Front page WSJ: Planned Parenthood rebrands
A front page story by Stephanie Simon in today’s Wall Street Journal focused on Planned Parenthood’s nationwide expansion strategy:
Flush with cash, Planned Parenthood affiliates nationwide are aggressively expanding their reach, seeking to woo more affluent patients with a network of suburban clinics and huge new health centers that project a decidedly upscale image.
I’ve reported on this for awhile (here and here).
The article also spotlighted PP’s abortion feeders, its “Expresses“:
PP has also opened more than two dozen quick-service “express centers,” many in suburban shopping malls. Some sell jewelry, candles, books and T-shirts, along with contraception.
“It is indeed a new look…a new branding, if you will,” said Leslie Durgin, a senior vice president at PP of the Rocky Mountains.
View merchandise photo here.
In the process, PP has changed its mission statement…
Last spring, the nonprofit – which has 882 clinics nationwide – dropped its crusading mission statement setting out the rights of all individuals, no matter their income, to “reproductive self-determination.” In its place, PP adopted a crisp pledge to “leverage strength through our affiliated structure to be the nation’s most trusted provider of sexual and reproductive health care.” Ms. [Cecile] Richards [PP CEO] says the new statement implies expanded services for all – she’s especially eager to draw more male patients – but some outsiders wonder why it no longer mentions affordability or access.
I wrote last year part of PP’s strategy was to run mom and pop chop shops out of business. WSJ explained:
Ms. [Amy] Hagstrom Miller competes with PP for abortion patients [in TX and MD] – and finds it deeply frustrating. She does not receive the government grants or tax-deductible donations that bolster PP, and says she can’t match the nonprofit’s budget for advertising or clinic upgrades….
“They’re not unlike other big national chains,” Ms. Hagstrom Miller said. “They put local independent businesses in a tough situation.”
Even as the total number of abortions in the U.S. has dropped, the number performed by PP has grown steadily, to nearly 290,000 a year. In 2005… PP accounted for about 1 in every 5 abortions. In part, that’s because independent providers have quit the field, tired of battling antiabortion protesters. Ms. Richards also said that she has encouraged more Planned Parenthood clinics to offer abortions.
Our old friend Steve Trombley, of Aurora PP infamy, popped in the piece with a gem of a quote:
“I like to think of it as the LensCrafters of family planning,” Steve Trombley, the top executive in IL, said as he toured an express center a few doors down from a hair salon and a Japanese restaurant in the well-to-do suburb of Schaumburg, IL.
Flattering illustration of Steve. Recall he and I had an interesting experience travelling together in a plane recently.
This is Part I of 3-part post. (Read Part II here and Part III here.) Read article in its entirety below.
[All illustrations courtesy of WSJ]
Wall Street Journal
PAGE ONE
EXTENDING THE BRAND
Planned Parenthood Hits Suburbia
Abortion Provider Goes Upscale; Aid For Poor Questioned
By STEPHANIE SIMON
June 23, 2008; Page A1
Flush with cash, Planned Parenthood affiliates nationwide are aggressively expanding their reach, seeking to woo more affluent patients with a network of suburban clinics and huge new health centers that project a decidedly upscale image.
The nonprofit, which traces its roots to 1916, has long focused on providing birth control, sexual-health care and abortions to teens and low-income women. While those groups still make up the majority of Planned Parenthood’s patients, executives say they are “rebranding” their clinics to appeal to women of means — a move that opens new avenues for boosting revenue and, they hope, political clout.
Two elegant new health centers have been built, and at least five more are on the way; the largest, in Houston, will be 75,000 square feet. They feature touches such as muted lighting, hardwood floors and airy waiting rooms in colors selected by marketing experts — as well as walls designed to withstand a car’s impact should an antiabortion protest turn violent.
Planned Parenthood has also opened more than two dozen quick-service “express centers,” many in suburban shopping malls. Some sell jewelry, candles, books and T-shirts, along with contraception.
