PUMAs concerned about new Obama dirt on Palin
One of our new PUMA friends has posted a disturbing photo of Sarah Palin, one of many disturbing finds by the only army Barack Obama is not repulsed by, his army of lawyers.
Wrote CountUsOut.com, today:
Reports from a crack team of reporters, lawyers, researchers, and forensic analysts sent by the Barack Obama campaign to Alaska to properly vet little known vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin filtered in late Tuesday. They paint a chilling portrait of a disturbed woman who is not ready to assume the Presidency should John McCain be run over by a pie wagon or bored to death by Keith Olbermann…
“Sarah was always a strange little girl,” opined Harriet Nelson, Sarah Palin’s 2nd grade teacher. “If I remember correctly, she used to chew on crayons. Her parents always ostentatiously bought her the big 128 crayon box so she could lord it over the other kids. I still shiver when I remember the way those silver and gold lumps of wax used to cling to her teeth- not the front ones, she had lost those. She always colored the sky pink in all her pictures. I recommended her for special counseling, but her father used his influence to stop it. I still think if she had received proper counseling, she might have turned out normal.”…
There’s much more. Continue reading at CountMeOut.com.
[HT: reader Janet]
Jill Stanek is a nurse turned speaker, columnist and blogger, a national figure in the effort to protect both preborn and postborn innocent human life.
the original link for this story came from a political satire site, which also claimed she’s a terrorist because she’s a christian and believes marriage should be between a MAN and a WOMAN.
I guess the left would call me a terrorist because I believe in God, am a Catholic christian, I am against abortion for ANY and ALL reasons, I believe in saving self for marriage…..
But what did Ozzie Nelson think? And didn’t Edward Haskell always behave well around Mrs. Cleaver?
It’s getting harder and harder to distinguish the satire from the real smears these days…
That was scary until I realized it was a hoax. Geesh, I was really worried there for a minute!
Oh.my.God. That was hilarious stuff!
“Her hitting me on the head with that big notebook is what activated my gay gene I think”
ROTFL!! Oh mannn!
Does anybody else feel like they’ve re-entered high school with this election? I sure do.
Elizabeth,
I passed you a note in study hall. I hope you got it!!
High School, that’s a good one! You are right it does feel like high school!
Jill:
The wheels are falling over the Liberal Movement in this country.
Sarah Palin has actaully ignited a “New Women’s Movement” and I am absolutely thrilled that women are starting to get it.
Remember this: Pro-abort Liberals are willing to murder baby girls in the womb. Do you think they would stop at maliciously murdering the reputation of a little girl if they thought it would advance their cause? If I was a well meaning Liberal, I would definitely re-think my loyalties.
In my April 17, 2007 post I proposed that pro-abort leaders could care less about womens rights and that eventually their fangs would show. Turns out I was right. I’ll repost it here again:
“The New Underground Women’s Movement
By HisMan (one totally sold out to Jesus Christ):
Since abortion makes no sense to any rationally thinking person, there has to be other reasons for pro-aborts’ “death grip” on this so-called “death right” .
It is no secret to me what abortion truly is and why I think it is used as a means to hold political power. I state it again as posted on previous threads as follows:
“You have to realize that pro-deathers are not driven by logic. They are driven by the lust for power, perhaps abortion followers without realizing it, but its leaders and initiators, guilty as hell.
They are no different than the poor man who fantasizes about taking the rich man’s watch without regard to how or why the rich man acquired the watch; while poor materially, they lack no prejudice. They feel totally justified in their position, not because of logic but in some sinister form of perverted self-righteousness not thoroughly arrived at, at having simply arrived. Perhaps this itself feeds the power demon inside them, at just being able to arrive, at joining up: “I’m in the club now and no one will every kick me out, not even me”.
