Limbaugh: Obama’s a hypocrite for “blessing” Planned Parenthood
Planned Parenthood cannot afford to condemn any abortion, after birth, partial birth, they can’t condemn any. They can’t take action in one way, one syllable, one word, they can’t oppose any type of abortion or they destroy their own purpose.
To Planned Parenthood, every abortion is good, every pregnancy is a potential disease, every pregnancy is the result of male domination. Every abortion equals female freedom and emancipation. Every abortion equals women saying, “Screw you.”
Barack Obama, who, as a senator in Illinois, actively, maybe more than any other legislation, supported the idea that a baby surviving a botched abortion should go ahead and be killed, because that was the original intention of the mother. And when we’re talking about the original intention of abortion, we should always be loyal to it.
Now, the original intention of the Constitution, no, no, no, no, no. No, no, no. The Constitution’s a living, breathing document. The female body is not….
Last week Barack Obama talking about what happened in Boston said, “If we can save just one child. If we can save just one child,” and today Obama goes and celebrates an abortion factory and closes by saying “God bless you” to Planned Parenthood.
~ Conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh, reacting to President Obama’s speech at a Planned Parenthood event in DC last week, RushLimbaugh.com, April 26
[Photo via illuminatielitemaldita.blogspot.com]
Jill Stanek is a nurse turned speaker, columnist and blogger, a national figure in the effort to protect both preborn and postborn innocent human life.
And here I was thinking he was going to give us a lecture on marital fidelity.
“Now, the original intention of the Constitution, no, no, no, no, no. No, no, no.” – now that’s funny, coming from someone like him.
What a windbag.
If he WAS giving a lecture on marital fidelity in the quote, perhaps we could begin on this thread to call him out as a hypocrite, but he was in fact pointing out Obama’s hypocrisy in a more than valid statement.
You mean claiming, not ‘pointing out’.
I see he mentioned always being loyal in his less than valid statement too!
Good call Rush. Give me Rush over any brain dead lib any day!
When Rush gets it right, it is a beautiful thing.
I hope Sandra Fluke calls up Obama and encourages him, in a gentle hand-on-the-shoulder sort of way, after that mean bully Limbaugh so cruelly pointed out Obama’s two-faced hypocrisy.
Reality, forget for a moment that Rush said it. (because that is what trolls do; however, we are not taking our eye off the ball this time.)
Where is this statement even close to not being true. I’ve been on this site for about 2 years now, and this is what YOU’VE been saying.
I love this quote even more because of the way he nails Planned Parenthood.
Professor Henry Louis Gates is arrested for disorderly conduct and the obamateur jumps in with both his feet firmly planted in both side of his mealy mouth and declares absolutely, “The police behaved stupidly!”
But when asked to comment on Kermit Gosnell, the long legged, on the down low, mac daddy demurs, “There is a trial in process and it would be inappropriate for me to comment.”
When americans were being murdered in Benghazi this same empty suit said nothing and did nothing.
b o is a coward.
I think Rush is the last person who should be calling out hypocrisy, just saying.
Doesn’t mean what he said about Obama isn’t true, though.
Democratic MVP’s of the last election:
Paul Ryan and Rush Limbaugh.
I love Rush – I’ve never listened to him, but he’s been great for the left.
Heather, for the brain dead lib, just look 4 hours and 47 minutes before you. Typical response – don’t say anything to disprove the facts – when you are losing the argument, level personal attacks at the other side – OK realityNOT now you can attack me
by the way, I am happily married for 25 years, have 9 kids (5 of them adopted), I stand on the sidewalk in front of PP and other abortuaries (that’s right, I said abortuary, not “women’s clinic”), I am a white male, and in addition to opposing abortion, I also oppose gay marriage and amnesty for illegal immigrants – I support gun rights and conscience rights for medical professionals, companies and business owners, I think the HHS mandate is a travesty and that Obamacare is a disaster for our country – I am sure there are many other terrible things I believe, but I am sure that is enough ammo for you right now, so have at it
Oh, look, here’s the “pro-life” Ex-GOP right on cue to NOT say anything pro-life in response to this comment about actual pro-life issues by someone he’s NEVER ACTUALLY HEARD.
I think Rush is the last person who should be calling out hypocrisy, just saying.
Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.
Good luck with that in Washington. Or anywhere, for that matter. Just saying.
Typical response – don’t say anything to disprove the facts – when you are losing the argument, level personal attacks at the other side
True.
