Pro-life blog buzz 6-11-13
by Susie Allen, host of the blog, Pro-Life in TN, and Kelli
We welcome your suggestions for additions to our Top Blogs (see tab on right side of home page)! Email Susie@jillstanek.com.
- At Real Choice, Christina Dunigan says abortion advocates omitted crucial information about Beatriz, the woman from El Salvador who delivered a terminally ill child at 27 weeks gestation, in order to make the world believe Beatriz had an abortion:
Their argument was that since Beatriz’s baby was “not viable” due to anencephaly, the c-section was actually a hysterotomy abortion, performed to deliver a baby and then just let it die of prematurity.
Thanks to Melissa for providing links to this Spanish-language article, and this one, which certainly add an interesting big of information: Beatriz had already gone into labor when doctors elected to switch from a vaginal delivery to a c-section to preserve her health….
I’ve also learned that Beatriz and her mother did go to the nursery and see the baby.
In other words: She didn’t have an abortion.
- At Live Action, Ashley Herzog points out the latest instance of anti-life bullying by the “hate brigade” – this time against Republican Congresswoman Jamie Herrera Beutler (pictured left), who recently discovered that her preborn child has a potentially fatal anomaly:
What motivates these people to abuse women who have chosen to carry to term despite a poor prenatal diagnosis? I strongly suspect many of them have been involved in an abortion — or know they would want one in a similar situation. It angers them to see someone make a choice they didn’t have the courage to make themselves. But it’s impossible for any normal-thinking person to really know what motivates them.
- Abstinence Clearinghouse links to an article about the balance between a minor’s privacy and parental responsibility. In her column, Mary Beth Hicks writes:
How much privacy you allow depends on the child and the record of trust she has built, but your minor child’s privacy is not an entitlement. Parental responsibility for our children means we have the right to know what’s going on. That’s the only way we can guide and teach them.Too bad the abortion industry fights furiously against parental involvement when it comes to sex ed and abortion. It’s just bad for business.
- Alex Schadenberg of Euthanasia Prevention Coalition highlights an article written by Montana State Sen. Jennifer Fielder (pictured right) on the issue of assisted suicide legislation in MT, in which she notes the massive amount of funding behind pro-assisted suicide “nonprofit” lobbying groups.
- At National Review, Michael J. New discusses a report which features “two separate polls both of which found that a majority of young voters lean toward either banning or restricting abortion.”
- Big Blue Wave says Canadian conservatives seem to have the same trouble as many in the U.S. – they court pro-life support to get elected, but distance themselves from the position once in office.
- Ethika Politika notes the importance of fatherhood, and how its disappearing role in the home affects all of us. Each day this week, they will feature a new article on the subject to “make possible a more serious, productive discussion of fatherhood.”
- At FRC Blog, Anna Higgins laments the continuing reluctance of pastors to discuss abortion in the church, deeming it a “political issue” instead of a heart/sin issue necessitating repentance. Higgins also points out that where church leaders have dropped the ball, Christian rappers are beginning to speak out, offering hope and healing. One of those artists is Trip Lee:
[youtube]http://youtu.be/NQr6xmpdO5s[/youtube]
[Photo via Twitter]
I winced when I read last week of Congresswoman Beutler’s announcement of her baby’s diagnosis on Facebook. But I have only disgust and anger for the pro-choice vultures who are sniping at her.
4 likes
Is this the same Ashley Herzog who used to be a pro-choice troll here years ago? Did she have a change of heart? Also, why is my comment being moderated? Am I in trouble for something I said?
2 likes
I found an interesting article about anencephaly and early induced delivery here.
3 likes
Regarding Beatriz and the 27-week-old baby: I can tell that the woman went into labor. I don’t understand why there was a need for a Cesarean versus vaginal delivery. But I don’t know what is normal for this situation. Is Cesarean done to give the best chances to the baby?
Also, I don’t know how the woman’s diagnosis of lupus fits into this. I believe the article says that the mother would face risks because the mother has lupus. Lupus may have contributed to the birth defect, but I do not know how it would present a risk to the mother or child in delivery.
Maybe someone with some OB knowledge could chime in.
This is important to think about because the medical establishment is very supportive of abortion whenever anything is wrong, or suspected to be wrong, with the baby during gestation. There have been numerous stories posted here and elsewhere where a doctore advised a woman to abort due to some suspected physical defect, and then the mom defied the medical establishment pressure, and the baby turned out just fine.
And I have never heard of an M&M conference evaluating this type of error – recommending abort then the child being just fine.
2 likes
OK Mat.Anna – that article explains a good bit on the 2nd page. abt risks of vaginal deliv with an anencephalic baby.
3 likes
LastDemocrat,
Beatriz had had a particularly nasty experience with the birth of her first child, which was born via C-section. Also, El Salvador has a really high C-section rate. I don’t think there was really much question that Beatriz would have delivered by C-section–I really don’t think there were any plans at all for a vaginal delivery. The question was when they would perform the C-section, not if they would perform the C-section.
3 likes
Melissa, I hadn’t previously read that B. had a history of a previous c/s but that makes it all the more reasonable that she had a c/s this time. The local policy may be against VBAC (and I’m not going to go into the virtues/dangers of VBAC because that’s not at issue here). If it was necessary for her to have a c/s then as soon as she went into labor it was time to head to the OR. I really can’t see that anyone can argue that this was elective or an abortion. Just a very unfortunate situation that some pro-aborts attempted to use as a tool.
2 likes