They reject anyone or anything in authority that would tell them how to live including God Himself and it’s generally masked in the facade of women’s rights. Which when you analyze it, is a very parasitical way of thinking. I mean, they kill unborn baby woman too don’t they? How dare they use the issue of abortion to bolster their sense of self-hood. Again, the perverted, twisted and demented logic shows its ugly head from every angle of the looking glass. Ah, but they see in a mirror darkly? No, the light’s off.
So, when they acknowledge the horror of a baby cooking video, or talk about how bad kicking a dead baby in a bag is, or allowing a baby to die in a toilet in an abortion deathatorium despite the pleas of the mother for the baby’s life, they really are acknowledging the horror of abortion since to not do so would be illogical. What they fail to realize is that in doing so, they for a moment remove their masks, and their K-9 fangs show through the sheepskin, scaring even themselves. Does a werewolf know who he is?
So, I ask myself, if we disparage ourselves of the silliness and really take a deep look, what is abortion? Here’s what I, HisMan, think it is:
Abortion is an affront to the creative nature of God, it negates God as Creator.
Abortion denies the power of God to right a wrong, to show forth His glory, it negates God as redeemer.
Abortion makes that which is good, the birth of human life, into that which is evil, the death of human life, and then calls it good, the very definition of blasphemy.
Abortion negates the resurrection power of God as it takes flesh that is alive in it’s earthly abode (the womb) and kills it, while God takes that flesh which is dead in it’s earthly abode (the grave) and desires to make it alive.
Abortion’s desire is to take that which was composed from the chaotic array of elemental molecules into a symphony of life infused with an eternal soul, and turn it back to the entropy of randomness, chaos, nothingness, uselessness, decay, death.
Abortion is against all that is hopeful, all that requires faith for success; for it’s solution; annihilation, it’s goal; death, it’s dream; breaking God’s heart, it’s vision, satan’s ultimate power. Abortion is a counterfeit, for the clawprints of satan are everywhere to be found in its performance.
Abortion disguises hate as love, bondage as freedom, choice as maturity, sin as righteousness, political correctness as wisdom.
Abortion pits men against women, mothers against their children, fathers against God.
Yes, Abortion is satan’s feeble attempt at killing God himself, for Abortion is a metaphor for satan; it is his coat of arms, his family crest, his logo, his brand, it belongs to him……for he laughs at its willing proponents as they craft their own self-destruction, mantled in self-deception.”
As so truthfully stated by By Jennifer Roback Morse in her article, even women suffragists are beginning to see the light:
http://www.townhall.com/Columnists/JenniferRobackMorse
/2007/04/16/the_new_underground_womens_movement
“Abortion advocates never admit that women in crisis face an extremely lopsided “choice.” A woman can end her pregnancy at any time. The abortion clinic provides her with an immediate solution to her “problem.” She can walk in pregnant, and walk out not pregnant. Abortion counselors, assuming there are any, have no particular incentive to provide for her longer term needs, or to get to know her and her problems.
By contrast, the decision to carry a child to term has to be renewed on a daily basis. Throughout the pregnancy, the mother may have moments of fear or fatigue or indecision. Her boyfriend or her mother may be working on her to abort. If her conviction wavers, for even a single afternoon, she can get an abortion. Her child will be gone forever.
That is why workers in a crisis pregnancy center must have a whole different level of commitment than those in an abortion clinic. Pro-life counselors know perfectly well the client has a “choice,” other than returning to their center, so they have to make their services appealing. Pro-life counselors get to know the woman, her life, her problems, sometimes even her boyfriend or her mother. They help clients with housing, medical care, jobs, transportation and child care. The Real Alternatives program in Pennsylvania for instance, has a mandate to assist the woman for a year after her baby is born.
The modern feminist movement is a Marxist knock-off, committed to transforming class warfare into gender warfare. Under the guise of equalizing income for men and women, the feminist movement made in-roads into the power structures of America, inroads that would have been impossible any other way. Since babies account for so much of the gender difference in earnings, Girl Marxists need to neutralize the impact of babies: hence their commitment to all abortions, all the time.