“It is indeed a new look…a new branding, if you will,” said Leslie Durgin, a senior vice president at Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains.
While Planned Parenthood executives describe the tactics as a natural extension of their mission, the moves have opened the organization up to criticism from foes and friends alike.
Antiabortion groups point out that Planned Parenthood, the nation’s largest abortion provider, reported a record $1 billion in annual revenue in its most recent financial report — about a third of that coming from federal and state grants to care for low-income women. The nonprofit ended the year with a surplus of $115 million, or about 11% of its revenue, and net assets of $952 million.
“Why are we giving them so much money?” asked Jim Sedlak, vice president of the antiabortion American Life League. “As they reach out to more and more affluent customers,” he added, “that will bolster our argument that we shouldn’t be giving them any government funds.”
Experts in nonprofit management said it’s fiscally responsible to end the year with a surplus, and Planned Parenthood’s numbers are within a reasonable range.
“There is no excess,” Cecile Richards, the organization’s president, said. “Any money we have, we put back into services.”
Yet some of Planned Parenthood’s political allies question the allocation of those resources.
Last spring, the nonprofit – which has 882 clinics nationwide – dropped its crusading mission statement setting out the rights of all individuals, no matter their income, to “reproductive self-determination.” In its place, Planned Parenthood adopted a crisp pledge to “leverage strength through our affiliated structure to be the nation’s most trusted provider of sexual and reproductive health care.” Ms. Richards says the new statement implies expanded services for all — she’s especially eager to draw more male patients – but some outsiders wonder why it no longer mentions affordability or access.
“This is not the Planned Parenthood we all grew up with… they now have more of a business approach, much more aggressive,” said Amy Hagstrom Miller, who runs abortion clinics in Texas and Maryland.
Ms. Hagstrom Miller competes with Planned Parenthood for abortion patients — and finds it deeply frustrating. She does not receive the government grants or tax-deductible donations that bolster Planned Parenthood, and says she can’t match the nonprofit’s budget for advertising or clinic upgrades. She has carved her own niche by touting her care as more holistic — and by charging $425 for a first-trimester surgery at her Austin clinic, compared with $475 at the local Planned Parenthood. (Both Ms. Hagstrom Miller and Planned Parenthood say they work out discounts and payment plans for the needy.)
“They’re not unlike other big national chains,” Ms. Hagstrom Miller said. “They put local independent businesses in a tough situation.”
‘We Can Do Both’
Even as the total number of abortions in the U.S. has dropped, the number performed by Planned Parenthood has grown steadily, to nearly 290,000 a year. In 2005, the most recent year that national statistics are available, Planned Parenthood accounted for about one in every five abortions. In part, that’s because independent providers have quit the field, tired of battling antiabortion protesters. Ms. Richards also said that she has encouraged more Planned Parenthood clinics to offer abortions.
Independent providers often consider Planned Parenthood a partner in the fight to preserve abortion rights, but they’d like to see the nonprofit focus more on expanding access for the destitute or for isolated rural residents.
“They’ve made a decision to go after the young and the hip and the affluent, and they’re leaving poor women behind,” said Claire Keyes, an independent abortion provider in Pittsburgh.
Ms. Richards fiercely disputes that. “We can do both,” she said. “…There are 47 million Americans without insurance, and 17 million low-income women who need help paying for family-planning services like birth control. They remain our top priority.”
Planned Parenthood grew out of activist Margaret Sanger’s efforts to promote and legalize contraception throughout the U.S., beginning with the opening of the nation’s first birth-control clinic in 1916. Sanger’s organization became the Planned Parenthood Federation of America in 1942.
The group has always operated some suburban clinics, but some of its local affiliates, which have a great deal of autonomy, have made a determined effort in the past few years to “be the provider of first choice…for people who do have other options,” said David Greenberg, Oregon’s top Planned Parenthood executive. Officials note that health insurance doesn’t always cover contraception and even women with access to private doctors may prefer the confidentiality of buying birth control or getting a herpes test at a Planned Parenthood clinic.
