I have a new poll question up:

Is it fair to equate abortion with slavery?

Virginia Democrats are attacking Attorney General and Republican gubernatorial candidate Ken Cuccinelli for comments he made last year connecting the two, this on the heels of Susan B. Anthony List president Marjorie Dannenfelser doing the same at CPAC.

Cuccinelli was spot on:

I received an infographic, “What we think about abortion,” from a person working for healthcare-administration-degree.net.

The ultimate goal in emailing me was to promote that degree program, which I coincidentally do think is a good career path for pro-life college students to consider, particularly in these times.

But I thought the infographic was well done and worth posting. It is as fair and balanced as the poll questions dictate.

HAD’s answer to question, “Why the difference?” was intriguing, although I think many people who say they believe abortion should be legal in most or all cases would find they actually oppose the legality of many more abortions than they realize if asked about specifics – gender-selective abortions, abortions as primary birth control, late-term abortions, abortions when babies can feel pain, etc.

Click to enlarge…

My new poll question comes via Priests for Life:

Are you willing to commit acts of civil disobedience in response to unjust laws?

We already know the Obama administration is trying to force those opposed to abortion based on their religious beliefs to buckle and fund it. The Christian owners of Hobby Lobby have already answered the poll question in the affirmative. Where do you stand?

Last week’s question was:

I have a new poll question up: There is growing sentiment the term “pro-life” has become corrupted & absconded by the other side. Should we start using “anti-abortion”? This is in line with the success of other “anti” campaigns, such as anti-drunk driving, anti-smoking, anti-meat, anti-fur, anti-slavery, etc. Vote on the lower right side of […]

I have a new poll question up:

Do you agree with Michael Voris that Obama’s reelection “signals the end of a civilization,” or is he overreacting?

Vote on the lower right side of the home page.

Obviously, pro-lifers greatly miscalculated on the last poll question:

I have a new poll question up, in keeping with the latest flak over abortion:

Who will win the presidency on Election Day?

Vote on the lower right side of the home page.

The last poll was interesting. I separated out responses so pro-life thinking on the rape/incest question wouldn’t be skewed.

The overwhelming majority of pro-lifers, at least visiting this blog, believe there should be no rape/incest exception.

This election season has only brought that question more to the fore. One surprise has been learning how woefully inept many of our pro-life politicians are at responding to a basic question they should have anticipated and had in their talking points handbag.

While I appreciate their stance, the other half of holding this belief is articulating it well, so as to fend off unnecessary attacks and also persuade the masses. This is obviously an issue for pro-lifer leaders to return to after the election.

Up on Drudge now is a link to a Washington Examiner story reporting the results of a new Susan B. Anthony List’s poll, which are:

I’ve reported several times in recent months that Barack Obama’s favorability among female voters has only slipped since he, Democrats, and liberal feminists launched their “Republican war on women” campaign earlier this year, despite rosy reports you may read to the contrary. From ABC News, September 4: