Quote of the Day 5-22-10

fetus doll 1.jpg

"It is hard to imagine that we would have an employee who believes it would be appropriate to share plastic fetus dolls with students in one of our schools." ~ School Board Chairman Stephen Tonelson

"Very life like, and it's a pro-life tool. To be quite honest, that is so incredible to me, that a staff member would do something so... entirely inappropriate and unacceptable. [Board members] were all pretty dumbfounded." ~ Board member Kirk Houston Sr.

"The administration has to look at that. That's obviously inappropriate." ~ Board member Billy Cook

fetus doll 2.jpg

~ All reacting to the "disturbing" news that an Oakwood Elementary School (located in Norfolk, VA) employee, now on administrative leave, has been handing out "plastic human fetus dolls" along with "a card with a 'pro-life' message and information on fetal growth" to 3rd, 4th, and 5th grade students for several months. Principal Sheila Tillett has also been placed on leave pending an investigation of "the distribution of the life-like forms... [that] shocked and repelled some parents and teachers and School Board members," according to The Virginian-Pilot, May 21

[HT: reader Gail C. R.]

Comments:

In the context of a biology lesson, this would be completely appropriate.

Posted by: Lauren at May 22, 2010 11:42 AM


"Very life like, and it's a pro-life tool. To be quite honest, that is so incredible to me, that a staff member would do something so... entirely inappropriate and unacceptable. [Board members] were all pretty dumbfounded." ~ Board member Kirk Houston Sr.


I love when those it positions of authority say things like, "To be quite honest" as if saying this will reassure us that they always are. Ack!

Oh, and there's a typo in Kirk's statement. The word 'founded' needs to be deleted.

Posted by: Praxedes at May 22, 2010 11:50 AM


Praxedes... haha on last line.

Posted by: Jill Stanek Author Profile Page at May 22, 2010 11:52 AM


But of course they would feel it wasn't appropriate, there wasn't a Planned Parenthood card with an 800 # to call so the little kiddies would know what to do if after having sex ed shoved down their throats in 3rd grade the condom the school nurse gave them broke!!!

Posted by: Rhonda at May 22, 2010 11:55 AM


I don't see why they were so angry? It would be a great tool if any of those students have a pregnant mom.......so they can see and hold a figure of what their sibling looks like before birth.

NOT INAPPROPRIATE!

Posted by: LizFromNebraska at May 22, 2010 12:17 PM


Add to my reminder list of "Reasons Why I Homeschool":

Incompetent, unqualified school board members who believe educating students about human development is somehow "disturbing."

Posted by: Kel at May 22, 2010 12:24 PM


I'd also like to add that I have a fetal model at 11 weeks gestation (Thanks, Jacque!) that I use to show my much younger children exactly what their little brother looked like at that point in the pregnancy when we told them I was pregnant.

Their response? 5y/o "A BABY!" 18 mth old "Baby!"

I don't think they were exactly tramatized by the event. Now they both like looking at the ultrasound of their little brother and looking at the pictures online.

Posted by: Lauren at May 22, 2010 12:28 PM


"Their response? 5y/o "A BABY!" 18 mth old "Baby!"

"Amen, I say to you, unless you turn and become like children, you will not enter the kingdom of heaven."

My kids went to my town's Catholic School until 5th grade. Then the older ones went to the local public middle school. During this time, I started working at the public school. After seeing the reality for myself, my youngest is now attending a Catholic middle school one town over. An administrator told me I am great with the students but not so good with the adults. I told him I was hired to work with the students not schmooze with the adults. I talk about the humanity of the unborn with kids any chance I get. I'm not real liked by many of the adults and know my days are numbered in this district.

Kids should get to run for school board. Our schools would improve.

Posted by: Praxedes at May 22, 2010 12:55 PM


Should have handed out condoms. The employee would be receiving an award by now.

Posted by: Cranky Catholic at May 22, 2010 1:01 PM


Everybody knows public school employees are supposed to encourage students to experiment sexually and then refer them to Planned Parenthood to get scraped out. Actually EDUCATING the kids isn't the school's job!

Posted by: Christina at May 22, 2010 1:06 PM


Well color me shocked. The same people who complain about the "liberal indoctrination" of kids in public schools suddenly think this form of indoctrination is perfectly acceptable.

Posted by: Marissa at May 22, 2010 1:18 PM


Because the liberals are not being put on administrative leave Mardupissa.

Posted by: Praxedes at May 22, 2010 1:34 PM


Marissa...how is biological information about human development "indoctrination" exactly? Wow. They must really be indoctrinating those docs in med school!

Have you had a child Marissa? Any of us here who have carried a baby can attest that the child's life begins well before birth. My son was alive at my 5 week ultrasound with a beating heart and arms and legs. He was alive at my 5 month ultrasound as he moved around and wiggled his toes and proudly showed us he was a boy. He was alive at my 6 month ultrasound where we watched him wink and yawn and suck his thumb. I felt him moving every day for over 5 months. He was ALIVE. That is biological fact. I know it doesn't help your baby killing cause any, but hey, the truth hurts sometimes.

