Congresswoman criticized who compared “Christian militant” abortion clinic bombers to Islamic jihadists
So Sheila, these Islamofascist terrorists want America destroyed: liberals, conservatives, Christians, Jews, the young, the old, the good-looking, the ugly, the capricorns, the geminis, the golfers, the ballers, the snowboarders, the skiers, the Burger Kings and the McDonald’s, the Albertson’s and the WalMarts, the heterosexuals, the homosexuals, the bisexuals and the trisexuals, Morehouse or the White House, and yes, even the abortion clinics.
If it’s on American soil, and if it ain’t their model of Islam, they want to see it all burn!
~ Zo criticizing Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D–TX) (pictured above), who compared militant Christianthat blow up abortion clinics to Islamic militant jihadists, PJTV’S ZoNation, June 23
Jun.27, 2011 6:00 am |
Political anti-life bias |
Jill Stanek is a nurse turned speaker, columnist and blogger, a national figure in the effort to protect both preborn and postborn innocent human life.
Isn’t this the same legislator who led the charge against the crisis pregnancy centers?
“Militants” who blow up abortion clinics are NOT “Christian”. They’re disturbed individuals.
Whoever wrote this ought to read their own commenting rules.
I agree with Pamela.
Many people have observed that some elements of islam are about 600 years behind christianity in their cultural thinking and acts.
Which would explain why some of them commit the acts they do, much like some elements of christianity did in the past.
This is the same lawmaker who thought astronauts had landed on Mars.
GirlyGirl,
Actually, we get to ridicule buffoons like Jackson in the posts. We just need to be civil with one another in the comboxes.
I love Zo! He is great and a wonderful black conservative. (Even if the libs say there are no black conservatives.)
Actually, watching the video, I don’t think Zo goes far enough in his condemnation of Jackson’s comments. Jackson doesn’t mention anti-abortion violence in her comment, or even protests. The only word that even hints in that direction is “militant” early on, and we all know how words like that have been abused by the left-wing crew of late (she said, side-eyeing that infamous DoJ report about “right-wing extremism”). Honestly, listening to her speak, it sounds like she’s trying to make out that any opposition to abortion constitutes the undermining of the United States. Or, rather, that anyone who disagrees with her interpretation of the Constitution is undermining the United States. Under her paradigm, even peaceful opposition toward things she supports constitutes militant extremism.
“Crazy” is not a strong enough word, I feel.