stillbirth.jpgThis would appear to be a no-brainer, but of course not, thanks to abortion. From the New York Times, May 22:

In the last six years, 19 states, including NJ, have enacted laws allowing parents who have had stillbirths to get [birth] certificates. Similar legislation is under consideration in several more, among them NY. More than 25,000 pregnancies a year end in stillbirth, generally defined as a naturally occurring, unintentional intrauterine death after more than 20 weeks of gestation….
But politically, the birth-certificate laws… occupy uncertain territory, skirting the abortion debate while implicitly raising the question of fetal personhood….
[S]ome abortion rights supporters see the push for these laws as a barely disguised political move to undermine abortion rights….

In some states, local chapters of abortion rights groups have opposed the legislation. But at the national level, some abortion rights groups are comfortable with the laws, if they are drafted carefully to cover naturally occurring fetal death and not late-term abortion.
“At a level of great abstraction, there are probably some people who worry that recognizing a nonviable fetus as a person would in some way be a seed that could sprout into a threat to abortion,” said Roger Evans, a lawyer for the Planned Parenthood Federation of America. “But I don’t think we see it that way. We recognize the tragedy and loss of stillbirth, and as long as these laws are medically accurate, and the certificates are optional and commemorative, they’re a way to recognize that loss.”
Last month, Gov. Bill Richardson of NM vetoed legislation that would have granted stillborn birth certificates. Mr. Richardson, a Democrat who is running for president, did not mention abortion, but said “confusion and potential fraud” could result….
[T]he concept of birth certificates for stillbirth raises complicated questions. In heated Web discussions, some people cite the parents’ deep need for validation while others say birth certificates are legal documents, not memory trinkets or prizes for enduring birthing.

I agree this raises complicated questions, but only for pro-aborts.
Am I reading right? Did the PP lawyer admit preborn babies are persons? And although he dismisses the connection, I would say yes, he can add this to the list of threats against abortion.
[Photo is of San Francisco Chronicle journalist Suzanne Pullen with a bellycast made the day she was told in 2005 her 24-week-old preborn son Avery would be stillborn.]

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...