And Jack, you being a person who has been addicted to drugs before… I honestly and truly hope you’re not smacking down Rush for his oxycontin addiction.
We can learn something from people, whether we agree with them or not. What I learned from Obama’s statements is that he has a serious mental disconnect, not unlike other pro-choicers… not unlike certain commenters here.
“Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.
Good luck with that in Washington. Or anywhere, for that matter. Just saying.”
Well, there are hypocrites, like you and me and every single human ever. Then there are HYPOCRITES like Rush and Newt Gringrich, and Keith Olbermann. Like seriously, I don’t understand how people can take Rush seriously when he rails against drug users while he was using drugs improperly and illegally, or Newt when he goes on about family values (lol), or Olbermann when he accuses the right of being sexist while he uses sexist slurs against women. It’s just staggering what people will ignore if they agree with the opinions the person is putting forth.
And I’m NOT judging Rush for having a problem with addiction, Kel. I wish him the best recovery, though according to him I should be in prison (while he shouldn’t be, apparently). I’m judging him for his double standards on how he thinks that addicts besides himself should be treated. Seriously, the man is hugely hypocritical and doesn’t have a compassionate bone in his body.
I will say though, Rush is about the only conservative I’ve seen call out the racial disparity in drug busts and prosecutions, I do have the tiniest bit of respect for that. But apparently, people who use drugs should go to jail. Do not pass Go, don’t collect 200 dollars. Unless you’re Rush, of course.
“There’s nothing good about drug use. We know it. It destroys individuals. It destroys families. Drug use destroys societies. Drug use, some might say, is destroying this country. And we have laws against selling drugs, pushing drugs, using drugs, importing drugs. And the laws are good because we know what happens to people in societies and neighborhoods, which become consumed by them. And so if people are violating the law by doing drugs, they ought to be accused and they ought to be convicted and they ought to be sent up.
What this says to me is that too many whites are getting away with drug use. Too many whites are getting away with drug sales. Too many whites are getting away with trafficking in this stuff. The answer to this disparity is not to start letting people out of jail because we’re not putting others in jail who are breaking the law. The answer is to go out and find the ones who are getting away with it, convict them and send them up the river, too.
…We are becoming too tolerant as a society, folks, especially of crime, in too many parts of the country…. This country certainly appears to be tolerant, forgive and forget. I mean, you know as well as I do, you go out and commit the worst murder in the world and you just say you’re sorry, people go, “Oh, OK. A little contrition.”… People say, “I feel better. He said he’s sorry for it.” We’re becoming too tolerant, folks.” -Limbaugh
Sorry Kel – I suppose I’m having a hard time following Rush on this one.
First off, is he saying he’s anti-Scalia and he believes in a living constitution? And “the female body is not” Not living? Not in the constitution?
On abortion – yes – I don’t like planned parenthood – I discussed this at length a few days ago.
This isn’t that hard though – Obama doesn’t see pre-born babies as people, Rush does. So when Obama says he wants to ‘save one child’ – he doesn’t see the same group of children as Rush sees.
Now, I don’t agree with Obama – I think that they are babies and thus children – I suppose I don’t get the shock that Obama doesn’t see them as children. Isn’t that the fundamental difference here? If somebody doesn’t believe that a fetus is an actual protected life (and equal to anybody else under the law), then they are going to have separate beliefs about it.
With all that being said, I’m still confused by aspects of his quote, but happy he is still in the political entertainment business, because he’s done great things over the years for the left!
” Now, I don’t agree with Obama – I think that they are babies and thus children – I suppose I don’t get the shock that Obama doesn’t see them as children. Isn’t that the fundamental difference here? If somebody doesn’t believe that a fetus is an actual protected life (and equal to anybody else under the law), then they are going to have separate beliefs about it.”
Well, I’d be willing to see Obama just like any other pro-choicer (woefully wrong, but not incredibly hypocritical), but he opposes protecting born-alive infants after abortion infants, several times. I think that makes him hypocritical when he talks about children dying as a tragedy. Plus there’s the whole “won’t comment on an ongoing case” thing when he doesn’t seem to have an issue commenting about other ongoing cases, as long as they are politically expedient for him and play to his base. Which makes him like most other politicians, but it’s still hypocritical.
Inb4 Reality tells me that born alive infants aren’t really born because of the attempted abortion.
