Sunday funnies
Gary McCoy of MSNBC provides the proper context to view the May 31 murder of late-term abortionist George Tiller…
As expected, there was no shortage of pro-abortion political cartoons linking the murder to anything from pro-life “hate speech,” to religious fanaticism, to terrorism, to hypocrisy, and to the movement itself.
For example, it couldn’t get any more pointed than this, by Don Wright of GoComics.com…
Would Wright ever consider substituting the word “ISLAM” for “PRO-LIFE”? Its members have certainly demonstrated a thousands-fold greater propensity for violence. In this decade alone the ratio is ~3,000:1, just in the US. The last killing came only 3 days after Tiller’s.
Nah. Way politically incorrect.
Plus, ironically, Wright innately knows he has nothing to fear from pro-lifers but would have to worry about the whereabouts of his own head if posting such a sweeping political statement against Islamists.
See more pot shots below.
by Steve Benson from GoComics.com…
by Ben Sargent for GoComics.com…
by Tony Auth for GoComics.com…
by Lalo Alcaraz for GoComics.com…
by Stuart Carlson for GoComics.com…
This last one, by Jim Morin for GoComics.com, is interesting, an admission, although I’m sure that wasn’t his intent…

They should just make fun of schizophrenics while they’re at it.
According to the gospel of ‘Soonerman’ all these pre-natal children who are killed in utero are dispatchted directly to Abraham’s bosom.
This is ‘sudden glory’ as one theologian has described instant death of ‘christians’.
Soonerman views this as a positive good. Good for the child, good for the mother, and we can conclude, if Soonerman is consistent in his theology, good for the abortionist.
One problem here: Soonerman has done nothing that I know of to establish his bona fides as one who has an intimate knowledge of God. He has not fed thousands with a few loaves of bread and handful of fish, he has not healed anyone, he has not cast out any demons, he has not raised anyone from the dead, and he himself has not risen from the dead.
Soonerman has made no claim to have visited the sick, or the imprisoned, even given a cup of water in the Name of Jesus.
Soonerman’s litmus test for salvation is that you or your children have adopted at least one child.
Soonerman does not realize that our adoption by God is a proof of our salvation and our sonship.
yor bro ken
Blame shifting started with adam and Eve. Repentence means we accept blame for our sins. I recall Jesus telling Peter to get the behind me satan. Christians understand Peter was reprimanded for trying to take a physical solution and hurt someone. Actuall killl them but he missed and just got the ear.
It is a severe case of One incident being on display to detract from the 60,000 Tiler killed. In the twisted dishonest Liberal mind, if Hitler was killed by a Christian extremist it would be met with outrage. drama.
Glad the numbers show they read these posts by the thousands for the last 6 days.
I can also say his family is greiving and has no doubt they know dad was in the wrong. The extent to which they publically deny it is a defense mechanism we all have and can apply to grieving.
well yes, Morin does admit that abortion leaves a “bloody aborted fetus” but of course since it’s not human nor a person, “its” death is “less” than the fully human person that Tiller was.
It’s reasoning like this that has led to 50 million plus lives being snuffed out, to all the injured and emotionally scarred men and women.
I don’t bother with cartoons anyway, but these were really dumb.
Obnoxious is a better way to describe them.
I hate this: why are people turning Tiller’s death into something to celebrate? It’s almost as though all of these people who call themselves pro-choice were waiting, excited, for him to die so that they could just trample all over him and use him, not even caring that a man is dead, as a reason to spread hatred. Why can’t they, for once, stop trying to make everything about politics and getting an extra jab in, and start making this a time of mourning and a time to call for some understanding?
I just don’t understand- he died. His body does not hold a spirit anymore. Why are they so fanatic about his death? Not a single one shed a tear for him, they took to their blogs and began acting outraged, but instead of talking about him, all that they could talk about was how they were going to use his death to “teach those anti-choicers a lesson about what happens when you impose you ‘dangerous ideas.'”
Like Islam, we cannot be forced to live in the shadow of what radicals do. Muslims aren’t terrorists, and neither are pro-lifers. We just have to work doubly hard to try and undo the damage that this man did.
Vannah, I believe that the PC industry will do most anything to further their political agenda!
I watched a few clips from the Tiller funeral services. Gloria Allred attended, and praised Tiller for “protecting women.” Gloria has an abortion in her past. She claims she became pregnant from rape. However, I tought of Christen Gilbert at that moment.
