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Messianic Obama</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The <strong>Obama</strong> campaign is mailing out the flyer below (see backside on page 2) in front of next week's <strong>KY</strong> primary.</p>

<p>To columnist <strong>David Broder's</strong> <a href="http://www.cbn.com/CBNnews/375188.aspx" target=_blank">request</a> for an explanation of its purpose, the Obama campaign responded via email (emphasis mine):</p>

<blockquote>These fliers are part of the Obama campaign's sincere effort to communicate the values of Senator Obama's own Christian faith and the hope that people of all faiths and moral backgrounds will come together to address the needs of the <strong>"least of these"</strong> in our nation and in our world....</blockquote>

<p>"Sincere"? "Values"?  "Christian faith"?  Obama's increasing gall is increasingly galling me.  </p>

<p>"Least of these"?  I'd like Obama's definition.  I have one.  How about live aborted babies left to die in hospital soiled utility rooms?  No, the campaign won't like that one.  How about late-term babies getting stabbed in the back of the head and their brains sucked out?  No, it won't like that one either.  How about 11-year-old girls being raped by their step-fathers?  Ixnay.  Oh, I give up.</p>

<p>And the line used to be "Faith, hope, and charity," btw.  Now Obama's even trying to rewrite the <strong>Bible</strong>.  Hide the <strong>10 Commandments</strong>, quick.</p>

<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="slide 1 least of these.jpg" src="http://www.jillstanek.com/slide%201%20least%20of%20these.jpg" width="478" height="912" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></span></p>

<p>He claims to be "do[ing] the Lord's work"?  The man has cajones, I'll give him that.</p>

<p>[HT: <strong>Wendy Wright</strong> of <a href="http://www.cwfa.org/main.asp" target=_blank"><em><strong>Concerned Women for America</strong></em></a>]</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.jillstanek.com/slide%202%20least%20of%20these.jpg"><img alt="slide 2 least of these.jpg" src="http://www.jillstanek.com/slide 2 least of these-thumb-478x924.jpg" width="478" height="924" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></a></span></p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/05/messianic_obama.html</link>
<guid>http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/05/messianic_obama.html</guid>
<category>Industry watch</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 13:57:30 -0600</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>My crazy ants</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="crazy ants 2.jpg" src="http://www.jillstanek.com/crazy%20ants%202.jpg" width="252" height="390" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;" /></span>Saturday morning I worked on my computer comfortably located in my favorite recliner downstairs in the living room.  When finished I placed the computer on the carpeted floor.</p>

<p>Sunday afternoon I chose another cozy spot to work, lounging in bed while watching old movies.  So I retrieved my computer, arranged my pillows just so, found just the right old movie (<em><strong>Mr. Holland's Opus</strong></em>), and settled in to catch up on emails and such.</p>

<p>But as soon as my computer warmed up, what to my surprise should emerge but ants!  Lots of them!  And one of them even "jumped up and bit me," as <strong>Forrest Gump</strong> would say (although not in the buttocks).</p>

<p>What a coincidence that the <a href="http://news.aol.com/story/_a/crazy-ants-swarm-over-houston-area/20080514152109990001?icid=100214839x1202155990x1200077402" target=_blank"><em><strong>Associated Press</strong></em></a> posted a story yesterday about "crazy ants" taking over <strong>Houston</strong>, including computers.  I'm in <strong>Chicago</strong>.  Are they taking over <strong>America</strong> this quickly?  From the story...</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<blockquote>In what sounds like a really low-budget horror film, voracious swarming ants that apparently arrived in <strong>Texas</strong> aboard a cargo ship are invading homes and yards across the Houston area, shorting out electrical boxes and messing up computers.

<p>The hairy, reddish-brown creatures are known as "crazy rasberry ants" - crazy, because they wander erratically instead of marching in regimented lines, and "rasberry" after <strong>Tom Rasberry</strong>, an exterminator who did battle against them early on....</p>

<p>Scientists are not sure exactly where the ants came from, but their cousins, commonly called crazy ants, are found in the<strong> Southeast </strong>and the <strong>Caribbean</strong>....</p>

<p>They also bite humans, though not with a stinger like fire ants.</p>

<p>Worse, they, like some other species of ants, are attracted to electrical equipment, for reasons that are not well understood by scientists.</p>

<p>They have ruined pumps at sewage pumping stations, fouled computers and at least one homeowner's gas meter, and caused fire alarms to malfunction. They have been spotted at <strong>NASA's Johnson Space Center </strong>....</blockquote></p>

<p><strong>Barrack Obama</strong> called Rev. <strong>Jeremiah Wright</strong> his "crazy uncle."  Well, we've apparently got our own crazy ants.  Beware.</p>

<p>[HT: husband <strong>Rich</strong>; photo, courtesy of the <strong>AP</strong>, is of exterminator Tom Rasberry, letting the "crazy rasberry ants," crawl up his arm]</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/05/saturday_mornin.html</link>
<guid>http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/05/saturday_mornin.html</guid>
<category>Site updates</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 08:02:36 -0600</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Whoops, King reelected - unanimously?</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This is one of those times I'm not sure what is going on, so I'm just reporting the latest.</p>

<p>When last we left the <strong>Roderick</strong><strong> "Why Can't We All Just Brawl" </strong><strong>King </strong>vandalism story (catch up just a <a href="http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/05/claire_gets_rep.html" target=_blank">couple posts down</a>), <strong>University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point</strong> official <strong>Stephen Ward</strong> wrote in an email that while the <strong>Student Senate</strong> failed to defrock King, he had resigned.</p>

<p>But <strong><a href="http://www.studentsforlife.org/" target=_blank">Students for Life of America</a></strong> reported in a press release late yesterday:</p>

<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.jillstanek.com/roderick%20question%202.jpg"><img alt="roderick question 2.jpg" src="http://www.jillstanek.com/roderick question 2-thumb-225x317.jpg" width="225" height="317" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;" /></a></span><blockquote>Contrary to Ward's e-mail, SFLA confirmed this afternoon by speaking with <strong>Erika Wardle</strong>, <strong>College of Natural Resources Caucus</strong> Chair and Student Senate member, that King is still a member of the Student Senate and was unanimously re-appointed to Student Senate for the 2008-2009 school year. </p>

<p>PFL further reported that the Student Senate found a provision in their constitution requiring the body to hold meetings before they can address the situation. Because the Student Senate has now adjourned for the school year, it will not take up the situation until its first meeting in the Fall 2008 semester. </blockquote></p>

<p>The press release added that both the full Senate and the sabotaged <strong>Pointers for Life </strong>rejected the Senate Rules Committee's recommendation that King be forced to write a letter of apology and hold off on his reelection until the Fall.  PFL nixed the idea because King stated during the meeting he wasn't sorry for vandalizing PFL's crosses.</p>]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/05/whoops_king_ree.html</link>
<guid>http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/05/whoops_king_ree.html</guid>
<category>Violence</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 17:40:17 -0600</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Created equal</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>There has been a movement afoot several years to define personhood.</p>

<p>But it hasn't driven by pro-lifers.</p>

<p>While our side has been arguing whether or not now is the time to nail this point down legally, the other side has been plodding full steam ahead to fill the void with their own definition of personhood.  And it isn't pretty.  Read all about the <strong>Personhood Theory</strong> on <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Person" target=_blank"><em><strong>Wikipedia</strong></em></a>.</p>

<p>"Secular scholars" have been arguing with greater and greater success that personhood is defined by consciousness and self-awareness.  This definition excludes a lot of people, like newborns, vegetative children and adults, and dementiaed elderly.</p>

<p>So it's time for ney sayers within the pro-life movement to just knock off complaints about various statewide attempts to define personhood as beginning at fertilization or risk the other side filling the gap.</p>

<p>Grand place to start: <strong>Colorado</strong>.</p>

<p>I couldn't be prouder of young <strong>Kristi Burton</strong> (below, left), who launched a ballot initiative in the <strong>Centennial State </strong>last year when only 19 years old to define personhood.  </p>

