mjfox clone2.jpgWho can forget that shaky Michael J. Fox ad encouraging Missourians to vote to fund human embryo experimentation last November?
One of the lies of Amendment Two was that it outlawed cloning, which it actually sanctioned.
The amendment stated in one section, “No person may clone or attempt to clone a human being,” which it could only say by redefining the word. Yet in another section it endorsed “somatic cell nuclear transfer,” which is cloning.
Pro-lifers even sued – and lost – over the misleading ballot language.
MSM didn’t help, of course, calling the valid argument – which anyone, even a reporter, could confirm by looking in a dictionary – a “claim.”
But Amendment Two squeaked by, 51-49%, and MSM no longer has to play dumb, either that or it has forgotten to aid and abet the cover-up….


The Washington Post yesterday called a clone a clone when it reported that public funded human embryo experimentation is suffering serious setbacks in MO. This is due in large part to the threat of an initiative to call Amendment Two’s bluff and ban somatic cell nuclear transfer:

Some researchers even fear the techniques known as therapeutic cloning could still be outlawed in Missouri.
Scientist Kevin Eggan had once considered packing up his lab at the Harvard Stem Cell Institute and moving to Missouri. Now he’s reluctant.
“I couldn’t possibly come to a place where I thought the potentially lifesaving research I want to do could become illegal,” said Eggan….

I’ve repeatedly said embryonic stem cell researchers need cloning to stand any chance of fulfilling their wild promises. This is because embryos are unique humans with unique genetic markers, so any tissue grown from their cells will most often not match recipients. Only clones will.
[hat tip: Family Research Council]

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...