Pro-life March Madness: “Sweeping… hurtling… astonishing display”
If abortion proponents condemned 2011 as “the year of abortion restrictions… mark[ing] a sea change for abortion rights,” and 2012 as “an unmitigated disaster for abortion rights,” I can’t imagine what they will say about 2013.
In 2011 there were a record 92 pro-life laws enacted in the states, followed by the second highest number, 43, in in 2012. This year has already seen at least 14 pro-life bills become law, according to Mailee Smith, Staff Counsel for Americans United for Life, so we are on track for another banner year.
But in 2013 we are not only seeing a high volume of typical pro-life legislative fare, we are seeing passage of pro-life legislation on steroids, the likes of which has never been observed in 40 years of legalized abortions throughout the U.S.
Yesterday, North Dakota adopted the “heartbeat” ban, which outlaws abortion once a baby’s heart tones can be detected, as early as six weeks. At the same time ND Governor Jack Dalrymple signed the first ever ban against eugenic abortions for fetal abnormalities or gender.
Bumped from the top spot, held only three weeks, was Arkansas, which on March 6 passed what was then an unprecedented ban on abortions after 12 weeks.
Just a week prior, Arkansas became the 10th* state to pass a ban on abortions after 20 weeks.
Then there’s the Personhood Amendment. On March 22 North Dakota became the first state to legislatively authorize a ballot initiative that would establish the right to life from the moment of conception.
The other side is attempting to exude coolness by mocking and dismissing, but you know they must be overwhelmed, not just because the attacks against abortion are coming from all sides, but also because of pro-life chutzpah and legislative cohesiveness never before seen.
Mother Jones has created three rounds of “Anti-Choice March Madness” charts, because:
Despite being Women’s History Month, March has seen relentless attacks on ladies’ rights. As soon as one state passes some outrageous woman-restricting bill, another is right behind with something even, well, outrageous-er. The “state-by-state race to the bottom on women’s health,” as the president of Planned Parenthood put it, inspired us to set up our own March Madness bracket to determine the national champion in the War on Women.
Read through the match-ups to get a thrill up your leg. The winner is, no surprise, North Dakota! Click to enlarge…
More on the pro-life tsunami from Politico, March 26:
For years, decades even, abortion fights targeted procedures used in later stages of pregnancy, such as the ban on certain late-term abortions. Or they focused on making abortion harder to access because of rules like waiting periods, parental notification or regulations that make it harder for clinics to stay in business. Several states have also begun to put restrictions on drugs used to terminate a pregnancy in its early weeks, like… RU-486.
Then the battleground began to shift. A few years ago, states began passing “fetal pain” laws, restricting abortions at around 20 weeks post-fertilization….
This year, states have begun hurtling toward very early bans, in the first trimester of pregnancy.
“It’s an astonishing display, really. I think in the last month, we’ve seen legislatures basically in a race to the bottom, each one trying to outdo each other in being more anti-choice than the other,” said Donna Crane, policy director for NARAL….
“These are obviously, these are without question, unconstitutional,” Nancy Northup, president and CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights, said. “There’s no chance that these could stand up in court. They are an absolute affront to the current standards.”…
Jennifer Dalven, director of the ACLU Reproductive Freedom Project, said… “These are certainly the most extreme restrictions that we have seen in quite some time. But I don’t think we should miss the point that the goal of all the restrictions is to make it very difficult, if not impossible, for a woman to get an abortion if she needs one”…
Note that both Richards of PP and Donna Crane of NARAL used the “race to the bottom” catch phrase. They must share PR firms.
From a PP email alert yesterday (click to enlarge)…
Well, duh.
*According to AUL, 10 states maintain prohibitions of abortion at 20 weeks: AL, AR, DE, IN, KS, LA, NE, NC, OH, and OK. Three state laws are in litigation: AZ, GA, ID.

“Well, duh.” Simple yet brilliant! :)
This is how it is done.
Seems like the “Madness” is on THEIR end. ;)
Wait Delaware has a 20 week ban? How did I miss that?
Part of me hopes this triggers the SCOTUS and part of me just hopes the states stand by their newly enacted laws.
Glory be. They finally figured out our ultimate goal. Took them long enough.
Beautiful music to my ears! Keep going, states!
Loving the bracket idea – so cute, anti-lifers!
And the winner is … Babies (and moms, dads, cousins, grandparents …)!
How nice for you. And following the rout of the GOP at the next mid-terms because of their stupidity in catering to the looney tunes extremists, we will see their power in various states also fade away and reason and sense will re-emerge.