<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.jillstanek.com/kristi%202.jpg"><img alt="kristi 2.jpg" src="http://www.jillstanek.com/kristi 2-thumb-240x180.jpg" width="240" height="180" class="mt-image-none" style="" /></a></span><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.jillstanek.com/kristi%201.jpg"><img alt="kristi 1.jpg" src="http://www.jillstanek.com/kristi 1-thumb-240x180.jpg" width="240" height="180" class="mt-image-none" style="" /></a></span></p>

<p>Yesterday Kristi and crew submitted 131,245 signatures (above, right) - 55,000 over the requirement - of CO voters wanting an amendment attached to the CO Constitution with these simple but brilliant 14 words:</p>

<p><em><blockquote>The term person or persons shall include any human from the time of fertilization.</blockquote></em></p>

<p>Now CO voters will decide in November whether they want to protect not just preborns but themselves.  How foolish if they don't....</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p>CO is known as a purple state.  It went for <strong>President Bush</strong> in 2000 and 2004.  That said, the <strong>Democrat National Convention</strong> will be held in <strong>Denver</strong> in August, which will give their side a boost.  And liberals will pour millions into defeating this amendment.  <strong>MSM</strong> will help for free.</p>

<p><strong>Colorado for Equal Rights</strong> needs donations now, $100,000 to be exact, in the early weeks of its campaign.  Every donation will help.  Early money is more important than late money, enabling the group to set up a structure and teams to get the education campaign rolling.  Please donate generously <a href="http://www.coloradoforequalrights.com/donate" target=_blank">here</a>.</p>

<p>The CO personhood initiative will force the other side to address the question they thus far have avoided: Exactly what are the unborn?</p>

<p>[Photos courtesy of <strong>Leslie Hanks</strong>]</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/05/created_equal.html</link>
<guid>http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/05/created_equal.html</guid>
<category>Apologetics</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 13:58:41 -0600</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>New Stanek WND column, &quot;McCain and the pro-life plank&quot;</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="WND%20logo.gif" src="http://www.jillstanek.com/WND%20logo.gif" width="338" height="60" /></p>

<blockquote>On May 9 <i><b>ABC News </b></i>unearthed disturbing footage from a 2000 <b>Republican</b> primary debate between <b>John McCain</b>, <b>Alan Keyes</b>, and <b>George Bush</b> showing McCain's surly pro-abortion side. View the video below: </blockquote>

<p><a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=4823197&affil=wls" target=_blank"><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="mccain abortion.jpg" src="http://www.jillstanek.com/mccain%20abortion.jpg" width="475" height="438" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></span></a></p>

<p> <blockquote>McCain provoked President Bush on the exceptions they share: rape, incest. He tried to corner President Bush as a liar or hypocrite since he supported the pro-life plank of the Republican platform, which backed a human life amendment to <br />
the <b>Constitution</b>.</p>

<p>Keyes, always clear, although these days so hostile he has alienated all but a core few, nailed them both on their duplicity, saying...</blockquote></p>

<p>Continue reading my column today,  "McCain and the pro-life plank," on <a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=64177" target=_blank"><i><b>WorldNetDaily.com</b></i></a>.</p>]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/05/new_stanek_wnd_43.html</link>
<guid>http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/05/new_stanek_wnd_43.html</guid>
<category>Stanek columns</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 09:20:39 -0600</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>(Prolifer)ations 5/13/08</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="Thumbnail image for blog buzz.jpg" src="http://www.jillstanek.com/assets_c/2008/04/blog buzz-thumb-250x94.jpg" width="250" height="94" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;" /></span><strong>by</strong> <a href="http://jivinjehoshaphat.blogspot.com/" target="_blank"><strong><em>JivinJ</em></strong></a></p>

<p><li> The <em><strong>Telegraph</strong></em> is reporting on baby girl <strong>Ellie-Suzanne Fish</strong>, <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1949500/Girl-born-before-24-week-legal-abortion-limit.html" target=_blank">who is leaving the hospital healthy </a>after being born before <strong>Britain's</strong> abortion limit cut-off:</p>

<blockquote>She weighed 1lb 4.7oz and was given just a 10 to 15% chance of survival then had to endure three operations, including two on the brain.

