Today’s abortion Nazis and their selective breeding

nazi.jpg
I linked to this story last week. Didn’t know the details. And the Vatican is absolutely right. If you don’t think so, explain.
From the Herald Sun, today:

A botched abortion of a fetus instead of its Down syndrome twin has prompted the Vatican to compare abortion to the Nazis’ selective breeding practices….

Italy was embroiled in a bitter ethical dispute yesterday after it emerged that a surgeon had accidentally terminated the wrong fetus while trying to abort its Down syndrome twin.
The operation on a 38-year-old woman 18 weeks into her pregnancy was performed at the San Paolo hospital in Milan in June but has only just come to light.
The fetus who had Down syndrome was also subsequently aborted.
Weighing into the controversy, the Vatican said aborting a Down syndrome child was the result of a culture of perfection resembling Nazi eugenics….
The gynaecologist who performed the Milan abortion, said the woman, who has not been named, requested the abortion after an amniocentesis test.
The doctor, Prof Anna Maria Marconi, said her conscience was clear.
She said the identical fetuses had moved in the womb between the last scan and the operation.
Hospital authorities backed Prof Marconi, calling the botched abortion a “misfortune”.
The mother, who has a small son, said that her life had been ruined.
She told Corriere della Sera: “Neither my husband nor I can sleep at night.”…
Her husband said they were truly desperate over the terrible mistake and were consulting lawyers….
The Vatican newspaper L’Osservatore Romano said: “No one has the right to suppress another life and take the place of God for any motive whatever.”
The newspaper said selective abortion amounted to eugenics that stemmed from a culture of perfection….
The mistaken abortion was the latest error to prompt debate about the standards of Italy’s hospitals as well as its abortion law.
In March, a fetus aborted in the 22nd week of pregnancy at a Florence hospital because of suspected deformities was found to be physically sound.

t4.jpgCirca 1938, this poster reads: “60,000 Reichsmarks is what this person suffering from hereditary defects costs the community during his lifetime. Fellow German, that is your money, too,” according to Wikipedia.
It promoted the Nazi T4 program, first a voluntary then forced euthanasia program targeting the mentally and physically disabled. The gas chambers at Tiergartenstrasse 4, the villa in Berlin where this eugenics program was carried out, became models for the Jewish death camps.
Death camps. Pro-aborts hate it when we call abortion mills death camps.

115 thoughts on “Today’s abortion Nazis and their selective breeding”


  1. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Erin says:

    *sigh* No one is forcing or even SUGGESTING to any pregnant woman that she should abort a handicapped fetus. It’s an option. With a surgical procedure comes a risk. It’s sad, yes, but I’m sure that the woman can concieve again. The woman decided to have the procedure. Unless there is obvious proof of some kind of malpractice or reckless neglect, there is no reason for the doctor to be blamed. I’m sure she feels bad enough as it is.


  2. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    mk says:

    Of course they hate when we call abortion clinics death camps. That’s harder to rationalize. Just like calling it a fetus instead of a baby saves them from facing the truth. Just like calling it “choice” instead of extermination saves them from facing the truth. Just like our posters are hated because they make them face the truth. Just like calling abortionists, “doctors” keeps them from facing the truth. Just like throwing in pregnancy tests as a service to skew the statistics on what percentage of Planned Parenthoods services are abortion keeps them from facing the truth. Just like denying PAS exists keeps them from facing the truth. Just like saying they didn’t consent to pregnancy but did consent to sex keeps them from facing the truth. Just like not looking at the uncomfortable videos, pictures and articles we post keeps them from looking at the truth. Just like comparing dentist offices to abortion clinics keeps them from facing the truth. Just like clinging to the coat hanger myth keeps them from facing the truth. Just like clinging to the falsified numbers of “back alley” abortions keeps them from facing the truth. Just like claiming a woman is 10 times more likely to die in childbirth than from having an abortion even when Val has clearly shown that this is a lie, keeps them from facing the truth….
    I could go on, but it would be pointless. They see no evil, hear no evil and speak nothing but evil…
    The truth is they have been played like fiddles but don’t want to see it, because their entire worlds will be rocked. So they cling to the lies, and misconceptions, and illogical arguments and keep sinking deeper and deeper in the mire…
    Wake up people. The alarm is going off and you’ve hit snooze one too many times!


  3. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    mk says:

    Erin,
    I’m sure she feels bad enough as it is.
    The doctor, Prof Anna Maria Marconi, said her conscience was clear.
    Face the truth, Erin.


  4. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Erin says:

    A conscience being clear doesn’t mean someone doesn’t feel bad. She followed correct medical practice to a tee, something went inherently wrong. It is not her fault. I have a clear conscience on a lot of things that I feel bad about. They’re different issues. Guilt and feeling bad are different.


  5. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Jacqueline says:

    No one is forcing or even SUGGESTING to any pregnant woman that she should abort a handicapped fetus.
    Erin- there is immense societal pressure to abort the handicapped! Those that don’t are accused of draining resources and “forcing the child to endure pain and suffering.” There is a duty to abort any child that isn’t “perfect” and even a duty to abort a “perfect” child is the circumstances of the parents aren’t ideal (mother in poverty, for instance).
    It’s sad, yes, but I’m sure that the woman can concieve again.
    First of all, why is it sad? This was the equivilent of a apendectomy in your eyes, right? Secondly, if someone were to kill you when you were a baby, I doubt your mother would have shrugged her shoulders and said, “Oh well, I’m sure I can concieve again.” Your mother would have lost Erin. You, Erin, would have lost your life. Nothing can replace Erin. Likewise, that baby who was killed- no one can replace him/her. People are unique and once they die, they are gone. This is why death is so hard to accept.
    Unless there is obvious proof of some kind of malpractice or reckless neglect, there is no reason for the doctor to be blamed.
    Well, killing a disabled baby and killing a non-handicapped baby are equally evil (if not more so, because the more vulverable deserves extra protection). I don’t blame the doctor for killing the baby that the parents wanted to keep, but killing babies, period. If anything, targeting the disabled for destruction makes that doctor even more of a monster.
    I’m sure she feels bad enough as it is.
    Why should she feel bad, Erin? It’s not like she killed an innocent baby, right?


  6. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    prettyinpink says:

    Interesting how “distraught” that their downs syndrome baby wasn’t the one killed. What does this say about our society? Unless I read this wrong and they were distraught on the decision they made in the first place.
    You know, part of the reason I switched sides on this issue is the confrontation of the pro-choice semantics and philosophy to the reality of what abortion is in our society. I think this is a good example.
    As a side note, the older the woman having the child, the more likely she is to produce a down’s syndrome kid. Anybody like to add thoughts to this statement?


  7. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Jacqueline says:

    What are pro-aborts saying when the killing of a genetically perfect child is a horrible tragedy and the killing of a disabled child is a non-issue?
    They’re implying:
    1. Genetically perfect unborn children have more value than disabled ones.
    2. Perfect unborn children have some value, or the loss of this perfect child wouldn’t be newsworthy.
    So make up your mind, pro-aborts! Are you eugenic bigots or not? And if so, shouldn’t we extend some protection to those “perfect” babies we need to populate our brave new world?
    This raises another issue:
    I ask you, what’s worse? Throwing a healthy man into the ocean to drown or throwing a quadraplegic man into the ocean to drown? Throwing a adult in the ocean to drown, or throwing an infant?
    While they’re all equally horrendous, I, personally, have a greater level of disgust for those that would prey upon the weak and defenseless. To be cliche: Pick on some one your own size!
    Those that are weak are entitled to our care and protection- their weakness is not a license to exploit and destroy them. I often hear this from women, “But this baby can’t even survive without me! So it’s okay to abort it.” when I should be hearing, “This baby can’t even survive without me! That means I better take good care of her, because she has no one else.”


  8. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Erin says:

    *sigh* Okay…here we go. CDC. Unbiased source. Direct quotes.
    “In 1972, 24 women died from causes known to be associated with legal abortions and 39 died as a result of known illegal abortions.”
    “Overall, abortion ratios and abortion rates have declined over time”
    “In the 41 areas for which race was adequately reported, approximately 55% of women who obtained legal induced abortions were known to be white, 35% were black, and 7% were of other races; for 3% of the women, race was unknown.”
    http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5212a1.htm
    “The highest percentages of reported abortions were for women who were unmarried (82%), white (55%), and aged http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5407a1.htm
    “Since 1982, maternal mortality has not declined”
    “black infants are more than twice as likely to die as white infants”
    “the United States has higher maternal and infant mortality rates than other developed countries”
    http://www.jstor.org/view/00987921/ap010004/01a00310/0?frame=noframe&userID=83609949@gsu.edu/01cce440610050e6450&dpi=3&config=jstor
    From the JAMA:
    “As determined by the Center for Disease Control’s epidemiologic surveillance of abortion mortality, the death-to-case rate for legal abortion in the United States for the three years 1972 to 1974 was 3.9/100,000 procedures. This mortality compares favorably with that from other commonly performed surgical procedures.” (That’s .000039%, according to my handy dandy calculator)
    http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/237/5/452
    “The risk of death from complications of pregnancy has decreased approximately 99% during the twentieth century, from approximately 850 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births in 1900 to 7.5 in 1982. However, since 1982, no further decrease has occurred in maternal mortality in the United States. In addition, racial disparity in pregnancy-related mortality ratios persists; since 1940, mortality ratios among blacks have been at least three to four times higher than those for whites.” (My calculator says that that is .000075%)
    Whew!