“It is high time we follow the population,” said Sarah Stoesz, who heads Planned Parenthood operations in three Midwest states. She recently opened three express centers in wealthy Minnesota suburbs, “in shopping centers and malls, places where women are already doing their grocery shopping, picking up their Starbucks, living their daily lives,” Ms. Stoesz said.
The mall sites promise walk-in convenience and “clothes-on” care, with services limited to birth-control counseling and tests for pregnancy or sexually transmitted infections. Most patients are in and out in less than half an hour.
“I like to think of it as the LensCrafters of family planning,” Steve Trombley, the top executive in Illinois, said as he toured an express center a few doors down from a hair salon and a Japanese restaurant in the well-to-do suburb of Schaumburg, Ill.
New Patients
The strategy draws new patients — and revenue. In Illinois, for instance, Planned Parenthood officials say they take a loss of nearly $1 on each packet of birth-control pills distributed to poor women under the federal Title X program, which funds reproductive care. But the group makes a profit of nearly $22 on each month of pills sold to an adult who can afford to pay full price out of pocket. The majority of women who stop by the Schaumburg express center are in that group, according to Planned Parenthood statistics.
Their payments can then be used to subsidize other operations — health care for the poor, sex education for teens, or political activism.
In Massachusetts, for instance, profits from an express center in a trendy retail plaza popular with college students will be used to open a similar clinic in a low-income, largely Latino community.
The new strategy is also designed to protect Planned Parenthood from any cutbacks in government funding while strengthening its ability to pursue its political agenda. Ms. Durgin, the Rocky Mountain executive, said attracting more patients who can pay full fees helps the affiliate “weather political shifts even as we try to influence them.”
Nationally, Planned Parenthood’s political-action arm plans to raise $10 million to influence the fall campaign. Under federal tax law, the health-care wing of Planned Parenthood cannot support political candidates but can mobilize voters and advocate on issues such as abortion rights and sex education in schools.
To encourage the new wave of patients to join the cause, an express center in Parker, Colo., sells political buttons next to the condoms and sets out invitations to activism by the magazine rack. A 52,000-square-foot center opening this summer in Denver uses about 20% of its space for health care; roughly 40% is for meetings, including political work.
In Portland, Ore., a planned 40,000-square-foot headquarters will include space for candidate forums and phone banks, as well as a clinic. Mr. Greenberg said donors were initially skeptical about the size and $16.5 million cost, but eventually came around: “The building becomes a symbol for our outreach and community activism.”
Upbeat Marketing
Officials also aim to rally support with upbeat marketing: TV ads with perky voice-overs about love; a crass-and-sassy Web campaign aimed at teens. Earlier this year, Planned Parenthood began selling a $2 branded condom – promoted as a “must-have fashion accessory” – in luxury boutiques and W hotels.
Though they want to raise their organization’s profile, officials remain acutely aware that Planned Parenthood is often a target.
Antiabortion activists have picketed the homes of contractors building the Denver center. When Planned Parenthood tried to open a clinic in McMinnville, Ore., a lower-income rural community, two dozen landlords said no. The affiliate eventually bought its own building.
To protect patients and staff from hostility – and the possibility of violence – executives have designed the new health centers with fortresslike security.
They’ve maximized the distance between patients and the protesters, with long driveways and heavily landscaped buffer zones. A new 21,000-square-foot clinic in Aurora, Ill., a fast-growing suburb west of Chicago, has a bulletproof vestibule and walls of 9-inch-thick precast concrete — an upgrade that added nearly $1 million to the cost — so no one can plow a car into the clinic.
The Aurora facility typifies Planned Parenthood’s balancing act in reaching out to clients. It’s located on the wealthy side of town amid cul-de-sac subdivisions, across from a bank. But it’s also convenient to Aurora’s significant population of poor and uninsured families. Some used to drive an hour or more to reach a full-service Planned Parenthood clinic in downtown Chicago.
Similar dynamics are at work in Denver. The new $6.3 million health center sits in a poor neighborhood of modest bungalows with iron bars on the windows. But it’s also just a few blocks from the booming planned community of Stapleton, where custom estates sell for $1.2 million. Planned Parenthood has already begun to market its services to young professionals there through mailings and fliers in local shops.
The regional affiliate in Colorado, which also covers four other states, shifted to “a more businesslike approach” three years ago “to protect and strengthen our dual bottom line of margin and mission,” according to its most recent financial report. The number of cervical-cancer screenings dropped, but sexual-disease testing, contraception and abortion rose sharply. So did income: Last year, the affiliate reported clinic revenues of more than $19 million, on direct patient-care costs of $17 million. The surplus helped cover administration, political work, fund raising and other expenses, according to Ms. Durgin.
Other regions also report promising results. At the Massachusetts express center, one in three patients pays with private insurance. In Minnesota, the suburban clinics have drawn more than 12,000 patients, most of them new to Planned Parenthood and 30% of them using private insurance.
Planned Parenthood officials say the poor are also using their clinics in ever-greater numbers; a recent pitch to donors stressed the group’s role in caring for women who “literally have nowhere else to go.” Nearly 75% of Planned Parenthood’s three million annual clients are considered low-income, with earnings of less than $15,600 a year for an individual, or less than $31,800 for a family of four. That category includes a sizable number of teenagers, who make up a quarter of Planned Parenthood’s clientele. Unless they come in with a parent, teens are classified based on their personal earnings.
Sliding-Scale Fees
To accommodate poor patients, Planned Parenthood uses sliding-scale fees. In some markets, though, public clinics are cheaper, though often more crowded. In Denver, an uninsured woman can get sexual-disease tests for free and birth-control pills for $8 a month at a public clinic. Planned Parenthood charges a minimum of $30 for the tests and $25 a month for the pills.
Administrators across the country say they need to do more to inspire confidence in Planned Parenthood among poor and wealthy patients alike. So part of the rebranding involves rehabbing shabby clinics.
In Oregon, clinics are updating to a “contemporary, fun and lively look” with a new color palette that includes pink, orange and teal, said Mr. Greenberg, the regional executive. In Texas, a dingy downtown Austin clinic got a $40,000 upgrade that struck patient Hannah Powell, a 21-year-old college student, as long overdue. “It wasn’t necessarily that you hesitated to go there, but you could definitely tell they needed help,” she said. “Now it looks a lot cleaner and safer.”
In Massachusetts, Dianne Luby, the affiliate’s president, also talks up a new “green” clinic, to be built with recycled and eco-friendly material.
Most people associate Planned Parenthood with abortion, Ms. Luby said, so “we’re trying to reposition ourselves as caring about their health, about prevention, about a sustainable planet.” Or, as she later put it: “So much more mainstream.”
Write to Stephanie Simon at stephanie.simon@wsj.com

Not a day goes by when I don’t hear a story about how charities compete with each other for business.
(Joke)
The fact that there are alternative providers out there, whose business is being hurt, really punches a big ‘ol hole in the argument that they are providing a greatly needed service to the community. It’s interesting to me that a group so committed to service would care so much about corporate expansion. It serves as a clear reminder to me of one (among many) huge difference between PP and real service organizations: humility.
“I tried to strike a conversation when we got drinks. I tapped him on the arm, and he lifted his earphone, and I asked, “So are you going to Dallas for business or pleasure?” He answered, “Business,” and put his earphones back on.”
Ms. Stanek, how many drinks did you have with Monsieur Trombley?
A talented sketch artist, yes.
That clear, just want to say Steve Trombley has a ‘refreshed’ appearance.
That’s new.
His trademark is a haggard look — in person & in photos.
That’s a ‘comment’!
Jacques, none. I would have enjoyed a few drinks with the man.
