Not after you get done with them

Marie, LOL! so true

Jodi, go back to school. You need a refresher course in human biology and common sense.

Ms. Jacobson on her bio says that she has 'extensive experience' in public health, and human rights. Scary.

Uh, in other news: the sky is blue.

And, no, she does not have much experience in human rights. She's too busy dehumanizing to understand a single thing about human rights.

Oh my goodness. That's quite a thread over at RH Reality Check. Until Americans understand the biology and medical terminology surrounding the abortion debate it will be very difficult to change hearts and minds to the pro-life side.

In Opposite Land, Jasper, killing people is considered "public health" and denying those people any sort of trial before killing them and calling it legal is referred to as "human rights". She also happened to forget her credit as Ambassador of Opposite Land.

Janet, the pro-choice side likes to keep 'em dumb. Obfuscating a simple biological system with medical/philosophical/legal mumbo-jumbo works nicely.

Reality Check. Reality?
Chalking it up as one more molestation of the English language.

'Fetuses that undergo abortions are not alive.' And guess what, Jodi...people who are buried in cemeteries are not alive, either...DUH!

If they are not "alive," why must they be "terminated"?
If they are not "alive," when, exactly, do they become "alive"?
If they are not "alive," why are they growing?

Oh Cindy, that is the best. If they are not alive why must they be terminated???? and why are they growing???

I get that she's completely without even a casual acquaintance with truth, but I've just got to say, what a bizarre choice of words: "undergo" ?! Does one undergo execution? Usually a death sentence is imposed. A house undergoing remodeling is not the same as a total demolition.

By her own logic, I guess she's not alive either. At least she's proven that intellectually.

This pro-abort's statement reminds me of the statement "If it is not a baby, then you are not pregnant". (Maybe it's a tumor) Duh?

If you want to know when human life begins just ask any man getting ready to put on a condom. Duh?

The pregnant woman consents, though not always fully informed, but the prenatal child, though never consulted and never consenting, is fully informed of the violent act of abortion.

yor bro ken

If it's not alive, than why do we have laws in some states that can convict someone who murders a pregnant woman for taking two lives, including the unborn child?

Why have prenatal care? Why sue the doctor if something goes wrong with the pregnancy?

The left is so smug about being the reality-based, pro-science community but they are in full-on denial of both science and reality to support abortion.