<p>But she is now 9 months old and a healthy 14lbs, and has been allowed out of hospital for the first time.</blockquote></p>

<p><li> An <strong>OR</strong> woman <a href="http://www.oregoncitynewsonline.com/news/story.php?story_id=121064920156470100" target=_blank">is accusing </a> <strong>Republican</strong> congressional candidate <strong>Mike Erickson</strong> of paying for her abortion in 2000.  Erickson denies being involved in the abortion. Erickson's primary opponent <strong>Kevin Mannix</strong> has used this charge in a campaign mailer...</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<blockquote>The woman and her friend, <strong>Kristi Oetken</strong>, first attempted to draw attention to the issue in 2006 after receiving a campaign mailer from Erickson touting his endorsement by <strong>OR Right to Life</strong> during Erickson's first run for OR's 5th Congressional District. The woman and her friend said they considered Erickson's anti-abortion stand hypocritical in light of his experience with the woman.</blockquote>

<p>Below is the damaging email Mannix included in his mailer.  Read his intro letter <a href="http://www.politickeror.com/files/politickeror/KLM_letter_0.pdf" target=_blank">here</a>.  Click to enlarge:</p>

<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.jillstanek.com/kristi.jpg"><img alt="kristi.jpg" src="http://www.jillstanek.com/kristi-thumb-500x566.jpg" width="500" height="566" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></a></span></p>

<p><li> Ryan Anderson <a href="http://www.firstthings.com/onthesquare/?p=1065" target=_blank">chronicles a recent symposium</a> at<strong> Princeton</strong> titled "Is It Wrong to End Early Human Life?"  Participants included <strong>Robert George</strong>, <strong>Patrick Lee</strong>, and <strong>Peter Singer</strong> among others"</p>

<blockquote>Taken as a whole, the discussions revealed several salient points. It was instructive to witness the ease with which various speakers could embrace infanticide or dehumanize unborn life - recall <strong>Harman's </strong>argument that unborn children "really are a lot like plants." But even more instructive was how unalarmed many in the Princeton audience seemed to be by any of this. I had forgotten that, for more than a few in the academic elite, this is just par for the course.</blockquote>

<p><li> <strong>Cornell </strong>researchers created what is believed to be the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/13/science/13embryo.html?ref=science" target=_blank">first genetically altered human embryo</a> by inserting a gene to make the embryo fluorescent:</p>

<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="Thumbnail image for flourescent.jpg" src="http://www.jillstanek.com/flourescent-thumb-275x187.jpg" width="275" height="187" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" /></span><blockquote>The Cornell scientists put a gene for a fluorescent protein into the single-celled human embryo. The embryo had 3 sets of chromosomes instead of 2.</p>

<p>After the embryo divided for 3 days, all the cells in the embryo glowed, Dr. <strong>Rosenwaks </strong>said. He said the goal of the work was to see if the fluorescent marker would carry into the daughter cells, allowing genetic changes to be traced as cells divided. </blockquote></p>

<p>Researchers justified their work by saying the abnormal embryo would have never become a baby.</p>

<p><li> <strong>John Ronson</strong> has <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2008/may/12/mentalhealth.health" target=_blank">a long piece </a>in the <em><strong>Guardian</strong></em> about his experiences following around assisted suicide facilitator <strong>George Exoo</strong>:</p>

<blockquote>Once or twice a week," Humphry explained, "I get very strange people on the telephone who are anxious to commit suicide because of their depression or sad lives. When they get your number they want to talk and talk. And they call again and again. And they also call all the other right-to-die groups."

<p>Humphry said that the mainstream right-to-die groups will tell them, "'We can't help you. It's not within our parameters because you aren't terminally ill.' But they pursue you. They call and call. And eventually someone will say, 'George Exoo will probably help you.' And that gets them off the phone and on to George."</blockquote></p>

<p>[HT for Ronson and Anderson pieces: <strong>Wesley Smith </strong>; photo of fluorescent human embryo courtesy of <a href="http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2008-05/13/content_8157321.htm" target=_blank"><em><strong>Agencies</strong></em></a>]</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/05/proliferations_25.html</link>
<guid>http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/05/proliferations_25.html</guid>
<category>Blogs</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 19:48:21 -0600</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Miracles</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="miracles.jpg" src="http://www.jillstanek.com/miracles.jpg" width="180" height="265" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;" /></span>Abortion not only kills babies and sometimes their mothers, it kills miracles.  It kills hope.</p>