“Ms. Hagstrom Miller has carved her own niche by touting her care as more holistic”
Just wondering how abortion can be more holistic.
Herbs instead of ru486?
Massage during the procedure?
What kind of mom is Mrs. Obama (todays quote). Are you kidding me? As a stay at home mom (4 children home this summer, ranging in age from 5 to 16) I can tell you I am glad I am home with them. Let me tell you, no one loves your children more that you do. NO ONE!! This means finding meaningful activities, monitoring TV, internet and other media.
And I know parents who don’t know there kids, so sad. My oldest are looking at college soon and I am glad I got to spend time with them.
Steve missed a golden opportunity with you, Jill.
He could have set the record straight. Ya’ll could have compared pictures of the kids and stuff.
Oh, wait, maybe he doesn’t have kids.
He would have seen the humanity behind the screen and maybe come to like you as a person and not despise you for the commentator that you are.
And you could have probably learned a few things from him yourself.
Oh, wait, maybe he doesn’t have kids.
I think he does have a few…
Front page WSJ: Planned Parenthood charts
This is Part II of a 3-part post on a front page Wall Street Journal article today entitled, “Planned Parenthood hits suburbia.” )Read Part I here.) Following are informative charts that accompanied the story. The source for all stats was…
I’ve lived in Baltimore for 5 years and used to live in Austin TX for 7 where both of Hagstrom-Millers’ abortion clinics are and from horror stories I’ve hear it is clear why they consider Planned Parenthood competition. PP offers full, comprehensive reproductive health care from mission-oriented caring providers. Her for profit businesses, mistakenly dubbed Whole Women’s Health, only offer abortion services. You cannot get a well-woman exam or a STD test unless you are a former abortion patient. I find that Dr.’s who are focused on churning a profit focus on just that, the bottom line. Planned Parenthood offers a need to the community to not only offer a treatment, but education and a place to get answers. I would rather go to my provider of all women services whether it be for a PAP, birth control or if I was in a position where I would choose abortion, than be pigeon-holed into an abortion clinic who’s bottom line is to raise money.
Baltex,
You don’t think PP’ goal is to raise money? Are you joking??
WSJ blog continues the Planned Parenthood discussion; quotes Stanek
This is Part III of a 3 part series on today’s Wall Street Journal article, “Planned Parenthood hits suburbia.” See Part I here and Part II here. Reporter Stephanie Simon accompanied her piece with a blog post at WSJ’s Front…
lovethemboth,
How do you know that Michelle Obama doesn’t love her children just as much as you love yours? Do you know her personally? Do you know her innermost thoughts?
What makes a stay at home mom so much better than a working one is what I’d like to know? I know plenty of excellent mothers who work full time and still spend quality time with their kids (my mother is one).
Jill,
great quote of the day. It says a lot about M.Obama
The quote is a good and truthful response to desperate nit-pickers. There are far worse mothers among those who parrot the conservative “party line” and among those who call themselves “pro-life.”
If I had been asked to predict how Steve Trombley would respond to being seated on a plane next to Jill, I would have predicted, he would return her greeting and then ignore her for the rest of the flight.
Which is what he did.
Baltex:
You never heard of a loss leader? These animals kill children for God’s sake. Where’s your head?
A new acronym for Planned Parenthood:
NAZI
National Abortion Zealots Incorporated
How do you know that Michelle Obama doesn’t love her children just as much as you love yours? Do you know her personally? Do you know her innermost thoughts?
What makes a stay at home mom so much better than a working one is what I’d like to know? I know plenty of excellent mothers who work full time and still spend quality time with their kids (my mother is one).
Posted by: JKeller at June 23, 2008 5:38 PM
I am pretty sure she doesn’t love her children as much cause she holds fund raisers for PBA.
Not saying working mothers don’t love their children, but love and devotion to their children is the “identity” of a stay at home mom.
“Truthseeker”, you wrote: “I am pretty sure she doesn’t love her children as much cause she holds fund raisers for PBA.”
