Pro-life video of the day: The Bachelor’s Sean Lowe talks abstinence

by LauraLoo

Sean Lowe from “The Bachelor”, who married Catherine Giudici on live TV January 26th, made it public knowledge that they were choosing to wait until their marriage to have sex (as proven by a lie detector test taken by both of them).

Lowe further explains his choice to forego sex until marriage in his video for I Am Second.  Though he had been labeled “the virgin bachelor,” Sean actually went through a period in his life where he was sexually active and felt great regret.  Eventually, he made the choice to return to his faith and to take it seriously by following God’s design for sex within marriage.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_AXs2JGBves[/youtube]

Email dailyvid@jillstanek.com with your video suggestions.

Nearly naked man vs dead babies: Guess which campus display was censored?

sleep3davidlryan

Backdrop on the above (click to enlarge) from the Boston Globe, February 5:

A realistic-looking statue of a man sleepwalking in his underwear near the center of Wellesley College has created a stir among the women on campus, especially as more than 100 students at the all-women’s college signed a petition asking administrators to remove it.

The statue, called Sleepwalker, is part of an art exhibit featuring sculptor Tony Matelli….

“[T]his highly lifelike sculpture has, within just a few hours of its outdoor installation, become a source of apprehension, fear, and triggering thoughts regarding sexual assault for many members of our campus community,” says the petition…. “[I]t has already become a source of undue stress for many Wellesley College students, the majority of whom live, study, and work in this space.”

video-undefined-1B404A0A00000578-751_637x367Surprisingly, notable abortion proponents are defending the statue.

Explained Amanda Marcotte on Slate, “College is a time for taking everything too far.” Certainly Sleepwalker is that.

Added Jill Filipovic at The Guardian:

At the heart of the debate is the question of what a college should be. Is it preparation for the real world? …

College is supposed to be physically safe. But it’s not supposed to be intellectually safe. Shielding students from uncomfortable moments does them no favors.

Sexual assault is a serious offense from which many women suffer major physical and psychological trauma, including post-traumatic stress reactions that may be triggered by particular sights, sounds or events. When Wellesley students say the statue is “triggering,” that’s what they mean. Those feelings are valid and those reactions are real.

But here is the sad truth: the world is not a particularly safe place for women. It should be, but it’s not. Everyone has a right to physical safety. Emotional and psychological safety, though, isn’t quite as simple a calculus…. Do women have the right to live free of the intentional infliction of emotional and psychological violence? Yes. Do we have the right to move through public space without being harassed or assaulted? Yes. Do we have the right to move through public space without having our PTSD triggered by a source with no intention of triggering us? No, we don’t. That’s an impossible standard, and a dangerous one….

Our schools would be poorer if all potentially triggering material – hell, if all offensive, sexist, blatantly feminist unapproved material – were removed from them, and if students could not engage with troubling material.

I wonder when Marcotte and Filipovic will take up the cause of Bama Students for Life regarding what the two would surely consider “blatantly feminist unapproved material” that the University of Alabama recently removed. Click to enlarge…

BamaStudentsForLifeDisplay (1)

School officials deemed the group’s pro-life display, which included pictures of three mothers who died from abortions and two photos of young abortion victims, “offensive” and “graphic,” according to administrator Donna Lake, who added in a secretly recorded video, “We have to keep it happy for everybody.”

ImageUploadedByTapatalk1376425910.416386Happy happy happy? Somebody has been watching too much Duck Dynasty.

The display was removed on February 6, just one day 48 hours short of its reserved run from January 8 through February 7.

“You guys were lucky to get it up there as long as you did,” said Lake on the video.

Actually, school administrators were unlucky and unsmart not simply to grit their intolerant teeth for just a few more hours. The information about abortion they intended to suppress has now exploded onto the national public scene and mushroomed into a PR nightmare for them.

They also picked the wrong group to mess with. Only three weeks ago Bama Students for Life won Students for Life of America’s Group of the Year award, so these kids are not ones to walk away from this injustice.

The group has retained Alliance Defending Freedom as legal counsel, sent the university a formal letter of complaint requesting an apology and another display opportunity, and scheduled two days of public events on February 19 and 20 to spotlight the school’s denial of their First Amendment rights.

They have already won.

2014-02-17_0831

Who’s your daddy? DNA homework assignment gone wild

who-s-your-daddyby Carder

The focus of the assignment is to teach student about D-N-A by having them perform an exercise called “Who’s the Daddy?” which poses a scenario of a woman trying to figure out who the father of the baby is.

