How about a pro-choice dating service?
There had been some talk among Abortioneers in the past about dating and relationships, and how an anti-choice position would be a dealbreaker among potential mates.
This then led to the imagining of a pro-choice dating service, where pro-choice folks can meet each other and fall hopelessly in love (or just hook up, whatever), without having to have the awkward conversation about “what you do” which may then lead to another awkward conversation, at the end of which you get dumped and stuck with the bill.
The horror!
Fear not, lovers of dudes, because I’ve found some prospectives who just might get your juices flowing!
~ Anti-Anti introducing Dudes for Choice, a Tumblr account chock full of hot pro-choice males, The Abortioneers, July 25
Jul.30, 2012 6:00 am |
Pop Culture |
Jill Stanek is a nurse turned speaker, columnist and blogger, a national figure in the effort to protect both preborn and postborn innocent human life.
Call it “Choice Meets”.
’nuff said.
At least the dudes’ll know they have a high chance of getting laid. I’m sure they’ll make many beautiful abortions together.
EDIT: just checked out the page. Most of the dudes there seem grody.
Guys: I’ll have sex with you, but I’ll kill the child if I’m not all that interested in you, or feeling ultra-bitchy at the moment, or I’m not sure it’s actually your child because I couldn’t resist that really cute guy at the party we went to, or I need to assert I’m not your precious fetus vessel right now, because you somehow forgot that.
Then if I keep my child you’ll be angry with me because you thought I’d abort it. Didn’t I tell you, I alone get to choose? Then when you tuck your tail between your legs and move on to that whore down the hall, I can refer to you as the sperm donor to my friends and family. But you’re so sexy when you’re marching with me in these pro-choice demonstrations.
—
A tabloid cover showed pro-choice Bill Clinton says he looks forward to chasing grandchildren around the yard, but likely won’t get to see his grandchild before he dies. In the meantime, the Romney’s have enjoyed their 16 beautiful grandchildren.
If you really think “choice” is a winning proposition, go pair up – please!
Selecting yourselves out of the gene pool is awesome.
—
I think those without children need to pay a much higher portion of taxes, because raising kids costs a great deal and over the long haul, childless couples financially benefit from households who have raised future taxpayers. Why should they get a free pass and ride on the coattails of traditional families?
I assume this is a joke. Most of the people on the “dudes for choice” site look like someone scraped the scum from the bottom of the gene pool. And the worst part is that these people look horrible by their own “choice”. If they were dressed and acting like human beings, and accepted the concept of hygiene, they would look alright.
Klassy.
At the time of this posting, the top image has a guy holding a sign of a cross layered over a swastika bearing the legend “fight the fascist right.” Which…yeah. Ten-foot poles and so on for pretty much all of these guys. If these are the dudes the abortion apologists want, they can have them.
Dudes for the freedom to sleep with any girl and walk away no matter what happens. Use ’em, leave ’em, hey what a great deal for me!
What “dude” wouldn’t love that? A man, however, well that’s another story.
Pro choice boys are not so smart. Let me spell it out for you guys.
Get her pregnant, you choose life, she chooses abortion, you have no choice.
Get her pregnant, you choose abortion, she chooses life, you have no choice, AND you get to pay child support for the next 18 yrs, AND she can dump you and move on with someone else, or move away with your child, and you still have no choice.
Get her pregnant, you choose life or abortion, she chooses adoption, and your choices are agree with her, or raise the baby yourself?
The only way it works for both with complete equality is if you have both agreed that you are both going to choose abortion every single time. So what you get is two people who are planning in advance to kill any children they create. Nice.
Unfortunately, I doubt that bit of truth will look quite as good on a t-shirt.
Are you sure this isn’t just a satire site put together by a pro-lifer with a weird sense of humour? It really seems like one, judging by the pictures. I think Abortioneers has been punked.
Are you sure this isn’t just a satire site put together by a pro-lifer with a weird sense of humour? It really seems like one, judging by the pictures. I think Abortioneers has been punked.
I wondered about this too… This would be a great bit for a pro-life site. However, the total lack of snarky comments convinced me that this is the real thing.
That, and this is how the pro-choice guys looked at every counter-protest I’ve ever seen.
Is this a joke???? A bunch of old guys and the young guys look like they haven’t showered in a week? SMH.
And the caption under some guys with abortion signs “They’re killin it!” Oh the irony!!!!!
I feel like I should tell everyone not to judge people on their looks, and it’s what’s on the inside that counts, but in this case what’s on the inside is even uglier.
And prochoicers say that the prolife mouvement is nothing but Old men trying to controle women’s bodies. They should check their kind of men on their side.
