New Arizona anti-abortion law flouts 40 years of precedent

For almost 40 years, the law has been that you cannot ban previability abortions, and that’s exactly what Arizona did.

~ ACLU attorney Alexa Kolbi-Molinas, on a new Arizona law set to take affect Thursday that will ban abortions past 18 weeks gestation (counted as 20 weeks of pregnancy) except to save the life of the mother – i.e., no health or viability exception, as quoted by the Huffington Post.

Yesterday a federal judge ruled the law constitutional, according to the Associated Press:

U.S. District Judge James Teilborg said the statute may prompt a few pregnant women who are considering abortion to make the decision earlier. But he said the law is constitutional because it does not prohibit women from making the decision to end their pregnancies. He also wrote that the state had provided “substantial and well-documented” evidence that a fetus has the capacity to feel pain during an abortion by at least 20 weeks.

Abortion groups say they will file an emergency appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

 

Coming soon, “The best book ever written on abortion”

There is a banner ad at the top of my site offering 35% off pre-orders of the soon-to-be-released book, Abandoned: The Untold Stories of the Abortion Wars, written by Dr. Monica Miller.

My endorsement of Abandoned will be on its back cover, along with the endorsement of several pro-life leaders like Fr. Frank Pavone, Joe Scheidler, David Bereit, Teresa Tomeo, Al Kresta, and best-selling author Dinesh D’Souza, who wrote in the book’s forward:

Quite simply, this is the best book ever written on abortion. Beautifully written, this is about the consequences of Roe v. Wade, as seen through the eyes of one woman, who tells a clear and compelling story with passion but without fanaticism. On a subject that is often heavy and depressing, this is a hard-hitting yet compassionate and moving book. Honestly, I wouldn’t have thought such a narrative could be done, only now it has been done.

I couldn’t more highly recommend Abandoned. I couldn’t put the manuscript down once I opened it this winter. In fact, I quoted a compelling section from Abandoned in a post back in February.

Monica was a main force behind the launch of the pro-life rescue movement in the late 1970s/early 1980s and has also retrieved and given proper burial to thousands of aborted babies over the years. Most of the incidences Monica describes in Abandoned took place in the Chicago/Milwaukee area, making them even more real since I was familiar with many of the locations she wrote about.

But most compelling is to read Monica’s thinking and emotions along the way. What was it like to be the first to actually creep into back alleys and warehouses in the dead of night to pick aborted babies out of the trash? To decide it was right and just to take artistic, respectful photos of the dead (see front cover) – before anyone else was doing it? To spend time in prison – pregnant? To find love in the midst of unspeakable human tragedy?

Monica weaves apologetics into her heroic personal story, making Abandoned much more than a biography. Abandoned is also an important historical reference book, a must read by all pro-lifers.

Abandoned is published by St. Benedict Press. Order now to not only get a great discount but also to give the book a good launch. Abandoned will also be the topic of my first ever book club this fall. The book is that important.

What every pro-lifer (esp Mitt Romney) should know about Tim Pawlenty

Guest post by Joel Brind, Ph.D.

He may or may not be on Mitt Romney’s short list for VP, but journalists always seem to have his name near the top of their list. At least Tim Pawlenty’spro-life credentials are reliable, right?

Well if you ask me, the view from under the Pawlenty bus ain’t so pretty.

As you may know, I have been researching and trying to bring into public awareness the abortion-breast cancer link (ABC link) for twenty years with some success, no thanks to Gov. Pawlenty.

Oh sure, in 2003 he signed into law the Women’s Right to Know law that required informed consent before abortion, the law previous Gov. Jesse Ventura had vetoed. And yes, Minnesota is one of only a handful of states that specifically mentions breast cancer as one of the medical risks of abortion explicitly in the statute. And yes, under Gov. Pawlenty’s watch in 2003, and according to the new law, a “handbook” for pregnant women was posted on the Minnesota Dept. of Health website to explain the facts about pregnancy and the risks of childbirth and abortion, including increased risk of breast cancer with abortion.

But something else had also happened in 2003 that soon affected what showed up on Pawlenty’s decision desk.

Under pro-life Congressional pressure to acknowledge the ABC link (in the form of a letter signed by no less than 28 Representatives) the National Cancer Institute held a 3-day “workshop” to review the evidence. In reality, it was a political charade designed to give the NCI’s official imprimatur to the denial of the ABC link. (As one of 100 invited experts, I was a participant and the sole dissenter from the official denial. Read my minority report here.

The official denial of the ABC link by the corrupt federal bureaucrats at the NCI cast a worldwide pall over efforts to educate the public, to be sure, but who would expect that pressure from the organization that represents the abortionists would sway a pro-life governor to pull the ABC link info from his state’s informational website?

Yet that’s exactly what happened, as a letter from the CEO of the Minnesota Medical Society, Robert Meiches, was all it took for Gov. Pawlenty to summarily delete the ABC link info from the state Dept. of Health website.

But lest the reader rush to Pawlenty’s defense, as one who does not have the requisite expertise to determine which side was correct about the existence of the ABC link (although one might expect him to defer to his own majority voices in both houses of the state legislature!), his willful avoidance of being educated on the issue was telling indeed.

You see, one of the state legislators who had sponsored the new law, Tim Wilkin, knew the governor well, and contacted me in New York to see if I was willing to give the governor a briefing on the subject, as he knew of the Meiches letter and Pawlenty’s consideration of doing Meiches’ bidding. I absolutely was willing – and told Wilkin so – to make the trip to Minnesota at my own expense to do so, anytime that the Governor was available.

