Imagine if a pro-lifer were to pull a gun on a pro-abort outside an abortion mill.
Yet I can only find ONE mainstream news story on the opposite sort of incident that happened at a Phoenix, AZ, Planned Parenthood 5 days ago. And note no suspect name was provided, no mug shot....
Were the situation reversed, this man's name and face would be plastered everywhere, with commentary upon commentary vilifying the entire pro-life movement....
And, as Steve Ertelt of LifeNews.com reminded us, this incident came only 1 week after a pro-abort tried to run over a pro-lifer in front of a PP in Chico, CA. I think this proves all pro-aborts entering PPs are prone to violence against postborns as well as preborns and should be placed on Janet Napolitano's domestic terrorist watch list.
Case in point, this particular PP was 1 of 2 Phoenix PPs exposed by Lila Rose only 4 months ago as willing to cover up minor rape. I think this is interesting adjunct information, don't you?
Proves yet again the only violence being done is by proaborts and those who choose abortion.
This "choice" of a violent solution spills over into other areas of their lives.
and why isn't this everywhere either?
Violence against pro-lifers= good
violence against pro-abortionists= bad
It seems that the pro-aborts have their problems too. Ours is a constant battle, whether it be in defending our First Amendment rights, or dealing with screamers who have only two or three words in their vocabularies, or trying to get our message across about the utter violence of abortion to a media that is unwilling to print and show the truth, or dealing with authorities and police who sometimes let their pro-choice bias influence their decision making, or being lied about by staff members at some clinics who make false accusations, or having to defend ourselves in court against extremist advocacy groups such as NOW at great expense...and so on.Posted by: Jerry at July 6, 2009 9:56 AM
A reminder, If you are witnessing/praying in front of an abortuary, bring a cell phone with camera/video capability. Bring a friend, don't go alone.
I hope Bill O'Reilly at FOX NEWS reports on this. Lord know, the MSM won't.Posted by: Janet at July 6, 2009 10:48 AM
Good idea, Janet! No..the LIBERAL MEDIA never talks about or shows this sort of thing.Posted by: Pamela at July 6, 2009 11:47 AM
I actually read a quote from someone who defended pro-choice violence saying that they were in the right because they were defending infanticide from those who would wish to take it away...as he put it (I don't remember his exact syntax, but I do remember the words that he used), "Like a tigress defending her cubs, or a lion defending her cubs."
I had to give the man who wrote that credit though...mad poetry, mad skills.Posted by: Vannah at July 6, 2009 12:00 PM
Reality, this article might interest you:
49 MILLION TO FIVE
June 3, 2009
In the wake of the shooting of late-term abortionist George Tiller, President Barack Obama sent out a welcome message that this nation would not tolerate attacks on pro-lifers or any other Americans because of their religion or beliefs.
Ha ha! Just kidding. That was the lead sentence -- with minor edits -- of a New York Times editorial warning about theoretical hate crimes against Muslims published eight months after 9/11. Can pro-lifers get a hate crimes bill passed and oceans of ink devoted to assuring Americans that "most pro-lifers are peaceful"?
For years, we've had to hear about the grave threat that Americans might overreact to a terrorist attack committed by 19 Muslims shouting "Allahu akbar" as they flew commercial jets into American skyscrapers. That would be the equivalent of 19 pro-lifers shouting "Abortion kills a beating heart!" as they gunned down thousands of innocent citizens in Wichita, Kan.
Why aren't liberals rushing to assure us this time that "most pro-lifers are peaceful"? Unlike Muslims, pro-lifers actually are peaceful.
According to recent polling, a majority of Americans oppose abortion -- which is consistent with liberals' hysterical refusal to allow us to vote on the subject. In a country with approximately 150 million pro-lifers, five abortionists have been killed since Roe v. Wade.
In that same 36 years, more than 49 million babies have been killed by abortionists. Let's recap that halftime score, sports fans: 49 million to five.
Meanwhile, fewer than 2 million Muslims live in America and, while Muslims are less murderous than abortionists, I'm fairly certain they've killed more than five people in the United States in the last 36 years. For some reason, the number "3,000" keeps popping into my head.
So in a country that is more than 50 percent pro-life -- and 80 percent opposed to the late-term abortions of the sort performed by Tiller -- only five abortionists have been killed. And in a country that is less than 0.5 percent Muslim, several dozen Muslims have killed thousands of Americans.
But the killing of about one abortionist per decade leads liberals to condemn the entire pro-life movement as "domestic terrorists." At least liberals have finally found some terrorists they'd like to send to Guantanamo.
Tiller bragged about performing 60,000 abortions, including abortions of viable babies, able to survive outside the mother's womb. He made millions of dollars performing late-term abortions so gruesome that only two other abortionists -- not a squeamish bunch -- in the entire country would perform them.
Kansas law allows late-term abortions only to save the mother's life or to prevent "irreversible physical damage" to the mother. But Tiller was more than happy to kill viable babies, provided the mothers: (1) forked over $5,000; and (2) mentioned "substantial and irreversible conditions," which, in Tiller's view, apparently included not being able to go to concerts or rodeos or being "temporarily depressed" on account of their pregnancies.
In return for blood money from Tiller's profitable abattoir, Democrats ran a political protection racket for the late-term abortionist.
In 1997, The Washington Post reported that Tiller attended one of Bill Clinton's White House coffees for major campaign contributors. In addition to a $25,000 donation to Clinton, Tiller wanted to thank him personally for 30 months of U.S. Marshals' protection paid for by the U.S. taxpayer.
Kansas Democrats who received hundreds of thousands of campaign dollars from Tiller repeatedly intervened to block any interference with Tiller's abortion mill.