The options to choose from are: A bartender, a guy at the club, a cab driver, or flight attendant. After the students finish this part of the assignment, they must also give reasons why the state took the child away.

~ News station KMOV reporting on a controversial homework assignment given at a Michigan high school, via Gateway Pundit, February 14

[Graphic via Dreamstime]

Stanek Sunday funnies 2-16-14

Good morning and Happy Sunday! Here were my top five favorite political cartoons for the week. Be sure to vote for your fav in the poll at the bottom of this post!

by Signe Wilkinson at GoComics.com…
wpswi140212
 by Dana Summers at GoComics.com…
tmdsu140212
 by Henry Payne at Townhall.com…
payn140210
 by Glenn Foden at Townhall.com…
1800296_10203611052696320_2115316830_n
 by Gary McCoy at Townhall.com…
144139_600

 

[polldaddy poll=7803731]

Sunday Word: “Be on guard so you aren’t led off course by sinful people”

741px-Pied_Piper2Therefore, dear friends, since you have been warned in advance, be on guard so that you aren’t led off course into the error of sinful people, and lose your own safe position.

~ II Peter 3:17, Common English Bible translation

Stanek weekend video: Valentine’s serenade

by Hans Johnson

A capella group Vocal Point surprised fellow students at Brigham Young University the other day.

[youtube]http://youtu.be/FBpMIbcJkz0[/youtube]

Email dailyvid@jillstanek.com with your video suggestions.

[HT: The Blaze]

Stanek weekend Q: Is it “dishonest gain” to forego having children until we think we can afford them?

112896

Prefer loss to the wealth of dishonest gain; the former vexes you for a time;
the latter will bring you lasting remorse.

~ Chilo

Nancy Leigh DeMoss wrote in her devotional book The Quiet Place for February 11:

And my God will supply every need of yours according to his riches in glory in Christ Jesus. ~ Philippians 4:19

The first fear [about relinquishing total control of our lives to God] is one of provision: “Will I have what I need?”

What if I lose my job? Can we afford to have more children? How will we pay for their education?…. What if the economy goes under?…. Will we have enough to get by?

God knew we would naturally be concerned about these things, yet His Word frequently exhorts us not to worry about how our future needs will be met. Rather, Scripture says, “Seek first the kingdom of God and his righteousness  and all these things will be added to you” (Matt 6:33)….

Trusting God in matters of practical provision is no small matter. If we are unwilling to do so, we can expect to be plagued by such things as greed, cheating, worry, covetousness, lack of generosity, and all the unsettledness that comes from centering our lives around money.

His Word, however, provides us a sure basis for anxiety-free living by promising that He will “supply every need” (though not necessarily every want). Rather than fretting, striving, or manipulating, we can simply stand on His promises and confidently ask Him to provide.

When we make a decision to forego having children – or more children – in order to be more financially secure, is it seeking financial gain dishonestly? Are we stealing from God? Are we unknowingly settling for second best?

[Graphic via desicomments.com]

Will abortion enthusiasts continue to support Waffling Wendy?

Stand-With-Wendy-Davis-Tim-Doyle-Print-OrangeAll she’s doing with this parsing is trying to walk the line between signaling to casual Texas voters that she’s kinda sorta socially conservative while reassuring abortion warriors who follow this issue closely that her “ban” would have no teeth in practice.

But that’s not her brand; the left loves her not because she’s willing to hide behind loopholes but because she’s a loud-and-proud filibusterin’ bulwark against the pro-life patriarchy. Says Jonah Goldberg, what exactly are people who “stand with Wendy” standing for at this point? Do they even know?…

How much enthusiasm can she sustain among liberals for a candidacy that’s now purely about identity politics? Having achieved left-wing celebrity status, can she lose that status or will they feel duty-bound, if only to save face, to excuse her heresies and go down with the ship?…

Will they continue to pony up donations, telling themselves that it’s Good For Women and that she’ll revert to form once in office a la Obama and gay marriage? Or will they decide that it’s no fun cheering for a fighting liberal who’d rather hide and lose a close-ish election than fight and lose badly?

~ AllahPundit at Hot Air, February 12, on Texas gubernatorial candidate Wendy Davis’s equivocation on a 20-week abortion ban, which she infamously filibustered last summer


Who Is Jill Stanek?

Jill Stanek is a nurse turned speaker, columnist and blogger, a national figure in the effort to protect both preborn and postborn innocent human life.

Read Jill's full bio »
What the Media says »

  • May 2016
  • December 2015
  • October 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005

  • Categories
  • Stanek Top 20

    Latest Posts

    Latest Comments