Obama’s solution
Sep.10, 2008 5:02 pm |
Obama |
Violations will be deleted and you may be banned.
Threats will be immediately reported to authorities.
Following these rules will make everyone's experience visiting JillStanek.com better.
Our volunteer moderators make prudent judgment calls to provide an open forum to discuss these issues. They reserve the right to remove any comment for any reason. Jill's decisions on such moderations are final.
Go to gravatar.com to create your avatar.
LOL that is scary but so hilarious!
Keep up the great work, Jill! :D
I’m voting for that women!!!!
No, no, it’s not quite right…where’s the LIPSTICK? LOL
HILARIOUS !!!
Come on guys, that is one UGLY woman!
You can put lipstick on a man, but you still have a man.
http://www.theonion.com/content/whitehousewar/barackobama
NOW we know what happened to the “4th Supreme” !
She has beautiful eyes! Lol!
The picture is hilarious.
Mike: NOW we know what happened to the “4th Supreme”!
Ha!
Isn’t it really bizzare that this is the first time the media has gone to over kill? There should be a law that the media cannot show partiality of a candidate. They are going completely insane on Palin which is so insulting, especially when BO cannot compare any accomplishments with Palin. Gibson actually asked her if she thinks she has the experience to be a VP or possibly the pres..is that the hilt of hypocrisy? How did BO get elected? No one has torn old Bidens ass up? No one has asked him such ridiculous questions. Having Biden as a VP is not change. He wears DEPENDS for God’s sake!!!
There should be a law that the media cannot show partiality of a candidate.
No, there shouldn’t. I understand your sentiment–and perhaps you were kidding–but how would such a law be enforced? It would result in worse deception, the kind of corruption you find in Canadian “human rights commissions” or the government-owned Canadian Broadcasting Commission of Canada.
There is a law, however, against slander. Yes? No?
They are supposed to present the news. They are not supposed to promote or bash a candidate. They are also supposed to give equal air time. It just makes absolutely no sense why the media goes gaga over a man with not one single accomplishment to his name. Not one shred of credibility. One has to have SOMETHING, ANYTHING, they can show the people why they are capable of running a country. He has nothing but the word CHANGE. He was a senator for 4 years and spent 2 of them campaigning. Before running for president, no one heard of him. Maybe because he had no accomplishments? How does one support a man who has such friends as Bill Ayers, Farrahkaan and Pastor Wright? He supports partial birth abortion and abolishing minimum sentences. He speaks of all that is wrong with America as does his wife, but they have no solutions, just the word CHANGE. A person can promise to fix your car, but are they really a mechanic? You don’t go to a dentist for brain surgery. I was told the media totally edits what “THEY” want the story to be such as the Charlie Gibson and Palin interview. They clearly cut off her answers..they started an answer in the middle of her answer, he didn’t let her finish an answer and clearly tried to make a fool of her. Not once has the media said that Alaska is the doorway to the USA. That doorway is PROTECTED by Alaska. Palin knows how to protect it..a huge responsibility! In stead of saying, WOW, a woman that knows how to use weapons, they say she shoots animals. We have come to a point in time where the media will actually stretch the truth or lie. Yes i was kidding about a law as i know that isn’t possible but there is the FCC for radio, well what about TV?