Reporter believes vaccines tied to population control in Philippines
While the Solicitor General and his legal team are trying very hard to convince us that state-mandated contraception under the Reproductive Health Law is not population control, an aggressive vaccination campaign among the poor is reported to be causing an alarming rise in infant mortality in the countryside.
Last weekend I listened to reports from family life workers assembled in Cebu City [who]… reported similar cases of infants dying after having been vaccinated by local health workers….
The law… requires that every newborn be given the Hepatitis-B vaccine within 24 hours after birth. Some doctors find this highly questionable because the newborn derives its immunity from the mother for the first 15 months from birth, and risks no infection unless the mother is infected. This raises the suspicion that the Hepa-B campaign could be part of the globally-directed population reduction drive.
… In 2010… the billionaire Bill Gates… one of the leading advocates of eugenics as a means of reducing the global population, told a conference… that “if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we (could reduce the global population of 6.8 billion people) by perhaps 10 to 15 percent.”
… A few months before that… Gates announced that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation would give $10 billion over the next ten years to develop and deliver new vaccines to children in the developing world….
… [L]ast year in India, at least 47,500 children were reported to have been permanently paralyzed after having been injected with anti-polio vaccines. The Gates Foundation and the World Health Organization, who, together with the vaccine industry, are partners in the Global Alliance for Vaccinations and Immunization, dismissed these cases as pure coincidences. But not the family life workers.
In the mid-90s more than 3.4 million Filipino women were injected with tetanus vaccines… found to contain human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG)… which, when introduced into the body coupled with a tetanus toxoid carrier, produces anti-bodies that render a woman incapable of maintaining [her] pregnancy. The vaccine was supposed to be against tetanus, which afflicts both men and women, but only women were vaccinated, and only women between age 15 and 45.
It was clearly an anti-fertility measure — an instrument of population control.
Now we are hearing more.
~ Francisco Tatad, reporting on what he believes is a connection between attempts at population control and vaccines in the Philippines, Manila Standard Today, August 14
[Photo via topnews.us]
Jill Stanek is a nurse turned speaker, columnist and blogger, a national figure in the effort to protect both preborn and postborn innocent human life.
“if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we (could reduce the global population of 6.8 billion people) by perhaps 10 to 15 percent.”
If a modality did a “really great job,” wouldn’t it be reducing mortality?
Everyone should do their own in depth research before vaccinating! There’s MUCH more to the picture than what your doctor is telling you.
Doctors do such a poor job in creating trust between patients and themselves lately. As many abuses as I have seen the technocrat class engage in over my short life, the question of who to trust anymore becomes impossible to answer.
“if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we (could reduce the global population of 6.8 billion people) by perhaps 10 to 15 percent.”
If a modality did a “really great job,” wouldn’t it be reducing mortality?
Yeah I was thinking the same thing. Better vaccines and health care shouldn’t be reducing the population. The only thing on that list that would be doing that is the contraception and abortion (oh, forgive me, “reproductive health services”).
Vaccines are so important and I don’t want to feed into the anti-vaccine stuff. However, if population control attempts are being made through the vaccine program, that is despicable. And given the people involved, I wouldn’t put it past them.
Absolutely, CT. There was a flawed “study” on autism that was blamed on the preservative in some vaccines that was discredited, but the damage to people’s trust was already done. I do believe that vaccines can be greatly beneficial to promote “herd immunity” but they can also be misused. I think perhaps they might be spread out over a person’s lifetime and not have tiny bodies inundated with vaccination products too many too quickly. But the kind of misuse suspected in today’s quote is quite alarming.
The population control conclusion seems to refer to the reproductive health services.
Outside of the “developed” world, reproductive health services is the euphemism for providing birth control and abortion so those dark-skinned people don’t over-burden us in the white world, and don’t over-burden our planet.
Otherwise, the topic could be split off between ob/gyn care and maternal/child health.
You can take any of these countries where people have darker skin, and enter that country in google, and add a couple search terms – maybe “birth spacing” or “reproductive access” and you will find that the United Nations, WHO, and International Planned Parenthood Federation have been on the ground for a long time. Their M.O. is to get each of these dark-skinned countries to see that population control is a means to economic strength, to then set up a census, to then survey women about number of children, desired number of children, birth-spacing, and attitudes toward birth control and abortion.