But alas, as Wilkin informed me subsequently, Gov. Pawlenty was not interested in learning about the ABC link, and rather summarily yanked the ABC link info from the informational website handbook for pregnant women.

Today, the Minnesota Dept. of Health website’s handbook for pregnant women is even worse, carrying the NCI party line. It cites the phony NCI “workshop” consensus and an additional high profile (but fraudulent) review by a group at Oxford University, which, according to the website, “also indicated there is no link between abortion and breast cancer.” (Check out this website, which also shows links to summaries of the NCI report and the Oxford paper.).

Meanwhile, in the years since 2004, many more studies have come out which support the reality of the ABC link. Several are ironically from despotic nations such as China and Iran, and one American study, published in 2009, was actually co-authored by NCI official Louise Brinton (pictured left). Brinton was actually the official who orchestrated the phony 2003 “workshop” that essentially banished the ABC link from the public mind, valid scientific evidence – even her own – be damned.

So the end result in Minnesota is that a law which was intended to warn women about the dangers of abortion, instead falsely reassures them of abortion’s alleged long-term safety.

Thank you, Tim Pawlenty. At least now we know that when push comes to shove, he will defer to the federal bureaucracy and the abortionists’ rep. Not exactly the kind of official who could be relied upon to say, defund Planned Parenthood.

Seems to me Mr. Romney has some much better genuinely pro-life veep candidates to choose from.

Pro-life video of the day: Sex, the other Olympic sport

by LauraLoo

Warning: Adult content.

To many the Olympics are synonymous with sex – inside the bedroom and outside in public.  The Olympics are helping these physically fit competitors fuel sexualized memories for life by allotting 15 condoms per athlete.  This is 50,000 more condoms than what was dispensed during the 2008 Olympics in China.

Wait a minute.  Can’t these obviously disciplined athletes buy and bring their own contraception?

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZeYGz3ld_8[/youtube]

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=asa-9XvRRjY[/youtube]

Additionally, in an effort to bolster ardent activity (and put those freebie condoms to good use), one English hotelier removed copies of the Gideon Bible from their40-room venue and replaced them with 50 Shades of Grey.

Email dailyvid@jillstanek.com with your video suggestions.

[HT: Drudge Report; credit for title to Technorati]

How about a pro-choice dating service?

There had been some talk among Abortioneers in the past about dating and relationships, and how an anti-choice position would be a dealbreaker among potential mates.

This then led to the imagining of a pro-choice dating service, where pro-choice folks can meet each other and fall hopelessly in love (or just hook up, whatever), without having to have the awkward conversation about “what you do” which may then lead to another awkward conversation, at the end of which you get dumped and stuck with the bill.

The horror!

Fear not, lovers of dudes, because I’ve found some prospectives who just might get your juices flowing!

~ Anti-Anti introducing Dudes for Choice, a Tumblr account chock full of hot pro-choice males, The Abortioneers, July 25

Stanek Sunday quote: “Our God is the God of victories… our escape from death”


 
Our God is the God of victories. The Almighty LORD is our escape from death.

~Psalm 68:20, God’s Word translation

Stanek Sunday funnies 7-29-12

My top five favorite political cartoons this week…

by Glenn McCoy at Townhall.com…

by Glenn Foden at Townhall.com…

by Chip Bok at Townhall.com…

by Michael Ramirez at Townhall.com…

by Michael Ramirez at Townhall.com…

… referring to this campaign speech by President Obama on July 23…

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gS5FJR34C5U[/youtube]

Stanek weekend question: Should “Wailing Wall” be part of pro-life memorial?

Pro-lifers compare the pro-abortion view of preborn children as nonpersons to the pro-slavery view of blacks as nonpersons (well, 3/5).

We also call the modern genocide of preborn children a “holocaust,” comparing it to Hitler’s mass extermination of the Jews.

Understandably, the other side doesn’t like those comparisons.

But now comes word that the planned International Pro-Life Memorial & National Life Center in Wichita, Kansas, will include a Wailing Wall, “an exact replica of the Western Wall at the Temple Mount in Jerusalem,” according to the website.

There will be 60 crosses in front of the wall to represent one million children killed by abortion each. “This will be a pace of repentance, mediation, and healing,” add planners.

I’m not sure this memorial will ever be built, or that Wichita is the right place for such a memorial, but nevertheless, is adding a Wailing Wall going too far? Is it right to co-opt a sacred Jewish site? The Anti-Defamation League writes:

“Over the years we have seen a number of anti-abortion groups compare abortion to the Holocaust, but this takes the misuse of Jewish symbolism and history to another level,” Abraham Foxman, ADL’s national director, said in a statement issued Monday. “The Western Wall, this monumental symbol of Jewish grief and redemption is being co-opted and distorted to promote an anti-abortion agenda and message. Members of the pro-life movement are entitled to their opinions, but we wish they would not express them at the expense of Judaism’s holiest site and the Holocaust.”

What do you think?


Who Is Jill Stanek?

Jill Stanek is a nurse turned speaker, columnist and blogger, a national figure in the effort to protect both preborn and postborn innocent human life.

Read Jill's full bio »
What the Media says »

  • May 2016
  • December 2015
  • October 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005

  • Categories
  • Stanek Top 20

    Latest Posts

    Latest Comments