The struggle feminism created is not now, nor has it ever been, solely between women and men. The struggle is between women who want their babies, and women who want something else more. The conflict is between women who value marriage, and Marxists who see marriage as another manifestation of class warfare.
Don’t be fooled by the rhetoric of the Feminist Establishment. You’ll never hear this from the Main Stream Media, but pro-life women are the real champions of the most vulnerable women’s interests. The Pro-life Movement is the New Women’s Movement.”
I love satire.
Why did they not mention the part about how she loves walking around with mittens on her ears?
http://www.andrys.com/palin-kilkenny.html
interesting authentic letter on Sarah Palin written by a resident of the town she presided over as mayor. Fairly interesting.
http://www.newsweek.com/id/157986
This article discusses many FALSE claims being made about Sarah Palin.
(That Anne Kilkenny “letter” was posted here on Jill’s site last week on a thread, apparently by Anne Kilkenny herself.)
The ORIGINAL post of the Newsweek article, before it was updated, stated this: “A few of these claims were included in a chain e-mail by a woman named Anne Kilkenny. We’ll be looking into other charges in that e-mail for a future story.”
It NOW reads: “We’ll be looking into other charges in an e-mail by a woman named Anne Kilkenny for a future story.”
Interesting how they changed it from “chain e-mail” to “e-mail.”
In other words, some of the claims proven false were included in that “chain e-mail” by Kilkenny.
Oh, and btw, that PUMA article was clever. :P
Kel-
her identity was confirmed, that’s why, and its now posted on over 2000 sites, lol. Originally was sent to about 40 people.
Kel-
everything I have found about claims in that letter have been true. It mentions the banning of books, but distinctly says it was only mentioned. In fact, all the stories that are out now, the elements that are proven true are in that letter.
” In our original story, we incorrectly said that a few of the claims we examine here were included in the e-mail by Kilkenny. Only one of the claims – about the librarian’s firing – was similar to an item in that e-mail. We regret the error”
Interesting how they changed it from “chain e-mail” to “e-mail.”
Posted by: Kel at September 10, 2008 8:30 PM
…………………………..
All chain emails are started by one single email. Once a chain email is tracked back to the source and the original, the term chain email would no longer be accurate. Do you really need this explained to you?
the original link for this story came from a political satire site, which also claimed she’s a terrorist because she’s a christian and believes marriage should be between a MAN and a WOMAN.
I guess the left would call me a terrorist because I believe in God, am a Catholic christian, I am against abortion for ANY and ALL reasons, I believe in saving self for marriage…..
Posted by: LizFromNebraska at September 10, 2008 5:55 PM
whoohooo!You think you are a terrorist Liz, trying having more than 1.2 kids, never have used BC, have your babies naturally and at home (when possible), and homeschooled…… NOW that’s wacko! (Actually any ONE of those makes you a right-wing terrorist who breeds Earth-destroying brats according to NARAL, NOW, and the EU….)
With 7 kids my mother would have been considered Bin Laden !
http://www.lesjones.com/2008/09/07/more-palin-rumor-debunking-20-million-debt-book-banning/
http://www.theonion.com/content/video/economists_warn_anti_bush
more satire :P
http://www.theonion.com/content/video/latest_poll_reveals_430_new
All chain emails are started by one single email. Once a chain email is tracked back to the source and the original, the term chain email would no longer be accurate. Do you really need this explained to you?
Posted by: Sally at September 10, 2008 8:45 PM
I realize that emails start with an ORIGINAL email, Sally (why so condescending all the time, btw?). However, their use of the term “chain e-mail” reminds me of the “chain letters” that are forwarded on and spammed, etc. It seems to have a little bit of a bad connotation to say “chain e-mail.” That’s all. I wondered if that was why they had removed it. Apparently, they just went back and changed the wording once they realized their error, as Dan has pointed out.
Kel-
her identity was confirmed, that’s why, and its now posted on over 2000 sites, lol. Originally was sent to about 40 people.
Why does it not surprise me that one anti-Palin email that has been circulated is now on 2000 sites? (lol) I suppose we’ll expect the media to descend upon Anne Kilkenny now for a face-to-face interview. What am I saying? I’m sure they’ve already found her and have paid her handsomely for an interview and they’ll soon unleash it on the public. “Film at 11! Cell phone footage of catfight between librarian and governor!” ;)
http://www.theonion.com/content/node/85974
Hey, I heard that she brings her own books to read under the dryer at the beauty shop! Some woman named Susan who sits two dryers down said so. She said Sarah Palin’s too snooty to just read Vogue and Cosmo like everybody else. And that really hurts the beautician’s feelings! But all Sarah Palin thinks about is looking like a hot librarian!
Patricia, if I’m lucky enough to get married, I’d adopt children (maybe even ones that were spared from abortion). And I’d homeschool, too.
Except for homeschooling, natural births/at home births, you described my brother & sister in law (three kids, oldest is 7, youngest is 18 months) and my sister & brother in law (three kids — oldest is 9, youngest is 4).
I bet they’d consider this family with 9 kids terrorists, too. The 9 includes one set of twins.
oops, meant to add to the family of 9 kids is that they went to my parish and the parents still attend. And a few of their kids that live in the area also go there.
my mom is the second-oldest in a family of 9. i’m the oldest of 6. i had my two, and later in life, we hope to adopt, if we can. that’s why i really hope someone (probably someone who is pro-life, as a pro-choice politician would have no reason to) changes and fixes adoption/foster care systems, because as they stand, they are quite broken.
harassing a relative’s ex is crazy, Having no foreign policy experience is crazy. Sarah Palin crazy. Misusing police powers for family matters is crazy. Billing per diem for time spent at home. Thats crazy. Sarah Palin Crazy!
That’s hilarious!!!!!!
All chain emails are started by one single email. Once a chain email is tracked back to the source and the original, the term chain email would no longer be accurate. Do you really need this explained to you?
Posted by: Sally at September 10, 2008 8:45 PM
I realize that emails start with an ORIGINAL email, Sally (why so condescending all the time, btw?). However, their use of the term “chain e-mail” reminds me of the “chain letters” that are forwarded on and spammed, etc. It seems to have a little bit of a bad connotation to say “chain e-mail.” That’s all. I wondered if that was why they had removed it. Apparently, they just went back and changed the wording once they realized their error, as Dan has pointed out.
…………………….
Honey, if you hate chain emails/second hand information, you would hate Jill abd her bloggy.
You really don’t know why you support what you support. Get used to having your own hoof lodged in your mouth.
Kel-
……………..
Christina @ 10:12,
Hey, I heard that she brings her own books to read under the dryer at the beauty shop! Some woman named Susan who sits two dryers down said so. She said Sarah Palin’s too snooty to just read Vogue and Cosmo like everybody else. And that really hurts the beautician’s feelings! But all Sarah Palin thinks about is looking like a hot librarian!
LOL! I saw your similar comment at the end of the satire post (at CountUsOut.com). Your comment there had a slightly different ending though. All very funny!
Did you guys notice the caption under the picture above? Priceless.
Christina,
Did you write the whole article? You’re very funny!
Hi Sally,
If you let people in just a bit, you might make some friends who can see past your bitterness into the heart of a woman who could really use some friends. There are people here that care about you. ME!
Kel,
We used to have a girl that posted here. Sally used the “hooves” line on her too. She actually changed her screen name to “Hooves in Maw”. Hilarious!
PIP,
Those were pretty dang funny. Especially the first one.
Yo Lo,
Speaking of crazy…
Count Us Out is a NObama Pro McCain/Palin site and 99.999% of the time the news and information we compile is serious. However, we do enjoy when the opportunity allows us to laugh “back” at those who believe they have the right to model American society after themselves and impose their will, their “beliefs,” “norms” etc. on the rest of us.
Here’s another fun post for All American Women about an All American Woman:
In her home state, retailers are looking to capitalize on the governor’s patronage. Just before she was offered the nomination two weeks ago, Gov. Palin went shopping at Out of the Closet, an Anchorage-based secondhand store, with her 14-year-old daughter Willow and her infant son Trig. She picked up a Juicy Couture coat for Willow and a tweed blazer for herself by Escada, which is one of her favorite labels, a saleswoman said.
Not everyone is cashing in on their association with the Alaskan governor. The famously liberal New York fashion establishment seems to have paid little attention to Gov. Palin while publicly embracing Barack and Michelle Obama.
Vogue Editor Anna Wintour and designer Calvin Klein held a fund-raiser for the Democratic nominee in June, and more than a dozen designers, including Diane von Furstenberg, Marc Jacobs, Vera Wang, Narciso Rodriguez, Tory Burch and Isaac Mizrahi, have designed T-shirts and other merchandise for the Obama Web site.”
hahah! No wonder elites (snobs) hate Palin!
http://tinyurl.com/WhyElitesHatePalin
Kel,
We used to have a girl that posted here. Sally used the “hooves” line on her too. She actually changed her screen name to “Hooves in Maw”. Hilarious!
Posted by: mk at September 11, 2008 8:43 AM
*************************************
I think I’ve seen her post here before! ;) Was wondering where that came from. Now I know.
Sally, I know why I support what I support.
BTW, I lived with emotional abuse for much of my life and I know that the people who say cruel things to others usually have some seriously deep issues. For what you’ve been through, I’m very sorry, but attempting to injure others won’t help you to heal.
If I were you, I’d take Carla up on her offer. She’s a lovely person.
http://www.theonion.com/content/node/29540
Obama and the Palin Effect
by Deepak Chopra
Sometimes politics has the uncanny effect of mirroring the national psyche even when nobody intended to do that. This is perfectly illustrated by the rousing effect that Gov. Sarah Palin had on the Republican convention in Minneapolis this week.
On the surface, she outdoes former Vice President Dan Quayle as an unlikely choice, given her negligent parochial expertise in the complex affairs of governing. Her state of Alaska has less than 700,000 residents, which reduces the job of governor to the scale of running one-tenth of New York City . By comparison, Rudy Giuliani is a towering international figure. Palin’s pluck has been admired, and her forthrightness, but her real appeal goes deeper.
She is the reverse of Barack Obama, in essence his shadow, deriding his idealism and turning negativity into a cause for pride. In psychological terms the shadow is that part of the psyche that hides out of sight, countering our aspirations, virtue, and vision with qualities we are ashamed to face: anger, fear, revenge, violence, selfishness, and suspicion of the others. For millions of Americans, Obama triggers those feelings, but they don’t want to express them. He is calling for us to reach for our higher selves, and frankly, that stirs up hidden reactions of an unsavory kind. (Just to be perfectly clear, I am not making a verbal play out of the fact that Sen. Obama is black. The shadow is a metaphor widely in use before his arrival on the scene.) I recognize that psychological analysis of politics is usually not welcome by the public, but I believe such a perspective can be helpful here to understand Palin’s message. In her acceptance speech Gov. Palin sent a rousing call to those who want to celebrate their resistance to change and a higher vision.
Look at what she stands for:
Small town values – a nostalgic return to simpler times disguises a denial of America’s global role, a return to petty, small-minded parochialism.
Ignorance of world affairs- a repudiation of the need to repair America’s image abroad.
Family values – a code for walling out anybody who makes a claim for social justice. Such strangers, being outside the family, don’t need to be needed.
Rigid stands on guns and abortion – a scornful repudiation that these issues can be negotiated with those who disagree.
Patriotism – the usual fallback in a failed war.