  9. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Erin says:

    Hey, Jacqueline, do you know how much it costs to raise a handicapped child, and how low a rate of adoption they have?
    I’m not suggesting that it’s ‘right’ to abort a child based on their handicaps, but if you’re a first time mother preparing to have a child for the first time, that throws a massive amount of new expendatures you never figured into the equation.
    MK- I have a super-long post of linkage coming once Jill approves it.


  10. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Jacqueline says:

    As a side note, the older the woman having the child, the more likely she is to produce a down’s syndrome kid. Anybody like to add thoughts to this statement?
    Lauren has written at length about how women are lied to that they can have kids on their terms- “Sure! Finish college, build a career for 15-20 years and then you can have babies” only to discover that they are now infertile or their biological clock is breaking down.
    So these women turn to in-vitro, hormones, amnios and abortions to make sure they have the kind of child they want- and we don’t expect this sort of thing to happen? In fact, many couple have multiples “selectively reduced” when the $25,000+ baby-making venture gives them more children than they desire to care for. So they artificially create babies and artifically destroy them at will. No wonder children have no value- they are yours to make and kill at your whim!
    And finally, those that do concieve and give birth to children with Downs are the rarity- almost guarenteeing that research/resources won’t be available to help these people.


  11. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    lauren says:

    Jacque! I’ve been running around like a chicken with my head and multiple extremities cut off! I’m home now though…call me!
    Erin says “No one is forcing or even SUGGESTING to any pregnant woman that she should abort a handicapped fetus”
    Erin, I have a “handicapped” son (who actually is no where near as handicapped as they thought he would be. In reality, he’s just tiny). Anyways, when I was pregnant with him I was told MANY times by MANY people to abort. My triplescreen was abnormal, which suggests spinal bifida or DS. I was given “case studies” of adults living with the disorders who hated their lives.
    When my water broke at 22 weeks, I was told that I should let “nature take it’s course”. Thankfully, I had a wonderful doctor (not the PP spokeswoman who was my high-risk doc) who was willing to transfer me to a higher level hospital to stop labor.
    After my son was born, I was told by several people that he was a drain on the system and that I was irresponsible for letting him live. Even now I have an intense guilt for the fact that we “drain the system”. Allowing a “not perfect” child to live is going to incrue alot of critism.
    Even after birth and within the christian community, you will hear things like “Don’t you think it’s time to pray for God’s will in the matter?” This is code for “don’t you think it’s time to stop the surgery and pull the plugs?”
    People most definitely “suggest” you abort disabled children. When it is your doctor doing the “suggesting” it becomes very similar to “forcing”. I hope you never have to go through the pain of being told that your child is a drain on society and would be better off dead.


  12. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Erin says:

    Jacqueline, I wouldn’t have care. I wouldn’t have had the consciousness to care. Here’s an interesting little point- people, generally couples, want to have kids for selfish reasons. They WANT the kids. They COVET children. Sounds like a no-no to me.
    Also, I was adopted. My birth mother probably would have been pretty stoked to have a miscarriage at the time. She was 16, I think. I’m Irish and from Wisconsin, so I think she was probably Catholic. Anyhow.
    It’s sad because she went in for a surgical procedure and something went wrong. There are a few cases a year when a colonoscopy goes wrong and a person’s intestine is punctured. Sometimes people have severe reactions to anesthesia. It’s surgical risk. When things go wrong, it’s too bad. But it does happen.
    Finally, she probably feels bad because a patient under her care had something go wrong. It may not be her fault, but the doctor still remains connected with the patient and empathizes with her. If chemo doesn’t work on a cancer patient, should their oncologist feel guilty? If a person has a completely unanticipated reaction to a general anesthetic, should the anesthesiologist feel guilty?


  13. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Erin says:

    Jacqueline- my mother tried from the age of 25 to concieve her own children. She wanted them desperately. She used IVF, anything she could try. I guess my mother is a grand scale baby killer, huh?
    Also, Lauren, I have worked with Special Education programs for years. Since the time I was 12 I worked with a program called Great Beginnings with SNP, where I helped supervise handicapped children under the age of three. In middle school I also worked with the other special needs kids my age for one of my exploratories. No one can tell me that I don’t know the kind of life that they go through- or the amount of money that they can cost. I would never suggest that they aren’t worth just as much as anyone else. But people who deny that taking care of a moderately or severely disabled child is a completely different type of parenting is lying to themselves.


  14. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    mk says:

    PIP,
    The parents weren’t distraught over the DS child…you’ll note that they subsequently aborted that baby too…
    I think the whole idea of women “waiting” to conceive until later in life fits right into the “want it all” mindset. There is nothing inherently wrong with having children later in life, heck I had one at forty and another at forty two. It’s the idea that you wait to begin a family until your late thirties and then act surprised that things go wrong. I’m all for women having babies later, provided they understand AND ACCEPT the risks and the CHILD no matter what the circumstances.
    What I hate is the idea of “being owed” a perfectly healthy child. This feeling of indenture that irks me. A child is a gift, not an object. You don’t deserve one and you don’t automatically get one just because you want one.
    Where did this idea of ownership come from?


  15. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Jacqueline says:

    Hey, Jacqueline, do you know how much it costs to raise a handicapped child, and how low a rate of adoption they have?
    My response to this can be easily summed up with a hearty, “So the hell what!?!?” But I’ll respond in detail:
    Do you hear yourself, Erin? So normal children are worth the money they incur and Down’s children are not? So people are only worth a certain amount of expense and people that require more money to care for them are better off dead? By your philosophy, you better never develop a disability and require additional care! In that case, would you suggest we dismember you or poison you and save ourselves the expense? Not just you, how about your siblings, parents, friends? I doubt it. But you’ll use this as a rationale to kill disabled infants.
    I worked in adoption in 2003 and we had two beautiful, healthy babies in foster care while hundreds of couples still waited for a child. Why was that? Because those couples were white and those babies were black (and apparently those couples only had love to give if the children looked like them or could be passed off as “their own”).
    I ask you, though- Are those black babies worth less as human beings because they are more difficult to place (due to the prejudices of others)? Are those beautiful little girls better off in pieces in a garbage disposal? I would argue the same for Down’s children, although that’s no so much the case since agencies exist solely for the placement of Down Syndrome children and currently there are more waiting families than their are adoptable children with Down’s.
    Human beings are of equal worth: regardless of gender, race, age or ability. To think otherwise is the very definition of bigotry.


  16. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Rae says:

    “my mother tried from the age of 25 to concieve her own children. She wanted them desperately. She used IVF, anything she could try. I guess my mother is a grand scale baby killer, huh?”
    @Erin: Hey! My mom’s a grand-scale baby-killer too! They should get together and have coffee sometime!
    *eyeroll*
    And a ::headdesk:: to the original post. What stupid parents, I hope they are never able to conceive again.


  17. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Erin says:

    Jacqueline- So the hell what? If you can’t afford the medical costs that a baby with a disability may need, it will probably die. Harsh reality. Hospitals don’t run a charity service. They’ll make it comfortable, but you can’t afford the expensive surgery or the expensive drugs it takes to keep your child alive, it will die. Social services won’t keep him or her alive either. They’re broke.
    Reform the health care system so people who need stuff can get it. Then I’ll say, Oh, yeah, there’s no inherent difference.
    Also, if a couple really wants children that badly, they’ll take anything. My kid brother is Korean.


  18. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Erin says:

    And Jacqueline, you should really pay attention to how you guys talk sometime. About you know, human beings. Like Muslims. And homosexuals. And abortionists.


  19. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    mk says:

    Rae and Erin,
    I am glad that your mothers’ choices resulted in “you”…my world is brighter because of it!


  20. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    lauren says:

    Uh, Erin. You don’t know what you’re talking about. Please don’t pretend to. Every child that fits certain criteria is automatically placed on SSI medicaid. For example, every child born weighing less than 1100 grams fits this criteria.
    My son has been on SSI medicaid for 2 years and would have been regardless of our salary. In addition, there is SSI payments that are paid depending upon salary to offset the cost of childcare. In the United States at least, there are programs to help children with disability.