Kathleen Sebelius, who was the governor of Kansas until Obama made her Health and Human Services Secretary, received hundreds of thousands of campaign dollars from Tiller. Sebelius vetoed one bill restricting late-term abortions and another one that would have required Tiller to turn over his records pertaining to "substantial and irreversible conditions" justifying his late-term abortions.
Kansas Attorney General Paul Morrison also got elected with the help of Tiller's blood money, replacing a Republican attorney general who was in the middle of an investigation of Tiller for various crimes including his failure to report statutory rapes, despite performing abortions on pregnant girls as young as 11.
But soon after Morrison replaced the Republican attorney general, the charges against Tiller were reduced and, in short order, he was acquitted of a few misdemeanors. In what is a not uncommon cost of doing business with Democrats, Morrison is now gone, having been forced to resign when his mistress charged him with sexual harassment and corruption.
Tiller was protected not only by a praetorian guard of elected Democrats, but also by the protective coloration of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America -- coincidentally, the same church belonged to by Tiller's fellow Wichita executioner, the BTK killer.
The official Web page of the ELCA instructs: "A developing life in the womb does not have an absolute right to be born." As long as we're deciding who does and doesn't have an "absolute right to be born," who's to say late-term abortionists have an "absolute right" to live?
I wouldn't kill an abortionist myself, but I wouldn't want to impose my moral values on others. No one is for shooting abortionists. But how will criminalizing men making difficult, often tragic, decisions be an effective means of achieving the goal of reducing the shootings of abortionists?
Following the moral precepts of liberals, I believe the correct position is: If you don't believe in shooting abortionists, then don't shoot one.
COPYRIGHT 2009 ANN COULTER
DISTRIBUTED BY UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE
1130 Walnut, Kansas City, MO 64106
Posted by: B
at July 6, 2009 9:47 PM
Gotta love Ann- she makes some great points.
Just proves this guy is a killer with a killer's heart...he'll kill his baby and anyone else.Posted by: Sydney M at July 6, 2009 10:07 PM
Go ahead, let them pull out a gun on me.
Last I checked, my Second Amendment rights are still in effect.Posted by: carder at July 6, 2009 11:13 PM
Hi Carder 11:13PM
You're my kind of lady!!Posted by: Mary at July 7, 2009 3:28 PM
..He was just showing you wingnuts that he was armed and ready to protect himself if needed..
You should be happy. This is what you guys (on the right want). Some sort of "civil war" between the two sides.
In light of what I've been reading on some of your blogs lately (COUPs against the governemt..etc..etc.)(..and seeing on Faux), I've talked to my wife about arming to protect my family from you guys.Posted by: soonerman at July 7, 2009 3:34 PM
Violence against pro-lifers= good
violence against pro-abortionists= bad"
There's no violence against Pro-fetusers...
Media rules = show facts.
...sorry, your movement attracts the crazies because you are leading it the wrong way...
Yelling at people at abortion clinics and showing signs of aborted babies ("shock and awe") attracts them. Making the focus more about the "LIFE" part of pro-lfe, adoption, community involvement, health care for all children, volunteering..etc (Actually, valuing fetuses outside of the womb). You know all that stuff that Jesus talks about in the Bible would give you so much more success...
...Flame away....Posted by: soonerman at July 7, 2009 3:41 PM
So when someone pulls a gun on you, you will just assume this person is showing you he/she is ready to defend themselves against you if needed.
You were saying something about wingnuts Soonerman?
Posted by: Mary at July 7, 2009 7:47 PM
On what do your base your assumption that PL people do not involve themselves with adoption, service to the community, health care for children, volunteering, etc.?Posted by: Mary at July 7, 2009 9:52 PM
Mary, whenever this popular argument is put forth by a proabort, I have to ask if they would berate a cancer researcher, saying, "Why don't you research AIDS?!?" Of course they wouldn't, but they think this 'help the born people' argument is a sure gotcha!, not knowing any other aspects of service prolifers are involved in. The fact is that far from "crazies", everyone I have met in my work the pro-life movement are exemplarly, contributing citizens who give of themselves and their time and are willing to subject themselves to abuse and derision for these defenseless little ones.Posted by: klynn73 at July 7, 2009 10:09 PM
Since you're so concerned about consistency and the importance of all life, do you recall hearing any outrage from the PC community or MSM over the gunning down of 7 Detroit schoolchildren in front of their summer school? Did Rachel Madcow blather ad nauseum about an alleged "conspiracy" against Detroit schoolchildren?
I certainly think you folks and your media allies should be as consistent as you demand we should be.
Ever hear if federal marshalls were sent to protect Detroit summer school students like they were sent to "protect" abortionists? Or are the lives of black schoolchildren not as important as that of a white abortionist?
You anti-aborts would have a much better argument if the suspect were a nurse or doctor, rather than a stressed-out kid who knocked-up his girlfriend and didn't have the courage to escort her into the clinic.
One stupid kid illegally carrying a firearm, and assaulting someone does not cancel out the bombings, murders, and threats committed by white male fringe wingnuts.Posted by: Dhalgren at July 8, 2009 9:49 AM
Of course, when people on your side pull guns they're simply stressed out. Something all of us do all the time when we're stressed. Just a stupid kid with an illegal weapon. You'd howl like a banshee if that "stupid kid" pulled a gun on an abortionist.
Posted by: Mary
at July 8, 2009 10:24 AM
On what do you base your assumption this was a "kid"?Posted by: Mary at July 8, 2009 10:31 AM
"Of course they wouldn't, but they think this 'help the born people' argument is a sure gotcha!, not knowing any other aspects of service prolifers are involved in."
If someone saved my life when I was extremely young, that person wouldn't owe me a thing more. I would owe THAT person something, but (s)he wouldn't owe me.Posted by: bmmg39 at July 8, 2009 3:55 PM