You know whom I really admyer in the pro-life movement? Its those brave wimmon, like Carla and Angele, who have the guts to come out and tell the truth about abortion and how it really hurts wimmon! Why don’t we try to get 22 weeks, on the life time network! Just a thought. RJ
Also, I wonder if Allred has ever viewed the Cemetery of Choice. Women who are dying from legal abortions today. Some of Tiller’s patients claim that he was a nasty man to them, and that he was rough with them.
That’s how allot of proborts are Heather. RJ
My mother isn’t doing well this morning. I’m asking you all to pray for her. My brother in law, is doing beter. RJ
I’m sorry to hear about that, R.J.; I’ll keep her in my prayers.
And you’re right: everyday people, like Carla or Elisabeth or HisMan, do extraordinary things. My uncle is a police officer, my mother is a single parent, my sister will be the first woman in our family to go to college. Martin Luther King, Jr. was not a famous celebrity; Abraham Lincoln began his life not as a wealthy man but as a man with failures (coming out the wazoo, I might add). Susan B. Anthony and Alice Paul were just women with a dream of equality.
We must always do whatever we can to fight injustice, even if that means we don’t get recognized for it or we are not treated like human beings.
Excellent point, R.J. :D
Vannah: Your observation about certain pro-aborts celebrating the death of Tiller accurately discerns the seething rage that resides in those who have lost faith and hope.
Just as they embrace the death of unborn infants as something to be celebrated, so too the death of Tiller.
There is no doubt as to the spiritual dimensions of this battle. The struggle between the culture of life and the culture of death intersects in 50 million ways plus one in our fight.
One more thought: Perhaps one of the reasons the media types are going ballistic over Tiller’s death is because they see their side is losing, as reflected in recent polls. Thus they are all the more strident in their attempts to impose their despair on the rest of us.
Jerry, that’s a good point!
Thank You Vanna for those words of incouragement.
Let’s do a graphic role reversal here:
In the Tony Auth comic have the demonic dude hold a fishing pole labeled, “CONVENIENCE” with a forceps as bait and, have the angelic character as a young pregnant mother chasing the bait.
You can’t let a good martyr go to waste. That is exactly what Tiller is.
Has someone heard the same outrage expressed over the death of the military recruiter? Are Odorman and Madcow desperately trying to connect his death to anti war or Islamic groups?
How about some cartoons connecting these groups to the killing of a military recruiter.
For added drama we have the US marshalls “guarding” abortionists, and who for some reason have not been dispatched to post offices or high schools where there have been considerably more shootings and deaths.
Does anyone know if they were dispatched to recruiting stations?
It is places like this board that make the bullet comic seem realistic in the minds of many. The comics here are usually shrill and low on the intellectual rigor, they shoot for the cheap and crass stereotypes. That you can dish it out, but not take it says a lot about the level of dialogue one can expect with the average pro-lifer. You can throw a mean punch but when someone rightfully calls you a bully you run screaming about “bigotry”. How politically correct is that???
Yo La,
Political correctness has no place in the abortion debate. Sorry.
YLT 11:17am
You never did tell us if antiwar groups and Muslims should be held responsible for the killing of that recruiter.
Should they be and if not why not?
Also, did you ever make it over to the militia sites to give them your opinion on their recruiting the likes of Roeder, a schizophrenic I now hear, and encouraging and supporting such a potentially dangerous and lawless person?
For the majority of pro-lifers, the reason we are pro-life is that we see the intimate connection of life, even at its earliest stages to the Creator Himself and His eternal nature and from His viewpoint. In fewer cases, some see the absolute illogic of abortion and to them that alone is enough to be pro-life.
Without that information as in the case of an intentional atheist or, not being able or willing to accept and understand it as a casual non-believer or believer in error, the majority of pro-choicers see a conceptus as just a blob of cells or insentient tissue. Doing so, they make themselves unable to conceive of the equality between a life in the “unborn womb universe” and and a life in the “born world universe”. Their minds are closed to the possibility, no the certainty, that humans do not just exist in a physical body but also as spiritual beings with yet untold infinite dimensions of time and space, created by the Spiritual Being. They shut the door on the richness of this view and turn themselves into wretched individuals locked in spiritual poverty. They then seek and glorify leaders and sacrificial high priests that confirm this view, even when those priests and leaders espouse to know the Spiritual Being. They don’t know they are being used in exchanging the truth for a lie, victims of those that lust after power and filthy lucre.
To be honest, if the total of our existence was indeed the result of a cosmic soup spontaneously recipied billions of years ago by Chef Random Chance in the kitchen of a godless mansion, I could possibly understand their outrage. I mean does anyone think that a scab is worth more than a living being?
However, to bargain or seek “common ground” as a solution to the disparity in understanding is not a solution at all. Either truth is truth, or it is not. If truth can be arbitrated, if it can be negotiated, gravity and thermodynamics can be ignored as well and, with equally disastrous results. The solution lies in proclaiming the truth without compromise to the stubborn children self glorification until the truth is discovered and it blossoms in the heart.
They label us pro-lifers “as crazy”, “as terrorists”, “as mindless, unintelligent Neanderthals” and “the worst”, and every other vile name imaginable. They behave as a pack of wolves mercilessly guarding the booty of their recent kill, the Roe v. Wade carcass. Apart from divine intervention they, like the wolf pack who gleefully howl at their fortunate circumstance, are simply unable to understand anything more than their need for flesh and self-preservation. The physics of their existence is set in stone. They can do nothing else.
We should pity them. They are at a great disadvantage. They need to be changed. Their metamorphosis is not complete as intended. They need to find God, they need to discover that this life is not all there is.
Jesus said it very simply, “they hate you because they hate Me”. Funny how hatred is ultimately related to ignorance, the absence of the knowledge and fear of God, some knowingly and some unknowingly.
This is why we need to love the Obama’s and the Olbermann’s of the world. They need a Savior and we wait patiently for Him to act. This is our job.
Press on to the high calling friends.
A .22 calilber long rifle bullet used to cost about two cents. You could buy a brick of 500 rounds for ten dollars.
If a neighbor or friend had a sick animal that was suffering I called the .22 bullet the recommended ‘two cent solution’ to their problem.
I only implemented the two cent solution one time on feral tom cat that made the mistake of clawing my 6 year old daughter.
I warned him off once, but he came back a second time. I have to confess I did not want to kill him and I did not like doing it, but where he chose to sit I chose to shoot and he died a quick death.
That was one of the benefits of living ‘off the grid’ in the woods. In the incorporated areas it would have been illegal to discharge a firearm. You would have to call ‘animal control’ and they would have come out and set up a live trap and if they were fortunate to catch the critter, then they would have presented you with a bill for their services and the cat would have ended up dead anyway.
Nobody would have adopted an aggressive feral tom cat.
An owl would have killed him sooner or later.
Still clingin to my GOD and my guns.
yor bro ken
The one I find the most interesting is the pro-lifer with “Hateful rhetoric” and a gun.
Talk about hateful.
Olbermann looks good next to some of these.
I was just discussing the other day the fact that we had ought to see a list of day-by-day aborted babies, and each time an abortion doctor dies, for any reason, put his name there. I’m apparently not alone in so thinking.
I’ve taken to ignoring the comics; life feels a little less stressful when I tune out the propaganda images. I think that we could all agree on that.
Anyways, this is really, really, really off of the topic, but I’ve been considering asking the local community college if they would do a series of discussions on the genocides in Darfur but I have no idea how to go about doing so. So some quick questions (since this is a pro-life blog, and this is an issue related to life and human rights, I thought that I ought to at least attempt to ask someone):
1. Does anyone know the proper way to request this? I mean, you can’t just send someone a letter asking for an exhibition can you?
2. Would you pray for me and anyone who would like to help were the college to say yes that this would be a success and raise community awareness about Darfur?
Okay, sorry for the detour. Back to anti-abortion activism…
Anon 5:52PM
Do you have any studies to verify this?
YLT:
Quit. Whining.
You are obviously offended by pro-life topics and claim to see malicious intent in every facet of the movement, yet you come here to a pro-life site MULTIPLE TIMES A DAY. The theme of your posts is quite consistent: pro-lifers are inherently bad. Your “level of dialogue” adds NOTHING to the debate. I try to be respectful when addressing pro-choice people who are serious about defending their stance. You aren’t one of them.
Ooooo Noooooooooooo
Yor Bro Ken,
You are going to FREEK out those leftist abortion lovers and give them nightmares about us Rural Dwelling Pro lifers and our habits.
I will add that catching a skunk in a have-a-heart trap is a no-win situation, even with the two cent solution.
You know what I heard on the news? Carheart.
First they ignore you,
then they laugh at you,
then they fight you,
and then you win.
