Indiana vs. Planned Parenthood bffs Obama and MSM
Just as the Obama administration was willing to shut down the US government to keep Planned Parenthood on the federal dole, it is willing to shut down Indiana’s Medicaid program to keep Planned Parenthood on the state dole.
For enacting a new law last month that bars Planned Parenthood from receiving $1.4 million in state Medicaid funds, Indiana has been told by the Department of Health and Human Services it risks losing up to $5.3 billion in federal dollars. Unless Indiana backs away from PP, one million of Indiana’s poor and elderly will have no financial medical support.
So far Indiana isn’t blinking in this high stakes game of chicken.
Meanwhile, although Indiana Planned Parenthood says it will have to close 7 of its 28 clinics and lay off 24 employees if defunded, it has received an “unprecedented amount of donations” totally $116,000 so far, reported the Huffington Post on June 8. Good. Let the pro-aborts support pro-aborts.
Federal Judge Tanya Walton Pratt, who previously rejected PP’s request for a restraining order against Indiana on May 10, says she will rule on Planned Parenthood’s request for an injunction by July 1. Meanwhile the state has 60 days to appeal DHHS’s decision.
But this also gives MSM 60 days to prop Planned Parenthood.
For example, ignoring Planned Parenthood’s history of fraud, failure to report minor rape, dispensing false information, and willingness to cover up statutory rape and sex trafficking, MSNBC’s Martin Bashir on June 6 simply asked PP CEO Cecile Richards to confirm some of her own talking points.
You can watch MSNBC’s entire 3:17 Planned Parenthood PSA here. But Newsbusters’ Matthew Balan did something interesting. He simply spliced together a montage of Bashir’s promos to accentuate the obvious…
This next news video goes back to February, when Cecile was defending Planned Parenthood against LiveAction.org’s sex trafficking sting videos and to keep PP in the federal budget.
Since the interview was conducted on the liberal Democracy Now! channel, bias was expected.
But something very interesting happens at 36:31 and again at 36:40, which David Schmidt of Live Action first noticed and drew to my attention. At both points Cecile seems to look down and say “ok,” as if she is responding to someone saying something in her earpiece. Do you see it?
[Graphic via Family Research Councilem>]

Ho, ho, ho, a whoring they will go.
As far as the two spots on the video. Maybe Cecile’s cell phone was set on ’recreation’ mode and she had it in her pocket and Weiner was sending her a sext message.
It reminds me of an SNL spoof of slick willy talking on the phone to a head of state in the oval office while the hired help is testing out her her new knee pads under the desk.
Which brings me back to my first sentence.
Can we be surprised when this crowd behaves like whores? They have no code, no standard, no sense of decorum, nothing is beneath them,….but any and every whore is.
When they get caught, they lie. They and their fellow whores feign indignance. They attack the one who outed them for having the audacity to expose their unseemly conduct. It is a crime, an outrage, a blasphemy to accuse them of such vulgar acts.
But then the ‘semen stained blue dress’ makes it debut and there is no reasonable explanation for how his semen ended up on her dress.
Then the whole scenario changes. They are both consenting adults enjoying one anothers favors in private, everyone does it, they are just obeying the evolutionary imperative imbedded in their genes.
Of course they did it, you victorian prude. So what!?!?!?
Just as the Republican party was willing to shut down the US government to defund one of the largest providers of womens’ health services and sexual health services in general it is willing to shut down Indiana’s Medicaid program in a further attempt to institute denial of medical services it doesn’t like. – my take on the situation, not everyone sees it the same way that you do.
“Let the pro-aborts support pro-aborts” – and let the religious support religious activities.
Jill Stanek,
How much money does the US Government give to Pro-life, and Pregnancy Crisis Center organizations?
How does that compare to the money given by Taxpayers, the Federal Government, to slaughter new human beings via chopping them to pieces, ripping their bodies to pieces, burning them alive with chemicals, inducing birth and puncturing the child’s skull, inserting a suction device, and suctioning the contents of the child’s skull, collapsing the child’s skull in on itself, and other violent, oppressive, abusive forms of sadistic aggression and violence against innocent, tiny, new, fully human beings?
The Pro-life movement is too peaceful. If there were a slaughterhouse butchering two year olds, and if it were legal, I’d bed that pro-lilfers would do the same as they do with abortion of younger children, they would talk, protest, pray, and talk some more, and they would especially claim that they oppose all forms of violent opposition, thus condeming those two year old children in the aforementioned scenario, to death, and continuing, by lack of action, to support the very thing they claim to oppose.
I agree re: Cecile Richards reactions in those clips.
My guess – it was Stuart Schear along with a few others, making sure Cecile was finely tuned in her messaging.
@ Pete: what has to do an homosexual rape compared to murder of children? both are hideous crimes of curse. the first one is illegal, the second sadly legal and supported and cover up by people like you!! “pro-life movement” has its focus in “abortion”.
by the way Jill some in my heart tells me that the situation presented here by miss Richards about doctors refusing to assist abortion, and the total recall article about a girl bleeding and the doctor didn’t perform the abortion that she wanted,, are connected. I always asked my self how did she know what was going on with her medically speaking. I don know, just thinking. by experience I know evil and know exactly what is capable of. there are lots of money involved!!!
Hey Reality…explain to me how supporting the human rights of unborn people Is an exclusively “religious activity” that only “religious” people should support. There are humanists, agnostics, skeptics, and irreligious people who believe in life at conception and are pro-life. Also “religious people” are paying some of the tax revenue that is going to kill these unborn people…if they want to voice their support of defunding a federally subsidized group that is ending American lives at a genocidal rate then they have the right to.
Hey Ryan…I didn’t say that. I was responding to the call for only ‘pro-aborts’ to fund ‘pro-aborts’ by saying that only the religious should fund religious activity.
Yes they do have the right to voice their support for the removal of choice. And I also have the right to voice my support for the removal of things that I don’t agree with.
Reality…what would you say is this “religious activity” in the context of the post?
There are a vast array of ‘religious activities’ which are funded by tax dollars or commercial enterprise Ryan. Some of the organisations benefitting from those sources spend money campaigning against abortion.
But…within this actual post the statement was made that only those who support abortion should contribute financially to the provision of abortion. My rejoinder was that only those who are of religion should contribute financially to religion. That is the actual context.
I am sure that there is a Federal judge that will put an injunction on IN citizens paying payroll withholding taxes to the US government while this misunderstanding is sorted out.
Let’s see if I’m understanding this correctly. The Obama administration is willing to withhold Medicaid funds for everyone on the program in the state of Indiana because of the state exercising is sovereignty and using those funds toward other doctor’s office and clinics that do not perform abortion? So, patients with diabetes, cancer, heart disease, etc., won’t have their care funded because of PP? Yet, Republicans are accused of killing the elderly for wanting to reform Medicare?
Yup, that’s about it. Planned Unparenthood has most-favored status in this administration.
@RCH: Amen! One cannot hold a candle to the leftist ideologies, because they are completely and utterly incongruent and absurd. In the end, we just roll our eyes and pray that the scales fall from their eyes as well.
It is difficult for me to believe that Planned unParenthood is the SOLE provider of contraceptives in this country.
Do public agencies like Planned Parenthood have to be licensed? With all the laws they broke recently how can they even qualify for public funding?