  21. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Erin says:

    Exactly. Payments are made depending on salary. As soon as you try to improve your situation and make it out of that little bracket, you are on your own(that’s how the welfare trap works too :-/). Maybe you haven’t read the kind of things I have, but if you deny that people die everyday because they can’t afford the medical care that they need to survive, you’re blind.


  22. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    lauren says:

    Oh, and one more thing, Erin. Many hospitals *are* charaties. The largest children’s hospital in our area, cooks childrens, donates millions of dollars of service every year. The Scotish Rite hospital in Dallas doesn’t charge patients anything for its services.


  23. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Erin says:

    I went to Scottish Rite when I was little once. They charged my parents. A LOT.
    LOL. It COOKS CHILDREN?????


  24. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Ellie says:

    PrettyInPink: “As a side note, the older the woman having the child, the more likely she is to produce a down’s syndrome kid. Anybody like to add thoughts to this statement?”
    Yeah, so what’s your point? Please be respectful to individuals with Down syndrome. “Down’s kid” is disrespectful. I suggest “a child with Down syndrome.” They aren’t “produced,” they are conceived.
    Erin: “Hey, Jacqueline, do you know how much it costs to raise a handicapped child, and how low a rate of adoption they have?”
    Erin, I know. I am a mother of a child with Down syndrome. I know of people who cost far more than she does. What’s your point? My daughter has brought unexpectd joy into my life. I would have thought I wouldn’t want a child with Down syndrome. Oh, was I wrong! It has taught me that we don’t always know it all.
    BTW, there is a waitng list to adopt children with Down syndrome. If only the mothers wouldn’t abort them.
    This story about these two innocent babies sickens me. The mother only feels bad about aborting the non-DS baby; not the one with DS. She has no idea of the gifts she threw away (both of them).


  25. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    lauren says:

    Erin, payments that go above and beyond medical care are dependant on salary, yes. I agree that it is foolish to discourage working by cutting payments, but doing so will not remove therapy or medical care from your child. Both are provided regardless of income.


  26. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Jacqueline says:

    We kill babies when we don’t want them and we kill babies when we want them more than anything (IVF is the killing dozens of your own children in the hopes of birthing one). Regardless of the motives, those babies are equally dead.
    I want children. I want a quiver full of them. Desiring to have, love and care for children is a beautiful thing. And having worked in adoption I can tell you the pain I see in infertile couples. Not being able to have biological children is a substantial loss on so many levels, but there are plenty of children who were abused, neglected, or orphaned that are in need of love and care- so my sympathy grows thin when these couples only want babies “on their terms” and only have a home for babies that are as close to their ethnicity as possible.
    So wanting and coveting children is a good thing, only it has its limits: killing children (IVF, abortion) and stealing children (Madonna, Angelina Jolie).
    And Erin, I don’t know how old you are- but saying your birthmother would have preferred you dead over placing you for adoption is a horrible assumption to make of someone, especially your mother. That’s very disrespectful to her and women who place for adoption. Choosing not to parent for whatever reason and maliciously wishing death on your own child are not the same thing. Show a little respect for the woman that carried and birthed you.


  27. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    lauren says:

    Erin-
    http://www.tsrhc.org/
    There is no charge to patient families for treatment, and admission is open to Texas children from birth to 18 years of age.
    They obviously don’t anymore.


  28. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Heather says:

    Ellie, I give you so much credit! You are so special. I’ll bet your child brings you so much joy.


  29. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Erin says:

    Ellie- I worked with Down Syndrome children. They’re wonderful. I knew a girl in middle school with DS who tried to convince everyone that she was dating Mitch from Baywatch. Dana was such a sweetheart.
    Lauren- Have you ever been denied a treatment that you needed because you could not afford it? I personally know two people who were rejected from hospitals for things that they needed. One needed a transplant. The other couldn’t afford to continue their cancer therapy. The woman who couldn’t afford her cancer treatment died within 6 months of the end of the treatment. Her daughter was left motherless AND without any funds to use at college. This is a BRILLIANT girl who could have gotten in anywhere she wanted. It happens.


  30. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Heather says:

    With my last pregnancy, I was taking some medication. Sorry. I’m going to get blunt here. This bit$h of a doctor told me that d/t the medication, my child could be born with a cleft palate. She assured me that I could abort the pregnancy. I wanted a new doctor immediatly, and I got one. I gave her the dagger dart eyes. She took the hint.


  31. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    lauren says:

    Erin, grow up.
    http://www.cookchildrens.org/site.asp?com=D4DF82657E58415BA06DA5697DC13CB0&spid=28F20A2145DA4F35AAC006257279AA60
    Charity: To the extent that our resources permit, we will not refuse necessary or needed care to any children residing in the region we serve because of their parents


  32. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Ellie says:

    Heather, thank you. I thank God every day for the privilege of being her mother. It is very special indeed to have a child like her. Most women who find out their baby has DS are very sad. But if they keep them, they come to find out that they have really been blessed. Unfortunately it is difficult to see beyond that when you first find out. They read things like this tragic story and think there must be something terribly wrong with it. Most mothers do come to appreciate the special gift they’ve been given.


  33. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Ellie says:

    Heather, thank you. I thank God every day for the privilege of being her mother. It is very special indeed to have a child like her. Most women who find out their baby has DS are very sad. But if they keep them, they come to find out that they have really been blessed. Unfortunately it is difficult to see beyond that when you first find out. They read things like this tragic story and think there must be something terribly wrong with it. Most mothers do come to appreciate the special gift they’ve been given.


  34. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Erin says:

    Jacqueline- I do not know my birth mother. I am not in any way obligated to respect her. Do I wish I were dead now? Of course not. I’m just saying that then I wouldn’t have cared. Respect for me is something that has to be earned. If I ever meet my birth mother and find her to be a decent human being, of course I will respect her. My mom has my respect because she has raised me for 19 years and earned it. Being an incubator just doesn’t make me respect someone. If a pregnant lady is a jerk to me I’m not going to respect her just because she’s pregnant.


  35. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Jacqueline says:

    Ellie-
    I apologize for my lack of “people first” language. A child with down syndrome is not a “down’s syndrome child.” It’s a child first. Thanks for the reminder.
    Oh Erin, apparently you don’t know me and my research and lobby work on behalf of people denied care because of an illness of a disability. I am currently doing doctoral research to overturn the Texas Futile Care Law, so that disabled people of all ages get the care they require. The difference between you and me is that I am trying to change this evil, not using this evil to justify additional evil (killing the disabled unborn). So we should kill the handcapped before birth so that they aren’t killed after birth by lack of health care? I prefer changing the system over killing the children, but hey, that’s just me.
    And by the way, you’re wrong. It’s a fight to get disabled kids care but it’s possible. Only in states like Texas that will deny care and inhibit in-state transfers do we actually encounter the situations you speak of, and even then, it’s a rarity. Daniel Cullen and Emilio Gonzales are the only two cases I can think of, and both of which were won by an out-of-state transfer or a court injunction which allowed time for Emilio to die a natural death.
    One more thing- there will be people that develop disabilities after birth. Would you recommend killing them for all the reasons you use to justify killing the unborn? Explain that double standard for me, will you?


  36. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Erin says:

    Lauren- that was poorly worded. Look at it. It says cooks childrens. Cooks Children’s, or the like, or better use of commas, and you wouldn’t have gotten my snarky comment.
    I thought it was funny.


  37. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Heather says:

    Ellie, this same witch of a doctor assured me that a DS baby could be aborted. I really got bad vibes from her. She lacked compassion. Guess who had so much more?? A male gyn. He was heaven sent. He told me not to worry about the cleft palate problem. It did not happen, but had it, surgery would have corrected it. He also weaned me off of the medication, and assured me that there was a very slim chance of this happening.


  38. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    lauren says:

    Elli, I think so often (as was the case with my doctors) doctors deliver news of the possibility of DS as though it is THE WORST THING EVER. Because almost all DS children are aborted, the parents don’t really have any experience with a child with DS and just assume the worst.
    I was really happy to read that many parents of children w/ DS are making themselves availible to parents who are dealing with the diagnosis.


  39. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Ellie says:

    Erin, think of Dana then. Think of what she added to the world. Imagine a world without people like her. This is what it is coming to because of earlier testing. Already 9 out of 10 that are diagnosed are aborted. And this is without the earlier testing. Unfortunately, “choice” for any reason leads to “choice” for specific reasons, which leads to targeting the handicapped. What kind of message does that send to people like Dana?


  40. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Heather says:

    I also had to wonder how many abortions she had performed.


