I’m anti-life
In response to my WND column last week – discussing GOP House pointless passage on an embryonic kill bill (thereby betraying the base of the party and the President) – blogger Obiter Dictum complained yesterday that pro-lifers against ESCR are actually anti-life.
She directly implied that pro-aborts like Mark Kirk – a previously untouchable Republican golden boy because of his naval service – is pro-life for his support of ESCR, stating, “Two weeks ago, these [Kirk, Judy Biggert] and other solons took the ultimate pro-life stand: passing HR810 (aka “the stem cell research bill”) by a 238-194 margin.”
As Isaiah 5:20 says….
Jun.06, 2005 3:51 pm |
Stem cell |
Jill Stanek is a nurse turned speaker, columnist and blogger, a national figure in the effort to protect both preborn and postborn innocent human life.
Thanks for the link and Ms. Stanek, your perspective is always appreciated.
Amy, I’m still waiting for you to answer my question: When do you think human life begins?
Regards, Jill
I read that opinion yesterday and was shocked. Even if ESCR was GUARANTEED to provide cures and save lives (which it is not), how is killing one person to save another ever pro-life (save self defense, which this is clearly not)?
This response is indictitive of how we have lost any semblence of moral acuity. Claiming that purposely manufacturing and then destroying a human being soley for experimental purposes is truly a pro-life position makes it abundantly clear that our 21st century attitude toward human life has actually regressed.
No thinking person who is sane could make a valid argument that embryonic stem cell research is a moral, social or political good. That some of our elected officials have been duped into believing there is no harm in dehumanizing humanity also reveals how even our so-called intellectuals and leaders are unable to use intelligence and reason to make decisions but instead rely upon emotion and articulated lies.