This wins the prize for stupidest, and most embarrassing to its author, post on Jill’s site. Make it QOTD.
You wrote: “Not saying working mothers don’t love their children, but love and devotion to their children is the “identity” of a stay at home mom. ”
If there were a good way to measure love and devotion, I’d bet (if I were a betting man) it would turn out that the single characteristic which most strongly “identifies” stay-at-home moms would still be access to money.
The new? austin clinic is right down the street from my house. I pass it everytime I go to wal-mart. Let me just say it is fortified tighter than the white house. We’re talking 9 foot walls around the parking lot and a huge iron fence around the building itself. I’ve never actually seen anyone going in or out of the building, so I don’t know if it’s actually open yet.
All I *do* know is they certainly don’t want any *pesky* pro-lifers reaching out to any of “informed” patients.
The new? austin clinic is right down the street from my house. I pass it everytime I go to wal-mart. Let me just say it is fortified tighter than the white house. We’re talking 9 foot walls around the parking lot and a huge iron fence around the building itself. I’ve never actually seen anyone going in or out of the building, so I don’t know if it’s actually open yet.
All I *do* know is they certainly don’t want any *pesky* pro-lifers reaching out to any of “informed” patients.
Posted by: lauren at June 24, 2008 7:58 AM
………………………..
Every time you go to Wal-Mart? Now that was funny!
It’s probably so “heavily fortified” because some people like to show their intense love of “all life” by ending the lives of others in a violently explosive way.
lauren: I’ve never actually seen anyone going in or out of the building, so I don’t know if it’s actually open yet.
Are there any people praying outside the Austin, TX, PP clinic? I sure hope so!
What street is it on? I’m sure with a little googling, we could figure out if it is new or not. Thanks.
It’s probably so “heavily fortified” because some people like to show their intense love of “all life” by ending the lives of others in a violently explosive way.
Posted by: JKeller at June 24, 2008 11:56 AM
In my recent experience, it’s the PP fans who are generally much ruder than the pro-lifers found at the abortuaries. There hasn’t been violence at a clinic in years that I’m aware of.
The quote is a good and truthful response to desperate nit-pickers. There are far worse mothers among those who parrot the conservative “party line” and among those who call themselves “pro-life.”
Posted by: Anteia at June 23, 2008 10:15 PM
There are good and bad mothers of all types. Don’t you think it’s an odd comment for Michelle to make to at this specific event unless she was trying to be humorous? Do you think she was?
Janet: lauren: I’ve never actually seen anyone going in or out of the building, so I don’t know if it’s actually open yet.
Are there any people praying outside the Austin, TX, PP clinic? I sure hope so!
What street is it on? I’m sure with a little googling, we could figure out if it is new or not. Thanks.
Ooops! The Austin clinic is open according to Jill’s map. Never mind!
Janet,
Did you notice the awkward silence and few chuckles when Michelle O. was speaking? If she was trying to be funny…she fell flat.
Carla,
I must be missing something, where’s the video of Michelle speaking? Does Jill have a link? Thanks!
Sorry Janet. I must have caught it on the news??
“Truthseeker”, you wrote: “I am pretty sure she doesn’t love her children as much cause she holds fund raisers for PBA.”
This wins the prize for stupidest, and most embarrassing to its author, post on Jill’s site. Make it QOTD.
Somg, I guess you think that killing a heathy viable third term baby makes a woman a good mother? You are SOOOO warped you should be in prison.
You wrote: “Not saying working mothers don’t love their children, but love and devotion to their children is the “identity” of a stay at home mom. ”
If there were a good way to measure love and devotion, I’d bet (if I were a betting man) it would turn out that the single characteristic which most strongly “identifies” stay-at-home moms would still be access to money.
Posted by: SoMG at June 24, 2008 5:28 AM
Somg, you are just WRONG. You really have no concept of the love that drives a mother to sacrifice income in order to stay-at-home with her children even if it means struggling financially.