<p>From <a href="http://www.hattiesburgamerican.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?aid=/20080511/lifestyle/805110325" target=_blank"><em><strong>HattiesburgAmerican.com</strong></em></a>, May 11:</p>

<blockquote><strong>Judy</strong> and <strong>Yu Loong</strong> [<strong>Liew</strong>] were born in <strong>Malaysia</strong>, and moved to the <strong>U.S.</strong> in 1996 to study at <strong>Mississippi State University</strong>. Judy earned a degree in industrial engineering, and Yu Loong obtained a degree in electrical engineering. They married in December 2004 and moved to <strong>Laurel</strong> [<strong>MS</strong>].

<p>Life was good, and then it got even better in the fall of 2007 when they learned that they were expecting their first child....</p>

<p>All was well until a routine ultrasound... during the 4th month of her pregnancy revealed a complication. The doctor explained that the ultrasound indicated the baby's bones were not developing properly....</blockquote></p>]]>
<![CDATA[<blockquote>The couple was referred to a specialist in Jackson. After additional testing, the specialist reached the same conclusion as the obstetrician.

<p>The couple turned to their faith to comfort them in this difficult time. They prayed for their unborn child, and family and friends around the world joined them in prayer.</blockquote></p>

<blockquote>Prayer provided Judy with peace and hope.

<p>Eight weeks later another ultrasound was performed... the news was not good. That test revealed fractures in the arms and legs of the baby.</p>

<p>Doctors feared that he was suffering from Osteogenesis imperfecta, a rare genetic disorder in which the bones are brittle and break easily. In some cases, it is fatal.</p>

<p>Another ultrasound performed on March 21 revealed multiple fractures so clearly that even Judy and Yu Loong could detect them with their untrained eyes. They were devastated as the doctors explained that their baby boy had the most severe type of Osteogenesis imperfecta.</p>

<p>They also were told the baby's lungs were not developing properly, and they were given little hope for his survival.</p>

<p>The couple continued to pray, as did their family and friends. Family members and friends sent gifts for the baby, but eventually Yu Loong tucked them into a closet because it was too painful for Judy to see them. The room in their home that they planned to decorate as a nursery was turned into a home office.</p>

<p>A few weeks later, the Liews invited their pastor, Father <strong>Tommy Conway</strong>, to their home. Father Tommy blessed their home with holy water and anointed Judy with holy oil. Judy and Yu Loong asked him to be present during the birth of their baby so that he could baptize the child immediately....</p>

<p>[T]he delivery... was scheduled for May 2 - one week before the original due date.</p>

<p>Judy's parents... traveled from Malaysia and her sister... from <strong>Australia</strong>.... They were in the waiting room of <strong>Forrest General Hospital</strong> that Friday just before noon when Father Tommy emerged from the delivery room in scrubs exclaiming "He's alive, and he's perfect!"</p>

<p>Asher Liew entered this world at 11:46 a.m. screaming at the top of his lungs. He weighed 7 pounds 1 ounce and measured 19 inches in length.... [D]octors who worked on Asher's case are amazed that he is so healthy.</p>

<p>It truly is a miracle. Judy and Yu Loong believe that Asher is with them today because of the power of prayers. They wish to thank everyone who prayed for them.....</p>

<p>First-time grandmother, <strong>Alice</strong>, said the family never gave up hope throughout the entire ordeal....</blockquote></p>

<p>[HT: moderator <strong>MK</strong>; photo courtesy of <em><strong>HattiesburgAmerican.com</strong></em>]</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/05/miracles.html</link>
<guid>http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/05/miracles.html</guid>
<category>Apologetics</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 16:00:29 -0600</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Procession of Healing</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>On Saturday, the day before <strong>Mother's Day</strong>, <strong>TN</strong>, pro-lifers organized a funeral "<strong>Procession of Healing</strong>" to commemorate 3,100 babies killed by abortion in <strong>Knox Co.</strong> last year.</p>

