(Not so) pro-life vid of day: “Human Barbie” repulsed by families, children
by LauraLoo
Valeria Lukyanovas (aka “Human Barbie”) doesn’t look like your normal woman. She also has a bit of an unnatural revulsion toward families and children.
One of her most famous quotes is, “I’d rather die from torture because the worst thing in the world is to have a family lifestyle.”
Warning – Mild vulgarity:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XjJOmDF7a6I[/youtube]
Email dailyvid@jillstanek.com with your video suggestions.
Apr.28, 2014 12:00 pm |
Video of the day |
Jill Stanek is a nurse turned speaker, columnist and blogger, a national figure in the effort to protect both preborn and postborn innocent human life.
Poor girl, I honestly believe she has mental health issues…
She most defintely has, given her desire to convert to breatharianism
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/human-barbie-says-she-wants-to-subsist-on-air-and-light-alone-9162326.html
Well, she may get her wish to become the ultimate out-of-body traveler, if she starts eating oxygen….
Poor thing. Even a plastic Barbie doll will fall apart. All is vanity.
The photo looks like claymation to me… almost a charaicature of womanhood.
It’s her ideas that are so incredibly ironic. Hard to be spiritually or intellectually superior when you despise how your species is continued. Does she think her claims are original or compelling in the slightest? Yawn.
Consider the source.
I had to do a double take. She doesnt look real. Spooky.
She can do whatever she wants with her time on earth.
Her race-mixing ideas were very much a part of our medical establishment from the time Galton coined the term up until Hilter made “eugenics” unpopular.
Older textbooks would discuss “eugenics,” and would often have this topic combined with “evolution.” This adds up to: “we have to prevent the lousy people from reproducing.”
This eugenic idea led to massive government-led efforts to sterilize hundreds of thousands of people. Some was “voluntary,” with continued government benefits at risk if women did not agree to be voluntarily sterilized, and some was involuntary, and often unknown.
A lot of this was plain ol’ racism: those in charge could hide behind moralistic arguments for sterilizing someone (their offspring are likely to be thieving ne’er-do-wells just like them) or science (three generations of imbeciles are enough, and we cannot afford to water down our gene pool with low-IQ people out-reproducing the rest of us).
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/10/us/redress-weighed-for-forced-sterilizations-in-north-carolina.html?pagewanted=2&_r=2&hp
A quote from that NYT story:
“When she was 27 and started having uterine trouble, a doctor requested her records and discovered that she had been sterilized in an operation that had been botched, her medical records show. “I tell you what,” she said. “I about hit the floor.” She went to her mother, who said she was going to tell her before she got married. Welfare would have ended if she had not consented, her mother said.”
Historical analysis of textbook coverage of eugenics and evolution:
http://www.textbookhistory.com/eugenics-in-20th-century-biology-textbooks/
So:
This woman holds a viewpoint that was once very mainstream among the most educated and powerful in our society: physicians, textbook-author scientists, and at least one Supreme Court justice.
So what?
The story is the same today. It has just been morphed to disguise it. The modes today are abortion and birth control, including long-acting reversible birth control. This is a great humane advance relative to tricking or forcing people into sterilization. But it is, in the end, just a more smiley elitist, racist, classist totalitarianism.
To control those undesirables from reproducing, we sell them a story of economic opportunity, “reproductive rights” versus the “oppression” of Neanderthal knuckle-dragging conservatives, and “if it feels good do it”-style “freedom.” Medically, we have huge efforts going on to support negative outcomes from carrying a pregnancy to term
We target their schools and their communities with education and service providers. The next step is public funding of all of this, to get rid of the cost barrier.
So, I don’t think we have advanced so much. We have just gotten more stealthy about it all.
I get a kick out of her creepy illusion as a living Barbie Doll.
But she says so many strange and off-putting things. I’m rather glad that she has added family-and-child-hating to her New Age mythology and racial bigotry.
It is good for us that people in general see all of these things together as unnatural.
I’m totally fine with it if she doesn’t want to have kids. I hope she doesn’t. She should not partake in the activity that creates children then. As long as she doesn’t kill any babies in her desire to remain childless I’m fine with it. We already have an abortion barbie (Wendy Davis). The world doesn’t need another.
@Sydney – Yes, I agree, don’t reproduce. She doesn’t need to spread her hateful attitudes towards people of other races to an innocent children. The article is unclear — is she talking about Russian Armenians being non-white? Last time I checked they were considered Caucasian.
Im agreeing with possible severe mental issues here. I mean look at her. She looks awful. Painfully this with oversized boobs bigger than her head. I pity her.
Eh painfully thin above post…