Jack
It’s sad that these issues are so polarized that common sense stuff can’t get done. I’ve seen Democrats say that they won’t vote for born alive acts because it is a slippery slope to banning abortion – and I’ve seen Republicans say they won’t vote for even common senese gun laws because it could lead to something worse.
Salvation will never come through politicians. They are about power, and money – and they are going to be a slave to their donors before anything else. If you want to understand any political decision, look up their donors. Talking puppets.
And when we’re talking about the original intention of abortion, we should always be loyal to it.
Now, the original intention of the Constitution, no, no, no, no, no. No, no, no. The Constitution’s a living, breathing document. The female body is not….
Rush is saying that this is how Obama views abortion – as a sacrosanct right, subject to the woman’s original intention – but that he doesn’t view our Constitution the same way, as originally intended, continually striving to alter and override it by executive order.
Ahhhh – thanks Kel – I see it now. Tough without hearing his tone.
I didn’t figure he was in favor of a living constitution.
” It’s sad that these issues are so polarized that common sense stuff can’t get done. I’ve seen Democrats say that they won’t vote for born alive acts because it is a slippery slope to banning abortion – and I’ve seen Republicans say they won’t vote for even common senese gun laws because it could lead to something worse.
Salvation will never come through politicians. They are about power, and money – and they are going to be a slave to their donors before anything else. If you want to understand any political decision, look up their donors. Talking puppets. ”
Well yeah, I agree with everything you said. I think real change comes from the population, not egomaniacal politicians. That doesn’t lessen Obama’s personal corruption and hypocrisy, though, just because everyone’s doing it. Just because every politician has some skeletons and shady opinions and hypocrisy going on doesn’t mean we stop calling it out all together. Ya dig?
(though I would love it if Rush just retired. Maybe he could go to prison for five years, which is what he deserves according to Florida law and what he thinks all those other drug addicts deserve?)
I have no issue with people calling it out – I’m just surprised that people get so shocked so easily. Mostly because, in my heart I’d like to agree with your second sentence, but less and less, I have faith that the population is the most important thing. There’s a reason that politicians are at fund raisers almost every day during a campaign…it’s all about the benjamins.
Rush won’t ever retire – he’s a bigger egomaniac than any politician out there.
every pregnancy is the result of male domination – maybe for some of the religious and some anti-choicers. Not for pro-choicers.
“he doesn’t view our Constitution the same way, as originally intended” – hah! It’s Rush and people of his ilk who misrepresent and attempt to twist the constitution to suit their position.
“continually striving to alter and override it by executive order.” – no, that would be clarifying it to protect it against people like Rush.
“every pregnancy is the result of male domination – maybe for some of the religious and some anti-choicers. Not for pro-choicers.”
You seem to have missed what he was actually mocking there.
Mocking only works when it has some parallel to the truth Jack. He blew it :-)
Ex-GOP says: April 30, 2013 at 3:45 pm “I love Rush – I’ve never listened to him, but he’s been great for the left.”
Ex-RINO says: April 30, 2013 at 5:18 pm “Rush won’t ever retire – he’s a bigger egomaniac than any politician out there.”
ecks,
How can you make any informed conclusion about a person if you have never bothered to hear what they have to say?
I know.
You have read at least one of Rush Limbaugh’s books.
NOT!
You have just about eclipsed Real-stupid-ity in the inane and arcane categoris. Care to go for the tri-fecta and take ‘insane’ for the win?
Might as well double down on dumb and lose some more capital on the instant replay.
But you don’t mind helping yourself to Limbaughs wealth to finance your socialistic piped reams.
Has any one ever mistaken you for a man?
Limbaugh has his inconsistencies in his personal life, but when it comes to pointing out the phluckups of the left, no one has done it more consistently or more effectively in the last 20 years.
Rush should apolgoize to sluts everywhere for putting them in the same category as pan handling grifters and flim flam artists like Sandra Phluck.
Blaming four more years of the long legged, on the down low, mac daddy on Rush Limbaugh is absurd. The responsibility for that continuing disaster belongs to the ignorant and short sighted fools who elected her/him/it.
“Mocking only works when it has some parallel to the truth Jack. He blew it ”
He seems to have been mocking the more extremist elements of radical feminism, you know the Dworkin wannabes who think all hetero sex is rape and believe in the political lesbianism stuff. Granted, that doesn’t describe the views of most pro-choicers and feminists, but that’s probably what he was getting at.
I did have an argument on Facebook with one woman (sorry, womyn) of that bent once, I blocked her after the gazillionth time she called me a rapist and domestic abuser because I was married and had kids lol. Your side has its crazies too.