Ghandi
Keep fighting the good fight, friends!! I am so proud of you for all you do for LIFE!!
RJ,
Thank you for the kind words you said about me and Angele. :)
Also, I am praying for your mom and brother in law.
God bless.
Carla, You are one of my heros! Your testamony was ausom.
Thank you, RJ!! :)
The truth about abortion will be heard!!
Speaking of Angele, I wonder where that name comes from? I’ve heard of Angel, but Angele, that is a prity name for such a brave woman as she is. Rowan would be vary proud of her, and how she is reaching out to others to lend a helping hand. Jill Stanek, is a Woman of great humility, and who isn’t affraid to take risks, and we all should take time to pray for her this evening. RJ
Is Angele baby Rowan’s mom? I took a closer look and realized this wasn’t angel.
I was just watching Doyle’s video about baby Rowan on another thread.
I accidentally posted this on the wrong thread, so I am reposting here. I thought everyone would get a kick out of this pro abortion, yes, pro abortion blogger hilariously lampooning the insane media coverage of Tiller’s murder:
“I find the predominantly liberal advocates for abortion rights to be almost utterly unbearable. Consider this mewling appeal to Obama as Pontifex Maximus and politico-cultural plenipotentiary of the universe, Augustus of the East and West, Commander-in-Chief, dieu-donné, most blessed among men. The tone is at once hectoring and ingratiating, and worse yet:
“This was a terrorist act, one in an ongoing campaign against Dr. Tiller, … —but no one in our government will call it terrorism. … our government is unwilling to call this orchestrated, overt, unapologetic campaign against women and their healthcare providers terrorism, …. Mr. President,…. I am scared for whoever will be next, if the government continues to fail to take this terrorist campaign seriously”
A terrorist act? A terrorist campaign? They were threatening castration! Are we gonna split hairs?
The putative left, we see, is just as eager … to animate parallel systems of harsher surveillance and punishment for the political compeers of such criminals. Thus Dr. Tiller’s murderer is not simply a murderer, but the beachhead of a hostile force. Outlaw them! Spy on them! Watch their websites! Shut down the hate! Perhaps the more virulent believers should be preemptively detained, lest they act on their degenerate and violent beliefs.
It is sad that Dr. Tiller was killed, and one hopes that some measure of justice is delivered to his accused killer, who is already in custody. But perhaps we should pause before demanding the creation and implementation of the future crime division.”
more at http://whoisioz.blogspot.com/2009/06/with-friends-like-these.html#links
I hate it when the anti-children’s rights faction of this debate describe this as women’s this or that. What are women, a bunch of brain cells that come to, over and over again, the same opinion? What if I want to represent myself and not be represented by some wealthy Anglo woman who has never in her entire life had to contend with all of the things that make abortion so powerful in the lives of women, children, the non-Anglo, the impoverished, et cetera? Why, for some reason, am I not permitted to speak for myself? Why are women who live in poverty, single mothers trying to raise their children without infanticide needing to come into the picture, never given the opportunity to speak?
The tragedy of George Tiller’s death must only exist to reinforce the pro-life position. Equality for men and women, respect of children’s rights, fighting poverty, reducing unintended pregnancies through education (whichever education that you support), living in a society without violence and bigotry, and giving women real options are all the things which combine to create the pro-life movement…and that’s about it.
Here’s the thing: how can anyone say that pro-choice is pro-woman when, historically, abortion has been a pretty bad deal for women? It’s sent countless women into septic wards, has left women emotionally and psychologically scarred, has destroyed their bodies, and I don’t even want to know what else…and still call this a right? Clearly, they have no idea what it means to be caught between a rock and a hard place to the point of having to make this decision. This is not about rights. This is about lack of equality.
And, historically speaking, abortion has been tried, both legal and illegal, as the pro-choice movement has wished, and it’s yet to work. Why can’t we now accept that perhaps a society where abortion is fought in the courts through illegality and in the streets through campaigning, aggrandizing women, et cetera, is the only solution to this problem? We’ve tried giving abortion whatever it wanted…and it doesn’t work.
Sorry to go on…I read a blog from a pro-choicer doing to whole, “We pro-choicers are amazing! Woo hoo! I’m excellent!” and it sent me into a tizzy. :(.
Vannah:
I posted this comment on the Olbermann rant post however, based on your last comment I think it has some relevance. I was responding to YLT’s assertion that all I was interested in was controlling women’s bodies…….geesh.
