(Prolifer)ations 4-10-12
by Susie Allen, host of the blog, Pro-Life in TN, and Kelli
We welcome your suggestions for additions to our Top Blogs (see tab on right side of home page)! Email Susie@jillstanek.com.
- Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life discusses Obamacare and President Obama’s comments against judicial activism, which are strange in light of his support for Roe v. Wade.
- At Live Action, Jenna Hines comments on the pro-life agenda she sees hidden within The Hunger Games.
- The Leading Edge shares the joys and sorrows of a family whose son, Eli, was born with spina bifida.
- Euthanasia Prevention Coalition highlights Wesley J. Smith’s recent article on a court decision in Germany that could open the door for assisted suicide there. With the economy faltering, it is easy to see how this could be used as a way to reduce the competition for scarce medical resources.
- Ethika Politika has a piece discussing why those pesky “wedge” social/moral issues actually help the conservative political movement.
- Americans United for Life refutes a HuffPo article which attempts to spin the abortion surcharge in Obamacare as a “rumor.”
- Culture Campaign follows the story in which the State of Wyoming has been ordered to pay pro-lifers $30,000 for a First Amendment violation:
Rich Cathcart, head of the Wyoming State Building Commission, has said he ordered two WyWatch [Family Action] poster boards in the tunnel removed last year after receiving complaints. One poster featured a picture of [a developing] unborn fetus and the other a group of women saying that they regretted getting abortions.
After WyWatch filed its lawsuit early this year, the State Building Commission, which includes Gov. Matt Mead and the other four statewide elected officials, enacted a new policy banning all public displays of materials in the tunnel area.
I wonder what was most offensive: the Bibleverse on the display, the picture of the developing human, or the group of women. Somehow I think even if the verse weren’t on these displays, abortion proponents would still have complained. How dare pro-lifers show that actual human beings are affected by abortion!
[Photo via LifeSiteNews]
Jill Stanek is a nurse turned speaker, columnist and blogger, a national figure in the effort to protect both preborn and postborn innocent human life.
“I wonder what was most offensive: the Bible verse on the display, the picture of the developing human, or the group of women.”
Rich Cathcart, the state’s construction manager, originally gave permission to set up a display in the Herschler Gallery, located in a hallway Wyoming legislators pass through when walking from the Capitol Building to their parking lot.
Cathcart told local media that people complained about congestion during a prayer circle – and about the depiction of an unborn child in his mother’s womb.
http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/wyoming-sued-for-censoring-pro-life-display-in-capitol/
============================================================
Must have been a very long prayer meeting.
Maybe it was a prayer ‘vigil’.
Liberals please remain alert at all times.
Truth may manifest at anytime and at any place.
Suggest you have drills to hone your skills at ‘looking the other way’ and stopping your ears and ‘sticking your head in the sand’.
Chinese women are killing themselves at astronomical rates: is the one-child policy to blame?
by Heidi Miller Tue Apr 03, 2012 17:15 EST
http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/chinese-women-are-killing-themselves-at-astronomical-rates-is-the-one-child
…”there were approximately 500 female suicides per day in 2009.”
============================================================
The chinese on child policy is resulting in fewer females being born and the female survivors are killing themselves at record rates.
Nature abhors a vaccuum. Expect females from other nations to be sucked into the void at record rates, many, perhaps most, agains their will.
‘The Last Emporess’ may soon be a reality.
The Wyoming thing illustrates the lunacy of some of our leaders. The court says it’s ad hoc to disallow posters because of their content, so the officials ban all posters. But the ban itself is ad hoc, even if the results pass Constitutional muster (equal treatment for all). Thus for ad hoc purposes of not wanting pro-lifer material shown, they restrict everyone’s right to display anything at all in that area.
Think about that for just a few seconds. That’s all it takes to recognize madness, pure evil, or both. Because they hate the pro-life message, they’ll suppress everyone’s right to use a particular public space for free expression. If less liberty for all is the price of suppressing the pro-life message, so be it.
Wow.
Rasqual, correct me if I’m wrong (or anyone else, for that matter), but the madness to which you draw attention seems to fit the definition of manic paranoia unsettlingly well, a-la Stalin. Think back to the purges…
The good news is that, as expected, the fundamentalist pro-aborts are required to split with more and more of their more sane allies, ultimately resulting in too few remaining to be effective. The methods used in the defense of the indefensible are not self-limiting and do not end until ended externally. Come to think of it, it reminds me of the French Revolution and how those who started it were executed by the other revolutionaries later on for being too “reactionary”.
Hopefully, this time around won’t include any more executions; too many people have died over this already.
Attention all Dems in search of the #WarOnWomen:
HERE IT IS! See: India and China. Now go fight ’em, and leave us conservatives alone already.
[In China]…”there were approximately 500 female suicides per day in 2009.”
500 X 365 = 182,365 females dead in just one year in socialist paradise like communist China.
That does NOT include all the female children murdrered en utero or the baby girls murdered post partum.
Now THAT is a ‘war on women’.