Love the name of the organization. But pro-aborts and pro-homosexuals hate it, so much so they sued. And lost. Per the Colorado Springs Gazette, November 13:

The Colorado Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected an effort by pro-choice groups to stop a Peyton organization from collecting signatures for a 2008 anti-abortion ballot measure.

equality.jpg

Colorado for Equal Rights hopes to define life as beginning at fertilization, thereby banning and criminalizing abortion. After a title-setting board OK’d the initiative for signature-gathering, several organizations sued, saying its title is deceptive and misleads voters about the sweeping consequences of the measure.
Supreme Court justices ruled unanimously that the title involves only a single subject and that its intentions are not misleading. Colorado for Equal Rights now can begin collecting the roughly 76,000 signatures it needs to get the initiative on the ballot.
The plaintiff organizations blasted the decision Tuesday, saying that the measure would go beyond banning abortion and would give fertilized eggs access to Colorado courts.

Love how the AP titled its article….


egg2.jpg
And here’s a fuller explanation, again from the AP:

If approved by voters, the measure would give fertilized eggs the state constitutional protections of inalienable rights, justice and due process.
“Proponents of this initiative have publicly stated that the goal is to make all abortion illegal – but nothing in the language of the initiative or its title even mentions abortion,” Kathryn Wittneben of NARAL Pro-Choice Colorado said in a statement. “If that’s not misleading, I don’t know what is.”
Wittneben and others said the measure would have would hamper in-vitro fertilization and stem cell research and would effectively ban birth control.
Proponents of the measure disagree.

tissue.jpg

“It doesn’t outlaw abortion, it doesn’t regulate birth control,” said Kristi Burton, 20, of Colorado for Equal Rights. “It’s just a constitutional principle. We’re laying a foundation that every life deserves protection.
Burton said the initiative would simply define a human.
“It’s very clearly a single subject,” Burton said. “If it’s a human being, it’s a person, and hey, they deserve equal rights under our law.”

And the Family Research Council explains the full implications:

If successful, the campaign would make Colorado the first state to vote on the question of when life begins. Even more importantly, it would give voters the opportunity to establish a human life in the womb as a “person” under state law. As such, even the smallest unborn child would receive the constitutional protections of “inalienable rights, justice, and due process.” A victory would strike at the very heart of Roe v. Wade and have far-reaching significance in addressing the legality of abortion….
Similar proposals in Georgia, Wisconsin, Michigan, Montana, Mississippi, and Oregon are already underway.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...