They then help the govt of the dark-skinned country set up a repro health dept or ministry, and help this ministry promote the population control idea.
In China, they were able to be frank about national economic strength. In Japan, there already was something of this movement before we set up shop there in 1946, establishing a census. In most countries, we whites from the developed world guide these dark-skinned countries to begin campaigns of ideals such as spacing babies, not having too many, and being accepting of birth control.
The surveys continue, and so the changes in attitudes can be related to the overall reproductive numbers.
When these results are shared in research literature or national reports, the dark-skinned govt reports these efforts as being their own – not guided by white-skinned interlopers.
How likely is it that the same pattern gets repeated country after country? Afghanistan gets out of war with Russia, and the first thing thy want is a survey of women to find out how receptive women are to birth control? Come on now.
You would think the anti-colonialists would be all over this just like thy are all over environmental exploitation and worker exploitation, and the trap of foreign aid loans.
But no: the anti-colonialists are Marxists, and love the idea of being in control of how many babies a family has, and who lives and who dies. They want God’s job since they do not see anyone as occupying that job currently.
Gates is just another imperialist/colonialist.
None of this is a big secret or a conspiracy theory. We educated liberal elites just don’t talk about it much. I have never seen it in a presidential debate. If I bring it up among liberal friends, they have no idea that a major United Nations initiative is devoted to BC and abortion promotion across the globe – all the dark countries we can get in to.
It is well-documented everywhere, but you have to have an idea of the entire story to see these pieces for what they are.
Here is one solid piece to go read to see this whites uber alles plan:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Security_Study_Memorandum_200
Articles like this tell you this is coordinated. From New York…
Mauldin WP, Ross JA. Prospects and programs for fertility reduction, 1990-2015. Studies in Family Planning. 1994 Mar-Apr;25(2):77-95.
Source: Research Division, Population Council, New York.
Abstract
“What is the likelihood that each of the 37 developing countries with populations of 15 million or more in 1990 will reach replacement fertility by the year 2015? These countries have a combined population of 3.9 billion, 91 percent of the population of all developing countries. For this article, a composite index was used as the basis for predicting future levels of total fertility. The index was constructed from socioeconomic variables (life expectancy at birth, infant mortality rates, percent adult literacy, ratio of children enrolled in primary or secondary school, percent of the labor force in nonagricultural occupations, gross national product per capita, and percent of the population living in urban areas), total fertility rates for the years 1985-90, total fertility rate decline from 1960-65 to 1985-90, family planning program effort scores in 1989, and the level of contraceptive prevalence in 1990. Eight countries are classified as certain to reach replacement fertility by 2015, and an additional thirteen probably will also. Five countries are classified as possibly reaching replacement fertility, and eleven as unlikely to do so.”
There’s a problem here. I think it was Joe Stalin who said ‘one death is a tragedy, 10,000 a statistic’. This is evident especially heree BECAUSE these folks are COLORED FOREIGNERS … it’s a slam-dunk ‘so what?’ Same thing as killing 50 million each year by doctors … Josef Mengele would be so proud!
Yeah I was thinking the same thing. Better vaccines and health care shouldn’t be reducing the population. The only thing on that list that would be doing that is the contraception and abortion (oh, forgive me, “reproductive health services”).
Vaccines will reduce the population because a high birth rate is, in part, a cultural holdover from the not-too-distant past in which people had many children because they could not realistically expect all those children to survive childhood. For the sake of mathematical simplicity, let’s say that the average Indian couple wants four children. The numbers aren’t fresh in my mind because I looked them up yesterday morning, but IIRC, the statistics said that about one in five children born in India in 1970 died before reaching adulthood. So people would routinely assume that a woman would need to give birth five or six times if she and her husband were to have four children supporting them in their old age. The infant mortality rate in India is now significantly lower, and so now more of those five or six infants born to a family will reach adulthood. Hence a rapid population growth in the past several decades. However, even though the infant mortality rate is lower now, it is still high enough that a couple can’t be confident that they only need to have four babies to end up with four adult children. They might reasonably still conclude that they should have a fifth baby because there is still a real possibility that one of their four children will die young.
Vaccination and other health care improvements are supposed to take the “gambling” out of a couple’s family planning. I mean, I realize that some pro-lifers oppose family planning because they think that God wants all the empty spaces on the planet filled up, or whatever, but surely we can all agree that it would be nice to live in a world where parents can expect that their children won’t die.
