Pro-life vid of day: Simon Cowell fathers child with married woman
by LauraLoo
X-Factor creator Simon Cowell (53) is expecting a child with New York socialite, Lauren Silverman (36).
Unfortunately, this news is filled with adulterous drama. Lauren is still legally married to Andrew Silverman, who is a friend of Simon’s.
Simon has said in the past, “I do really, really like kids. The problem is how much time you need to devote to bringing up kids. I’ve always dedicated all my life to work, and at 52, I’ve probably missed the opportunity.”
Apparently, he was wrong about that. His baby is due in March 2014.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDJyjrKPEY8[/youtube]A “plus side” to this situation is that the innocent party, Simon and Lauren’s child, will have a chance at life. It would have been easy for Mrs. Silverman to abort to cover up this unplanned pregnancy. Hopefully, $imon is so financially set he can make this baby a real priority in his life.
Perhaps, as it does with many men, fatherhood will change him for the better. Your thoughts?
Email dailyvid@jillstanek.com with your video suggestions.
Jill Stanek is a nurse turned speaker, columnist and blogger, a national figure in the effort to protect both preborn and postborn innocent human life.
He is a nasty creep and she is a skanky gold digger. I read she wants a reality show. Eww who watch it? I feel sorry for that kid and for the cuckold husband.
I seem to remember the reason he broke off his longtime relationship with the Access Hollywood reporter was because she wanted to marry and start a family. I bet those “good terms” they left on are not so good on her part now.
Hi phillymiss,
Try to think positive. Better this child is born to a pair a low life heterosexuals than a homosexual couple.
I’d rather be raised by nice stable homosexuals than “low-life heterosexuals”. Give me Ellen or Mary Cheney (though def not Rosie) as a parent any day over the likes of Paris Hilton or Levi Johnston. Of course I think nice stable heterosexuals are the ideal.
I think Mary was being sarcastic, Nicole.
Hi Jack,
Thank you. How right you are.
Hi Nicole,
My bad. I shouldn’t assume people know I am being sarcastic.
Better that any child has a chance to live…. Obviously homosexual couples do not have children they are missing parts… Natural law as well as God’s law…
Homosexual people often have biological children.
I think Lind was speaking of them not having the natural ability to procreate children, the sterility of their sexual relationship and that same-sex reproductive systems are not sexual complimentary which has to do with plumbing Jack. So unless they borrow plumbing or sperm or eggs from someone else, or borrow/rent a womb or adopt or have children from previous heterosexual relationships they are incapable of reproducing.
I am not being snarky here but 3-4 percent of the U.S. population identify as homosexual the last stats I saw. Not much of a population but very powerful politically, socially, economically and they control the media which can give the perception of lots of people. Saw a survey where most Americans thought anywhere from 10-20% of population was homosexual.
Am I the only one who envisions Simon berating the tyke, “What? You call that crawling? No, you are not going to Las Vegas!”