<p>Between 300-350 cars participated in the funeral procession that wove through <strong>Knoxville</strong>.  Must have been quite something.  Watch a <a href="http://www.volunteertv.com/home/headlines/18837444.html" target=_blank"><em><strong>VolunteerTV.com</strong></em></a> news video by clicking on the graphic below:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.volunteertv.com/home/headlines/18837444.html" target=_blank"><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="procession of healing.jpg" src="http://www.jillstanek.com/procession%20of%20healing.jpg" width="301" height="261" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></span></a></p>

<p>According to <a href="http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2008/may/11/procession-mourns-abortions/" target=_blank"><em><strong>knoxnews.com</strong></em></a>:</p>

<blockquote>Organizers formulated the idea after hearing of a funeral and burial of 25 aborted babies found in dumpsters behind a clinic in <strong>Detroit</strong>.</blockquote>

<p>... <a href="http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/hodari/" target=_blank"><strong>Hodari's</strong> babies</a>.</p>

<p>Balance, we must have balance.  So <a href="http://www.volunteertv.com/home/headlines/18837444.html" target=_blank"><em><strong>VolunteerTV.com</strong></em></a> dredged up a pro-abort to condemn the mourning:</p>

<blockquote>"I think that it is a little dramatic, and implies that it was a kind of intended murder, which I don't believe choice is," said <strong>Ina Hughs</strong>, a pro-choice advocate who also said she understands why healing is needed, but called the procession a mockery. "I think it denigrated the spiritual and ritual side of a funeral."</blockquote>

<p>Notice Hughs avoided the word abortion, which rendered her statement incoherent.  And why is healing needed?  Exactly WHY?</p>]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/05/procession_of_h.html</link>
<guid>http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/05/procession_of_h.html</guid>
<category>Apologetics</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 13:15:05 -0600</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Claire gets reprimanded</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="roderick.jpg" src="http://www.jillstanek.com/roderick.jpg" width="300" height="187" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;" /></span>On May 1 <strong>University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point</strong> sophomore and <strong>Student Government Association</strong> senator <strong>Roderick King</strong> was <a href="http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/05/proabort_studen.html" target=_blank">caught on video</a> vandalizing a UWSP-approved cross display commemorating aborted babies.  In 1 week the video, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5NeLyMZUYM" target=_Blank">posted on <em><strong>YouTube</strong></em></a>, has been viewed 38,000 times.</p>

<p>Since then a sidebar has developed involving fellow SGA senator <strong>Claire Smith</strong>, who wrote a juvenile and poorly crafted email blaming <strong>Pointers for Life</strong>, the group displaying the crosses, <a href="http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/05/justice_served.html" target=_blank">posted here first</a>, for King's behavior.  She was responding to a respectful complaint that the SGA had not reprimanded King.</p>

<p>Pro-lifer <strong>Milissa</strong> fowarded UWSP official <strong>Steven Ward</strong> a link to my posting of Smith's email.  Smith <a href="http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/05/post_63.html" target=_blank">first responded last night</a> by shedding just a tad more light on King's SGA staus.</p>

<p>Later Ward forwarded Milissa an email he had just sent Smith.  It is good to see at least 1 UWSP administrator appreciates the ramifications of King's actions as well as the significance of an immature little snit making matters worse.  I also appreciate Ward's transparency.  Here's his latest email...</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.jillstanek.com/ward%20to%20claire.jpg"><img alt="ward to claire.jpg" src="http://www.jillstanek.com/ward to claire-thumb-500x562.jpg" width="500" height="562" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></a></span> </p>

<p>The fact that UWSP is receiving "international attention" is also encouraging.  Even the <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eugene-volokh/vandalism-of-pro-life-dis_b_100883.html" target=_blank"><em><strong>Huffington Post</strong></em></a> covered the King story with no defense of his actions.</p>

<p>[Photo courtesy of the <em><strong>Wausau Daily Herald</strong></em>]</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/05/claire_gets_rep.html</link>
<guid>http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/05/claire_gets_rep.html</guid>
<category>Violence</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 09:48:50 -0600</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>