  41. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    lauren says:

    Erin, yeah real funny…


  42. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Jacqueline says:

    Erin,
    Women are not incubators and you deserve to be smacked for your disrepect.


  43. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Jacqueline says:

    On a happier note- LAUREN! It’s LAUREN!
    Lauren is my BFF! We even have bracelets to prove it.


  44. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Erin says:

    Jacqueline- That sounds like wonderful work!
    I don’t consider it a double standard- I consider it an option. Keep in mind that as long as it is within a reasonable period of time(before viability) I see no real difference in aborting a handicapped fetus or a regular fetus. I do think that things need to change. If given the choice between dying a horrible death in the world because no one will give me the types of medicine I need, etc, etc, or dying in the womb before my brain can understand pain or the like, I’d take the womb. I’ve said several times, it’s not like I have anything ‘against’ children with disabilities. I have worked with them for several years. I get angry when I see the problems with out system that people consistently ignore- that ends in complications or deaths that are completely unjustified. I’m not for more abortions in the case of fetii with handicaps- I’m for less suffering when they are born. And of course I would never say we should kill people if they became disabled later in life. I may at some point go blind(no time soon though, yay, experimental treatment). But I sure don’t want anyone to whack me. And that’s the point. I don’t want someone to kill me. A fetus can’t want to live or want to die. It’s brain isn’t functioning until mid-second-trimester. Am I being clear? I feel a bit jumbly this morning.


  45. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Erin says:

    *shrugs* Pro-lifers tend to treat them that way. Maybe you guys are rubbing off on me.


  46. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    lauren says:

    Erin, my point in all of this was that you made an incredibly false claim that women are never told to abort children with disabilties. We are. By those beakons of “choice” who claim to respect whatever choice a woman makes and blah blah blah.
    The bottom line with abortion in terms of disability, is that no one is pro-choice. The people who matter are all either pro-abortion or pro-life. If you “choose” poorly, you will be berated for your “choice” by the very people who are supposed to support you. Anyone who nominally supports abortion becomes a vocal proponant once an abnormal result rolls in. I know because I have lived it. It’s so bad even the NYT acknowledges it. It is offensive for you to claim that pressure to abort is a figment of our imagination.


  47. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    lauren says:

    No, Erin it is the pro-choice crowd who treats women like incubators. They have so marginalized motherhood that homemakers are a ridiculed characature and womanhood is something to be subverted.
    Talk of “forced incubation” and “walking incubators” is quite hurtful to someone unable to carry to term. It belittles something that so many women cry for years over not being able to achieve. How stupid and disfunctional a woman must be in order to fail at the most base and demeaning thing a woman may go through.
    The pro-choice crowd has degraded motherhood and women, not the pro-life.


  48. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Erin says:

    Lauren, that’s blatantly stupid. I can’t think of a SINGLE choicer I know that would berate someone for not aborting a fetus that was disabled.


  49. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Erin says:

    Lifers expect women to be mothers, even if they don’t want to. They place the value of a fetus over the rights of the mother to control her own body. If you want to have a kid, you should be able to. If you don’t you shouldn’t be forced to. You cheapen motherhood by forcing it upon people who don’t want it.


  50. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    prettyinpink says:

    “Yeah, so what’s your point? Please be respectful to individuals with Down syndrome. “Down’s kid” is disrespectful. I suggest “a child with Down syndrome.” They aren’t “produced,” they are conceived.”
    I’m not trying to be disrespectful or be leading. Just threw a statistic and asked what people thought about it…
    How is saying “Down’s syndrome kid” disrespectful by the way? Or the word produce? I can’t call a child a kid? I can’t call conceiving producing? I do realize it’s a sensitive subject, as this always is, but the language should be the same without being disprespectful. I mean, I call healthy children kids. Why not DS children? Produce comes out of “reproduce” and is just a synonym for conceive, have, give birth to. How in the world is that disprespectful?
    I know a lot of people, myself included, with health problems.
    By the way, my mom had me, after my brother. She produced another kid shortly thereafter. We found out (as kids) that my brother and I are epileptic.
    Continuing, epilepsy has been costly on the expenses too, but insurance luckily helps us out a lot. I know a lot of kids with disabilities who also recieve federal aid, and received it the minute they were born..
    btw, Sorry, I didn’t want to make a big deal out of this, but I honestly don’t feel I was politically incorrect, unless standards have raised and I just wasn’t aware of it.


  51. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    prettyinpink says:

    Lauren,
    I find it sad that nowadays it makes it hard for people to be homemakers. I know a lot of women who want to, but the way society is set up nowadays, both parents often need to work full time jobs to support their household.
    When parents are forced into such a situation, it often makes it hard for adults to spend a lot of time with their children. I wish that there were enough benefits that being a stay at home mom was an easier career choice to make.


  52. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    lauren says:

    Oh,I see Erin, I suppose I just imagined being told that my son was a drain on society and that I was irresponsible to bring him into the world.
    Dr. Dan Brock of the National Institutes of Health suggested that blind and severely disabled children should be aborted for the good of society.
    But, you’re right Erin, I’m stupid.


  53. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    lauren says:

    No, Erin. No evil government busibody is “making” women get pregnant. Women make the choice to engage in sexual reproduction and then are shocked *shocked* when they reproduce.
    We aren’t running around injecting zygotes into unsuspecting women.


  54. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Erin says:

    Therefore you’re justified in assuming that all choicers think like that. Anyone else? Rae? Hal? Anyone else think that lauren’s kid is a drain on society? Because obviously, we’re supposed to.


  55. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Erin says:

    *headdesk* Next time I hear that stupid ‘consentto sex=consent to pregnancy’ argument, I’m just….grrr. IT IS NOT THE SAME.


  56. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    lauren says:

    PIP, it’s possible to live on one salary, but not at the standard of living that most american’s wish to have. It invovles frugality and used cars. Unless, of course, that one salary is quite high. Generally those types of jobs are taxing on family time as well.
    I’t is very unfortunate that we no longer live in a time where most people can live on one salary. If you want it badly enough it is possible, but it’s definitely “easier” financially, to live on two.


  57. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Ellie says:

    Erin, you have point. Although “kids with Down syndrome” would be more PC than Down’s kids. Parent’s of children with ds would rather people not use “Down’s” as an adjective.
    Perhaps I’m a bit more sensitive to the language because I have to live with the prejudice of the world toward people with Down syndrome.
    I suppose if you use the word produce instead of conceive for all babies, that’s not specifically disrespectful to those with ds.


  58. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    lauren says:

    Erin, yes honey it is.
    You are accepting the risks associated with a behavior.
    You’re yelling “WAHH consenting to gambling is not consenting to having to pay money when I lose”
    Yes, dear, it is. You weighed the percetages, found them to be in your favor, and so engaged in the behavior. However, you did so KNOWING full well of the risk of pregnancy and decided to do it anyways. You accepted the risk. Just because you lose a bet, doesn’t mean that you didn’t make it.
    So yeah, women consented to the possibility of pregnancy. Then they defaul when it’s time to pay up.


  59. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Ellie says:

    Sorry, that post was for prettyinpink not erin


  60. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Erin says:

    I consent to walk across a very busy city street every day to go to and from class. I know that there is a teeny risk that I may be hit by a car when I cross because Atlanta drivers are all insane. Does that meen I am consenting to maybe get hit by a car if I decide to cross the street anyway?


  61. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Erin says:

    Heh, thanks, Ellie. I was confused for a minute.


  62. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    prettyinpink says:

    Ellie, I understand. It is a sensitive subject, esp because it hits so close to home for you.
    I promise you, I respect children with Down’s Syndrome and the parents that raise them tremendously. That’s why this article is so sad.


  63. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    lauren says:

    Erin, your accepting the risk.
    Although, the function of crossing the street is not to be hit by a car. Not true for sexual reproduction.
    It’d be like shooting off a gun, hitting a person, and saying “hey, hey, I know that guns are intended to shoot and wound something, but I just like pulling triggers! I can’t be held responsible for my pulling of triggers hurting someone!”
    Yes, you can. You weigh the risks, find the odds to be in your favor and shoot away. Even so, you’re responsible if someone gets hit by your bullet.
    Sorry, Erin. Women know full well that having sex is the way babies are made. Unless you think the stork brought you here wrapped in a little pink blanket, you are responsible for the reproductive outcome of your reproductive act.


  64. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Michelle says:

    Ellie, Barbara Curtis (who has 4 sons with DS, 3 adopted) wrote an interesting blog post when she was attacked for calling her sons “the Downzers.” Her main point was that subgrouping kids is a big family thing (she has 12 total), but her kids wondered if PC language wasn’t actually more prejudiced:
    “I brought this up for family discussion a few days ago and my kids had an interesting take: they thought someone who had such a virulent emotional reaction to this would probably actually be the more prejudiced person because it shows some underlying shame – as if our kids need this kind of propping up by political correctness to be accepted and loved.
    Sometimes kids can cut to the quick of a philosophical disagreement, can’t they?”
    Certainly not accusing you of prejudice against your own child, just food for thought. You can read her whole post here:
    http://www.mommylife.net/archives/2007/07/why_i_call_them.html


  65. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Jacqueline says:

    “People First” language asserts that people are people first, then their attributes. For example, a person with Down Syndrome is a person with down syndrome, not a “down syndrome person.” They are a person first.


  66. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Ellie says:

    PrettyInPink: You’re forgiven :-)
    Michelle: Thanks for the website. I will read the post. I wouldn’t take offense if she had the nickname “Downzers” for her children with DS; it’s a family nickname. I don’t normally react with a “virulent emotional reaction” as she says in what you quoted. I just think in general, it is better to use the “people first” language as Jacqueline said (Thanks, Jacqueline). Perhaps it’s because there is so much negativity in general about DS (like going back for a second abortion when the first one missed), and the name “Down” has such a negative sound that the adjective just sounds so, well, down.


  67. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Michelle says:

    well, I admit that I don’t particularly like the term “Down Syndrome” to begin with, mainly because the man for whom it is named was a racist.


  68. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Michelle says:

    Er, hit submit too soon. Meant to add “But when people say ‘Down Syndrome’ they don’t have that in mind. Seems to me that a person’s heart is more important than subtle and unintended implications arising from word choices that have more to do with grammatical simplicity than prejudice.”


  69. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Ellie says:

    “Seems to me that a person’s heart is more important than subtle and unintended implications….”
    Michelle, I can’t argue with that. The heart is definitely more important. Still, it doesn’t hurt to be sensitive to the concern….


  70. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    TexasRed says:

    Death camps. Pro-aborts hate it when we call abortion mills death camps.
    ************
    I find lying contemptible and find liars contemptible. If the truth suited the antichoice agenda then they wouldnt find it necessary to lie. That they DO have to lie over and over and over again shows both their lack of integrity and the paucity of their argument.


  71. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    TexasRed says:

    I would never TELL someone to abort for ANY reason. Its her decision to make. If a woman discovers her fetus has a genetic anomalie or congenital defect then I am not going to criticize her for choosing to continue her pregnancy. And Im not going to criticize her if she chooses to NOT continue her pregnancy. She has to decide what she can and cannot cope with. Trying to pretend ‘you’ are in a better position to decide that FOR her and YOU should be making the decision instead of her when YOU are not the one who will be living with the pregnancy, birth and resultant child is arrogance of the rankest sort.


  72. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Sally says:

    Death camps. Pro-aborts hate it when we call abortion mills death camps.
    Don’t hate it Jill. Just find it insulting to those that have acutual experience of Nazi death camps and those like my father that had to deal with surviviers, thier experiences, conditions…….unlike you and your fantasies over aborted embryos.
    Dad had a deep and meaningful relationship with a former member of a death camp. And you talk to embryos. @@ You are weak minded and silly.


  73. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Sandy says:

    “I find lying contemptible and find liars contemptible. If the truth suited the antichoice agenda then they wouldnt find it necessary to lie. That they DO have to lie over and over and over again shows both their lack of integrity and the paucity of their argument.”
    Posted by: TexasRed at August 30, 2007 2:44 PM
    TR,
    Then you must find PP pretty contemptible since they lied over and over again to build their abortion mill in Aurora.
    Or do you just hate liars when it doesn’t fit your agenda. If you do not find PP contemptible then I guess you just proved yourself to be a liar.
    What about Bernard Nathanson, he and his whole crew based legalizing abortion on ALL lies. Do you ever do your homework?? Read up on him and get back to me. I guess like MK stated earlier, you just don’t want to face the truth.
    “Dad had a deep and meaningful relationship with a former member of a death camp. And you talk to embryos. @@ You are weak minded and silly.”
    Posted by: Sally at August 30, 2007 8:02 PM
    Sally,
    PCer’s always fall back on the it’s just an embryo” Millions of babies are aborted after the 8th week of pregnancy. Babies are murdered well into the 2nd and third trimesters?????? These are not embryos Sally. They are unborn children. Wake up and face the truth.


  74. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    jasper says:

    “Death camps. Pro-aborts hate it when we call abortion mills death camps.”
    “Sally: Don’t hate it Jill.”
    ..of course you don’t hate it Sally the Savage, you’d make a good nazi yourself….Adoft would’ve been proud of you!


  75. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Laura says:

    Yeah, we should all stand back and admire pro-life peace and love:
    Suit: Site threatens abortion providers
    By Mari A. Schaefer
    Inquirer Staff Writer
    The Justice Department asked a federal judge yesterday to order a Reading man to stop posting violent threats against abortion providers in Philadelphia, Allentown and Reading on an Internet site.
    U.S. Attorney Patrick Meehan alleged that John Dunkle, 72, “encouraged his readers to kill a specific clinic physician by shooting her in the head.”
    In a sworn statement, Mary Blanks, a doctor, said she stopped working at Reading and Philadelphia abortion clinics “out of fear of John Dunkle’s threats to my life.”
    The suit came as a surprise to Dunkle.
    When reached by phone yesterday, Dunkle said he was not aware of the lawsuit and he would stop posting the offensive material if asked.
    “Oh yeah, if someone tells me to stop,” he said. “You are not talking to a hero.”
    Dunkle, however, said he was not the author of the most heinous postings, which he says were put there by a man he refers to as MPC. “I call him MPC – My Philadelphia Correspondent,” Dunkle said. “I told him before all this started if the FBI comes and says who is writing this stuff, I’m not going to hide you.”
    Dunkle said the man told him to go ahead and display it anyway.
    Prosecutors allege the postings violate the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act.
    “This type of intimidation and scare tactic, regardless of one’s beliefs or religious convictions, simply cannot be condoned,” Meehan said in a statement. “Using a public forum, such as the Internet, to incite and instruct people to kill is tantamount to a form of domestic terrorism.”
    The suit calls for Dunkle to remove the postings from his blog and asks the court to prohibit him from publishing further threats, names, addresses and photographs of health clinic doctors, staff and patients.
    ——————————————————————————–
    Contact staff writer Mari A. Schaefer at 610-892-9149 or mschaefer@phillynews.com.
    Inquirer staff writer John Shiffman contributed to this article.


  76. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Jill Stanek says:

    Erin, 9:50a, said: “Hey, Jacqueline, do you know how much it costs to raise a handicapped child…”
    My, my, Erin. What a good Nazi you’d make. Did you read the poster on this post?
    “60,000 Reichsmarks is what this person suffering from hereditary defects costs the community during his lifetime. Fellow German, that is your money, too,”


  77. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    lauren says:

    Laura, the aclu should be all over that.
    Knowing nothing of Mr. Dunkle, I’ll just leave it at that. If he *is* planning violence,I’m glad he was caught.


  78. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Bethany says:

    60,000 Reichsmarks is what this person suffering from hereditary defects costs the community during his lifetime. Fellow German, that is your money, too,”
    Posted by: Jill Stanek at August 30, 2007 10:31 PM

    What amazes me, is that the ideals are the exact same as the nazi ideals…and yet most of these people who say things like “You know how much it costs to take care of a handicapped person?” don’t even seem to REALIZE what an evil ideal that really is. It puts a price on human life! How scary!
    It is so terrifying to think of how slowly and deceitfully, these ideals are brought into society. People don’t even see it coming.
    Eventually, will we be the next ones on the “non desirables” list?


  79. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Erin says:

    Yes,because in modern society, money has no value and there are no poor people. To heck with reality, the PLers can just be happy pretending that everything will work out perfectly fine as long as the woman pops out the baby. Who cares if she has the money to support herself? Or the OB/GYN bills? Or for a midwife? I guess she can always deliver it herself and put it in a dumpster or something. So much better than killing a little fetus!
    Money matters. I’d never put a price on a human life personally. Society will and does. Reality. Sorry.


  80. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Rosie says:

    There are couples who are willing to adopt and pay all the woman’s medical bills. THAT IS better than “killing a little fetus” as you put it so elegantly.


  81. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Jacqueline says:

    Erin,
    Your argument would only work if there weren’t resources out the @ss to help pregnant women. Maternity homes, Medicaid, CPC’s and so on and so forth.
    How many women do you know that have starved to death because they didn’t fork over the 400 bucks to have an abortion?


  82. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Erin says:

    Rosie-there are not enough.
    Jacqueline- I was on my way to class two days ago. A woman who looked like she hadn’t bathed in several days came up to me. She told me that she was 7 months pregnant(and it was obvious) and because of that, the battered women’s shelter wouldn’t take her. She had a cast on her arm and had just come from Grady’s. She couldn’t afford to go to the Salvation Army for a few nights- even though it only cost $12 per night.
    I gave her $20. Looks like the system sure is taking care of the pregnant ladies, eh?


  83. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    jessie says:

    Wow..how cold society has become. One of my daughters very good friends is a down’s child. I think of my daughter not having her very good friend and what she would be missing if Carla would have been aborted. Carla has given us joy and she certainly is unique as are we all. God has a plan for Carla and part of that plan was to enrich our lives. I’m sure of it.


  84. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    jessie says:

    Erin..there is no difference between aborting a 6 month old baby by sucking the brains out or leaving a child in a dumpster or drowning your 6 year old because you are tired of being a parent. The argument is purely geographical…dead human, live human…dead baby live baby…I’ll side on life everytime….live baby.


  85. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Ellie says:

    Amen, Jessie!


  86. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Jill Stanek says:

    Erin, 10:56a, said: “She told me that she was 7 months pregnant(and it was obvious) and because of that, the battered women’s shelter wouldn’t take her.”
    You were scammed, Erin. That was an incredible lie.
    Not the first one you’ve been snookered on.


  87. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Jacqueline says:

    Because women don’t accept help or know about help doesn’t mean that help doesn’t exist. Problem is, if women don’t know this help exists, then it’s all the same to them. Hence we need better case management and advertising of services to help pregnant women.


  88. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    jessie says:

    Jill…have you heard about the doctor in Europe that thinks a mother should have up to a year after the child is born to “dispose of it”? I heard that on Faith 2 Action-Janet Folgers show, but I can’t think of his name. Is that where society is moving?


  89. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Jacqueline says:

    Erin- not to deningrate your compassion, but that 20 bucks didn’t help her much. Had you directed her to a CPC, they would have found housing for her, as well as other resources. That 20 bucks might get her through the night, but what about tomorrow night, and the next night, and the next night? I know you hate CPC’s, but they do help women (if you’ll suck up your pride enough to send a woman there).


  90. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Erin says:

    Jacqueline: Two things. A, I have no idea where a CPC is in Atlanta. B, where the hell can you get off telling someone that their charity is misplaced?
    Jill- I wasn’t scammed. I checked with the SalArm. They had seen the woman and she hadn’t been able to pay.
    I really want to hear someone answer Laura’s hypothetical question. It’s one of the few points I stand with her very strongly on. If you were in a building that was on fire and you had to choose to save either a cooler that had 800 embryos in it, or a screaming, crying 8 month old baby, what would you take out of the building?
    I can’t believe that some people are so blind that they can’t believe that there are pregnant women who starve, that there are people who can’t afford food for their children, and that a lot of them have tried everything to get help. People need help 100 times more than fetuses do. Fix the messed up world before you start getting so energetic about bringing new people into it. Or do you just want to pump out a bunch of kids, and say, oh, they’ll take care of it when they grow up. Then they’ll say the same thing about their kids, and the world will just get to the point where everyone is alive, but everyone wishes they weren’t.


  91. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    jasper says:

    jesse: “Jill…have you heard about the doctor in Europe that thinks a mother should have up to a year after the child is born to “dispose of it”? I heard that on Faith 2 Action-Janet Folgers show, but I can’t think of his name. Is that where society is moving?”
    Jesse, you can pretty much do that in this country already…with maybe just a small penaly, maybe a year in jail, some fines, etc.


  92. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Bethany says:

    Jacqueline: Two things. A, I have no idea where a CPC is in Atlanta. B, where the hell can you get off telling someone that their charity is misplaced?
    #1) Erin, you have the internet. Do a google search..there are tons of them!
    #2) You tell us our charity is misplaced all the time!
    Listing of Georgia Pregnancy centers
    http://www.lifecall.org/cpc/ga.html
    Alpha Crisis Pregnancy Center
    2133 Whispering Pines Rd
    Albany, GA 31707-2573
    912-431-2343
    Birthright of Albany
    Albany, GA
    912-883-LIFE
    800-550-4900
    A Beacon of Hope Crisis Preg Center
    9855 Nesbit Ferry Rd
    Alpharetta, GA 30022-5350
    770-752-9188
    Americus CPC
    1620 Martin Luther King Jr Blvd
    Americus, GA 31719-2290
    912-928-2802
    Athens Pregnancy Center
    2350 Prince Ave, Ste 8
    Athens, GA 30606-6028
    706-353-2117
    Covenant Care Services
    337 S Milledge Ave, Ste102A
    Athens, GA 30605-7219
    706-546-7267
    Atlanta Care Center
    3115 Piedmont Road,
    Suite D-201,
    Atlanta, GA 30305
    404-262-CARE
    404-261-2736
    Bethany Christian Services
    1867 Independence Sq., Suite 201
    Atlanta, GA 30338
    770-396-7700
    Birthright of Atlanta
    Atlanta, GA
    770-451-2273
    800-550-4900
    Crisis Pregnancy Services
    680 W Peachtree St NW
    Atlanta, GA 30367-1931
    404-881-6571
    Family Concerns CPC West
    950 Cunningham Place SW
    Atlanta, GA 30310-1348
    404-756-0000
    Birthright of Augusta
    Augusta, GA
    706-733-LOVE
    800-550-4900
    Care Pregnancy Center
    1298 1/2 Broad Street
    P. O. Box 1775
    Augusta, Georgia 30903
    (706) 724-FREE (724-3733) or
    (803) 649-9890
    Baxley Crisis Preg Ctr
    561 Blackshire Highway
    Baxley, GA 31513
    912-367-5454
    Appalachian Area Crisis Preg Ctr
    PO Box 1789
    Blairsville, GA 30514
    706-745-7518
    CPC of Coastal GA
    3365 Cypress Mill Rd Suite 7
    Brunswick, GA 31520-2867
    912-267-1100
    Calhoun Pregnancy Center
    200 East Belmont Driv
    Calhoun, GA 30701
    (706)625-5768
    Franklin Life
    171 Bowersville Road
    Carnesville, GA 30521
    706-384-5081
    Save-A-Life of Carrollton
    Carrollton, GA
    770-832-0256
    Pregnancy Care Center of Bartow County
    20 Douglas Street
    Cartersville, GA 30120
    770-382-7224
    White County Life
    Suite A
    19 E. Jarrard Street
    Cleveland, GA 30528
    706-219-1678
    Columbus CPC
    1300 Wynnton Ct
    Columbus, GA 31906-2140
    706-327-9935
    706-322-5024
    Refuge CPC
    954 Main St NE
    Conyers, GA 30012
    770-922-5939
    800-696-5939
    Habersham Life
    101, 215 Hodges Street
    P.O. Box 612
    Cornelia, GA 30531-3293
    706-776-5225
    800-499-0177
    Whispering Hope Resource and Pregnancy Center
    133 Samaritan Drive
    Suite 402
    Cumming, GA 30040
    770-889-8302
    Paulding Pregnancy Services, Inc.
    300 W.I. Parkway, Suite 102
    Dallas, GA 30132
    (678) 363 – 9255
    pauldingps@juno.com
    Woman’s Enrichment Center
    118 W. Gordon St
    Dalton, GA 30720
    706.278.1050
    House of New Life
    4650 Flat Shoals Rd
    Decatur, GA 30034
    404-241-8062
    Doraville Pregnancy Resource Center
    5935 New Peachtree Road
    Doraville, GA 30340
    770.451.1030
    dhayes@cdmc.org
    Pregnancy Resource Center
    3030 Chapel Hill Road
    Douglasville GA 30154
    770.920.1000
    prc@pregnancycenter.info
    Dublin Save-A-Life
    120 S Monroe St
    Dublin, GA 31021-5234
    912-275-9500
    Women 4 Women
    PO Box 1971
    Duluth, GA 30096
    (770)232-1991
    Gilmer Pregnancy Center
    PO Box 383
    Ellijay, GA 30540
    706-276-1945
    Fayette CPC
    116 Bethea Rd, Suite 306
    Fayetteville, GA 30214-7239
    770-719-2288
    Pregnancy Center
    13 N Lee Street
    Forsyth, GA 31029
    912-994-3173
    Gainesville Care Center
    434 Green Street Place
    Gainesville, GA 30501-3318
    770-535-1245
    Caring House
    Griffin, GA
    770-229-4474
    Pregnancy Problem Center
    411 King Arnold St
    Hapeville, GA 30354
    404-763-4357
    Hart Life
    121 Vickery street
    Hartwell, GA 30643
    706-376-1700
    Paulding Pregnancy Services
    1899 Lake Road, Suite 120
    Hiram, GA 30141
    770-222-6911
    Pickens Pregnancy Center
    1549 E Church St, Suite C
    Jasper, GA 30143
    706-692-6303
    Hope Resource Center, Inc.
    29 South Avenue
    Jefferson, GA 30549
    (706) 367-5304 – 24 hour hotline
    CPC of Coastal GA
    147 NW Broad Street
    Jesup, GA 31545-1310
    912-588-0010
    Jonesboro CPC
    530 Parkwood Way
    Jonesboro, GA 30236
    770-477-1501
    Pregnancy Care Center
    LaGrange, GA
    888 413- 8378
    706-884-3833
    Gwinnett Crisis Pregnancy Center
    501 Crownpointe Way, Ste. 140
    Lawrenceville, Ga. 30045
    770.338.1680
    A Center of Hope CPC
    3080 Hwy 81 PO Box 1714
    Loganville, GA 30052
    770-466-3900
    Covenant Care Services
    3950 Ridge Avenue
    Macon, GA 31210-5002
    912-475-4990
    800-226-5683
    Sav-a-Life Ministry, Inc.
    Pregnancy Test Center
    Macon, GA
    912-475-1570
    Cobb Pregnancy Services
    186 Alexander Street
    Marietta, GA 30060-2035
    770-590-9361
    Email: cps@cobbpregnancy.org
    Women’s Pregnancy Center
    1545 Powers Ferry Rd, Ste 3E
    Marietta, GA 30067-9401
    770-953-1972
    Pregnancy Resource Center of Henry County
    3834 Jodeco Road
    McDonough, GA 30253
    770.957.8288
    pregnancycenter@charter.net
    Oconee Area Pregnancy Center
    1508 N Columbia St
    Milledgeville, GA 31061-7130
    912-452-7376
    Hope House
    Moultrie, GA
    912-985-4673
    Newnan CPC
    29 Brown Street
    Newnan, GA 30263-2003
    770-251-7158
    Pregnancy Care Center of Perry
    1104 Meeting St
    Perry, GA 31069-3342
    912-988-8199
    Rome CPC
    100 Redmond Road
    Rome, Georgia 30165-1536
    706-235-6833
    Coastal CPC
    5214 Paulsen
    Savannah, GA 31405-4723
    912-355-6295
    The Living Vine
    535 E 54th Street/PO Box 16932
    Savannah, GA 31405
    912-352-9998
    Savannah Care Center
    105 E 34th St
    Savannah, GA 31405
    912-236-0916 or
    912-236-1030
    Birthright of St.Mary’s
    1531 Highway 40 East, Suite B
    St.Mary’s, GA
    912-882-7171
    800-550-4900
    Crisis Pregnancy Center Of Statesboro
    204 S College St
    Statesboro GA 30458-5204
    912-764-4303
    Sav-A-Life North GA Crisis Center
    PO Box 407
    Summerville, GA 30747
    706-857-1457
    Heritage CPC
    104 1/2 N Green St
    Thomaston, GA 30286-3552
    706-647-8743
    Hannah’s House Maternity
    226 W Hendricks St
    Thomson, GA 30824
    706-724-3733
    Tifton CPC
    2214 Tyson Ave
    Tifton, GA 31794-3031
    912-382-4491
    Toccoa Life Cares
    406 W Doyle St
    Toccoa, GA 30577-2316
    706-886-0177
    800-499-0177
    Agape CPC
    4315 Cowan Rd, Suite 1
    Tucker, GA 30084-4831
    770-938-2000
    Birthright of Valdosta
    Valdosta, GA
    912-244-LIFE
    800-550-4900
    Pregnancy Support Center
    210 W Gordon St
    Valdosta, GA 31601-4515
    912-333-0080
    Evergreen CPC
    202 North Ave
    Warner Robins, GA 31093-1930
    912-922-5791
    Birthright of Waycross
    2006 Alice Street
    Waycross, GA 31501-6210
    912-283-8333
    800-550-4900
    The HOPE Center
    9740 Main St, Suite 120
    Woodstock, GA 30188
    770-924-0864