Reform – an italicized term, since in addition to cleaning out corruption and excessive spending, one also throws out anyone who doesn’t fit your ideology. Palin reinforces the overall message of the reactionary right, which has been in play since 1980, that social justice is liberal-radical, that minorities and immigrants, being different from us pure American types, can be ignored, that progressivism takes too much effort and globalism is a foreign threat. The radical right marches under the banners of I’m all right, Jack, Why change? Everything’s OK as it is. The irony, of course, is that Gov. Palin is a woman and a reactionary at the same time. She can add mom to apple pie on her resume, while blithely reversing forty years of feminist progress. The irony is superficial; there are millions of women who stand on the side of conservatism, however obviously they are voting against their own good. The Republicans have won multiple national elections by raising shadow issues based on fear, rejection, hostility to change, and narrow-mindedness.
Obama’s call for higher ideals in politics can’t be seen in a vacuum. The shadow is real; it was bound to respond. Not just conservatives possess a shadow — we all do. So what comes next is a contest between the two forces of progress and inertia. Will the shadow win again, or has its furtive appeal become exhausted? No one can predict. The best thing about Gov. Palin is that she brought this conflict to light, which makes the upcoming debate honest. It would be a shame to elect another Reagan, whose smiling persona was a stalking horse for the reactionary forces that have brought us to the demoralized state we are in. We deserve to see what we are getting, without disguise.
It would be a shame to elect another Reagan, whose smiling persona was a stalking horse for the reactionary forces that have brought us to the demoralized state we are in.
****************************************
Excuse me, Mr. Chopra, as I’m just a rigid, narrow-minded pro-life, pro-woman mother who “votes against her own good” (LOL, right), but HUH???!?
A “SHAME to elect another Reagan”, who did more for this country and the WORLD than most presidents in our history??
Good grief, what planet does this man live on? The make-believe planet of Barney, where “I love you, you love me, and we’re a happy family?” Guess what, Mr. Chopra: this world will not have peace until the return of Jesus Christ, whom you deny. But you keep on spouting your universalist drivel and keep selling those pointless books of yours. It amazes me that people even listen to you, but then…people will listen to almost anything nowadays other than truth.
I guess I’ll just embrace my family values and patriotism and keep on trying to reverse those 40 years of feminist progress (code for ABORTION RIGHTS). You can keep singing along with Barney.
I don’t know if Deepak is really much into Barney, but Barney is certainly a nasty piece of work.
I don’t know if Deepak is really much into Barney, but Barney is certainly a nasty piece of work.
Posted by: Doug at September 12, 2008 8:18 AM
——————————————-
Doug,
Our daughters have had the misfortune (for us) of seeing Barney two or three times in the past year. Now our 4 year old asks my wife, “Why can’t we watch Barney? We love Barney” and sings “Barney is a dinosaur…”
My wife once made the mistake of replying, “Because Mommy really doesn’t like Barney,” and now gets quizzed on why. Barney really is insidiously addictive to small minds.
One of the Capitol Steps (a DC parody singing troupe) most popular songs in the past 10+ years was a song “Time for Killing Barney.” I think most pro-lifers and pro-choicers could agree on this point!
Michael,
Killing Barney would be like killing the Easter bunny! :(
I’d take him any day over the telletubbies. Ick.
Michael and Janet, I used to advise taking revenge on Barney, like even if you see him in shopping mall, etc., that one should kick him, knock him over, etc. I’ve since given that up.
However, there is proof that Barney is the Devil:
http://members.aol.com/TrueHumor/barney.htm
Michael and Janet, I used to advise taking revenge on Barney, like even if you see him in shopping mall, etc., that one should kick him, knock him over, etc. I’ve since given that up.
Posted by: Doug at September 12, 2008 4:29 PM
*******************************************
LOL-Doug, I’m glad to hear it. Good for you, buddy. ;)
:: laughing ::
Right on, Kel.