Someone call the president! Stupak says executive order bars contraceptive mandate
Greta Van Susteren interviewed former Congressman Bart Stupak last night to get his take on the Obama administration’s new mandate forcing religious institutions to cover contraception, abortifacients, and sterilization in their employee insurance plans.
Pro-lifers will have no trouble remembering Stupak as the leader of a group of pro-life Democrats who signed on to Obamacare in 2009 after President Obama wrote an executive order attempting to allay pro-life concerns that taxpayer funded abortions might be hidden in the bill.
But pro-lifers were not alone in saying the executive order was worth the paper it was written on. So did such renowned abortion proponents as Planned Parenthood CEO Cecile Richards and former Obama Chief-of-Staff Rahm Emanuel.
Stupak echoed former colleague Kathy Dahlkemper’s recent contention that the executive order not only protects taxpayers from funding abortion but also protects religious healthcare entities from the contraception mandate.
Someone needs to call the president.
Stupak’s response here is incorrect (and frustrating) but relevant…
Van Susteren: I’m trying to understand your position. Is the morning-after pill, in your mind, contraception, or is it as – some Catholics might say it’s a form of abortion?
Stupak: I think it’s a – it’s a contraceptive. It’s – and you’re destroying an embryo, you’re taking a life. Therefore, I’m not in favor of that, nor does the Catholic church.
… because it sets up the question on contraceptive conscience protection…
Van Susteren: All right, so if it’s contraceptive, then it is not covered in the executive order that the president signed, is that right, that that executive order that you agreed to dealt with abortion?
Stupak: Oh, no. No, it dealt with – it dealt with not only abortion, but also with the conscience clause. In fact, if you look in section one of the executive order, it’s – very clearly it says – it cites the Church amendment way back in 1973, all the way to the Weldon amendment, which was in legislation that President Obama signed in 2009, in which they talked about the conscience clause and the right of individuals and institutions such as the church to not provide these services if it violates their tenets of their faith and their principles and their conscience.
Here’s the relevant portion of the executive order, according to Stupak and Dahlkemper:
Section 1. Policy….
The Act maintains current Hyde Amendment restrictions governing abortion policy and extends those restrictions to the newly-created health insurance exchanges. Under the Act, longstanding Federal laws to protect conscience (such as the Church Amendment, 42 U.S.C. §300a-7, and the Weldon Amendment, Pub. L. No. 111-8, §508(d)(1) (2009)) remain intact and new protections prohibit discrimination against health care facilities and health care providers because of an unwillingness to provide, pay for, provide coverage of, or refer for abortions.
Numerous executive agencies have a role in ensuring that these restrictions are enforced, including the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and the Office of Personnel Management (OPM).
I have read both amendments and checked with two impeccable legislative sources in D.C. who confirm there is no conscience protection in the Church Amendment for other than sterilization and abortion, and there is only “individual” conscience protection in the Weldon Amendment, not institutional.
In other words, they are both meaningless to this discussion (and in general).
Furthermore, there is no operative language in the executive order. It merely observes there are two conscience laws, like observing there are two clouds floating by.
Meanwhile, Obamacare states the HHS Secretary can mandate coverage of anything s/he decides is a “preventative service” which Kathleen Sebelius has indeed deemed contraception, the morning after pill, the IUD, and sterilization.
National Right to Life Committee’s Legislative Director Douglas Johnson further explained in an email to me today, “As National Right to Life warned before the ObamaCare law was passed, the law explictly grants the Administration authority to order every health plan to cover any medical service it desires, by defining it is a ‘preventive’ service – and there is absolutely nothing in Obama’s executive order that denies or weakens that authority in any way. Bart Stupak’s Fox interview only provides additional sad evidence that Stupak still has not grasped how thoroughly he was hoodwinked by the president in 2010 – and not only on this point.”
Jill Stanek is a nurse turned speaker, columnist and blogger, a national figure in the effort to protect both preborn and postborn innocent human life.
It appears Mr. Stupak is either about to go through the unfortunate experience of learning that evil lurks in the details or is about to remain perpetually deceived by his colleagues. Let’s pray that his exposure to his former boss’s deception will make him a stronger pro-life advocate and a better politician.
Mr. Stupak is retired in more ways than one.
Stupak is so close to that other word.
Hey Bart, I hope Obama at least kissed you first.
Mary!!
:)
CAll the President!?! Call the Doctor! Stupak you need a reality check(-up)!
Courtnay, I just have to say it Mr. Stupak is stupid. He needs his head and his ears examined. Is this person that deceived or just trying to be that deceptive? Good grief Charley Brown! The “abortion-lover-and-chief” already showed his hand. His hatred of “those people clinging to their guns and their religion” is written all over this bill and all over his anti-God agenda. If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck…
The Church has been absolutely right in its opposition to contraception.
For those who wish to learn why the Church is correct on this issue, an excellent commentary and further resource links can be found here:
http://allhands-ondeck.blogspot.com/2012/02/why-catholic-church-opposes.html
Why would anyone listen to what Bart Stupid has to say. The idiot sold us and billions of children out for a new airport for his district. He is not unaware of the law. He knew darn well that the EO was not worth crap, but it gave him an out, and a bunch of pork to boot. It allowed him to cave like the lilly livered democrat he is, and still save face, or so he thought. Obama never had any plans to stick to any part of that so called “compromise”, which is why PP was so happy with it. Any time PP is happy, you know they got their way, and their way is unlimited baby killing with the public footing the bill.
This explains why Stupak decided not to run for re-election. He realized his stupidity and wanted to get out before it was discovered.