Quote of the Day 1-8-10
Crist the 2006 gubernatorial candidate said he would not push for tougher abortion restrictions, saying he wanted to “change hearts, not laws.”
Crist the 2010 U.S. Senate candidate said in a press release this morning he would “fight for pro-life legislative efforts.”
Crist is locked in an intensifying primary struggle… so his shifting positions on a range of hot-button conservative issues… have rendered him guilty of committing the often-mortal offense in politics of modulating your message to appease a targeted audience of voters….
The campaign explains those “pro-life legislative efforts” include supporting adoption, not necessarily tightening abortion restrictions.
~Aaron Deslatte, blogging in the Orlando Sentinel regarding the confusion generated by FL Gov. Charlie Crist’s latest seemingly “pro-life” statements, January 8



Coward.
In John’s Revelation, in the list of those who will be thrown into the lake of fire forever, the very first on the list is “cowards.”
Revelation 21:6-8
6 And He said to me, “It is done! I am the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End. I will give of the fountain of the water of life freely to him who thirsts. 7 He who overcomes shall inherit all things, and I will be his God and he shall be My son. 8 But the COWARDLY, unbelieving, abominable, murderers, sexually immoral, sorcerers, idolaters, and all liars shall have their part in the lake which burns with fire and brimstone, which is the second death.”
Hey Jamie,
Great point. There’s at least one thing we can agree on when we get together for that micro-brew.
Since we last debated the Incrementalism v. Personhood issue, there was an excellent piece posted here by a pro-choice writer lamenting the series of recent defeats and setbacks for the child-killing side. (Wish I had a reference for you.) They now believe they have acquired some momentum with the recent defection of Benedict Nelson to the pro-death camp and the proposed government-funded abortion provisions in the Senate version of Health Care. However, as you know, the battle is far from over.
One of her points, and what she claimed as probably the most damaging issue for the pro-death mob in recent years, was the Partial Birth Abortion Ban. Now I know you don’t think the ban saved any babies lives directly, and I would probably agree. They just execute the murder a different way, right? But the diagrams and computer-simulated imagery that graphically depicted this horrific crime against the unborn was repeated day after day, night after night, for several weeks on network news. She claimed the damage to their side was incalculable. MSM just kept showing the barbaric injustice in graphic detail and there was no place they could go, no response they could offer, and public opinion toward abortion shifted, dramatically.
That is where the War will be won, in the hearts of the American people. Just like our hearts were turned against the Viet Nam War because we saw a picture of an innocent little girl naked, running down a war-torn street crying, her back burned by napalm.
The lack of success of the Pro-Life movement over the past 36 years has not been a matter of Incrementalism tactics v. Personhood tactics. Many humans are sinful and selfish and they want to have sex but they don’t want the responsibilities of caring for a child. Many are ignorant, their hearts are darkened and they believe a lie that if they kill their child early enough, it hasn’t really become their child yet.
As Father Pavone would say, “America will reject abortion when America sees abortion.” When BO was elected, his radical pro-death record and agenda was a wake-up call to many of us in the Pro-Life movement that had gotten complacent. We have been doing 2Chr 7.14 now for quite some time now and the Church is starting to awaken out of her slumber. Revival is breaking out in Kansas City, on college campuses and just this week at Rick Joyner’s Morningstar Ministries.
God is answering our prayer. I believe it may require additional waves of His correction, but the tide is turning. You need to drop your erroneous critical religious thinking, get into a good 2Chr 7.14 prayer and fasting group (I think Lou Engle was with a group out there in CO you could check out) and let God wash you with His Lovingkindness, Mercy and Forgiveness.
Then jump back into the fray with us.
We’d love to have you on God’s side. :)
PS – What I believe to be God’s side: In WWII, after Lieutenant General Courtney H. Hodges’ First Army punched a hole in the German defenses at a French town called St. Lo, Patton’s Third Army began roaring through the hole with their Sherman tanks. They began an attacking advance that moved in every direction on the compass; north, south, east, and west, all at the same time. There was no stopping them once they got started. They went east toward Le Mans, south and southwest through Laval, west toward Brest, and north toward St. Malo.
We in the Pro-Life movement need to attack in every direction, Fasting and Prayer, 40 Days for Life, Personhood, Parental Consent, Unborn Victims of Violence Act, Stupak Ammendment…
And we really need our religious leaders to stop being cowards and preach Life from the pulpits on Sundays.
I agree almost completely, Ed. All I have to add is that that picture was a lie. From Wikipedia:
“Phan Th? Kim Phúc, O.Ont (born 1963) is a Vietnamese-Canadian best known as the child subject of a Pulitzer Prize winning photograph taken during the Vietnam War on June 8 1972. The iconic photo taken in Trang Bang by AP photographer Nick Ut shows her at about age nine running naked on the street after being severely burned on her back by a South Vietnamese napalm attack. Contrary to popular myth, the US Air Force were not involved in the attack, and only two US troops were within 60 mi (100 km) of the scene, neither of whom had any say in the bombings. [1]”
Let us at least deal in truth rather than propaganda.
Hey X,
Sorry if I implied it was a US airstrike because you’re right, it wasn’t. But the picture wasn’t a lie, a South Vietnamese pilot bombed his own people by mistake. What the picture did was graphically depict the horror and injustice of war.
I don’t think it would have mattered who dropped the bomb. At this stage of the war Americans were getting tired of the fighting, we weren’t making significant progress, and this picture became the proverbial “straw” for many, turning their hearts against the war.
Now we just have to get you personally introduced to the King of Kings so you can agree with the rest of my post. :)
Ah, yes, Charlie Crist.
Which is why I’m voting for Marco Rubio.
The campaign explains those “pro-life legislative efforts” include supporting adoption, not necessarily tightening abortion restrictions.
_________________________________________________
That doesn’t even make sense. If you don’t tighten abortion restrictions, and women keep having so many abortions, where are the babies going to come from that you ‘support’ adopting?
*Yes I know there are older children waiting to be adopted-I’m just making a point*
Ed, you need to start your own pro-life blog just as Gerard did. Have you ever given that any thought? You’re an excellent apologist and writer.
Aw shucks Jill, (as I lower my head, stuff my hands in my pockets, and kick the ground with my toe) that’s awfully nice of you to say :)
I hope to someday. In fact, I’ve already registered the domain.
Thank you for the encouragement. I think I’ll make it one of my goals for this year.