Quote of the Day 10-15-10
My opponent’s position on Roe v. Wade is more extreme – and this is important – more extreme than any California senator or governor of either party in decades.
~ Democrat US Senator Barbara Boxer, joined in a press conference by notable Hollywood pro-abort women, attacking opponent Carly Fiorina’s pro-life views, as quoted by ABC October 14. As the video indicates, Fiorina is closing the already close gap. Donate to Fiorina’s campaign here.
Oct.15, 2010 8:03 am |
Quote of the Day |
Jill Stanek is a nurse turned speaker, columnist and blogger, a national figure in the effort to protect both preborn and postborn innocent human life.
Buh Bye Barbara Boxer!
So looking forward for Nov. 2nd. I am on her district, and voting for Carly.
ByeBye “Madam” Boxer
If you are a California voter and thinking about voting for Barbara Boxer, before you enter the voting booth consider this unhappy fact:
Barbara Boxer would have allowed you to have been destroyed by violence when you were an unborn child.
Think long and hard if you really want this inhuman politician “representing” you in the US Senate.
Wonder why pro-abort politicians always state that true prolife candidates are “extreme” for supporting the life of the unborn?
Are they implying that killing the unborn is the norm and letting them live is “extreme”?
Gee…I must’ve missed that lesson in school…
The only thing in the US that deserves to be aborted is Roe V Wade.
It is painful that church going pro-life Hispanic Catholic voters could be the ones who will end up keeping this atrocious politician in power.
There must be something that someone in a leadership position in this movement can do to get into the Hispanic community in California and turn them against Barbara Boxer just enough so that she loses.
I just realized how much money Boxer saved her rival’s campaign by making her own vote-for-my-pro-life-opponent video. Nice!
Barbara Boxer and her ‘ilk’ seem to have a single-minded view: “KILL,KILL,KILL!!!” I don’t think they even CARE about ‘politics’ or anything else anymore. Just HATRED.
I know this is probably going to be deleted, but why do these pro-abort women always look like such hateful hags, always frowning and bitter and just plain miserable.
That kind of hatred and rage and bitterness changes people from the inside out.
Your comment can stay, Phillymiss. :)
I agree Phillymiss and Carla. The face you have after 50 is the face you have earned.
http://www.freakingnews.com/Nancy-Pelosi-Portrait-Pictures-64394.asp
Well, my face doesn’t look too bad for a 52 year old, People often think I am in my mid-forties. As the saying goes, “black don’t crack!” ;-)
“My opponent’s position on Roe v. Wade is more extreme – and this is important – more extreme than any California senator or governor of either party in decades.”
DemocRAT Barbara Boxer
============================================================
Definition of EXTREME
a : existing in a very high degree <extreme poverty>
b : going to great or exaggerated lengths : radical <went on an extreme diet>
c : exceeding the ordinary, usual, or expected <extreme weahter conditions>
Santorum: But I would like to ask you a question. You agree, once that child is born, is separated from the mother, that that child is protected by the Constitution and cannot be killed? Do you agree with that?
Boxer: I would make this statement: That this Constitution, as it currently is – – some of you want to amend it to say that life begins at conception. I think when you bring your baby home, when your baby is born – – and there is no such thing as partial-birth – – the baby belongs to your family and has all the rights. But I am not willing to amend the Constitution to say that a fetus is a person, which I know you would.
[I wonder if missy boxer would venture a guess as to what species of ‘fetus’ was present in her mom’s uterus when she was pregant with ‘babs’ or what species of fetus was present in her own uterus when she was pregnant? I am reletively missy boxer would be just as uncomfortable and evasive as she was in this colloquy with Mr. Santorum.]
This discussion between Santorum and Boxer occurred on the floor of the United States Senate in the debate over the proposed ’partial birth abortion’ ban.
“I Am Not Answering These Questions!”
A Senate Exchange on Birth & Partial-Birth Abortion
Editor’s Note. When the Senate considered the Partial-Birth Abor- tion Ban Act on October 20, 1999, perhaps the most revealing part of the debate was the exchange that is reproduced below, between the chief sponsor of the bill, Senator Rick Santorum (R- Pa.), and the leading opponent, Senator Barbara Boxer (D-Ca.). This discussion appears on pages S12878-80 of the October 20 Congressional Record. We have corrected minor errors in transcription and punctuation based on review of a videotape of the C-SPAN broadcast.
Read the whole exchange here and see who better fits the definition of EXTREME
http://www.nrlc.org/news/1999/NRL1199/boxsan.html
LOL, Phillymiss! ;)
“It is theoretically impossible to fashion an abortion position significantly more EXTREME than Boxer’s, which is slightly modified infanticide.”
“Her “when you bring your baby home” criterion means that a born baby acquires a right to life only when a mother or family decides to confer that right.”
George Will
Exactly, Ken.
Since when is “extreme” a bad thing, Ms. Boxer? Who wants to be average anyways??
I wonder if Ms. Boxer is as gung-hoe about abortion when it comes to her future grandchildren in the womb? Does she suggest waiting until the baby comes home to buy a crib and hold a shower?
The face you have after 50 is the face you have earned.
Praxedes, I’ll have to remember that!
Phillymiss @ 4:44PM,
LOL. Haven’t hear that one before. Aren’t you lucky!
:)
Phillymiss,
Maybe not, but you crack me up! I too have a bit of “Dick Clark Syndrome” at 55. I keep seeing photos of people in the news who are younger but look 20 years older!
Phillysuburbguy