“Slain abortion opponent ‘loved the controversy’ his protests generated”
~ Title of September 16 New York Times article about pro-life activist James Pouillon, who was murdered for his stance on September 11
Violations will be deleted and you may be banned.
Threats will be immediately reported to authorities.
Following these rules will make everyone's experience visiting JillStanek.com better.
Our volunteer moderators make prudent judgment calls to provide an open forum to discuss these issues. They reserve the right to remove any comment for any reason. Jill's decisions on such moderations are final.
Go to gravatar.com to create your avatar.
Jill Stanek is a nurse turned speaker, columnist and blogger, a national figure in the effort to protect both preborn and postborn innocent human life.
The title of the article is “SICK” but then we must consider the source!
‘Sara Edwards, the Shiawasee County chief assistant prosecutor, said the suspect was annoyed by Mr. Pouillon’s protests’ Annoyed? So..you can kill someone just because they ‘annoy’ you??? Hmmm…wonder if THAT’S written into ‘Obamacare’? LOL :)
And ‘the source’ was one of the dead man’s neighbors not the newspaper. The title is a quote. To learn that you’d have to read the article not proceed on the basis of your prejudices.
And, no, I do not think being annoying means you should be shot. Ignored? Laughed at? Sure. Shot? No so much.
Note too that the article makes clear this is the first time a ‘pro-life’ protester has been killed for anything vaguely related to his beliefs. Too bad that is not true of pro-choice activists.
“And ‘the source’ was one of the dead man’s neighbors not the newspaper. The title is a quote. To learn that you’d have to read the article not proceed on the basis of your prejudices.”
Oh, I see, it’s a quote about a dead man. Well that makes it A-Ok, thank you for clearing that up.
Glad to know that James Pouillion just loved the controversy and didn’t care about the babies being killed, thank you new york times.
That article was pathetic. There were very few positive comments quoted. What a bunch of baloney.
Yes..I READ the article JJ…thanks. I was being sarcastic.