Posted by: Sydney M. at May 22, 2010 1:47 PM


Posted by: Praxedes at May 22, 2010 12:55 PM

Praxedes, you're awesome :)

"the same people who complain about the "liberal indoctrination" of kids in public schools suddenly think this form of indoctrination is perfectly acceptable."

So, educating kids about basic biology = indoctrination? Please, tell me you're joking. If not, that's just insane.

Posted by: Lucy at May 22, 2010 1:55 PM


the people who have no problem with 10 year old bobby getting free condoms in "Health class" have a problem with ten year old Susie getting a fetal model so she knows what she looked like before she was born. Or perhaps her baby brother or sister who her mother is pregnant with....*gasp*

Anything that shows the TRUTH about human development PRE BIRTH is illegal, but a piece of rubber (and learning to put it on a BANANA!) is just fine and dandy.......I see a HUGE problem with this.

Posted by: LizFromNebraska at May 22, 2010 3:12 PM


what a bunch of lousy creeps on this school board. repulsive human beings.

Posted by: Jasper at May 22, 2010 4:50 PM


I don't agree with handing these models out at school.
If it was simply a random handout in class I'm not happy with it.
Why?
Because if she/he can do this what might someone else handout? condoms? PP cards? info on how to do drugs safely?
If it were done in a class where fetal development were being discussed that would be different.
I would say something like this would be appropriate in high school, where a prolife teacher comes in with the fetal development models and these are given out.
I've used these in sidewalk counselling and they work.
But for 8 to 10 year olds? hmmmm

Posted by: angel at May 22, 2010 6:51 PM


"Because if she/he can do this what might someone else handout? condoms? PP cards? info on how to do drugs safely?"

I don't know about elementary schools but the above starts happening at some middle schools.

I was just supervising at a middle school dance last week. Two of the songs played were: Big and Rich's Save a Horse, Ride a Cowboy and ACDC's She Shook Me all Night Long. I don't believe these lyrics are 6-8 grade appropriate but based on my complaint history, nothing will be done to the teacher who owns and played the music.

I don't think this board will OK these fetus dolls be handed out in an elementary science or health class. Otherwise the board would meet her half-way and tell her to save the dolls for classtime and she wouldn't be on administrative leave and this wouldn't make the news.

However, it's a good thing that this type of stuff does make the news. Jesus is working here too!



Posted by: Praxedes at May 22, 2010 7:25 PM


Let's be perfectly clear. The only reason these morally bankrupt, spineless academics have an issue with someone exposing to the light of day the beauty and miracle of human life in its early stages of development is that they want to reserve the right to dismember and kill these little children if they want to.

To those of us that love Life and love children, these dolls are precious and awe-inspiring.

To the pro-death mob, they are "inappropriate...unacceptable...disturbing" because they have already decided in their evil hearts that they want to be able to kill their children if they "choose" to and don't want to be confronted with the truth of the beauty of preborn human life or the wickedness of their own hearts.

"And the judgment is based on this fact: God’s light came into the world, but people loved the darkness more than the light, for their actions were evil. All who do evil hate the light and refuse to go near it for fear their sins will be exposed. But those who do what is right come to the light so others can see that they are doing what God wants.” Jn 3:19–21 NLT

Posted by: Ed at May 22, 2010 9:19 PM


I realize Praxedes that the schools you are involved with are very different from the elementary school my daughter attends.
There is no bullying, no drinking, no drugs and definitely no sex.
It's a rural school and quite small.
I just can't imagine a teacher coming into class with these models unless they were doing some sort of instruction.
And I know a friend of mine who does prolife presentations in the local high schools (most the Catholic ones) does take in the fetal models.

Posted by: angel at May 22, 2010 9:47 PM


"It's a rural school and quite small."

The middle school I'm at is rural and has under 400 students.

"I just can't imagine a teacher coming into class with these models unless they were doing some sort of instruction."

I'm guessing she was instructing students on human development. I have brought in different plants/flowers/seeds and showed students these. I guess I better be more careful . . . .

Posted by: Praxedes at May 22, 2010 10:28 PM


Many antichoicers I talk to speak about the "parental rights" of adults to be in charge of the sexual/reproductive education of their kids.

How do you all feel about the fact that these fetus-dolls were given out without the parent's permission?

One parent was quoted as saying:
""As a parent, I choose to teach my children about those things later in life," she added. "I did not sign a waiver for my daughter to be given a fetus.""
http://hamptonroads.com/node/554267?cid=mc

Posted by: KushielsMoon at May 23, 2010 12:28 PM


This would not even be an issue if we as a country were not killing tiny humans by the millions. Those who kill their children either repent or attempt to remain in denial. It's beyond stupid to claim that a child is injured to see what he or she looked like at a younger age.

Posted by: Jan at June 1, 2010 3:36 AM



Post a comment:




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

Please enter the letter "x" in the field below: