Pro-life vid of day: Radio host mocks opposers of contraception
by Kelli
At Secular Talk, radio host Kyle Kulinski (pictured right) gives his take on why he believes pro-lifers are wrong to oppose contraception. To do so, he comments on a panel discussion from the National Right to Life Convention featuring remarks from radio host and pregnancy resource center director Joy Pinto. (Also shown in the clip are NRO editor Kathryn Jean Lopez and Dr. Jean Garton.)
In the course of the video, Kulinski claims that if a person represses their own urge to have sex, “it’s gonna manifest itself in all sorts of weird and screwed up ways” and insists that “it is overwhelming and unanimous that we all agree that contraception is a good thing”, despite the fact that his entire program is dedicated to claiming that religious pro-lifers are wrong on contraception – in other words, it’s obviously not unanimous.
It should really go without saying, but WARNING – Profanity:
[youtube]http://youtu.be/wdOOZwpTjdw[/youtube]
How would you answer Kulinksi’s claims?
Email dailyvid@jillstanek.com with your video suggestions.
[HT: Robert Berger]
Jill Stanek is a nurse turned speaker, columnist and blogger, a national figure in the effort to protect both preborn and postborn innocent human life.
In the course of the video, Kulinski claims that if a person represses their own urge to have sex, “it’s gonna manifest itself in all sorts of weird and screwed up ways”
I can’t help but think Mr. Kulinski would have been one of those one-marshmallow kids…
http://www.opposingviews.com/i/did-you-know-the-who-ranks-birth-control-pill-as-carcinogen
“In the course of the video, Kulinski claims that if a person represses their own urge to have sex, “it’s gonna manifest itself in all sorts of weird and screwed up ways””
I can’t help thinking of the many thousands of immigrant kids who were lured up to the U.S. unaccompanied by parents. Imagine the potential for abuse, now that they are in the care of a secular government which might agree with Kulinski that repressing sexual urges is unhealthy.
(Yes, the feds offered jobs in January for transporting an EXPECTED 65,000 new, minor immigrants. This crisis was planned, and is a real war on children.)
Who?
Truthseeker that’s way out of line. The US doesn’t encourage rape of children ffs.
The problem of unaccompanied minor immigrants is huge and horrible, and those kids are INCREDIBLY vulnerable to abuse (especially sexual and forced labor), but it’s absolutely ridiculous to act like the US government is like, planning to screw them over or something. You’re not doing the kids favors by turning this into “screw the Obama administration”. Those kids come from terrible, terrible situations in countries where you get basically forced into a gang at age eight, repeatedly abused and forced to labor or prostitute for pennies from basically the moment you are physically able just to survive. This seriously needs to be a bipartisan issue if anything is. We need to protect those kids and party lines are not going to do that.
There are lots of common meds that have carcinogenic effects, btw to stay on topic. Prilosec can cause abnormal cell growth in rats and stomach cancer, human effects possible. There are skin treatments for eczema that can cause skin cancer. People should be informed about their medications.
Deluded Lib
Glad to know you are thinking about me but I think you meant to direct your post to pharmer :)
Lol sorry buddy you are right, i apologize. I have no idea how I directed that at you.
Pamela,
my 18 yo daughter has just started taking norgestimate ethinyl estradiol. Do you have any info on that.
All the research I have seen on this is that it is a estrogen/progesterone combo and increase the study groups rate of breast cancer by 25% but my daughters risk would be even higher because she is under 20 years old and her breasts are still growing (breast cells are still metabolizing). I am worried. All the information on the web seems to avoid giving any real percentages and instead uses words like “slight increase”. I would especially appreciate if anybody could find the increased percentage for women under the age of twenty who start taking these hormones.
Truthseeker, I don’t have exact percentages, but I know the research supports an increase in breast cancer risk, but a decrease in ovarian and uterine cancer risk, I believe. It depends on her family history of female cancers too (if her mother or any of her aunts or grandmothers have had female cancers, really encourage her to talk to her doctor about this because that raises her risk a lot), and if she smokes cigarettes encourage her to get off the hormones immediately, the risk of DVT is really high in women on birth control who smoke. Higher for women over 30, but still not negligible for women younger than that.
Not trying to tell you how to parent or anything, and I get you’re Catholic and you’re probably not ecstatic about her being on this pill in the first place, just letting you know what I know.
http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/oral-contraceptives
Might help her get informed and make her decisions.
Thanks Deluded Lib. I appreciate your concern and your response. I think hers is one of those more dangerous triphasic contraceptives that are actually the worst choice.
[…] Pro-life vid of day: Radio host mocks opposers of contraception […]