  93. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Rosie says:

    “Rosie-there are not enough.”
    sure there are.


  94. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Erin says:

    I was in the middle of the city on my way to class. Pardon me for not whipping out my laptop in the middle of Brooke Street to look up CPCs. Bethany, actually, I think you’re the ones who spit venom at anyone who donates to PP. What monetary charity of yours have I ever downplayed?


  95. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Erin says:

    No, Rosie. There are not remotely enough parents who want to adopt as there are orphans. Not REMOTELY.


  96. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Bethany says:

    Crisis Pregnancy Centers!


  97. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Bethany says:

    Erin, MK was adopted as well as you, and she had some great statistics and references that could refute your statement about that.


  98. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Erin says:

    I said I didn’t like the organizations. I didn’t even know that you donated to them. That’s fine with me. Doesn’t mean I have to like the organization. I’m not calling it a waste of money, or the like, am I?


  99. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Bethany says:

    I said I didn’t like the organizations. I didn’t even know that you donated to them. That’s fine with me. Doesn’t mean I have to like the organization. I’m not calling it a waste of money, or the like, am I?
    Would you suggest to any of your friends who are in your friends’ situation to go to a CPC?
    I happen to volunteer at a CPC and the majority of our work is donating diapers, maternity clothes, baby clothes, formula, counseling, and referrals to good doctors, financial aids, etc….to help women out. I know for a fact that if you referred that woman to a CPC (even just telling her to search for one in your area) she could find help there. All the help she could possibly need. We do this out of our hearts, as a ministry. We do not get paid for helping these women, and most of the help comes out of our pockets or from donations from churches, etc. Maybe it wasn’t you who was talking so badly about CPC’s so many times, but I figure you’d agree with anyone who had anything bad to say about them, since they are against abortion. Correct me if I’m wrong though.


  100. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Doug says:

    Erin: There are not remotely enough parents who want to adopt as there are orphans. Not REMOTELY.
    I don’t know if the “remotely” really applies or not – I would think the number of parents who adopt is a lot bigger than the number of orphans waiting for adoption.
    However, whether or not that’s true, there are a lot of kids in state care or in unsatisfactory foster-care situations. I think it’s between 100,000 and 200,000 in the US.
    Doug


  101. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Erin says:

    No, I wouldn’t suggest that they go to a CPC. I would suggest a PP or a normal OB/GYN. I do not like CPCs. For one thing, there is no possible way that an organization can at every single turn, help a woman in every single way she could need. In a few cases, sure, but it gets far to expensive. Salvation Army, Red Cross, UNICEF, charitable organizations cannot always help everyone. It’s not financially possible. Unless almost no one is coming and you really have that much surplus funding, it’s not fiscally rational.
    The reason I don’t like CPCs is because there have been several documented cases of those centers lying to women about the status of their pregnancies in order to prevent them from legally obtaining an abortion.
    http://www.alternet.org/rights/35545/
    Am I saying that all CPCs are like this? Of course not. Some of them are probably completely legitimate places to go to in case of an unplanned pregnancy, who won’t shout at you about the evils of abortion or the like, and who will calmly and gently lead you through your options. I’m not saying they need to provide information or encourage abortion, but if it comes up, they shoudl be able to provide a place the woman can go if she wants to follow it up. Just like some PP centers can be under-par in terms of cleanliness or qualified employees, some CPCs can be staffed by religious zealots whose concern is not for the pregnant woman but for the fetus.


  102. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Bethany says:

    The reason I don’t like CPCs is because there have been several documented cases of those centers lying to women about the status of their pregnancies in order to prevent them from legally obtaining an abortion.
    Erin, honestly! The title of the article says “Anti-choice” and the first reference in the first sentence is “Planned Parenthood”. This is unbiased information? Planned parenthood surely wouldn’t have ANYTHING to lose by girls choosing to go to a CPC instead of paying them for abortions, would they?
    Come on!


  103. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Erin says:

    Bethany- I do not have time to root through all my files and find my AP articles. I will find them later, I am trying to pack for a convention right now


  104. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    jessie says:

    erin…by your logic..if I lose my job and can’t afford to feed my 8 year old…I should just kill her that would solve my problem.
    By your logic then the genocide in Darfar is ok because well, they can’t get along and it would just be easier if a certain section of the population no longer existed.
    The world will never be “fixed” and its sad when any child or person is unwanted or starves or goes through tragedy or is born with aids or is missing a foot, but how do you say that person has any less right to live then you.
    If a child is born in the US, most states have laws where the mom can drop the baby off at a hospital no questions asked. Babies in the womb feel pain when they are sliced, acid washed and sucked out of the womb.


  105. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    jessie says:

    and Erin..
    Could you tell me when Conner Peterson became a person with inalienable rights? How can Scott Peterson be charged with his murder if Conner was just a fetus?