“YLT:
I could care less about controlling women’s bodies.
I just want them to know the truth about abortion. Truth that is withheld from them on the bioethical, spiritual and emotional consequences of abortion by those that profit from its performance.
That’s the least I or any other pro-lifer could do for them: I try to present the spiritual consequences, Carla and many others provide the emotional consequences and others the bioethical. Do you think Carla, Angele, Heather, Janet, all women, are wanting to control women’s bodies as well? I don’t think so. They are motivated by pure love.
As pro-women as you claim to be YLT I am really surprised that you don’t feel the same way especially after learning the heart wrenching stories told by the women who have had abortions, the ones that are not in denial.
Do you have any idea what a women feels like when she’s in a difficult pregnancy? I would imagine it’s like a trapped animal willing to chew it’s leg off to get away.
They don’t need someone like you to tell them it’s OK to go ahead and gnaw. They need someone to say, “if you gnaw your leg off you might escape but then bleed to death”.
We are there to ask them, “can I help you through this, can I help you get out of this trap, so you can keep your leg and preserve your life”?
This is why we pro-lifers do this and for no other reason.
Whether you know it or not YLT, your well intended but misplaced compassion is actually hatred for women because it is not in their best interest and good. I don’t think you understand how offensive your comments are to a person like Carla who was nearly destroyed by the abortion she had and was only set free until she faced the Truth, met the Truth and let the Truth heal her. I am absolutely sure being found in the same situation she would not choose to do it again.
Open your heart man, open your heart!”
Thanks, HisMan. You said that with much more clarity than I did. :)
re: Janet at June 7, 2009 11:27 AM
re: Janette at June 7, 2009 6:52 PM
You use the topic of abortion as an excuse to have no manners and think you’re being rebellious by being snarky. You come off as boorish, uncivilized and pathetic in your “I’m Rubber, You’re glue” replies. Have you heard the phrase ” restraint is the better part of valor”? Juding by your defense of boorishness, you haven’t got a clue about manners or valor. If I were your mother and fahter I would be crying my eyes out for what you’ve become. You’ve got no civility, you’ve got no class… Oh, abortionist’s haven’t got class you say… Think about the babies…Seriously, are you this shrill in person… All the time? How do you face your children with the level of embarrassment you must cause. How can one think of babies when they are distracted by your poor behavior? Quite simply it is behavior like yours that sells your movement down the river.
Angele, is Baby Rowan’s Mom. Ilt, Please stop this nonsence! If you had to walk even one mile in Angele’s or Sycloria William’s shose’s You wouldn’t be calling abortion a right! You’d be hurting! You’d want justice! Abortion hurts Women I am sick and tired of people getting on here, calling the murder of babies a right. RJ (born one pound and five ounces, and eleven inches long. Given only a two percent chance of surviving… The Smallest Baby in the United States in 1979) I am vary upset That’s why I posted that!
YLT,
You are certainly one to speak! You come on this blog, using everything from women’s “rights” to population control to the unfortunate death of a doctor to your own selfish means, promoting your culture of death and horribly insulting nearly every poster on this thread.
You daily make attacks on the posters on this blog that completely lack any sign of respect, manners or, quite frankly, intelligence.
You call others rude and boorish to mask your own complete lack of respect for basically anyone but yourself.
Of course, I’m not sure what else to expect from someone whose motto is clearly “abortion for all, whether you want it or not!”
heather, I think you gave me credit for someone else’s video….. or is there another “Doyle”?
Maryrose, 7:01 very well said.
Doyle, it’s you One True Media video.
Doyle, I like your site. Chills me to the bone that your killing days look terribly packed!! It’s just like that at the East side clinics. I say it looks like the girls are running in for take out food. OR a fast food drive through. So sad. God bless you for your efforts! I’m gonna snap some pics of my own. Get some audio. Then I may set up a site or send it to Jill for posting. You just wouldn’t believe how sickening, evil, sinister, and deplorable the Pro death crowd is….or perhaps you do!
What? No pictorial editorial on the killing of the recruiters by a Jihadist?
Hmmm..wonder why??
Re: MaryRose at June 8, 2009 7:01 AM
So you acknowlege the snarkyness? Do you also acknowlege that it might potentially turn off a great number of people who might otherwise agree with you. No one wants to join with someone they think of as being mean. You might say “oh its abortion that is mean” but your comeback merely shifts the blame from you to the person who has already quit listening to you… which does no good for you because, well, they’ve already forgotten you.