“They finally figured out our ultimate goal” – yes, so you’ll get just so far and then the majority will realise just how insidious the impact of these junk policies are on their lives. You have heard of backlash haven’t you?
It never to ceases to amaze how the left just cannot abide by us working through the system and winning. It has taken decades. Between 1973 and today we have passed hundreds of laws, often against great odds, but nevertheless dismissed one after another as they met the fate of judges bent on maintaining the pro-abortion lie.
We are winning but we have lost so much beautiful human life in the process…a tragedy of unspeakable proportions.
It’s a good year to be alive.
Indeed U-104, much better than 2001-2008.
Jamie, yes, I rechecked on that before posting….
Del. Code Ann. tit. 24 § 1790 provides the following. The last sentence is relevant…
(a) No person shall terminate or attempt to terminate or assist in the termination or attempt at termination of a human pregnancy otherwise than by birth, except that a physician licensed by this State may terminate a human pregnancy or aid or assist or attempt a termination of a human pregnancy if such procedure takes place in a hospital accredited by a nationally recognized medical or hospital accreditation authority, upon authorization by a hospital abortion review authority appointed by the hospital if 1 or more of the following conditions exist:
(1) Continuation of the pregnancy is likely to result in the death of the mother;
(2) There is substantial risk of the birth of the child with grave and permanent physical deformity or mental retardation;
(3) The pregnancy resulted from:
a. Incest, or
b. A rape or unlawful sexual intercourse in the first or second degree committed as a result of force or bodily harm or threat of force or bodily harm, and the Attorney General of this State has certified to the hospital abortion review authority in writing over the Attorney General’s signature that there is probable cause to believe that the alleged rape or unlawful sexual intercourse in the first or second degree did occur, except that during the first 48 hours after the alleged rape or unlawful sexual intercourse in the first or second degree no certification by the Attorney General shall be required;
(4) Continuation of the pregnancy would involve substantial risk of permanent injury to the physical or mental health of the mother.
(b) In no event shall any physician terminate or attempt to terminate or assist in the termination or attempt at termination of a human pregnancy otherwise than by birth unless:
(1) Not more than 20 weeks of gestation have passed (except in the case of a termination pursuant to paragraph (a)(1) of this section or where the fetus is dead); and….
Wait, Reality can call us “looney toones extremists” but I can’t call him a freak?
When he is, by the body count, most certainly one?
By who’s standard/by what standard is a bill/law labeled ‘Pro-Life.’ I would like a serious answer to this.
Stopping babies from being torn limb from limb… an “insidious” agenda indeed Reality. Can’t have mercy here, now can we? Certainly not the sensible thing. Rip away!
Cranky Catholic says:
March 28, 2013 at 9:46 am
By who’s standard/by what standard is a bill/law labeled ‘Pro-Life.’ I would like a serious answer to this.
(Denise) The vast majority of pregnancies result from voluntary sexual intercourse and are of healthy embryos and fetuses.
Wow that’s great about DE, maybe that will rub off on the crazy state that I live in. Biden must be elated since he’s a “practicing Catholic” and all. *blink, blink*
Time to move back to the UK/Canada/AUS “R”.
LOL
“Sever or permanent…mental health”, yeah, that’s not an actualy ban on anything, it’s window dressing. It bans NOTHING. Women wants an abortion, doctor says ‘are you now or do you feel like you will be depressed if you are forced to continue this pregnancy? Because if you say ‘yes’ then you are in serious danger of this pregnancy indangering your mental health.’ And voilá, abortion on demand.
@Reality
Oh absolutely, only three more years until obama’s gone for good!
You can call me whatever you wish Courtnay, I really don’t mind.
I was actually referring to those such as the tea party element, not specifically anti-choicers. There are a raft of issues which will be redressed.
Absolutely U-104, then we’ll have Hillary :-)
Jespren says:
March 28, 2013 at 11:07 am
“Sever or permanent…mental health”, yeah, that’s not an actualy ban on anything, it’s window dressing. It bans NOTHING. Women wants an abortion, doctor says ‘are you now or do you feel like you will be depressed if you are forced to continue this pregnancy? Because if you say ‘yes’ then you are in serious danger of this pregnancy indangering your mental health.’ And voilá, abortion on demand.
(Denise) This could be more strictly interpreted to include those at genuine danger of post-partum psychosis or those who are actually handicapped.
@Reality
All that combat experience in bosnia should help her win the military vote. LOL