Vaccines are so important and I don’t want to feed into the anti-vaccine stuff. However, if population control attempts are being made through the vaccine program, that is despicable. And given the people involved, I wouldn’t put it past them.
It’s not clear that all the cases are related to the vaccine. If they are related, it is probably because the vaccination methods are not as safe as they could be, and that is a problem that should be (and is being) discussed. However, India vaccinated 170 million children against polio. Several million of those children would have been paralyzed or died without the vaccine. Why would Bill Gates spend billions of dollars to give 48,000 children non-polio paralysis when he could have saved his money and let fifty times that many children die from polio?
Vaccination programs can have unintended consequences. For example, if you go into a population ravaged by measles and diphtheria and vaccinate for measles without doing anything to improve the health and living conditions that make people susceptible to disease, there will be a surge of diphtheria in the vaccinated population, because all you’ve done is save children from measles so they can die of diphtheria. But it would still be much, much cheaper to simply do nothing.
“Vaccines-as-population-control theories” tend to rely upon the reader having poor math skills.
Vaccination and other health care improvements are supposed to take the “gambling” out of a couple’s family planning.
Really? I thought vaccinations and other health care improvements were to keep one from getting sick and improving their health.
If they are related, it is probably because the vaccination methods are not as safe as they could be
How reassuring. ”probably” means you really don’t know but like to talk as if you do.
I mean, I realize that some pro-lifers oppose family planning because they think that God wants all the empty spaces on the planet filled up, or whatever
Like, omg! I mean, like, that’s it! Your right, Lisa, some pro-lifers want every square foot of earth filled with a human. I’m sure you’ll provide a link to the prolifers who say as much!
Really? I thought vaccinations and other health care improvements were to keep one from getting sick and improving their health.
They are, yes, but I was addressing CT’s specific question of why vaccines are expected to reduce rather than increase the global population. That was my bad–I shouldn’t have assumed that you would understand the connection between my quotation of CT’s post and the content of my post.
I’m sure you’ll provide a link to the prolifers who say as much!
Again, my apologies. I should not have assumed that you were capable of understanding facetiousness.
How reassuring. ”probably” means you really don’t know but like to talk as if you do.
No, it means that I looked things up instead of believing whatever junk wanders across my screen. Not everyone lives in a world of self-imposed ignorance. Mr. Tatad didn’t cite his source, because no one ever accused pro-life “journalists” of practicing good journalism, but the statistics on 47,500 children experiencing paralysis after receiving the vaccine seems to trace back to an article published a year ago in the Indian Journal of Medical Ethics (vol 9 pt. 2), though the article says that research connecting the polio vaccine to non-polio paralysis goes back to 2007. The article found that rates of paralysis increased when the vaccine is given monthly, and concluded that giving children three doses of the vaccine instead of six or more could prevent polio from recurring without raising the risk of non-polio paralysis.
I realize that you may not understand why an article in a medical journal is more reliable than an unsourced newspaper column, but the link to the article is here, in the unlikely event that you want to have an informed opinion.
Incidentally, although the article says that children experienced paralysis after having been “injected” with anti-polio vaccines, the vaccines in question were administered orally. A reader with the capacity for critical thought would find that such a basic error called the reliability of the source into question.
Wow Lisa, condescending much?
Oops, accidently hit ‘like’ on Lisa’s post.
I don’t like her post at all but it sure is a great example of the Educated Snooty Elite Syndrome that has become rampant in our society. The problem is the carriers don’t even realize they have it.
Too bad there isn’t a vaccine for it. . .
Translation: No, you can’t be bothered to know anything about it.
Lisa, it’s like this: God created us in His own image and likeness. Therefore, rejection of a child is a rejection of God. It is throwing His gift away.
I am a USA citizen with a Filipina wife and live in the USA. We are having our first baby in February and he/she will be born in Olongapo, Zambales. I do not trust vaccines or drug companies. Do an internet search on SV-40 and/or aluminum, mercury and peanut oil in vaccines and you won’t either. We need to find a doctor that is skeptical of vaccines too in Zambales, Pampanga or Manila. Can anyone here help us?
barrygenetoney@hotmail.com