They’ll never admit to the fact that there are more pro-choice men than women. Instinct, basic all-around decency are the reasons why. “Dudes” have always been behind in those deparments. I would never want to be one of those “dudes”, thank you very much,
yikes
“I think those without children need to pay a much higher portion of taxes”
We’re already paying for schools that we don’t use – and that’s fine. We’re already paying for the disabled children that pro-lifers choose to have – and that’s fine, too. Here’s the thing, Chris – women are not baby factories inasmuch as you might think so. It’s all about choice and that includes the choice to have a family.
Aside from being icky, I think the whole things sounds terribly UN romantic.
Sterility… the modern girl’s aphrodisiac ;)
Anti, Anti, Anti,
If those are the ‘dudes’ you’ve come up with, I’ve got some good news and some bad news. The good news is that young pro-life women will absolutely NOT compete with you for these ’dudes.’ You have “dibs,” “first call!” or whatever you say, you are welcome to them.
The bad news: it’s the same as the good news.
I think those without children need to pay a much higher portion of taxes, because raising kids costs a great deal and over the long haul, childless couples financially benefit from households who have raised future taxpayers. Why should they get a free pass and ride on the coattails of traditional families?
Really? My sister is a surgeon, and she and her husband are childless by choice. I can assure you that she didn’t get a “free pass” or “ride on coattails” of ANYONE on her journey through medical school. All loans and scholarships, baby, that didn’t come from YOU. She doesn’t owe you (or me, with 3 kids of my own) a damn thing. Actually, nobody owes my “traditional” family anything, either.
CC, if women aren’t baby factories, where do we get babies from?
Notice the the t-shirt says I <3 pro-choice boys. I guess that’s because there’s no pro-choice MEN.
CC, if women aren’t baby factories, where do we get babies from?
From women who want to have them. Not from women who don’t want to have them. Easy peasy.
That’s quite a reveal. They avoid the “awkward conversation” because they both know going in that they ARE going to abort any child that shows up unplanned. So, where’s the choice in that? They are pro-abort from pre-conception. What if the awkward conversation turns out to be that one of them develops a heart and finds themselves rejoicing at the news of a pregnancy? There’s no protecting against the development of compassion and mercy… no matter how carefully you screen your dates.
Jess, Obama says your sister owes the government. She didn’t build that.
I assume this is a joke. Most of the people on the “dudes for choice” site look like someone scraped the scum from the bottom of the gene pool.
Yes, I was thinking that. If these are the “hot” prochoice males, what do the ugly ones look like?
From women who want to have them. Not from women who don’t want to have them. Easy peasy.
I agree. But if you’re pregnant, you already have a baby regardless of whether you want one.
“I agree. But if you’re pregnant, you already have a baby regardless of whether you want one.”
And, as the law stands, you have a right to get rid of it. Minor surgery and it’s all taken care of. Easy peasy.
Yes, “hot pro-choice males” is absolutely, unequivocally dripping with satire.
I went through the site and just found it amazing that Abortioneers would consider them worth salivating over.
From women who want to have them. Not from women who don’t want to have them. Easy peasy.
So, you are saying some women are baby factories!
CC: And, as the law stands, you have a right to get rid of it. Minor surgery and it’s all taken care of. Easy peasy.
CC, since you recognize that babies come from women, isn’t it logical to assume that women are responsible for the welfare and protection of their babies?
Ever heard of something called an unjust law?
If woman #1 has a baby to expand her family, then
If woman #2 has a baby to sell to another couple or individual,
which one is acting like a baby factory? And which behaves like a mother? See, they’re both mothers, but one is using her uterus for income the other is not. So, treating children like property is actually the pro-choice way, so when pro-choicers point the finger and say ‘baby factory’ as we all know, three fingers are pointing back at themselves. Women who opt to destroy their child are what abortionists call ‘money factories.’
PS Anyone find the “easy peasy” a little queasy especially when the subject of a dead mother (Tonya Reaves) is only a few entries away on this blog??
What about emphasizing that which makes humans distinctive — our intellect — instead of sexuality?
This would decrease many of the problems that deform our world. We could decrease STDs and women would get pregnant when they wanted to have and raise babies.
ninek: PS Anyone find the “easy peasy” a little queasy especially when the subject of a dead mother (Tonya Reaves) is only a few entries away on this blog??
That was exactly my thought. Tonya probably was told it was going to be easy peasy. :(
Jess, Obama says your sister owes the government. She didn’t build that.
True that, and my husband owns his own business. That’s a lot of work this family hasn’t been doing! I’ve got a lot of laundry to do, though, so I wonder where those little federally employed laundry fairies are right now . . .
From women who want to have them. Not from women who don’t want to have them. Easy peasy.
I agree. But if you’re pregnant, you already have a baby regardless of whether you want one.
I was referring more to women like my sister, who has never been pregnant or had an abortion, but will not be having children. If she did find herself pregnant, well, then . . . we’d be calling her mom. She’s a wonderful aunt, though, who adores her nieces and nephew.
Jess, if enough married folks choose to be childless, they’re also choosing to have someone else’s children taking care of them when they’re old. It’s poor foresight, and a choice with negative consequences for society.
Jess, if enough married folks choose to be childless, they’re also choosing to have someone else’s children taking care of them when they’re old.
Most people won’t choose to be childless. My sister is a minority, as far as that goes. Frankly, someone else’s children will, presumably, have chosen a job that entails taking care of the elderly. So, it’s not as if anyone will be forced to take care of non-family members, anymore than they’re forced right now. Before kids taking over my life, I was active in our nursing home ministry. Trust me, many, many elderly people are not being attended to by their children; it’s all done by “someone else’s kids.” Employees. Hired hands. Are you also holding those absent children responsible for making other people’s kids take care of their parents? If you’re not, then to be fair, you should.
Nobody makes it out of this life without their share (or more than their share) of burdens. Sometimes it is so inconvenient to have to live with other people who believe and live differently than you do, isn’t it? However, if you’ve discovered the secret to making everything fair in life, I’d love for you to share it!
Jess-
Your family has a “nursing home ministry” and you’re cursing in comments on a blog. Killing your testimony sister.
Chris-
Families with kids do pay less taxes, I get two large tax deductions for my two living children.
And also Jess?
If your sister used govt backed student loans she DID get them from Chris/us/you since tax payers foot the bill for them.
I’m not here to give a testimony. I don’t know where you got the idea that I was. That was a few years ago, and I’ve grown rather agnostic since then.
The dam* word negates any point I’ve made, question I’ve asked, or love for my fellow beings? Nope, you’re really reaching there. It’s possible that something else I’ve said – other than dam* - is what’s really bothering you, Jamie.
And also Jess?
If your sister used govt backed student loans she DID get them from Chris/us/you since tax payers foot the bill for them.
And she’s paying them back, in full. In addition to being in a position to care for the health of Chris/us/you/ taxpayers. I don’t understand what your problem is with loans when the end result is not only someone paying back monetarily, but by being a positive addition to the community.
I guess what I’m trying to say is that we’re all pretty interconnected, and life is fraught with opportunities and instances where you take on the “burden” of lifting someone else up. So what if the person you assist never had children? Are they less human and deserving of care and concern?
Jess, I’ve heard darn worse. :)
I’m a slow reader. I was referring to the post before. Oh, what the heck.
I knew what you meant, Hans. ;-)
The morning is young. No comment from CC yet about the Jews.
“The morning is young. No comment from CC yet about the Jews.”
I knew something was missing from this conversation.
I’m sure she’ll get around to it eventually.
CC
As a mom of disabled individual who has overcome leukemia, hyperthyroidism, and JDM, I would really like to thank you for having the decency to state that your fine with paying taxes so pro-lifers can have disabled children. We’ve had some changes in our medicaid program and for now my son’s visits will be limited to 12 visits a year. He’s doing really well but 12 doctor visits a year for an individual with a complicated health history is not really good news. Your verbal declaration though is very encouraging and I will try to remember it should doubt as to the nobility of the American taxpayer ever cross my mind. I never really considered myself as a pro-lifer having disabled children, I didn’t find out until my son was four months old that he had a disability but had I known when I was pregnant that he had a disability he would have still been safe in my womb anyway I feel so much better knowing that your o.k. with that.
That was exactly my thought. Tonya probably was told it was going to be easy peasy.
She probably was told that…and guess what…it is easy peasy 99 percent of the time. She was unfortunate, but really let’s not make this out to be that abortion isn’t easy peasy, because as a medical procedure, it really is.
How about a service leading to relationships that are intellectually based?
Or dating between men who do not want their partners to have abortions and women who vow not to have them?
Or dating that excludes pregnancy-causing activity?
I’m a dude, but none of those guys are particularly attractive.
Some Guy says:
August 2, 2012 at 10:11 am
I’m a dude, but none of those guys are particularly attractive.
(Denise) Don’t unattractive people date?
This -shirt reminds me of the Chris Rock video with his so-called “comedy” piece on “I love pro-choice women because I know they are #%&ing”. Horrible language but so true and he explains to guys how they have no say unless “she wants a baby” otherwise you better shut up. How pathetic and sad.