Obama’s fundraising letter using the “so-called” partial birth abortion ban

obama3.jpgHow liberal is Barack Obama? His wife used the ban on partial birth abortion (sucking the brains out of half-delivered babies) as a scare tactic and fundraising ploy:

From: email-list@obamaforillinois.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 7:41 AM
Subject: A Message from Michelle Obama
February 17, 2004
Dear Friends:
We have all been concerned lately with the rise of conservatism in this country, especially as it relates to women. You’ve read the alarming news about the Justice Department’s request for hospitals to turn over the private medical records of dozens of patients. This cynical ploy is designed to intimidate a group of physicians and force them to drop their lawsuit seeking to have the so-called partial birth abortion ban ruled unconstitutional.
The fact remains, with no provision to protect the health of the mother, this ban on a legitimate medical procedure is clearly unconstitutional and must be overturned. Attorney General Ashcroft and President Bush believe so zealously in their cause that the privacy rights of patients are under assault. They believe we have no federal right to privacy when it concerns our medical histories.
On March 16th, we have a chance to nominate a candidate who will be tireless in the fight to protect women. It isn’t simply about the right to choose, or privacy rights. It is about pay equity, about ending domestic violence, promoting health care around the world, and letting doctors decide treatment options, not federal judges.
It goes without saying that we must win back the U.S. Senate and hold our ground as a check against the right-wing executive branch. Illinois will be a key battleground and your vote is critical.
My husband has stood up for women time and again, and I am proud of his record. He understands that casting a vote on the floor of the Senate takes greater courage than issuing a position paper. Oftentimes, a well intentioned law is in fact a flawed law. That’s why it is critical we nominate someone who has faced these tough choices. That’s why nominating an experienced legislator is so important in this race. It takes courage to cast a vote.
Who among the Democrats running has a proven record? Who among the candidates running for the Senate in Illinois has stood up to the right wing politicians and voted against their agenda? Who can we count on to keep the Bush/Ashcroft team from appointing the Supreme Court Justice that will vote against Roe v. Wade?
Please join me in sending a message of unity and strength by attending the Women for Obama Luncheon on February 23rd at the Hyatt Regency. Lunch costs $150 and includes remarks from our friends the Reverend Willie Barrow and Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky. To reserve your seat please call the campaign office headquarters at 312-427-6400 or log on to the Obama for Illinois Website.
I urge you to stand with me and support my husband at this event. You know the stakes have never been higher and we can’t depend on untested amateurs and administrators in this fight. Barack is a fighter and he will be a champion we can be proud of.
Thanks you so much for all of your support.
Signature: Michelle Obama

141 thoughts on “Obama’s fundraising letter using the “so-called” partial birth abortion ban”

  1. I think Obama is great. Too new on the scene to run for POTUS in 2008, but maybe VP or next time. How wonderful to see a politican that can construct a sentence and even a coherent thought. Aren’t we all a little tired of GWB?

  2. Just one more liberal, feminazi liar. Unless, of course, she’s simply ignorant of what she is supporting. For her sake, I really and truly hope so. Ignorance can be corrected…but stupid is forever.
    It’s always stunned me how people with children can continue to hold these kinds of views. If I was one of their children, I would be scared as hell that they might find some justification for getting rid of me if I ever became inconvenient.

  3. Let’s see if for Hal’s sake I can construct a sentence and bring forth a coherent thought. Contrary to Madam Obama’s standing up for abortion “rights” is hardly standing against domestic violence nor is it pro-woman. The Western world into which her daughters have been born is every bit as misogynistic and violent toward women as our Islamo Jihadi enemy’s world.
    The current post-Sexual Revolution view is that sex is an activity devoid of sanctity, mystery or meaning outside of giving pleasure to whomever or (God forbid) whatever finds its way between our legs. In 40 years we have gone from “Here take this pill to surpress your god awful fertility” to “Here take this pill to flush out any zygotes or embryoes that we may have created while getting our rocks off last night” and now TA DA the great “Here get this vaccine little pre-teen because Mom and Daddy know you are going to behave like a skanky slut before long”.
    None of this speaks of respecting women nor of teaching girls to respect themselves. They have become concubines without burquas but enslaved every bit as much. It seems our trumpeted “choices” of which Ms. Obama speaks come AFTER we have serviced the men NOT in making the CHOICE of chastity until a loving commitment is offered.

  4. I have two daughters and I cannot believe you believe that our culture “is every bit as misogynistic and violent toward woen as our Islamo Jihadi enemy’s world.” Women are not treated perfectly here, that is true. But it’s a whole lot better than most other places. Unlike Bush, you can construct a coherent sentence. I just disagree with you.

  5. Ms Stanek,
    Is there a reason that you seem to be the only person in the entire world to have received this fund raising letter? I dare say, sending a letter to one person is not a very efficient means of raing funds.

Comments are closed.