Pro-life news brief 8-5-13
by JivinJ, host of the blog, JivinJehoshaphat
- Kirsten Powers has a column in the Washington Post on the Delaware Planned Parenthood whistleblowers:
After [Joyce] Vasikonis and [Jayne] Mitchell-Werbrich aired their complaints at the first state Senate hearing in June, the abortion-rights Web site “RH Reality Check” said that, “The nurses’ allegations have not been substantiated by any other source.” How many sources are needed? What better “source” is there than two abortion-rights nurses who saw it first hand? Vasikonis told me, “I am a liberal, and I have been shocked that liberal Democrats, who I thought had supported women, would turn their backs on women’s health safety just to support abortion rights.”Yes, it is sad that the people who are always lecturing us about how they are the only ones who care about women ignored the pleas of their own employees. Until they went public, of course. Makes you wonder how many other clinics are operating like this.
- The New York Times is covering the fetal pain legislation in its typical manner today. I did find this quote by Nancy Northup (pictured left) of the Center for Reproductive Rights to be notable:
The Supreme Court, including Justice Kennedy, has repeatedly affirmed viability as the point at which the state’s interest in protecting life outweighs a woman’s right to control her body, Ms. Northup noted.“There is no other line that is workable,” she said. “It is an appropriate line to draw.”
- Another North Carolina abortion clinic has failed its inspection. The North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services found the clinic wasn’t complying with 23 rules:
In addition to other findings, the survey found the facility:• Failed to maintain anesthesia (nitrous oxide gas) delivery systems in good working condition, with torn masks and tubing held together with tape. This could lead to patients not receiving the intended dosage and risk patients not being fully sedated during surgical procedures, leading to pain and physical harm.
• Failed to ensure emergency equipment had weekly checks to ensure the equipment was suitable for use in patient care and failed to ensure that emergency medicine wasn’t expired.
• Failed to have a resuscitator available.
• Failed to sweep and mop the operating room floor and failed to properly clean operating room beds.
• Failed to have a director of nursing responsible and accountable for all nursing services.
• Failed to have an agreement/contract with an anesthetist or anesthesiologist.
• Failed to have an agreement/contract with a registered pharmacist to assure appropriate methods, procedures and controls for obtaining, dispensing, and administering drugs
FEMCARE, Inc.’s last inspection was on January 16, 2007, a follow up inspection of a previous survey, which found the clinic in violation of personnel and quality assurance rules.
[Photo via MSNBC.com]
Jill Stanek is a nurse turned speaker, columnist and blogger, a national figure in the effort to protect both preborn and postborn innocent human life.
Don’t forget: Femcare was a member of the National Abortion Federation and thus is not some fly by night but one of the REPUTABLE clinics! Smack in the heart of SafeNLegalLand.
http://realchoice.blogspot.kr/
The Supreme Court, including Justice Kennedy, has repeatedly affirmed viability as the point at which the state’s interest in protecting life outweighs a woman’s right to control her body, Ms. Northup noted. “There is no other line that is workable,” she said. “It is an appropriate line to draw.”’
Kennedy has long been a sellout to the liberal madness. We truly need a Republican in the Oval Office to shake up the make-up of the SCOTUS.
CRR and Northrup just got an email from me explaining conception and my take on reproductive “rights.”
“There is no other line that is workable,” she said. “It is an appropriate line to draw.”
Why?
(and don’t say “because the fetus is capable of surviving outside the womb at that point”, as Justice Blackmun already said that)
“Why?”
I’m pretty sure the answer is because she said so.
She probably also thought that SCOTUS would find the ban on Partial Birth Abortions as unconstitutional. And yet, they upheld the ban on an abortion procedure. Furthermore, the Court did not have the current evidence of pain capability at the time of those earlier decisions. In light of new evidence, the court could revisit the issue and decide that the state has a compelling interest in protecting fetal life at that point.
“…the point at which the state’s interest in protecting life outweighs a woman’s right to control her body,…”
I am always troubled by this language. ”Right” and “interest” are often misused in this context.
The only one with a genuine right here is the child, who has an “inalienable right to life.”
The State has a natural duty to protect the child’s right to life.
The mother has a natural duty to nurture the child in her womb.
In practice, the mother has a license to kill her child, because the state (aka our society) is shirking our duty to protect the mother and child. And we permit this, partly because we have purged words like duty and responsibility from our vocabulary.