  106. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    jessie says:

    Erin, honestly! The title of the article says “Anti-choice” and the first reference in the first sentence is “Planned Parenthood”. This is unbiased information? Planned parenthood surely wouldn’t have ANYTHING to lose by girls choosing to go to a CPC instead of paying them for abortions, would they?
    Come on!
    Bethany to add to the above..planned parenthood lies all the time. They are against legislation that would require ultrasounds to be given before an abortion. They are against offering pain medication for the baby-because they do suffer when they are sliced apart and planned parenthood has told kids to lie about their age so they didn’t have to report an abortion in the instance of incense.


  107. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Jill Stanek says:

    Erin, 12:58p, said: “For one thing, there is no possible way that an organization can at every single turn, help a woman in every single way she could need. In a few cases, sure, but it gets far to expensive.”
    Erin, you’re wrong on that point. I’ve spoken at hundreds of CPC banquets all over the country. I know these groups. They indeed would and do help mothers AT EVERY SINGLE TURN, even way after they have given birth. They do indeed help with medical expenses, legal expenses, clothing for both mom and baby, furniture, food, formula, housing, and education.
    Your preconceived notions of CPCs are 180 degrees wrong, Erin. Jac was right. Wish I’d have thought of saying that. Had you directed that mom to a cpc, she would have been truly helped. (Still don’t believe a shelter turned her away b/c she was pregnant, however.)


  108. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Jacqueline says:

    I would suggest a PP or a normal OB/GYN. I do not like CPCs.
    PP and normal OB/GYNs are not social service agencies that help with housing, nutrition, etc.
    Planned Parenthood provides little to no prenatal care and will only do so if they can bill Medicaid for it.
    So with those referrals you’ve offered no help.
    Now- when you are walking down the street and you’re not a social worker, it’s difficult to offer a needy person anything but the money in your pocket. But now that you know better, you can refer them to some place that can help beyond what you have in your pocket.


  109. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Jacqueline says:

    By the way, I googled “Planned Parenthood PreNatal Care” to see what I’d get and was confirmed. I got one site however that shocked me. I’m shocked that PP offers anything for the unborn other than poisons and dismemberment, but I was more shocked to see the site say this: “If you are pregnant and looking for quality care for yourself and your baby, you can come to Planned Parenthood of Delaware.” Did you catch that? Planned Parenthood called it a BABY. I’m floored. So in their own words, Planned Parenthood kills 138,000+ babies a year.


  110. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    jessie says:

    Jacqueline-they say that, but when you go to PP they assume you are there for an abortion so if you are teetering they push you to the abortion because you know they get tax money for that.
    My hairdressers sister went in with questions and they didn’t even give her other options, she they just asked when would she like to make the appointment. Thank God she did an about face and kept the baby.


  111. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Bethany says:

    Wow, Jacqueline!!!
    Jessie, great points, by the way.


  112. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Heather says:

    Jacqueline, they SURE DID! See, liars all slip up from time to time.


  113. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Adam's Blog says:

    Oil Companies Vindicated

    Reaction to the Larry Craig Resignation, how market forces caused gas prices, hope for primary reform, and the overlooked heroes of the Hurricane Katrina Recovery effort. These and more are topics on tonight’s Truth and Hope Report Podcast.
    Popul…


  114. Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/jills/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/subscribe-to-comments.php on line 590
    Rachael says:

    The reason I don’t like CPCs is because there have been several documented cases of those centers lying to women about the status of their pregnancies in order to prevent them from legally obtaining an abortion.
    http://www.alternet.org/rights/35545/

    Erin,
    The of accuracy of this story is questionable at best.
    John at Generations for Life and JivinJ have both actually researched and looked into the accuracy of the story and have well-written articles on this:
    Evil CPC Story an Urban Legand?
    “It�s this last sentence in particular that raised a red flag for me.”
    The �crisis pregnancy center� staff then proceeded to wage a campaign of intimidation and harassment over the following days, showing up at the girl�s home and calling her father�s workplace. Our clinic director reports that she was �scared to death to leave her house.� They even went to her school and urged classmates to pressure her not to have an abortion.
    “They went to her school? One wonders how they would have done this. It�s next to impossible for a stranger to enter a school building, as nearly all schools� doors are locked from the outside.
    Perhaps �They even went to her school�� means that the CPC workers waited outside the school for the girl to leave at the end of the school day.
    But how could they have known who this girl�s �classmates� were? Or did they just go up to students at random (who, for all the CPC workers knew, didn�t even know who this girl was) and �pressure� them to tell her not to have an abortion?
    Until I see convincing evidence to the contrary, I think a healthy dose of skepticism is called for here.”
    New Development in the Evil CPC Story
    “It occurred to me today that if, in fact, the Indianapolis Police had shown up at the Planned Parenthood acting on a tip that a girl was being forced to have an abortion, they obviously would have filed a police report.
    Since police reports are matters of public record, I called the Indianapolis Police Department to find out if there was any police report that would corroborate Planned Parenthood�s version of events.
    The woman I spoke with at IPD did a search and came up with: nothing.
    I also asked her to do a search on the crisis pregnancy center. Again: nothing.
    If the CPC really did engage in �a campaign of intimidation and harassment,� it�s rather hard to believe that the police were never contacted. If Planned Parenthood cares so much about women, wouldn�t their first move have been to call the police on the girl�s behalf before telling the public?
    I also checked the Marion County Clerk�s Office records to see if any lawsuits had been brought against the CPC. One would certainly think that if Planned Parenthood�s version of events were true, and if the �intimidation and harassment� brought by the CPC were so intense that they made the girl �scared to death to leave her house�, Planned Parenthood wouldn�t have wasted a second in providing the girl an attorney to sue the CPC.
    This search found, yet again: nothing.
    Now the question becomes: Will those who took Planned Parenthood at their word�despite the story�s notable lack of specific details�continue to stand by it?”
    Calling Their Bluff

    Some people will believe anything

    “Unfortunately, no pro-choice blogger that I’ve seen has taken this story with a grain of salt. They’ve all taken Planned Parenthood’s word even though the story has virtually no solid details. The name and location of the CPC isn’t given. No witnesses are given to corroborate the story. No police report. Just the word of Planned Parenthood. “But I read it on the internet so it’s gotta be true!”
    Now maybe Planned Parenthood isn’t making up the story. What if Planned Parenthood was told this story by a client or supporter of theirs? One would hope they’d investigate this story to make sure it was 100% true before e-mailing it to their supporters, no? One would hope they’d contact the CPC in question to get the CPC’s side of the story and to see if the story had an basis in fact, right?
    I’m with Serge on this one. The fact that this story is being publicized at a time that eerily corresponds with the lobbying efforts on behalf of a pro-choice bill to regulate CPCs makes me wonder if something (such as the whole truth) is not being told.”
    As Jivin J notes in Those deceptive pregnancy centers
    “After viewing the pictures of the inside and outside of this clinic, I have an extremely difficult time believing that anyone (much less a girl, her mother, and her boyfriend) could mistake this pregnancy center (filled with prolife brochures) for a Planned Parenthood.”
    Related:
    Christina at Real Choice has pictures of the alleged CPC which shares a parking lot with a nearby Planned Parenthood:
    http://realchoice.blogspot.com/2006/05/more-on-evil-cpc-hoax.html
    Revisiting the Supposedly Deceptive CPC Story
    “An Indiana television station did a piece on the alleged incident where a girl was supposedly misled by a pregnancy center posing as an abortion clinic. They also have a video of it (which wouldn’t work with my media player).
    It seems the 17-year-old girl’s story has changed or Planned Parenthood was lying in their original e-mail. The article says,
    I could die, I was going to ruin my life, ” the 17-year-old said the center told her after she had already made the decision to get an abortion.
    Telling a girl she could die and that abortion could ruin her life doesn’t seem to be the kind of thing that a pregnancy center trying to pass itself off as an abortion clinic would say, now does it? According to the original Planned Parenthood e-mail:
    “The group took down the girl’s confidential personal information and told her to come back for her appointment, which they said would be in their “other office” (the real Planned Parenthood office nearby). When she arrived for her appointment, not only did the Planned Parenthood staff have no record of her, but the police were there � the “crisis pregnancy center” had called them, claiming that a minor was being forced to have an abortion against her will.”
    Now the girl is telling us the pregnancy center told her that she could possibly die and her life would be ruined? If I was trying to pass myself off as an abortion clinic, the last thing I would say is “abortion could kill you.” Does anyone else see the inconsistency in these stories?”
    The inconsistancies and red flags are glaring in this story. Is this a true story of CPC wronging a girl or is it an elaborate urban legand created by Planned Parenthood to generate sympathy and support. Don’t just trust what you hear. You do the research and decided.

Comments are closed.