“You have read at least one of Rush Limbaugh’s books.” – I haven’t. Why would I assist that clown financially. I’ll wait for the GW library to open to the public so I can borrow one of the 27,493 copies which’ll be in there. Might even take a look at one of the three other books that’ll be there. Do we need to take our own coloring-in pencils or are they provided?
The only thing Rush successfully mocks is himself.
No, he also seems to do a pretty good job of mocking the stupid things that Obama says.
Heather,
How’s your daughter doing and did you find the camera with the irreplaceable photos?
LL <3
Only to those who think obama says anything stupid Del, and that would be less than 50% of the population :-)
realityNOT – I assume you are making your assumptions about the population based on the outcome of the election – so let me point out that only about 21% of the population thinks BO is not stupid based on the number of votes he got in the election – he got about 66 million votes out of the 313 million people in the US
My work requires alot of drive time…and I spend the time alternating between talk radio and classical music.
Rush has been consistently great on pro-life topics. At times he really shines and here he just nailed the two faced hypocrite Obama who wants to have it both ways: appearing concerned about “saving just one life” while at other times working laboriously to make sure born alive infants are allowed to die. To what “god” does Obama pray when asking blessings for Planned Parenthood, an exceptionally well-oiled killing machine of innocent unborn babies?
On that basis Bryan, the vast majority must find what Rush says to be stupid. I know that any sane or rational person does.
Obama’s no two faced hypocrite Jerry. He just understands the difference between people and fetuses.
“To what “god” does Obama pray…” – apparently the same one as many, many other folks.
It is really quite amusing to see the trolls and liberals here harumph and beat their chests like they are so superior to Rush. The truth is that none of them could even begin to hold a candle to him, much less make it through an entire three hour radio show if they were ever deemed capable enough to be given such a chance.
Who is being superior to Rush? I’ve given much love to him during this whole thread. Him and Paul Ryan – MVP’s of the left.
I’m quite sure I couldn’t play the part for three hours straight on the radio – that would be tough for me.
And I’m pretty sure he couldn’t stay married and raise kids well like I have – that appears to be tough for him.
So all’s good – to each his own.
Reality says:
Obama’s no two faced hypocrite Jerry. He just understands the difference between people and fetuses.
Indeed. Obama knows that an unborn child cannot speak for him or herself and is therefore easy prey. Oh, what a brave man he is!! Tell me, Reality, what kind of a monster works to assure that a baby who is born alive during the course of an attempted abortion should not be given any medical attention? I will answer for you because you will not admit it, but that monster is your hero, the most pro-abortion president ever…Barack Obama.
Ex:
If he were as impotent as you claim the left would not even take notice of him, much less get their dander up as they frequently do.
Jerry – Elections have become less about convincing the middle, and more about getting turnout from the base.
Paul Ryan does a great job actually presenting how the GOP would rule, and how scary that is.
And Rush is always good for some sound bites to rile up the the base of the left.
Obama won the single women’s vote by 46 points. 46 points. Rush gets some credit for that, he really does.
Rush is a rolled-gold buffoon.
“The truth is that none of them could even begin to hold a candle to him,” – no, he’d melt because he’s made of wax.
“much less make it through an entire three hour radio show if they were ever deemed capable enough to be given such a chance” – well, apart from the earache and headache he would induce, most rational people just aren’t used to debating someone like Rush who doesn’t use facts or truth.
“what kind of a monster works to assure that a baby” – well that’s a presumptive question for a start!
“I will answer for you” – no, you’re answering for yourself, because “that monster is your hero, the most pro-abortion president ever…Barack Obama” is not my answer :-)
Since no previous president has had to deal with such a concerted, dishonest and intimidation attempting campaign against womens’ freedom, it’s rather hard to make a valid comparison. Therefore your claim is unfounded.
realityNOT – true to form again – ignore the real issue and continue to criticize the messenger – you must have gotten straight A’s at the pro-abort political academy training – well done, true and faithful servant of the culture of death – BO and Cecile must be very proud
Don’t be disingenuous Bryan. I didn’t ignore the real issue, I criticized the message being put across in relation to it because the message being delivered is false. And in this instance I criticized the messenger for being the creator of that false message.
And I’m pretty sure he couldn’t stay married
Yeah, well the Clintons are still married, too.
For that matter, so are the Obamas. Even though one of them is a single parent.