YLT,
In some cases, I might agree with you that comments like those you responded to were snarky. However, having read your posts consistently, it has become plainly evident to me that you are not in any way intending to reach out to those on this forum. Rather, you are insulting, crass, and downright rude. Consistently. Sometimes, it becomes necessary to tell people to just quit talking, and in your case, it’s evident we waited too long.
No one cares anymore, as you have made it quite plain that you are here to insult and demean rather than to dialogue. We are quite open to dialogue with those prochoicers who are here for that. I have no problem with comments posted by those such as Danielle, for example. I disagree with her stance, but I am open to dialogue. This attitude is common on this forum.
However, you mock, insult, and degrade. You aren’t here to discuss. Go away.
Yo La,
If you were in charge of the PL movement, what would you do to end abortion?
You use the topic of abortion as an excuse to have no manners and think you’re being rebellious by being snarky. You come off as boorish, uncivilized and pathetic in your “I’m Rubber, You’re glue” replies. Have you heard the phrase ” restraint is the better part of valor”? Juding by your defense of boorishness, you haven’t got a clue about manners or valor. If I were your mother and fahter I would be crying my eyes out for what you’ve become. You’ve got no civility, you’ve got no class… Oh, abortionist’s haven’t got class you say… Think about the babies…Seriously, are you this shrill in person… All the time? How do you face your children with the level of embarrassment you must cause. How can one think of babies when they are distracted by your poor behavior? Quite simply it is behavior like yours that sells your movement down the river.
Posted by: Yo La Tengo at June 8, 2009 2:49 AM
Wow, OK. If you were on here legitimately and seriously defending the pro-choice position, I would respond respectfully. But time after time your posts are nothing but erroneous generalizations, harsh presumptions and ad hominem attacks. I call you out on this and you respond, not surprisingly, with all of the above. You scold me for having a lack of manners and civility, and then make personal references to my parents and children. You put bizarre words in my mouth about “abortionists have no class” and “think of the children.” What’s that about? And me thinking I’m being rebellious for debating with you on an internet blog? Huh?
Anyway, if I must spell it out for you once more, then here it goes: Your comments are ineffective and counter productive. If you wish to assert pro-choice opinions and be involved in the debate, pleae do this based on the merits of abortion instead of demonizing groups and individuals.
I know Janette and Mary Rose. She wants us to hear her POV, and if we disagree, look out. YLT, Believe whatever you want to. PLfers are not going away.
Posted by: heather at June 8, 2009 8:31 PM
I’m not asking for you to go away. Just develop normal conversation skills of give and take. How can you convince someone to believe you if you don’t listen to what they have to say.
YLT,
Start acting like you want genuine dialogue, and I’ll be pleasant. Your constant personal attacks are wearing on our nerves.
Heather,
I hope that I don’t come across so bristly. I’m honestly just trying to assert my opinions/beliefs, and the reasons why. I hope I am not a “look out”! sort of spitfire.:-S
Admittedly, YLT has gotten under my skin somewhat for the constant uncivilized manner in which he approaches confrontation.
re MaryRose at June 8, 2009 11:38 PM
Admittedly, YLT has gotten under my skin somewhat for the constant uncivilized manner in which he approaches confrontation.
Confrontation? How about conversation? Not everything is a battle between right and wrong with you…or even a battle.
re: Janette at June 8, 2009 7:58 PM
When someone acts lame, I call them on it. It seems that people here act suprised when they get called on their boorish behavior, when they would prob be fired if they acted the same way at work or asked to leave if they acted that way in a restaurant.
If you are offended that I asked if you talked to your children the same way you talk on here, I’m honestly not sorry.
You act very crude and uncivilized and in ways that would make most parents blush in horror if they knew their daughter was acting. You’re so high on your own rightousness that you’ve sacrificed your manners to the cause. How sad is that? Pretty sad I think – to loose one’s own humanity so much that you are offended when someone notices.
I converse just fine with others. Have a lovely night.
YLT, yawn.
YLT:
I am not offended whatsoever. However, I do find your references to my family and attempts to be insulting quite childish on your part. Again, you have made it obvious that you are unwilling to discuss abortion without leaning primarily on ad homimem attacks against individuals and groups. That is the problem. That is why we are exasperated with you. It has nothing to do with my personal character or your personal character. Please consider changing the theme of your comments to one challenging the pro-life argument based on the merits of abortion so you can be included in the debate.
hominem*