Ginsburg “comforted” to know her progeny can abort her progeny
I think on the issue of choice, one of the reasons, to be frank, that there’s not so much pro-choice activity is that young women, including my daughter and my granddaughter, have grown up in a world where they know if they need an abortion, they can get it. Not that either one of them has had one, but it’s comforting to know if they need it, they can get it.
~ US Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elle magazine, October issue
Sep.27, 2014 8:47 am |
The Courts |
Jill Stanek is a nurse turned speaker, columnist and blogger, a national figure in the effort to protect both preborn and postborn innocent human life.
I always think when someone has to “qualify” something it’s more telling then they realize. Especially in the abortion debate.
“Not that either one of them has had one”
“it’s comforting to know if they need it, they can get it.”
I think Ginsburg is committing the common pro-choice error of substituting the word need for want.
Yes, what a comfort it is to know that if I “need” to kill an inconvenient human being, I can do so legally. Pfft.
How revealing that Ginsburg finds comforting the thought that her grandchild or great grandchild can be legally killed.
Looks like another case of dead eyes.
Ha!
I just wrote ‘dead eyes’ on the thread about Merritt Tierce and planned on doing the same on this thread but you beat me to it Lrning.
Thank goodness we get to see a picture of Jill’s twinkling eyes here to offset the Dead Eyes Gal Scouts.
As much as I despise you, Ruth, please keep breathing until the third week of January, 2017. Kthanksbye.
…”they [my daughter and my grand daughter] know if they need an abortion, they can get it. Not that either one of them has had one, but it’s comforting to know if they need it, they can get it.”
Ruth ‘Buzzi’ Bader Ginsburg
.
After running ms Ginsburg’s politically correct Bovinus Scatulus thru the transmographier it yielded this result:
.
“the goddess moloch be praised and worshipped by the unhindered and uninterrupted offerrings of human sacrifice, even of my own flesh and blood. May it be so, now and forever more!”
Omg 9ek I almost wet my pants. She wants you to know that her daughter or g dtr have not had abortions. That to me kinda seds the message that abortion is just beneath them. On other threads RG has been compared to an insect. A giant prayiing mantis always comes to mind. Dead eyes? Heck if she ever attempted to grin her face might crack!
Ik we arent to be picking on looks but I do hope in her hay day she sported a better look than this! Good grief…and she got married? Also she was one of the few to survive pancreatic cancer. She received treatment to live only to sit on her perch and decide that innocent children should die. What a bloody shame.
Need and want are subjective terms. I know people who say they “need” to take communion every week.The world will not end and I doubt they will be sentenced to hell for not attending mass when they have the flu.
Also, “dead eyes” is a dumb term. Unless a person has never has an unflattering photo taken of them they need to get over it. It means nothing. I love how the pro-life gen pictures shown are always posed, edited and perfect while pro-choice pics are take without the people even being aware. I’ve seen female members of this pro-life generation bouncing up and down on the sidewalk like Hooters girls while the boys stood still and held their signs looking at the bouncing girls. Wish I had a pic of that. It wouldn’t look so pure to have that as the image of your movement.
I think RBG is all talk. Abortion aint for rich folk like her. If a woman in her family faced an unplanned preggo shed cough up gazillions to make sure that kid would be born. Trust me on that!
“pro-life generation bouncing up and down on the sidewalk like Hooters girls”
Hooter girls bounce up and down on sidewalks? Where?
I hope these bouncy gals don’t have the dreaded Dead Eye Syndrome.
Tenn2 proof please. This is pure gossip!
Heather I hope your right.
Different article, but again, this is from the same woman…
“Q: Since we are talking about abortion, I want to ask you about Gonzales v. Carhart, the case in which the court upheld a law banning so-called partial-birth abortion. Justice Kennedy in his opinion for the majority characterized women as regretting the choice to have an abortion, and then talked about how they need to be shielded from knowing the specifics of what they’d done. You wrote, “This way of thinking reflects ancient notions about women’s place in the family and under the Constitution.” I wondered if this was an example of the court not quite making the turn to seeing women as fully autonomous.
Ginsburg: The poor little woman, to regret the choice that she made. Unfortunately there is something of that in Roe. It’s not about the women alone. It’s the women in consultation with her doctor. So the view you get is the tall doctor and the little woman who needs him.”
To have the arrogance to say a woman should not only be informed of the ins and outs of a procedure she will or has undergone and in the same exact breath, to shame her for looking up to her doctor for doing so… this OUTRAGEOUS level of ignorance is impossible for most rational thinkers to comprehend. Especially considering that so many of those doctors are not men that women in crisis are looking to, but other women, and sadly women like Ginsburg who wouldn’t even go near the issue of P.A.S.S., but hijack the question to the very nature of it’s essence down to the mere fact that a question has been asked and by her self-proclaimed righteousness she has the indicitive pleasure to bypass the suffering female and to the indicative and hypothetical self-rightous doctor who’s always, in Ginsburg’s terms, going to shame the woman who’s relying on him. This situation is of her own fanaticism and whimsy… answer the question, do women deserve to know the ins and outs of what’s about to occur? She thinks so little of the question that she can only address it in A. not answering it, and in B. using it as an opportunity to answer a question that was never even posed. How preposterous is the woman. And for the poor to hear her say this about her grandchild, and then of course, the fact that she likely wouldn’t want her grandson or daughter aborted. These people are so out of touch, and so elitist that they can just pretend and make believe and the honest can’t comprihend the level of debuachery and the dishonest know it all too well. Some one needs to start pointing out the fact that, under her rich robes, this empress has no clothes. POWER TO THE PEOPLE, RIGHT ON!
“Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.”
Ruth Bader Ginsburg, New York Times, July 2009.
City of Angels I sure could be wrong. I just detest this woman with every fiber of my being. I truly do. Maybe the good Lord gave her a second chance to repent of her sickening ways.
Hmmmm I like the second pic.:)
City of Angels…the entire thing is just jeepers creepers. We have 3 pro abortion women in the Supreme court. How can all of them see abortion as a positive thing with legal abortions ending in a rising death toll for women? They arent concerned with the blob of tissue…just the woman and her body. So what gives when we have pro life men who can see the entire picture? I just dont understand. The women on the Supreme Court ( especially after that chilling read from RBG) remind me of Margaret Sanger. Sounds like Ginsberg is saying..Lets get rid of the undesirables.
This woman reminds me of “Mrs. Meers” from the feminist movie, “Thoroughly Modern Millie”